Recs

44

This Stock May Be at Risk

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

I have an inherent distrust of dot-coms. I just don't trust that their competitive advantages are durable. Cases like Google (Nasdaq: GOOG  ) and Amazon.com (Nasdaq: AMZN  ) clearly prove that they can be, but still, my suspicion lingers. (Perhaps I need therapy.)

My doubts flared anew when I  recently looked at LoopNet (Nasdaq: LOOP  ) , a stock worth just 25% of its 2007 high. Is LoopNet's competitive advantage fleeting or durable? Is it at risk? Let's look under the hood.

Showcasing the competition
LoopNet operates the largest online commercial real estate listing service. Essentially, it functions as a market, providing the information for commercial real estate buyers to connect with sellers, and vice versa.

And it is a huge player in this market. In fact, just the pure size of LoopNet has been incredibly daunting for competitors.

That is, until recently. Last year, CoStar Group (Nasdaq: CSGP  ) , sometimes referred to as the Bloomberg of commercial real estate, announced the christening of its own online marketplace, Showcase.

CoStar seems to be pursuing LoopNet's turf, with its brand and client base behind it -- an unwelcome development for LoopNet investors, to say the least. As of last September, CoStar had a subscriber base of 92,000, compared to LoopNet's premium subscriber base of 83,808. If anyone can challenge LoopNet's pure scale, it appears to be CoStar.

CoStar's Showcase launch in May seemed to go well. By June, CoStar got more than $2 million in subscription orders from over 300 firms, but since the company has released only one quarter's worth of results, it's too early to say if Showcase will truly gain traction. 

Nonetheless, there are plenty of valid reasons to believe it will. In looking at LoopNet's and CoStar's offerings:

  • LoopNet charges for full search capability, but CoStar allows its listings to be viewed without even registering. CoStar only charges for listing.
  • A subscription with Showcase allows an unlimited number of listings. Meanwhile, LoopNet charges tiered pricing for additional listings.
  • CoStar's larger subscriber base will likely all use Showcase.

CoStar is giving away some of the services for which LoopNet charges. CoStar appears to be competing mostly on price, while leveraging its large and growing client base and brand. It's clearly taking square aim at LoopNet.

Size matters
As new and significant competition enters the space, LoopNet's past competitive advantages -- size and network effects -- have weakened, thanks to a combination of market forces and management missteps.

One of the key components of LoopNet's durable competitive advantage has always been that it benefits from positive network effects. In other words, as more people use LoopNet's marketplace, its value increases to others, causing more people to join -- and this process continues in an ever-increasing virtuous cycle. Network effects can be powerful, as businesses like MasterCard (NYSE: MA  ) , eBay (Nasdaq: EBAY  ) , and Liquidity Services (Nasdaq: LQDT  ) have discovered.

Since the first quarter of 2007, LoopNet has raised its average monthly premium membership price from $49.75 to $64.51 in the most recent quarter, and management expects that average price to continue to rise. Increasing these prices was a serious strategic mistake, made more with an eye toward boosting profits than maintaining the company's long-term competitive advantage.

If LoopNet had kept prices stable, the value proposition of membership would have increased naturally through network effects, making membership more and more irresistible. Memberships would have burgeoned, the marketplace's size would have become dauntingly large, and once LoopNet was in a position of unassailable dominance, it would have been free to set its own terms.

Instead, LoopNet undermined the natural workings of network effects by increasing prices, thereby artificially limiting the size of its marketplace. The result: Its main competitor now has more customers.

Network effects … in reverse
Those price hikes are now coming back to haunt LoopNet. As of Sept. 30, premium subscribers had declined 7% year over year. Even back in the fourth quarter of 2007, when premium memberships first began to decline, management recognized that price hikes were actively driving customers away.

