Like four-leaf clovers or Po'ouli birds in the wild, profitable drug companies with one major drug exist -- but they're not very common.
So it's kind of impressive that Onyx Pharmaceuticals
At least superficially, though, shareholders don't seem too impressed by the profitability. Just look how Onyx compares to its in-the-red peers:
Company |
Major Drug |
Partner |
Market Cap (in millions) |
2009 Revenue (in millions) |
Price/Sales |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Onyx |
Nexavar |
Bayer |
$1,829 |
$843* |
2.2 |
Elan |
Tysabri |
Biogen Idec |
$3,883 |
$1,113 |
3.5 |
Amylin Pharmaceuticals |
Byetta |
Eli Lilly |
$2,431 |
$758 |
3.2 |
*Nexavar sales as recorded by Bayer; Onyx's P/S is based on this number.
Source: Capital IQ, a division of Standard & Poor's.
There are a couple of reasons why Onyx is valued lower than Elan and Amylin on a revenue basis. First, the latter two both derive revenue from unpartnered drug(s) in addition to their major partnered drug; Onyx only has Nexavar. Second, Onyx has a 50/50 partnership with Bayer, except in Japan, where it receives a considerably lower royalty. Sales in Japan made up more than 10% of Nexavar sales last year, and continued to accelerate through the fourth quarter.
Perhaps the biggest reason for Onyx's low valuation is that biotech companies are valued based on their current drugs, plus their potential for future growth. While Onyx is testing Nexavar in other cancer types, the rest of its pipeline is farther back in development . In contrast, Amylin has a new drug up for review at the Food and Drug Administration, and Elan's phase 3 Alzheimer's drug, partnered with Johnson & Johnson
It may seem unattractive for unprofitable drug companies such as Elan and Amylin to plow their earnings back into research and development, but the short-term pain may be worth the long-term gain.
Todd Wenning has some suggestions on how to find the greatest stocks of the next generation.