Sprint Corporation Has Seen Better Days

If you listen to T-Mobile CEO John Legere, Sprint is in chaos, but if you look at the business yourself, you'll find the reality might be worse.

Aug 9, 2014 at 3:00PM

Sprint Corporation's (NYSE:S) attempt to acquire T-Mobile (NASDAQ:TMUS) has officially failed to materialize, as the former announced that it's abandoning its pursuit due to excessive regulatory hurdles . This means that Sprint won't be able to capitalize on T-Mobile's $3 billion cash position, growing customer base, and its spectrum. In other words, Sprint is left with its own business, and for current and prospective subscribers, this is not a positive.

Is Sprint so bad?
In 2011 AT&T failed to acquire T-Mobile, which then resulted in the latter receiving compensation valued at $6 billion in combined cash and spectrum . With this compensation T-Mobile has staged its turnaround, and has been able to afford some of the most aggressive service plans that the industry has ever seen.

Meanwhile, Sprint has had no such break, nothing to give the company a second chance at rejuvenating its tarnished brand. Yet, many still believe that Sprint has experienced a come-back in recent years, as the company is nearly three-times as valuable today as it was in late-2011.

However, much of this assumption of a stronger Sprint is artificially inflated, in part due to the Apple's (NASDAQ: AAPL) iPhone. In the years prior to late-2011 Sprint did not have right to sell the iPhone, and quickly lost subscribers and saw its debt skyrocket as peers like AT&T (NYSE: T) and Verizon (NYSE: VZ) thrived behind the success of a device that sold more than 70 million units during the fiscal year of 2011.

Therefore, when Sprint gained the iPhone, which was coming off two years where it grew 81% and 93% year-over-year, respectively, in units sold, it was the hottest must-have device in America . Yet, even during these growth years of the iPhone, Sprint did not do so profitability, and its revenue growth was only marginal.

Albeit, Sprint did reverse the trend of losing subscribers once it gained the iPhone, but now with the device reaching peak penetration levels within the U.S., and unit growth near flat , Sprint has since fallen back to its old tricks.

In the first six months of 2014, Sprint has lost approximately 633,000 subscribers . Meanwhile, T-Mobile and Verizon both gained more than 1.5 million subscribers in the second quarter alone. While Sprint did produce operating income in excess of $500 million during its last quarter, its highest in seven years, parent SoftBank's CEO Masayoshi Son recently said that price competition will intensify in the immediate future and that Sprint is testing more aggressive plans. In other words, its brief but sweet period of profits are unlikely to last.

In total chaos?
Following Sprint's announcement that it would not pursue a T-Mobile acquisition, the latter's CEO John Legere took to Twitter to bash Sprint, calling it total Chaos!

Unfortunately, Legere is right, as Sprint lacks a clear direction, and doesn't have the financial flexibility to completely reinvent its brand like T-Mobile has done.

Sprint has nearly $60 billion in liabilities, over $9 billion of which is current, and while its $519 million of operating income during the second quarter looks nice, investors must observe that Sprint's cash and cash equivalents declined $800 million during the same period.

Hence, the company is not financially strong enough to make any drastic changes, and if it does implement aggressive service plans, the company better hope it works, or the outcome will be a faster cash burn. With all of these unknowns, total chaos seems like a fair description of Sprint.

Foolish Thoughts
John Legere clearly believes the Sprint bus will crash, and when you look at all the moving pieces, he might very well be right. T-Mobile has officially surpassed Sprint as the number one prepaid wireless service provider , and has added at least 1.5 million net new customers for five quarters in a row . Meanwhile, Sprint continues to lose subscribers.

Furthermore, there's a reason that Sprint had planned to keep the T-Mobile name over its own had the buyout occurred, because its brand is tarnished and faces real threats. The most significant of those threats might be T-Mobile, and as the two companies now go their separate ways, investors and subscribers are likely better off staying or moving to T-Mobile before the chaos causes the bus to crash.

Leaked: Apple's next smart device (warning, it may shock you)
Apple recently recruited a secret-development "dream team" to guarantee its newest smart device was kept hidden from the public for as long as possible. But the secret is out, and some early viewers are claiming its everyday impact could trump the iPod, iPhone, and the iPad. In fact, ABI Research predicts 485 million of this type of device will be sold per year. But one small company makes Apple's gadget possible. And its stock price has nearly unlimited room to run for early in-the-know investors. To be one of them, and see Apple's newest smart gizmo, just click here!


Brian Nichols owns shares of Apple and Verizon Communications. The Motley Fool recommends Apple. The Motley Fool owns shares of Apple. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information