Unfortunately, that means the network effect has started working in reverse. As people defect from a marketplace, the value of that marketplace decreases to everyone else, leading to an ever-increasing defection of subscribers. LoopNet's subscriber numbers show that subscriber declines are accelerating, from 0.1% in the first quarter of 2008, to 1.8% in the second, and finally to 3.4% in the third. The death of LoopNet's positive network effect is now eating away at its former size advantage.

You opened the door
The combined effects of CoStar dramatically undercutting LoopNet on price, and the ever-declining value proposition of LoopNet because of reverse network effects, increases the likelihood that LoopNet subscribers will defect to alternate services, particularly Showcase. By raising prices, LoopNet opened the door to competition, and now its competitive edge is more at risk than ever. 

In the short term, possible Showcase cannibalization, coupled with an almost assured continuing deterioration in the number LoopNet's premium subscribers, would provide a disastrous double-whammy for LoopNet, whose margins are already quickly deteriorating:

Margins

12/07

3/08

6/08

9/08

Operating

40.4%

35.4%

32.7%

32.5%

Net

29.1%

23.6%

20.6%

21.5%

Source: Capital IQ, a division of Standard and Poor's.

As for the company's long-term prospects, investors should question whether LoopNet's management is really up to the task of building the company's competitive advantage in the face of determined competition. So far, it seems to have undermined its competitive advantages simply to shore up short-term results, which is a recipe for disappointment in the long run.

More on LoopNet:

The Steve Jobs Betrayal
You may already know that in the final year of his life, Jobs revealed a stunning betrayal — and told his biographer, "I will spend my last dying breath... and every penny of Apple's $40 billion in the bank to right this wrong." What was it that made Jobs so irate — and why could it make a few in-the-know investors some major profits over the coming months and years?

Enter your email address below to find out what made Jobs so enraged!

Devon Rackle does not own shares of any of the companies listed in this article. LoopNet is both a Motley Fool Hidden Gems pick and a Motley Fool Rule Breakers pick. eBay and Amazon are Motley Fool Stock Advisor selections. Google is a Rule Breakers pick. Try any of our Foolish newsletters, free for 30 days. The Fool has a disclosure policy.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On February 06, 2009, at 10:40 AM, MoolaMonster wrote:

    Great article! MoolaMonster has suggested competition from CoStar will pressure LOOP’s stock since August 1, 2008. MoolaMonster is the top rated bear on LOOP. Read the post:

    http://caps.fool.com/Ticker/LOOP.aspx

  • Report this Comment On February 06, 2009, at 1:16 PM, BobMcCorkle wrote:

    The author of this article seems to have failed to take into account market dynamics.

    The fact that premium subscribers had declined 7% year over year is a direct result of the dramatic number of real estate agents (both residential and commercial) exiting the business.

    LoopNet's (and Costar's) pool of potential customers has shrunk and will continue to do so until the real estate market heats back up. LoopNet is much better positioned than Costar to weather this storm simply because of their cost model.

    LoopNet can turn the lights off and send employees home, and as long as the servers are still on, they still make money.

    Costar on the other hand has $40,000/year employees driving trucks taking photos of buildings. LoopNet gets those photos for free, from their users.

    My long term bet is on LoopNet.

  • Report this Comment On February 06, 2009, at 2:08 PM, rackled wrote:

    CoStar is growing subscribers (+6%); LoopNet is not (-7%). CoStar is not at risk.

    It is LoopNet that is at risk, with its continual loss of premium subscribers. And now, it has the pleasure of serious competition from Showcase to boot.

    The numbers speak for themselves. Sorry.

