Some Companies Are Giving Up on ARM Servers: What it Means for Intel and Advanced Micro Devices

The server chip market is dominated by Intel (NASDAQ: INTC  ) , and its near-monopoly level market share has allowed the company to extract hefty margins from the segment. Intel generated a 46% operating margin from $11.2 million in sales from its data center group in 2013, an even higher margin than PCs, another market where Intel is dominant. With those kinds of margins, it's not surprising that other companies are vying for a piece of the market, and with mobile devices bringing about the rise of chips based on the ARM architecture from ARM Holdings (NASDAQ: ARMH  ) , it was only a matter of time before competition began knocking on the door of Intel's server empire.

While ARM has high hopes for the server market, with the company aiming for a 10% share by 2017, recent news suggests that stealing market share from Intel may not be that simple. NVIDIA and Samsung, both aiming to power servers with their respective ARM-based chips, have now abandoned those efforts. While this may seem like a good thing for companies betting big on ARM-based servers, like Advanced Micro Devices (NYSE: AMD  ) , due to less competition, Samsung's and NVIDIA's lack of confidence should act as a warning sign for AMD investors betting on a server renaissance to turn the company around.

Why are NVIDIA and Samsung giving up?
NVIDIA was exploring pushing the upcoming 64-bit version of its mobile Tegra processor, called Project Denver, as a server processor, but the company has changed strategy and will only look to provide GPUs to complement ARM server chips from other companies. This is very similar to NVIDIA's decision to stop trying to be a mainstream mobile processor provider and instead focus on areas where its graphics expertise matter, as an attempt to compete in the server processor would have almost certainly been a disaster.

Samsung had made a major effort to develop ARM-based server chips, hiring people from AMD's server division to lead the charge, but that project is now being scrapped. Samsung is, by far, the largest seller of smartphones, moving over 300 million units in 2013. It designs some of the chips that it uses in-house, so the company has expertise regarding chip design. But, designing chips is an R&D-heavy endeavor, and the company often ends up using chips from other companies for its phones.

Samsung likely realized that the expense of pushing into servers simply wasn't worth the potential rewards, given both Intel's dominance and other companies vying for the same market. If ARM chips win 10% of the server market by 2017, that would only be around $1 billion of revenue split between the major players, based on Intel's current data center revenue. That's nothing compared to the smartphone processor market, and the return on investment is likely far too low, or nonexistent, for Samsung to continue its server push.

AMD investors should be worried
AMD is making a big bet on ARM-based server chips in an effort to reverse its collapsing server market share. AMD had a 15% share of the market in 2007, but this number has since fallen into the low single-digits. The company expects to claim 25% of the market by 2019, but this number isn't as impressive, considering that ARM's market share is unlikely to be very high at that point. The company will still make x86 server chips as well, but its recent record in that area leaves a lot to be desired.

At stake here is revenue in the hundreds of millions of dollars, assuming that ARM makes major inroads against Intel and that AMD rises above the fray of competitors trying to enter the market. Neither of these is guaranteed.

While ARM may manage to win some server market share from Intel, whether any one company can win enough market share to justify the expense of entering the market is a big unanswered question. Samsung has probably given up for exactly this reason, and it's unlikely that ARM server chips will have a positive impact on AMD's profitability.

The bottom line
ARM's dominance in the smartphone market, along with incredible growth over the past few years, has allowed some smartphone chip companies to do very well. But, the server market is very different. Not only does Intel hold a position that could prove to be unassailable, but even if ARM manages to meet its market share goals over the next few years, the market for ARM-based server chips will be small, likely too small for many companies to even justify entering the market at all.

The smartphone processor market was worth about $18 billion in 2013, for the sake of comparison, and even a small slice of that market would be worth more than a big slice of the ARM server market. ARM servers aren't going to be a panacea for AMD, and offering a different architecture won't change the fact that the company hasn't been competitive with Intel for years.

Leaked: Apple's next smart device (warning, it may shock you)
Apple recently recruited a secret-development "dream team" to guarantee its newest smart device was kept hidden from the public for as long as possible. But the secret is out, and some early viewers are claiming its everyday impact could trump the iPod, iPhone, and the iPad. In fact, ABI Research predicts 485 million of this type of device will be sold per year. But one small company makes Apple's gadget possible. And its stock price has nearly unlimited room to run for early-in-the-know investors. To be one of them, and see Apple's newest smart gizmo, just click here!


Read/Post Comments (2) | Recommend This Article (3)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On July 07, 2014, at 7:29 PM, anthonyms wrote:

    I think Intel's data center sales might be more like $11.2bn.

  • Report this Comment On July 07, 2014, at 8:37 PM, EngineerPaul wrote:

    The idea that potential competitors are giving up is probably a net positive for AMD. Most of the chip/tech sector has only two or three companies providing any given product class. Just based on that trend, I doubt that the market could have supported seven or eight different ARM server chip suppliers. Seeing a few pull out or flame out is probably a net positive for those who are getting products to market quickly and now have less competition. AMD and AMCC appears to be two of those. I was a little surprised at NVDA's decision, just based on my perception that they could leverage their SoC work pretty readily, but then they appear to be making a decision to invest within their circle of strength lately.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 3016771, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 12/20/2014 12:24:34 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement