What Will You Regret Not Buying in 20 Years?

Recs

20

Feel like crying over missed opportunities? Check out the following returns for some stocks over the past two decades:

Company

Average Annual Return

Total Return

Schwab (Nasdaq: SCHW)

25%

9,100%

General Dynamics (NYSE: GD)

24%

7,600%

Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT)

23%

6,500%

International Game Technology (NYSE: IGT)

20%

3,900%

Walgreen (NYSE: WAG)

14%

1,300%

Sysco (NYSE: SYY)

13%

1,000%

Maxim Integrated Products (Nasdaq: MXIM)

18%

2,700%

Source: Yahoo! Finance.

A $5,000 investment in International Game Technology 20 years ago would be worth nearly $180,000 today. The same investment in Schwab would be worth more than $400,000! Truly, one stock can change everything.

So, why didn't you buy them 20 years ago? Why aren't these amazing returns yours? Why isn't your portfolio home to a few millionaire-maker stocks?

What stopped you?
There are lots of reasons you might not have bought these companies 20 years ago. Maybe you weren't yet awake to the promise of the stock market. (I know I wasn't.) Maybe you didn't have money to invest, even if you wanted to. But even if you wanted to invest and had the means to do so, you probably still didn't buy these companies for your portfolio. Why?

Well, with some of them you didn't expect them to keep generating strong returns. With others, though, you probably didn't see their promise -- because you weren't imagining a future very different from the present.

You weren't appreciating how many more casinos would soon dot our landscape, or that you'd find a new Walgreen being built on so many street corners across the country. You didn't imagine individual investors trading stocks online via inexpensive brokerages.

Many of these companies succeeded in large part because they changed the status quo and broke the rules about "how things are done" along the way.

And now -- when those innovations are apparent to even the dimmest of us -- those companies are household names. Their very ubiquity means they won't be maintaining those stratospheric growth rates going forward because now they're established. They may still serve your portfolio well, but they aren't likely to blow its doors off anymore.

Don't kick yourself
But even though these companies are well past their rule-breaking stage, there are a bunch of small, growing ones poised to do the same thing -- ones that are breaking the rules, moving first in exciting new arenas, and creating new ways of doing things. Some of them even stand a decent chance of delivering out-of-sight returns for you over the coming 20 years.

So, how can you tell the difference between the companies that will deliver those out-of-sight returns and companies that will sink, well, out of sight? Fool co-founder David Gardner looks for companies that offer "the highest possible returns" -- companies that are top dogs in important and emerging industries, and that have sustainable advantages, strong past price appreciation, good management, and more.

Take video gaming, for example, which, as an industry, has been experiencing explosive growth -- up 19% in 2008 and generating $21 billion. Both Activision Blizzard and Take-Two Interactive have been busy changing the rules of the game -- and setting new standards.

So, what will you regret not buying today?
David and his team have found, among many exciting companies, a specialist in surgical robots, a company that runs China's premier search engine, and one involved in commercial space systems. They each have some key traits in common with the powerful performers in the table above.

If you'd like to see what they're spotting today, I invite you to take advantage of a free 30-day trial of our Motley Fool Rule Breakers service, including full access to all past issues and every previous recommendation, many of which are in cutting-edge fields such as biotech, alternative energy, and nanotechnology. Click here to learn more.

So give it some thought -- you might want to park a little money in some rule-breaking companies that could serve you well for a long time.

This article was originally published March 4, 2009. It has been updated.

Longtime Fool contributor Selena Maranjian owns shares of International Game Technology, Microsoft, and Activision Blizzard. Take-Two Interactive Software is a Motley Fool Rule Breakers recommendation. Activision Blizzard and Charles Schwab are Motley Fool Stock Advisor selections. Microsoft is an Inside Value selection. Sysco is a Motley Fool Income Investor recommendation. The Motley Fool is Fools writing for Fools.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On June 08, 2009, at 7:50 PM, sv650s wrote:

    Quote from article" David Gardner looks for companies that offer "the highest possible returns" -- companies that are top dogs in important and emerging industries,"

    Look what is Maxim, Schwab, Walgreen return for last 10 years maxim -80%, schw -50%, walgeeen 0%, THAT is for last 10 YEARS. Now 90's will not happen again but look at bright side there is tax write off

  • Report this Comment On June 09, 2009, at 9:10 AM, Columbo1 wrote:

    TAX WRITE OFF! MEANS ONE THING AND THAT IS YOU STILL LOST MONEY.

  • Report this Comment On June 09, 2009, at 1:18 PM, SteveTheInvestor wrote:

    Yeah Columbo.... I think sv650 was being sarcastic. Chill.

    In regards to the article..... I guess it's more fun to talk in hindsight about the 1 in a thousand stock that makes millionaires out of people that invest $50,000 or $100,000.

    You may have noticed that MF quit displaying the returns of of their various newsletter services. Any guess as to why? Yup, too many were down over the life of the service. Basically, over the last 10 years stocks have been a loser's game for the most part. Hard to sell a newsletter service when people know that.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 915226, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/8/2009 10:19:09 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
Which Companies Can Buy It Like Buffett?

Related Tickers

11/6/2009 4:00 PM
MSFT $28.52 Up +0.05 +0.18%
Microsoft Corp CAPS Rating: ***
SYY $26.91 Up +0.07 +0.26%
SYSCO Corp CAPS Rating: *****
GD $65.58 Up +0.19 +0.29%
General Dynamics C… CAPS Rating: ****
SCHW $17.13 Down -0.15 -0.87%
The Charles Schwab… CAPS Rating: ****
WAG $39.57 Down -0.50 -1.25%
Walgreen Company CAPS Rating: ****
IGT $20.18 Up +1.62 +8.73%
International Game… CAPS Rating: ****
MXIM $17.47 Up +0.18 +1.04%
Maxim Integrated P… CAPS Rating: ****

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Headwaters: Headwaters (NYSE: http://caps.fool.com/Ticker/HW.aspx HW) is a diversified company providing products, technologies and services in two industries: construction materials, including coal combustion products, and alternative energy.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!