  • Report this Comment On February 06, 2009, at 8:40 PM, AtlasTheDog wrote:

    I'd suggest a couple of things to keep in perspective:

    1. CoStar and LoopNet have been long-time competitors; this is nothing new. Each provides an important service to commercial real estate industry, but for most of their histories, they've done this with different business models. CoStar does in-depth, labor-intensive research about many commercial properties, regardless of whether or not they are currently on the market for sale, or for lease. People involved in commercial real estate subscribe to this research at significant annual cost, and then tap into the database, perhaps for property info to help market a property when comes up for sale or lease, or to find comparables to help set prices, or to research competing properties. In contrast, LoopNet is an Internet-based multiple listing service for commercial real estate, thereby providing an online marketplace where buyers and sellers, as well as landlords and tenants, can come to find properties for sale, or for lease. Property owners or landlords pay to list properties for sale or for lease, and most LoopNet registered members search for free, while other premium members pay for enhanced search capabilities. CoStar’s product is an “information service” and LoopNet’s product is a “marketing service.”

    2. This difference in business model is reflected in financial performance of each company. For trailing twelve months from 30-Sep-08, CoStar had $210M revenue and $49M EBITDA. For same period, LoopNet had $85M revenue and $32M EBITDA. This largely reflects much higher price to subscribe to CoStar’s research database vs. price of premium membership on LoopNet’s website. Higher profitability for each revenue dollar for LoopNet vs. CoStar represents much lower cost for LoopNet’s online marketing service vs. CoStar’s more labor-intensive research.

    3. It’s also true that CoStar has recently added an online multiple listing service to its research-based business model, and that new marketing service is called Showcase. It’s clear to industry participants that Costar is now competing head-to-head with LoopNet for the same type of marketing service. Perhaps CoStar recognizes value of LoopNet’s online marketing service, as well as attractiveness of LoopNet’s business model. CoStar started in 1987, well before the Internet had its remarkable impact on business, so its original roots were different than LoopNet, which started more as an Internet company in 1995. Moreover, LoopNet really took off as a dot-com when it merged 50:50 with PropertyFirst.com in June 2001; PropertyFirst.com first launched its online commercial real estate MLS in 1999.

    So, with this perspective, how are CoStar and LoopNet doing head-to-head for an online marketing service for commercial real estate? Based on information from ComScore Media Metrix, for 3 months ending 31-Dec-08, it would seem that LoopNet continues to have wide edge over CoStar. For the time period in question, according to ComScore, LoopNet generated an average of 846,000 unique monthly visitors vs. 138,700 for CoStar. While statistics are not released by CoStar for Showcase, at the end of Q3 2008, LoopNet’s marketplace has $535 billion of property for sale and 4.9 billion square feet of space for lease, as well as 3 million registered members. It’s true, only a subset of those regeistered members visited LoopNet’s site, perhaps at the rate of 846,000 per months as reflected in the unique visitor statistics. And, yes the majority of the members coming to LoopNet’s site are the “free” regular members, but they have enough paying premium members, 83,808 at the end of Q3 2008, to generate $85 in annual revenue along with $32M of EBITDA.

    All successful companies have competitors with similar, or substitute products. Between them, CoStar and LoopNet dominate the information services and marketing services for commercial real estate, giving commercial real estate professionals good choices between types of products, price points, brand, service, etc. Let the competition continue; there’s room for 2 good companies!

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 826512, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 5/27/2012 10:12:42 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 1 day ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,454.83 -74.92 -0.60%
S&P 500 1,317.82 -2.86 -0.22%
NASD 2,837.53 -1.85 -0.07%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

12/31/1969 7:00 PM
LOOP $0.00 Down +0.00 +0.00%
LoopNet CAPS Rating: ****
GOOG $591.53 Down -12.13 -2.01%
Google CAPS Rating: ****
LQDT $62.82 Up +0.27 +0.43%
Liquidity Services CAPS Rating: ***
MA $413.96 Down -5.87 -1.40%
MasterCard, Inc. CAPS Rating: ****
AMZN $212.89 Down -2.35 -1.09%
Amazon.com CAPS Rating: ***
CSGP $72.67 Down -0.29 -0.40%
CoStar Group, Inc. CAPS Rating: **
EBAY $40.35 Up +0.68 +1.71%
eBay CAPS Rating: ****

Advertisement