Fox Looks to ‘Predator’ In Hunt for the Next Billion-Dollar Franchise

The studio taps Shane Black to direct the next installment in the 27-year-old action franchise.

Jul 2, 2014 at 9:29AM

Predators Movie

Fox hasn't had much luck rebuilding the Predator franchise. Credit: Twenty-First Century Fox.

Remaking any action classic can be tricky. Remaking one that most Arnold Schwarzenegger fans can quote liberally? That's just crazy.

Or at least you'd think so after looking at the data. According to figures from, Sony's (NYSE:SNE) 2012 remake of Total Recall earned just $198.5 million worldwide despite spending $175 million to produce and market the film. Twenty-First Century Fox (NASDAQ:FOXA) intends to remake Predator anyway.

Why it will fail: History
A pure '80s adrenaline booster fueled by one-liners and astounding visual effects, Predator killed at the 1987 box office, earning $98.3 million worldwide off a $15 million production budget, Box Office Mojo reports. Three times Fox has tried to recapture that magic over the past decade. Success has proven elusive:

Release date
Worldwide gross
Budget / P&A

Alien vs. Predator

Aug. 13, 2004

$172.5 million

$100 million total

Aliens vs. Predator-Requiem

Dec. 25, 2007

$128.9 million

$88 million total


July 9, 2010

$127.2 million

$70 million total

Sources: Google,

And yet I can't blame Fox for trying. For years Dark Horse Comics has published various titles featuring the iconic alien hunter. What's more the entire Alien vs. Predator concept dates back to a 1990 comic book series that spawned years of follow-up series. Why not take advantage of the built-in fan base?

Pride may also have something to do with the decision to give Predator another go. Only two movies in Fox's storied history have ever cleared more than $1 billion in worldwide box office grosses versus seven (!) for Walt Disney (NYSE: DIS) and five for Time Warner (NYSE: TWX). Fox may want to prove that there's more to its hit machine than Avatar and the Star Wars movies it no longer distributes.

Why it will succeed: Hawkins
But isn't a remake a huge risk? Maybe, but the new Predator will also have a connection to the first movie, something the Total Recall remake lacked. Fox has hired Shane Black, who played Hawkins in the 1987 version, to direct.

Investors should love that move. Black's connection to the first movie should help to recapture the sensibility that made the original so enjoyable. He's also one of a handful of directors to have made a billion-dollar movie: last year's Iron Man 3.

To be fair, working with an established franchise probably helped. Black is nevertheless aiming high with Predator, telling Collider that he wants to expand and explore "the existing Predator mythology, rather than hitting the restart button." We've seen that strategy work before, most recently with 2009's Star Trek.

What to watch for next
Fox is also sharply underrated when it comes to squeezing profit from its movies. The studio earned $1.3 billion in operating income from its Filmed Entertainment business in fiscal 2013, resulting in an impressive 15% margin vs. about 11% for Disney and Warner over similar periods. A new hit franchise would only serve to widen the gap.

Now it's your turn to weigh in. What do you expect from a new Predator movie? Leave your take in the box below. You can also follow the Fox story by adding the stock to your Foolish watchlist.

Hunting for huge gains
The best investors consistently reap gigantic profits by recognizing true potential earlier and more accurately than anyone else. Let me cut right to the chase. There is a product in development that will revolutionize not just how we buy goods, but potentially how we interact with the companies we love on a daily basis. Analysts are already licking their chops at the sales potential. In order to outsmart Wall Street and realize multi-bagger returns, you will need The Motley Fool's new free report on the dream team responsible for this game-changing blockbuster. CLICK HERE NOW.

Tim Beyers is a member of the Motley Fool Rule Breakers stock-picking team and the Motley Fool Supernova Odyssey I mission. He owned shares of Time Warner and Walt Disney at the time of publication. Check out Tim's web home and portfolio holdings or connect with him on Google+Tumblr, or Twitter, where he goes by @milehighfool. You can also get his insights delivered directly to your RSS reader.

The Motley Fool recommends Walt Disney. The Motley Fool owns shares of Walt Disney. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information

Compare Brokers