Did Putin Just Harm His Fellow Russians By Banning Food Imports?

The Kremlin has its hands full with international pressure due to the Ukraine crisis. But Putin's attempts to retaliate against the West by banning food imports may be inflicting more pain at home for Russians than with trade partners.

Sep 1, 2014 at 12:12PM


Russia means business, but it's tough to take seriously if you consult the data. Source: Dmitry97ken/ Wikimedia Commons.

Russian President Vladimir Putin and Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev have been fighting fire with fire. When the United States and European Union announced expanded economic sanctions against Russia at the end of July for its role in the Ukraine crisis, Putin and Medvedev responded by placing a one-year ban on a sweeping list of food imports from the United States, European Union, Canada, Australia, and Norway that included beef, pork, poultry, fish, fruit, vegetables, and dairy products. Ouch.

The ban targeted Tyson Foods (NYSE:TSN) and the $303 million worth of chicken exported from the United States as well as nearly $1.15 billion in seafood from Norway. Meanwhile, several McDonald's (NYSE:MCD) locations were closed in Moscow for "health concerns," although government officials promised not to ban the food chain's 440 restaurants outright.

In the days following the announcement, news headlines suggested that the food import ban was big news and would surely increase pressure on Western powers while limiting their moves in the unfolding crisis. But the economic numbers say quite the opposite -- as do Russian food prices nearly one month into the 12-month policy. As it turns out, Putin may have only expedited the harmful effects of Western sanctions on the Russian economy.

The numbers game
In 2013, Russia imported $43 billion in food products to supplement domestic production and feed its 142 million citizens. While total food imports combined for a relatively low total on their own, the imports included in the ban only represent about $9 billion, or 21%, of that total. Closing the door to $9 billion in total imports from over 30 countries makes it difficult to think many noticeable effects will come outside of Russia's borders, although there are exceptions.

By the same logic, thinking Russian domestic agricultural production could pick up the slack from missing imports (without warning no less) sets lofty expectations. Consider that in 2013, Russia generated $110 billion in GDP from agriculture. In order to replace the banned food imports, the country would have to increase production across multiple food industries -- seafood, fruits, vegetables, dairy, poultry, and more -- by 8.2% (again, without planning). That's a tall order.

To further illustrate why the food import ban will hurt Russia more than the countries targeted, take a look at the importance of agriculture to each nation's economy and labor force. I've also included the importance of each nation's specific imports included in the total ban for the top 10 exporters.


Agriculture % of GDP

Agriculture % of Labor Force

Banned Imports % of Agriculture





















United States
























Using 2013 economic estimates. Source: CIA World Fact Book, Russian Federal Customs Service.

While the Norwegian fishing industry and Denmark's pork industry would come under increased pressure, the banned products represent just 0.41% and 0.27%, respectively, of total GDP. Finland's cheese exports would also take a hit, but they still account for just 0.20% of the nation's GDP. Besides, each nation is looking for other trade partners to pick up the slack, which will be easier on an individual basis than increasing all of Russia's agricultural production in the next year.

Where Russia's food ban really hurts
Axing 21% of your food imports without increasing production (or having the ability to do so rapidly) will increase prices accordingly. The numbers aren't so pretty for Russian citizens one month into the new closed-door policy, as Niall McCarthy of Statista recently reported.


To be fair, some of the increases in food prices shown above (calculated from the beginning of the year) are from a combination of inflation and previous sanctions. However, it's quite clear Putin and Medvedev have effectively taxed their own citizens in their efforts to stand up to the West. Aside from a few outlier industries in the 30-plus nations affected by the food import ban, many countries are not heavily dependent on trade with Russia involving banned food products. While his hands are largely tied, perhaps the next time Putin thinks about inflicting pain on trade partners in retaliation for sanctions, he will consider analyzing the economic data. 

Warren Buffett's threat is bigger than Russia, too
Russia's food bans aren't a major threat to Western powers, but Warren Buffett admitted this emerging technology is threatening his biggest cash-cow. While Buffett shakes in his billionaire-boots, only a few investors are embracing this new market which experts say will be worth over $2 trillion. Find out how you can cash in on this technology before the crowd catches on, by jumping onto one company that could get you the biggest piece of the action. Click here to access a FREE investor alert on the company we're calling the "brains behind" the technology.

Maxx Chatsko has no position in any stocks mentioned. Check out his personal portfolioCAPS pageprevious writing for The Motley Fool, or his work with SynBioBeta to keep up with developments in the synthetic biology industry.

The Motley Fool recommends McDonald's. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

A Financial Plan on an Index Card

Keeping it simple.

Aug 7, 2015 at 11:26AM

Two years ago, University of Chicago professor Harold Pollack wrote his entire financial plan on an index card.

It blew up. People loved the idea. Financial advice is often intentionally complicated. Obscurity lets advisors charge higher fees. But the most important parts are painfully simple. Here's how Pollack put it:

The card came out of chat I had regarding what I view as the financial industry's basic dilemma: The best investment advice fits on an index card. A commenter asked for the actual index card. Although I was originally speaking in metaphor, I grabbed a pen and one of my daughter's note cards, scribbled this out in maybe three minutes, snapped a picture with my iPhone, and the rest was history.

More advisors and investors caught onto the idea and started writing their own financial plans on a single index card.

I love the exercise, because it makes you think about what's important and forces you to be succinct.

So, here's my index-card financial plan:


Everything else is details. 

Something big just happened

I don't know about you, but I always pay attention when one of the best growth investors in the world gives me a stock tip. Motley Fool co-founder David Gardner (whose growth-stock newsletter was rated #1 in the world by The Wall Street Journal)* and his brother, Motley Fool CEO Tom Gardner, just revealed two brand new stock recommendations moments ago. Together, they've tripled the stock market's return over 12+ years. And while timing isn't everything, the history of Tom and David's stock picks shows that it pays to get in early on their ideas.

Click here to be among the first people to hear about David and Tom's newest stock recommendations.

*"Look Who's on Top Now" appeared in The Wall Street Journal which references Hulbert's rankings of the best performing stock picking newsletters over a 5-year period from 2008-2013.

Compare Brokers