A Lovelier Bare Escentuals?

Recs

3

Be A Motley Fool Millionaire!

David Gardner's top pick took an epic run of 1,334%! See what he’s recommending that you buy NEXT.

Investors seemed happy about Bare Escentuals' (Nasdaq: BARE) most recent quarter, judging by the stock's near-12% surge today. I only wish I knew just what made them so cheerful.

Net income fell by 19.8%, to $19.8 million, or $0.21 per share. Sales dipped 4%, to $132.5 million. Admittedly, those figures still bested analysts' estimates of $0.20 per share and $130.9 million in revenue.

All the same, I'm not sure euphoria is the right emotion here, even if management does believe it gained market share amid an 8% decline in the overall prestige cosmetic segment. That whole "beating expectations" game is getting a bit old this earnings season. I didn't see grounds for exuberance over Starbucks' (Nasdaq: SBUX) quarter by any stretch.

I still retain some of my bearishness on Bare, especially since its products are no longer unique. Well-heeled rivals have devised their own mineral makeup lines, from Avon (NYSE: AVP), Mary Kay, and Estee Lauder (NYSE: EL) to drugstore cosmetic brands such as Revlon (NYSE: REV) and Johnson & Johnson's (NYSE: JNJ) Neutrogena.

Bare Escentuals' balance sheet still bugs me, too. It has $234.1 million in long-term debt -- a hefty load, even if it's made some progress whittling that burden down in the last year. Despite that debt, Bare does sport $97.5 million in cash, compared to just $31 million at this time last year.

Even with its thick, lustrous cash hoard, I'm leery of Bare's prospects in a dour economy. High-end makeup seems like an easy budget cut when shoppers feel pinched for pennies. Bare Escentuals' renowned customer loyalty might protect it from such an outcome, but it's still good reason for concern.

Maybe I'm just too stubborn to shake my longtime bearishness on this Motley Fool Rule Breakers pick. My pessimism's definitely going against the crowd, in this case. Our Motley Fool CAPS community has a four-star rating on Bare Escentuals. Despite its severe beatdown over the last year -- or perhaps because of it -- investors remain highly optimistic about the stock.

Sure, Bare Escentuals has a single-digit price-to-earnings ratio, and it isn't as risky a stock as it was a year ago. But I'd argue there are prettier, less risky stocks for investors seeking consumer-facing brands.

Start investing today -- just $7 per trade with Scottrade. Or find the broker that's right for you.

“Make Big Money With Options” Motley Fool CFO Ollen Douglass recently made over $100,000 buying options on 7 well known stocks. Now we’re committed to turning his small fortune into a massive one! And we want you to join us! Enter your email address to hear more:

Bare Escentuals is a Motley Fool Rule Breakers recommendation. Starbucks is a pick of Stock Advisor and Inside Value. Johnson & Johnson is an Income Investor selection. The Fool owns shares of Starbucks. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days.

Alyce Lomax owns shares of Starbucks. The Fool's disclosure policy always looks this good.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On July 31, 2009, at 10:03 AM, emattos wrote:

    Whatever the reason, don't dampen it! I'm hoping to get to levels when it was recommended by Fools so I can get out.

    Everyone should go buy some mineral make-up quick!!

  • Report this Comment On August 13, 2009, at 5:34 PM, kgs13 wrote:

    Alyce Lomax must be a man. It is TOUGH to convince a woman to change her make-up routine! Despite any recession, walk past a BARE in the mall and it is always packed! Women love the product; in fact, most studies show that lipstick (even high-end) is an inferior good. Women buy more when personal income is low. Preferences are often not explainable!

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 954230, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 12/3/2009 10:20:54 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
Fool Search: Be GM's Next CEO!

By The Motley Fool

Fool Search: Be GM's Next CEO!

Related Tickers

12/3/2009 10:03 AM
JNJ $64.02 Up +0.14 +0.22%
Johnson & Johnson CAPS Rating: *****
REV $18.41 Down +0.00 +0.00%
Revlon, Inc. CAPS Rating: *
AVP $35.49 Down +0.00 +0.00%
Avon Products, Inc… CAPS Rating: ***
SBUX $21.71 Up +0.03 +0.14%
Starbucks Corp CAPS Rating: **
EL $49.46 Down -0.04 -0.08%
The Estee Lauder C… CAPS Rating: **
BARE $13.28 Down -0.01 -0.08%
Bare Escentuals, I… CAPS Rating: ***

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Due diligence: Due diligence is the research usually after a purchase to insure that the assets are as expected and properly valued.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!