MasterCard Stock: Is the Competitive Advantage Sustainable?

I spend most of my waking hours studying businesses and the industries they operate in, and trying to identify those businesses that have a long-lasting competitive advantage.

Businesses that consistently generate strong free cash flow, or FCF, relative to their sales and net income, and above-average returns on equity, or ROE, may have a competitive advantage (or "moat" as it is sometimes referred to by Warren Buffett) that protects their profits from the competition.

This advantage can take different forms such as a strong brand (think Coca-Cola, Tiffany, or Starbucks), cost leadership (think Wal-Mart and Costco), or network effects, meaning that the service becomes more valuable to users as the number of users increases (think eBay's PayPal).

In the latter case, an increasing number of people with PayPal accounts will encourage more vendors to accept PayPal as a payment option; with more vendors offering PayPal, more consumers will be enticed to sign up for the ease and security of paying with PayPal. The network effect strengthens the brand and provides organic growth, growing free cash flow and returns on capital, and barriers to entry by potential rivals.

When trying to identify these companies, please keep in mind five key principles:

  1. Identifying a company with a moat is hard.

  2. Identifying a company with a sustainable moat is very hard.

  3. Most companies don't have anything resembling a moat.

  4. Stocks of companies that have a sustainable competitive advantage outperform over a long period of time. To drive home this point, I will turn to Buffett. In his 1987 letter to shareholders, he wrote, "Only 25 of the 1,000 companies [in a Fortune magazine study] met two tests of economic excellence – an average return on equity of over 20% in the ten years, 1977 through 1986, and no year worse than 15%. These business superstars were also stock market superstars: During the decade 24 of the 25 outperformed the S&P 500."

  5. You may disagree with my assessment of a company's competitive position or the longevity of that position (like I said, this is hard work), and I welcome any and all feedback.

Today, I will discuss MasterCard (NYSE: MA  ) . MasterCard is a payment processing company that earns fees for processing credit and debit card transactions on its super-fast network.

Unlike traditional credit card companies, MasterCard does not provide credit and therefore faces no default risk.

MasterCard has two reinforcing competitive advantages: It is a trusted, globally recognized brand and it benefits from network effects. In other words, the company's strong brand encourages consumers to obtain a MasterCard, and as more and more consumers open a card, more stores will accept MasterCard as a form of payment. The network works in the reverse direction as well. As more stores accept MasterCard, more consumers will choose to carry a MasterCard in their wallet.

MasterCard's business model is not capital intensive so it can operate with very little (or even zero) debt, and its steady stream of fees provides a strong and growing free cash flow and almost obscene returns on equity.

According to Morningstar Key Ratios, over the past five years, MasterCard has generated average returns on equity of 43%, an average FCF margin (FCF/revenue) of 34%, and an average free cash flow-to-net income ratio of 1 times (indicating the high quality of its earnings).

Every industry and company is different, but in general, I get excited when I find companies that have historically generated ROE of at least 20%, FCF margins of at least 10%, and a FCF/net income ratio of at least 1 times. MasterCard is especially appealing to me because its high returns on equity are driven primarily by high net income margins (37% in 2013, according to Morningstar Key Ratios), and not by leveraging the balance sheet with debt.

Furthermore, MasterCard is positioned to profit from three long-term secular growth trends: the shift away from paying with paper, the growth of online shopping, and the continued increase of the middle class in emerging markets.

MasterCard does face considerable risks, including a fiercely competitive payments industry (especially in mobile payments), heightened government regulation of interchange fees, and legal fines and costs associated with defending its business model from additional class action lawsuits (it has already agreed to pay billions in fines).

MasterCard currently trades at 29 times trailing 12-month earnings, 22 times forward earnings, and 26 times free cash flow. I can't argue that the stock is cheap at these multiples, but I will point out that 26 times FCF starts to look more reasonable when you compare it to MasterCard's five-year average ROE of 43%. In the very least, I encourage you to read more about MasterCard and the industry and to put MasterCard on your watchlist.

Risk-free for 30 days: The Motley Fool's flagship service
Tom and David Gardner founded The Motley Fool over 20 years ago with the goal of helping the world invest...better. Their flagship service, Stock Advisor, has helped thousands of investors take control of their financial lives and beat the market. Click here to sign up today.



Read/Post Comments (5) | Recommend This Article (6)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On July 28, 2014, at 8:00 AM, JPMaysMustang wrote:

    Very nicely written, well laid out article. I agree with the points you made and feel that $MA has a deep, wide economic moat. My question is, what, in your opinion, makes $MA moat wider than industry leader Visa? Mastercard has a return on equity consistently higher than the market share leader, any thoughts as to why? They essentially operate in the same markets with the same business model? Do you feel they have roughly the same "moat"? What do you think differentiates $MA from $V?

  • Report this Comment On July 28, 2014, at 6:42 PM, TMFEarlyRiser wrote:

    Thank you for your kind words and for your question.

    In my opinion, Visa and MasterCard both have wide and sustainable moats. Visa has higher margins, but MasterCard is growing faster in emerging markets. Valuations are similar.

    ROE is driven by (1) profit margins, (2) asset turnover, and (3) debt/equity ratios. I believe that MasterCard has higher ROE than Visa because MasterCard has about double the asset turnover as Visa.

    That being said, Visa generates very strong free cash flow and returns on capital. In fact, in the May 5, 2014 issue of Barron's, Visa ranked number one out of 500 companies based on cash flow return on invested capital. MasterCard came in at number three.

    Before investing, always consider what can go wrong. In the payments space I am paying particularly close attention to disruptive technologies (ex: Bitcoin), the competitive landscape, and the regulatory and legal environment.

    Disclosure: I own shares of Visa

  • Report this Comment On July 30, 2014, at 4:46 PM, TMFWalter wrote:

    John

    Good discussion of moats. You're right, finding a company with a moat is hard. For me, figuring out what to pay for one is even more difficult.

  • Report this Comment On August 15, 2014, at 11:01 AM, TMFEarlyRiser wrote:

    TMFWalter,

    Thank you for your comment. You are right. Valuation is hard.

    My best advice on this is to say that a company's returns (or the appreciation of its stock price) tends to track the company's return on equity over a long period of time. Said another way, that consistently generate above average ROE, tend to outperform the market.

    Therefore, above average companies deserve to trade at above average multiples. So when a company like MA, or V, or American Express trades for a market multiple or lower, I get very excited. Fool on and have a great weekend.

  • Report this Comment On September 15, 2014, at 10:53 AM, TMFEarlyRiser wrote:

    Hi Fools!

    I want to share a few more articles I have written with you. I hope you enjoy and I welcome any comments or feedback you may have.

    http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2014/09/08/understandi...

    http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2014/08/25/2-lessons-i...

    http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2014/08/22/factset-doe...

    I hope everyone has a great week.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 3045288, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 9/16/2014 11:41:40 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement