Recs

0

eLong Popped: What You Need to Know

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

Although we don't believe in timing the market or panicking over market movements, we do like to keep an eye on big changes -- just in case they're material to our investing thesis.

What: Shares of Chinese Internet travel agency eLong (Nasdaq: LONG  ) leapt 11% in Thursday trading.

So what: It seems we can trace this bump right back to the friendly analysts at Brean Murray who yesterday upped their price target on eLong shares to $22 apiece.

Now what: Brean argued that eLong's "strong hotel volume growth" and "shift to online booking, and improved gross margins" make the stock worth 10% more than it was two days ago. Investors appear to agree -- almost to the percentage point.

But I don't. If you ask me, anybody willing to pay more than 200 times earnings for a Chinese small-cap Internet stock should have his (or her) head examined. For one thing, eLong still isn't providing shareholders cash flow information on a timely basis. Fact also is, even if eLong turns out to be generating as much free cash flow today as it managed to amass last year, the stock's still selling for something like 60 times free cash. That price is nearly as absurd as the stock's P/E makes it appear.

Long story short, I may not be courageous enough to go out and short the stock, but I'm definitely not foolish enough to buy it.

Would you go long eLong? Before you decide, add it to your Fool Watchlist.

The Steve Jobs Betrayal
You may already know that in the final year of his life, Jobs revealed a stunning betrayal — and told his biographer, "I will spend my last dying breath... and every penny of Apple's $40 billion in the bank to right this wrong." What was it that made Jobs so irate — and why could it make a few in-the-know investors some major profits over the coming months and years?

Enter your email address below to find out what made Jobs so enraged!

Fool contributor Rich Smith does not own (or short) shares of any company named above. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On August 11, 2011, at 3:55 PM, Pharcyde22 wrote:

    First, most stocks were severely beaten over the last week so you cannot accurately state the reason behind any stock that gained 10% today .

    Second, the P/E is incorrect for whichever service you use. Either it's still incorporating a 2009 quarter which may have been negative (b/c based on FY2010, it's P/E is about 50x), or it's not properly factoring that each ADR share equals 2 shares of the stock. So if they recently reported .04 per share, it's actually .08 per ADR share. The P/E you used, probably didn't make this conversion. The real P/E is actually somewhere between 40-60x no matter which metric you use (FY vs. LTM vs current FY actual + estimates).

    Third, they just had their first profitable year in 2010, so of course their FCF is not going to be great. It's not a mature company in a major industry. They have $283 million (U.S.) in cash and no debt, so they have no liquidity problems. It doesn't make sense to use value-oriented valuation analysis for a company focused on growth.

    Fourth, I've been following this company for four years, and they've always filed financial statements on time. When have they not provided timely cash flow information?

    And finally, it may be a Chinese internet company, but it's not a reverse merger, like all of the other frauds. It's majority owned by Expedia. (They have 84% voting rights ownership). Most of management are educated in U.S. and have worked for previous Fortune 500 companies. Many have come from Expedia. They have a reputable auditor (unlike the frauds). And regardless, they've never had aggressive numbers in their statements.

    I'm sorry but you've got to do your homework. A lot of completely inaccurate facts and loose assumptions.

  • Report this Comment On August 25, 2011, at 4:00 PM, Bcharmour wrote:

    I really appreciate your comment on this article. I own very little e-long and I own it for many of the reasons you've stated. The thing is, I trade with Scottrade and it is true that E-long has not provided up to date information. I don't see much from this entire year. What I have found, I've found on other sites and I had to dig. It was a scary bet to make I guess because I bought it at $25, but my bet was kind of on expedia and for the long-term with only a few shares. Price target being raised to $22 is great but $$28 will feel better.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1537886, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 5/27/2012 6:29:31 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 1 day ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,454.83 -74.92 -0.60%
S&P 500 1,317.82 -2.86 -0.22%
NASD 2,837.53 -1.85 -0.07%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

5/25/2012 4:00 PM
LONG $13.98 Up +0.05 +0.36%
eLong, Inc. (ADR) CAPS Rating: *

Advertisement