No, Seriously: Do Not Call!

Recs

0

For the second time in three months, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has walloped a telecom for making unwanted telephone calls to consumers. Last week, the FCC fined Primus Telecom (Nasdaq: PRTL) $400,000 for violating a circa-1992 predecessor list to the famous National Do Not Call Registry (DNC Registry) that the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) set up in September 2003.

The first and most famous instance of presumed FCC enforcement of the FTC's DNC Registry (even without all the alphabet-soup names, the similarity in purposes between the old do-not-call list and the new DNC Registry confuses many consumers) took place in July of this year, when the FCC finally settled a similar charge it had pursued against AT&T (NYSE: T) since November 2003. AT&T got hit with a larger fine than did Primus ($490,000) but actually got off easy. The FCC had alleged that AT&T made a total of 78 unsolicited phone calls to 29 complainants. At a maximum of $10,000 per violation, AT&T could have been fined $780,000.

The most interesting fact about each of these FCC enforcement actions is that neither one was based on the relatively famous DNC Registry, which since October 2003 has forbade all unsolicited telemarketing to the 60 million-plus consumers on its list. Rather, both enforcement actions were based on the 1992 do-not-call list created under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, which forbade only telemarketers who had been specifically asked not to call from calling the specific consumer who asked them not to call.

To date, however, the much more ballyhooed DNC Registry has not been the subject of a single FCC enforcement action. While several states have reached settlements with offenders against the newer federal law, the Feds themselves are still sitting this one out. Why? I have no idea -- but I'd love to hear the thoughts of any Fool out there who does. Give this link a click and clue me in if you know: I know why!

For more Foolish information on the DNC Registry -- and how to sign up, read:

Fool contributor Rich Smith owns no shares in any company mentioned in this article.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

Be the first one to comment on this article.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 501746, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 12/3/2009 2:19:01 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
Fool Search: Be GM's Next CEO!

By The Motley Fool

Fool Search: Be GM's Next CEO!

Related Tickers

12/2/2009 4:00 PM
T $27.35 Up +0.17 +0.63%
AT&T, Inc. CAPS Rating: ****

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Qualified dividend: Under current U.S. tax law (2008), a qualified dividend is a dividend paid to shareholders of U.S. companies that qualifies for a reduced income tax rate.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!