Oracle Corporation Is a Better Cloud Play than Pure-Play Cloud Companies

Oracle remains solidly profitable compared to many pure-play SaaS companies which are not. The company's other businesses will help insulate it against any losses as its cloud business matures.

Jun 26, 2014 at 1:31PM

Investors were not amused when Oracle (NYSE:ORCL) reported less than stellar fourth-quarter and full-year fiscal 2014 results that sent its shares tumbling. Chief executive Larry Ellison tried to explain to the investing world why the company's profit miss was actually a positive sign of its gradual transition into a cloud-centric revenue model, but it seems that the Street refused to buy the story.

For context, Oracle reported fourth-quarter revenue of $11.32 billion, a 3.4% year-over-year improvement. But, analysts were looking for $11.48 billion. The worst part: net income was down 4.2% to $3.65 billion. The company's saving grace, however, was its strong share repurchases, which helped keep EPS unchanged at $0.80.

Cloud revenues
Cloud growth was the operative word during the earnings call. Oracle's cloud SaaS and PaaS revenues were up 25% to $327 million. Cloud infrastructure, or IaaS, grew at a more modest rate of 13% to $128 million. According to Mr. Ellison, that's good because SaaS and PaaS typically command margins in the 40% to 50% range, while IaaS margins are lower. The company added 870 new cloud customers in the fourth-quarter alone.

For the full-year, SaaS and PaaS grew 24% on a GAAP  basis, and 20% on a non-GAAP basis, to $1.1 billion. IaaS revenue was up 1% to $456 million.

Where Oracle trounces pure-play cloud companies
Overall cloud growth (SaaS, PaaS, and IaaS) for Oracle clocked in at 17.25%. So how does Oracle's cloud growth stack up against the SaaS industry leaders such as Workday (NYSE:WDAY), Cornerstone OnDemand, NetSuite and (NYSE:CRM)?

Oracle's fiscal year 2014 ended on May 31, 2014, while Salesforce's fiscal year 2014 ended on Dec. 31, 2013. Workday's, Cornerstone OnDemand's, and NetSuite's fiscal year 2014 will end on Dec.31, 2014. We shall, therefore, compare Oracle's and Salesforce's full-year 2014 results with the full-year 2013 results for Workday, Cornerstone OnDemand, and NetSuite.


SaaS Revenue (millions of dollars)

% SaaS Revenue Growth




Cornerstone OnDemand












Source: Workday 10-K, Cornesrstone onDemand 10-K, NetSuite 10-K, 10-K, Oracle 10-K

Salesforce is one of the most mature SaaS companies. Its revenue has been growing consistently at a 30%-plus annual clip over the last three years or so. Meanwhile, Oracle's cloud subscriptions grew just 4% in fiscal 2013. Its 17.5% cloud growth in fiscal 2014, is therefore, a huge improvement.

Oracle might be a latecomer to the cloud business, but its cloud revenue is already much higher, in absolute terms, than that of growth leaders Workday, Cornerstone OnDemand, and NetSuite. It's quite likely that Oracle's cloud growth will hit a plateau around Salesforce's 30% annual clip.

Let's now look at the main reason why Oracle is a much better cloud play than the other four SaaS companies.

Sales and marketing expenses as a % of revenue
SaaS companies spend very heavily on sales, marketing, and customer management functions so as to rapidly grow their customer base, and also to reduce customer churn. The big difference between old-line software companies and SaaS companies lies in the timing of their sales and revenue expenses in relation to their revenue.

For traditional software companies which sell perpetual licenses, their marketing expenses and revenue are almost perfectly aligned. But for SaaS companies, the story is very different. Customers sign up to use a company's software on an ongoing basis, usually on 12-24 months contracts. This implies that the company spends money on customer acquisition expenses, development and sales of the software, and hosting infrastructure expenses upfront, and the expenses are immediately accrued for. Yet, the revenue comes in gradually as the months roll on.

However, SaaS companies know that if they continue growing their customer base, a time will come when the cash generated from the installed customer base will be enough to cover any new customer acquisition costs, plus any other marketing expenses. The company will then be able to sit back and harvest any incoming cash flow as profits. Moreover, SaaS customers tend to be sticky with low churn rates.

Oracle spent about 24% of revenue as marketing expenses in 2014. Its sales and marketing expenses grew 6% during the year. In comparison, most SaaS companies spend close to half of their revenue, or more, on sales and marketing expenses. This makes it very hard for these companies to turn a profit. None of the SaaS companies mentioned here is profitable, including Salesforce, which has been in business for around 10 years.


Credit: YCharts

However, Oracle is lucky in this respect since it's solidly profitable. Its other businesses insulate it from any losses as its cloud business matures.

Although Oracle spent a good amount of money on sales and marketing functions during the fourth-quarter, and the figure was charged to its balance sheet immediately, the revenue benefits will  appear on its balance sheet gradually as the quarters roll on.

Foolish takeaway
Oracle is solidly profitable, unlike many pure-play SaaS companies. Its cloud business is also growing at a healthy pace. This could make it a better long-term cloud play than pure-play SaaS companies.

Leaked: Apple's next smart device (warning, it may shock you)
Apple recently recruited a secret-development "dream team" to guarantee its newest smart device was kept hidden from the public for as long as possible. But the secret is out, and some early viewers are claiming its everyday impact could trump the iPod, iPhone, and the iPad. In fact, ABI Research predicts 485 million of this type of device will be sold per year. But one small company makes Apple's gadget possible. And its stock price has nearly unlimited room to run for early-in-the-know investors. To be one of them, and see Apple's newest smart gizmo, just click here!

Joseph Gacinga has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Apple and The Motley Fool owns shares of Apple and Oracle. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information