Cliffs Natural Resources and Casablanca Capital: No Winning Plan in Sight

Cliffs Natural Resources (NYSE: CLF  ) has written numerous open letters to shareholders and responses to activist shareholder Casablanca Capital in just a few months. In the latest act of this thriller, Casablanca Capital issued a 119-page presentation regarding changes it wants to implement at Cliffs. As usual, Cliffs' response followed.

While this correspondence is a rather fascinating read, it lacks one important thing -- a realistic plan to deal with Cliffs' problems. Both sides are good at highlighting each other's sins, but neither one makes a compelling case for a change.

Casablanca plan: sell, sell, sell
Casablanca's plan relies on selling almost everything, except Cliffs' U.S. iron ore business. Casablanca states that Cliffs' attempt to become a diversified miner with assets in different regions has failed and that there is no way that Cliffs could compete with the likes of major miners like BHP Billiton (NYSE: BHP  ) and Rio Tinto (NYSE: RIO  ) .

Instead, it looks like Casablanca views major miners as possible buyers of Cliffs' assets. While Cliffs has stated that it is not wise to sell assets during the market downturn, Casablanca believes that a good buyer would pay a good price. In my view, this is a wrong premise.

If we look at big iron ore players, be it BHP Billiton, Rio Tinto, or Vale (NYSE: VALE  ) , it becomes obvious that they regret the rapid expansion that brought iron ore prices to multi-year lows. For example, recent reports show that BHP Billiton could be eyeing more iron ore job cuts in order to lower costs. Vale, whose costs are higher than BHP Billiton's and Rio Tinto's because of transportation expenses, has its own projects underway and is unlikely to buy more projects. The likelihood that either of these major players would be ready to pay a decent price for iron ore assets is small.

The story with Cliffs' met coal assets is even more complicated. Met coal is probably the worst market to be in nowadays, so the price of these assets will be minuscule. Meanwhile, Cliffs is preparing to idle its West Virginia coal mine, joining a plethora of other miners in cutting production.

Casablanca's dream is to package Cliffs' Canadian and Australian assets and sell them in a bundle; but, once again, this looks good only on paper. The realization of such a plan looks unrealistic. Casablanca also speaks about so-called second-stage value creation opportunities. In fact, one of them is the sale of Cliffs, or what's left of Cliffs after all non-U.S. assets will be sold. All in all, this does not seem to be a value-creating plan.

Cliffs' plan: We are doing the right things
Unfortunately, Cliffs' own plan does not look better. In its numerous open letters and responses to Casablanca, the company has concentrated on bashing Casablanca's proposals, like the outrageous proposal to double the dividend, which Casablanca has already dropped. However, Cliffs' own actions have not been a real breakthrough. Otherwise, its stock would not be down 40% since the beginning of the year.

It remains unclear what Cliffs is going to do with its two most problematic points -- the Bloom Lake mine and the met coal business. It's impossible to assess the viability of Cliffs' plan without knowing what the company is going to do with these assets. Without a clear path for money-losing assets, Cliffs' plan is not a plan at all.

I've found another worrying thing in the latest Cliffs letter to shareholders. In this letter, the company states that the recent cyclical decline in pricing is not expected to continue for the longer term. In fact, multiple market observers have already cut their 2015 iron ore price estimates and predict no rebound in sight. If Cliffs' management is hoping for a magical rescue from the pricing side, the company's strategy is dubious.

Bottom line
Cliffs Natural Resources is facing significant headwinds from the iron ore and met coal sides as well as a proxy battle with Casablanca Capital. Unfortunately, neither Cliffs nor Casablanca demonstrated a clear and realistic turnaround plan. With that in mind, Cliffs' shares will remain under pressure unless the company shows a clear path out of the current state of things.

Top dividend stocks for the next decade
The smartest investors know that dividend stocks simply crush their non-dividend paying counterparts over the long term. That's beyond dispute. They also know that a well-constructed dividend portfolio creates wealth steadily, while still allowing you to sleep like a baby. Knowing how valuable such a portfolio might be, our top analysts put together a report on a group of high-yielding stocks that should be in any income investor's portfolio. To see our free report on these stocks, just click here now.

 


Read/Post Comments (2) | Recommend This Article (2)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On June 30, 2014, at 12:01 PM, Aurum wrote:

    It seems everyday a Fool writes a new article filled with opinions and hyperbole but completely lacking in new information or hard numbers. It's all very nice that you think Casablanca won't be able to sell any assets- BUT let's look at some facts shall we?

    -In the recent presentation you mentioned, Casablanca stated that they have ALREADY engaged with investment banks and have found interest in CLF's assets.

    -Casablanca is a hedge fund with prominent banking connections. If anybody can negotiate and execute a favorable deal it will be them.

    -The mining company Noront recently purchased an exploration camp at the Ring of Fire. In their press release detailing the purchase, they explicitly stated that if Casblanca wins the proxy fight and is interested in selling the entire property, "Noront would be first in that line."

    -You mention that the met coal environment is harsh and that this will impact CLF's ability to sell at a reasonable price. What you're not taking into account is the fact that they are LOSING money with the met coal assets. Selling them for ANY price is better than producing at a loss for an indefinite amount of time.

    I just want to see some real information come out of all these articles bad-mouthing CLF.

  • Report this Comment On June 30, 2014, at 2:55 PM, MNDLBRT wrote:

    Well, CLF management has received a green light from their bankers to spend money as needed. The bankers do business when it is good for them, they have creditor standing above the stockholders. Management can defend their salaries from Casablanca with the banks help. This self dealing is a well known tactic. Please vote with Casablanca.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 3012755, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 8/27/2014 1:25:04 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement