Recs

0

Does Qlik Technologies Earn Its Keep?

We'd all like to invest like the legendary Warren Buffett, turning thousands into millions or more. Buffett analyzes companies by calculating return on invested capital in order to help determine whether a company has an economic moat -- the ability to earn returns on its money above that money's cost.

ROIC is perhaps the most important metric in value investing. By determining a company's ROIC, you can see how well it's using the cash you entrust to it and whether it's actually creating value for you. Simply, it divides a company's operating profit by how much investment it took to get that profit. The formula is

ROIC = Net operating profit after taxes / Invested capital

The nuances of the formula are explained in further detail here. This one-size-fits-all calculation cuts out many of the legal accounting tricks (such as excessive debt) that managers use to boost earnings numbers, and provides you with an apples-to-apples way to evaluate businesses, even across industries. The higher the ROIC, the more efficient the company uses capital.

Ultimately, we're looking for companies that can invest their money at rates that are higher than the cost of capital, which for most businesses is between 8% and 12%. Ideally, we want to see ROIC above 12%, at a minimum, and a history of increasing returns, or at least steady returns, which indicate some durability to the company's economic moat.

Let's take a look at Qlik Technologies (Nasdaq: QLIK  ) and three of its industry peers, to see how efficiently they use cash. Here are the ROIC figures for each company over a few periods.

Company

TTM

1 Year Ago

3 Years Ago

5 Years Ago

Qlik Technologies (231.2%) (927.6%) 14.7% N/A
Actuate (Nasdaq: BIRT  ) 29.5% 24.1% 19.7%* 33.5%
International Business Machines (NYSE: IBM  ) 22.7% 23.2% 15.1% 12.2%
MicroStrategy (Nasdaq: MSTR  ) 172.3% 575.3% 881.0% 99.0%

Source: Capital IQ, a division of Standard & Poor's.
*Because Actuate did not report an effective tax rate, we used its 29% tax rate from five years ago.

Don't be scared by those recent negatives in front of Qlik. They're caused by the company running with negative invested capital -- a very positive occurrence -- rather than because the company is producing negative earnings. Actuate's returns fell below 20% three years ago, but they have steadily increased since then. International Business Machines and MicroStrategy have also seen substantial increases on their returns from five years ago.

Businesses with consistently high ROIC show that they're efficiently using capital. They also have the ability to treat shareholders well, because they can then use their extra cash to pay out dividends to us, buy back shares, or further invest in their franchise. And healthy and growing dividends are something that Warren Buffett has long loved.

So for more successful investments, dig a little deeper than the earnings headlines to find the company's ROIC. If you'd like to add these companies to your Watchlist, click below:

The Steve Jobs Betrayal
You may already know that in the final year of his life, Jobs revealed a stunning betrayal — and told his biographer, "I will spend my last dying breath... and every penny of Apple's $40 billion in the bank to right this wrong." What was it that made Jobs so irate — and why could it make a few in-the-know investors some major profits over the coming months and years?

Enter your email address below to find out what made Jobs so enraged!

Jim Royal, Ph.D., does not own shares of any company mentioned here. The Motley Fool owns shares of Qlik Technologies and International Business Machines. Motley Fool newsletter services have recommended buying shares of Qlik Technologies. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On August 25, 2011, at 1:06 PM, DocMonsta wrote:

    I am confused. You present ROIC as a means to assess whether a company is using its cash well and creating value. From this perspective, QLIK looks like a gawd-awful failure. But then you sort of dismiss those hugely negative numbers. The article title is "Does QLIK earn its Keep?" But I don't think you actually answer the question. I don;t know anything about MSTR, but by this single metric it looks like the best of the four companies you list. Did I miss something?

  • Report this Comment On August 26, 2011, at 12:52 PM, DiggityDawg wrote:

    I agree with DocMonsta. The article doesn't really answer the question posed in its title. It posits ROIC as an incisive metric, states that a healthy ROIC is (positive) 12 percent, at minimum -- then shows QLIK's hugely negative ROIC over the past year. Don't be scared by a (927.6%) to (231.2%) ROIC? Then what SHOULD scare an investor? The explanation, that "running with negative invested capital" is actually "a very positive occurrence," just raises more questions. And what accounts for MSTR's aberrantly large (though declining over the past 3 years) ROIC? The author says that companies with consistently high ROIC can use their extra cash to pay dividends ("something that Warren Buffett has long loved"), but neither BIRT nor MSTR pay a dividend, in spite of their apparently favorable ROIC numbers.

    I, for one, am getting a little tired of the "WWWBD?" (What Would Warren Buffett Do?) cliche, and would settle, instead, for articles that deliver on the promise of their titles.

  • Report this Comment On August 26, 2011, at 4:21 PM, tylerwolford wrote:

    I have to agree with the above comment, this is one of the most poorly written articles I've ever read on a respected website. If a business student turned this in for a class, it would receive an F. Did someone miss their deadline?

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1544027, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 5/27/2012 11:57:23 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 1 day ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,454.83 -74.92 -0.60%
S&P 500 1,317.82 -2.86 -0.22%
NASD 2,837.53 -1.85 -0.07%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

5/25/2012 4:00 PM
QLIK $24.54 Up +0.26 +1.07%
Qlik Technologies CAPS Rating: ****
MSTR $126.76 Down -0.18 -0.14%
MicroStrategy, Inc… CAPS Rating: ***
IBM $194.30 Down -1.79 -0.91%
International Busi… CAPS Rating: ****
BIRT $6.79 Up +0.15 +2.26%
Actuate Corporatio… CAPS Rating: ****

Advertisement