Stocks on Bubble Watch

Recs

15

Panic 2008... Profit 2009!

Fool -- Now's the time to invest! David and Tom Gardner's new book reveals their strategy for million dollar wealth.

Editor's note: A previous version of this article mistakenly included Siliconware Precision Industries in the table of high-P/E stocks. We regret the error. 

Can you tell when a company's stock is about to implode? Few people, if any, have repeatedly and accurately predicted massive declines in companies. But I have five steps that might offer you some assistance.

History serves an important lesson
Back in 2000, investors were blinded by an Internet world that was growing at a phenomenal rate. Many experts jumped on the tech bandwagon, but Wharton professor and writer Dr. Jeremy Siegel was among a small, vocal minority that failed to hear the siren song.

Siegel openly critiqued many Internet companies and their overly generous valuations, including networking giant Cisco Systems. This stock went from a high of $82 in 2000 to lows of $10.39 two years later, turning an investment of $10,000 into a pittance of just $1,267. In fact, Cisco brought Siegel fame -- and perhaps infamy -- when he discussed the company on CNN's Moneyline:

It's a super company. I would probably buy it at 80 times earnings, but at 150 times earnings? We have six stocks in the top 20 (market value) over 100. We have had no history of this. Never have stocks been worth over a hundred times earnings once they've gotten to the size of these companies.

Remember when that happened?
The rest, as they say, is history -- with other giants such as Yahoo!, Oracle, and Qualcomm (Nasdaq: QCOM) shedding 80% or more. Siegel proved adept at identifying this dangerous trend and went on to write about it in The Future for Investors. While the book offers plenty of investing gems, I believe his five simple lessons for how to avoid losing money in a bubble are the most valuable:

  1. Valuations are critical.
  2. Never fall in love with your stocks.
  3. Beware large, little-known, or little-understood companies.
  4. Avoid triple-digit price-to-earnings ratios (P/Es).
  5. Never short sell in a bubble.

Three questionable calls
With an eye toward lessons three and four, here are two stocks that may have gotten ahead of themselves:

Company

Market Cap (Billions)

Trailing P/E

Broadcom (Nasdaq: BRCM)

$16.7

107

Rostelecom (NYSE: ROS)

$7.1

158

Now, these companies might just go on to defy the odds. But I suspect you'll want to be on your game in case the companies begin to miss what are very optimistic expectations.

Look elsewhere
Siegel and other investing gurus suggest that investors find companies that don't carry rich valuations, have clear-cut business models, and offer more than just simple growth opportunities. But that's not all.

In his book, Siegel suggests that investors might want to look toward industries whose growth is below expectation, and whose existence is under the average investor's radar. Why? A successful company in an underperforming industry can also be explosively profitable, because it will "maximize productivity and keep costs as low as possible" while simultaneously outliving competition. This translates into significant bottom-line appreciation.

Examine three small-cap stocks that bested the market in relatively sleepy industries:

Company

Industry

Market Cap (in Billions)

Trailing P/E

3-Year Annual Return

Smith and Wesson (Nasdaq: SWHC)

Firearms

$0.45

33

95%

WD-40 (Nasdaq: WDFC)

Household products

$0.64

21

14%

Cleco (NYSE: CNL)

Electric utility

$1.59

10

16%

Forget the hype
Chasing hot companies in hot industries will often leave you burned. In the long run, it's likely that a company's valuation will land squarely alongside its earnings capacity -- which is often unproven when a company sports a triple-digit P/E.

Instead, you'll be rewarded by buying shares of small companies in underfollowed industries that have demonstrated a real ability to make money. We follow this strategy in our Motley Fool Hidden Gems small-cap investing service, and our recommendations are beating the market average by more than 31 percentage points. In fact, Hidden Gems was the best-performing investment newsletter of the past 12 months, according to the independent Hulbert Financial Digest.

You can take a look at the stocks Hidden Gems is recommending today by joining the service free for 30 days. Click here for more information.

This article was originally published July 10, 2007. It has been updated.

Fool analyst Nick Kapur owns no shares of any company mentioned above. Yahoo! is a Stock Advisor recommendation. The Fool's disclosure policy keeps a level head.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On November 12, 2007, at 8:14 PM, Lucky1300 wrote:

    Who is the idiot that pulled the data for this article, on the date this article was released the trailing PE of SPIL was not 127 but actually around 10 to 10.5, very conservative by any standard. This just goes to show that journalist standards don't exist for Nick Kapur, he clearly is to lazy to verify his facts. Shoot first check to see what he fired at later, what a true fool. Lets see if he is man enough to correct his mistake.

  • Report this Comment On November 12, 2007, at 9:35 PM, rjlehmann wrote:

    I too am amazed at this PE error for SPIL. Even if you are unaware that every ADR contains 5 common shares, the number is way off. Could this article have contributed to the 10% drop in the stock today? Manipulation? Fraud? someone should be all over this.

  • Report this Comment On November 14, 2007, at 1:08 PM, CShafESQ wrote:

    Hey Lucky- why dont you take a chill pill and check out the editor's note? No need to go around ripping on TMF advisors personally. I didnt think that was what this site-- or the comment section to "discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic"-- was about.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 540089, ~/articles/articlehandler.aspx, 1/9/2009 6:52:48 AM

Sign up for FREE Motley Fool site access!

Already registered? Login Here

It’s FREE! Enter your email address, and we’ll rush you to the article you're looking for right now.

Privacy / Legal Information

We will use your email address only to keep you informed about updates to our web site and about other products and services that we think might interest you. The Motley Fool respects your privacy. Please read our Privacy Statement

.

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

What Fools Are Saying

Most Recommended

Jan 8 at 4:06 PM

Market Summary

DJIA 8,742.46 -27.24 -0.31%
S&P 500 909.73 +3.08 +0.34%
NASD 1,617.01 +17.95 +1.12%
Sponsored by:

Related Tickers

Broadcom Corp

CAPS Rating 3/5 Stars

$17.53

-0.30 (-1.68%)

Outperform659

Underperform62

Rate This Stock