Sponsored by
Small-Cap Investing
  •  

Early Signs of Winning Stocks

By Dave Mock November 13, 2007 Comments (4)

48 Recommendations

We've all done it -- some of us repeatedly. Some of us habitually.

You know what I'm talking about: kicking yourself. One of the oldest pastimes, born from utter self-discontent and a strong case of the should'ves. In this case, I'm talking about applying a boot to your rear end for not buying a monster stock you spotted but failed to buy years ago, before it rose 10, 50, or even 100 times in value.

Still don't know what I'm talking about? Look at the 10-year returns for these companies:

Company

Trailing 10-Year Return

Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL)

3,317%

Southern Copper (NYSE: PCU)

2,318%

Amazon.com (Nasdaq: AMZN)

1,895%

BHP Billiton (NYSE: BHP)

1,049%

Terra Nitrogen (NYSE: TNH)

599%

Nokia (NYSE: NOK)

750%

Freeport-McMoRan (NYSE: FCX)

422%

Adjusted for dividends.

Did you buy any before they soared several hundred or thousand percent? That's what I thought. Go ahead and kick now. I'll wait.

Which way to the ground floor?
Before I came to the Fool, my backside was so sore from the kicking that I couldn't sit at the computer. I was constantly chasing stocks. Every hot company that came on my radar would have soaring share prices -- until the exact moment I bought the stock. I was hunting desperately to get in early on a great company, but this goal eluded me. Then I realized I was doing a number of things completely wrong.

If you were to look inside my brain at the time, here are the rules you would have found governing my investing strategy (and why they worked against me):

1. "If so many people are talking about this company, it must be a winner!"
By following what every other Joe Investor talked up, I was missing a large trove of quality stocks that packed potential. The popular party stocks in which I invested were often high on hype and low on substance, setting me up for big losses.

2. "The stock price doesn't matter -- this company's got unlimited potential!"
Every time I failed to recognize that a stock was insanely overvalued, I found out the hard way. Price does matter, and good investors know that there are prices they shouldn't pay, even for the best companies.

3. "Getting in on the greatest stocks is the best way to maximize my returns!"
Basically, I was too busy analyzing stocks to invest in businesses. I overlooked the fact that investing in fundamentally strong businesses -- companies that create value for their customers and shareholders -- is the best way to drive exceptional returns.

These faulty notions led me either to buy poor companies or to invest in good ones well after they had risen substantially in value. It wasn't until much later that I figured out not only how to find more great companies, but to invest in them before they rose dramatically.

Reform thyself
Following the lead of Tom Gardner, who advocates finding killer stocks early in his Motley Fool Hidden Gems newsletter, I turned over some new leaves:

  1. I started looking for high-quality, unknown companies with low market capitalizations (typically less than $1 billion).
  2. Rather than looking at beta values and momentum signals, I looked for companies with strong insider ownership, robust financial results (profits and cash flow), and evidence of solid management.
  3. I valued the stock by comparing the enterprise value of the company with its growth prospects.

All these are traits of the Motley Fool Hidden Gems team's philosophy. Its success is evident in Tom's 2003 pick of safety equipment manufacturer Mine Safety Appliances. The company was sporting high insider ownership of 25% and growing revenue. The stock was cheap four years ago, valued at only 10 times the free cash flow, and the stock returned 125% before Tom recommended selling late last year to look for even better opportunities.

My record has been improving as well. For instance, comparing enterprise value to growth prospects helped me see value in Starbucks shares in 1997 and Garmin in 2002. The leading coffee seller is up more than 400% since, and the leading GPS device maker is already an eight-bagger.

If you're looking to improve your chances of spotting early signs of winning stocks, a subscription to Hidden Gems is a great way to do it. It includes a wealth of analysis and a watch list full of great stock ideas. Or you can try out the full Hidden Gems service with a risk-free 30-day trial by clicking here.

This article was originally published on July 18, 2006. It has been updated.

Fool contributor Dave Mock still kicks himself occasionally, but much less often. He still owns shares of Starbucks and Garmin, which are both Stock Advisor recommendations. Amazon.com is a Stock Advisor recommendation, too. A longtime Fool, Dave is the author of The Qualcomm Equation. The Fool has a disclosure policy.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • On November 14, 2007, at 7:49 AM, raytoei wrote: Report this Comment

    dave,

    i like your article because you list down the common problems of chasing stocks all for the wrong reasons.

    here is a suggestion on how to make your post better:

    please elaborate more on your 3 points:

    " 1. I started looking for high-quality, unknown companies with low market capitalizations (typically less than $1 billion).

    2. Rather than looking at beta values and momentum signals, I looked for companies with strong insider ownership, robust financial results (profits and cash flow), and evidence of solid management.

    3. I valued the stock by comparing the enterprise value of the company with its growth prospects."

    Perhaps a little more elaboration on

    "High-quality" would help alot, is this the strenth of the balance sheet (ie. low debt, high cash) or does high quality refers to the management. How do you quantify something that is essentially qualitative ? Again, for insider ownership, is 5% your minimum requirement. Your point no.3, is that PEG that you refer to ?

    It would be very valuable to us if you could share these finer points.

    thanks

    raytoei

  • On November 16, 2007, at 12:10 PM, DaveMock wrote: Report this Comment

    Here's some of the things I personally look for:

    In terms of "high quality" companies, I look for sustained performance from a dedicated management team -- a group that preferably has high ownership of the stock. If you see a group that is consistently effective at guiding company growth through ups and downs, that's better than leadership that's shuffled often in my eyes.

    I don't necessarily put a number on insider ownership but try to look at it this way: Is management's financial interest strongly tied to a rising company value? Or do they have a $2M annual salary and potential $1M bonus if they meet operational targets yet own little stock? I prefer the former. Also, is a founder with a significant stake still running the show?

    On point 3, Enterprise Value compared to growth takes more into account than just market cap or PEG. Since EV includes things such as debt and cash it also gives a sense of the "takeover" value of the company. Hihgly leveraged companies can sneek in deceivingly low PEG values to make them look cheap. With smaller companies especially, considering debt makes a big difference in value.

    As you state, it is hard to quantify some of these qualities, and investors will have different criteria. You may wieght things with different qualitative factors too. But ultimately, having some boilerplate assessment of a company to work from rather than just chasing already "hot stocks" often leads to better long-term success.

    Dave

  • On November 17, 2007, at 7:11 AM, B1rd1e wrote: Report this Comment

    I agree with raytoei. I need to have some terms broken down for me. Good article

  • On November 18, 2007, at 3:43 AM, GreenLadyUK wrote: Report this Comment

    The other thing to look out for is where the money is going. Not just investors' money (where's the peak) but also the customers'.

    Eg, when times are tough, people buy "comfort" food, so look for undervalued stocks in grocery retailers. When house prices are on the rise, people spend money buying houses rather than doing them up, so DIY companies, suffer.

    Of course, the company needs to be soundly managed too...

Add your comment.

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 540174, ~/articles/articlehandler.aspx, 7/5/2008 7:25:34 AM, No ticker

Related Tickers

Apple, Inc.

AAPL Up! $170.12 +1.94 (+1.15%) 1:00 PM
CAPS Rating:
16933 Outperforms
1467 Underperforms
Rate This Stock

Major Indices

S&P 5001,262.90+0.11%
DJIA11,288.54+0.65%
RSL 2K665.78 -0.98%
NASD2,245.38 -0.27%
Updated: 1:04:33 PM
Sponsored by:

The Motley Poll

Will the U.S. economy fall into recession?

Sponsored by: