How Will You Earn the Best Returns?

Recs

5

Panic 2008... Profit 2009!

Fool -- Now's the time to invest! David and Tom Gardner's new book reveals their strategy for million dollar wealth.

Modern portfolio theory holds that investors are rational, risk-averse folk. If we're presented with two investments that offer the same rate of return, we'll opt for the one less likely to lose money.

Yet recent market activity indicates that many investors are willing to chase returns without regard to risk. This strategy -- let's call it the "more risk, more reward" school -- can lead to crippling losses.

Putting theory in practice
Take a look, for example, at the lists of the most heavily traded stocks on any given morning. The Nasdaq 100 ETF almost always leads the way. That's because -- since it's a volatile and liquid issue -- it's ripe for rapid trading. And many investors attempt to take advantage. There's simply no other reason why an index that tracks Bed Bath & Beyond (Nasdaq: BBBY), Intel (Nasdaq: INTC), Logitech (Nasdaq: LOGI), SanDisk (Nasdaq: SNDK), and 96 other big names should change hands so many times each day.

But as studies from Malkiel, Siegel, and many others have shown, the market is unpredictable over short periods of time. Investors who attempt to predict minute-by-minute changes in the market are taking an enormous risk with their capital -- and they're not being adequately compensated for it.

But more risk, more reward, right?

Little upside, tremendous downside
Go a little further down Friday's most-actives list and you'll see E*Trade (Nasdaq: ETFC), Countrywide Financial (NYSE: CFC), and the Financial Select Sector SPDR (AMEX: XLF).

Each one of these issues is tied closely to the credit market crunch, and I don't doubt that speculators are trying to play the momentum game to ply quick gains. After all, none of these names bear any resemblance to the 10 best stocks of the past 10 years.

But more risk, more reward, right?

More signs of the risk apocalypse
Then there was this ominous headline in The Wall Street Journal recently: "'Blank Check' Firms Gain Favor." A blank check firm, also called a special-purpose acquisition company (SPAC), is a business-less entity that "promises to buy a business" with the proceeds of its IPO.

In other words, SPAC investors have no idea what they're buying into.

But this minor detail hasn't stopped SPACs from becoming extremely popular. According to the Journal, a record 17 SPACs went public in the first quarter of this year, and the 20 that IPO'd through April raised more than $2 billion. That's $2 billion invested in nothing more than a glitzy presentation.

But more risk, more reward, right?

Here comes the punch line
The truth is, investors don't need to be taking these risks in order to make serious money in stocks. Indeed, as Mohnish Pabrai wrote in his book The Dhandho Investor, the investors who succeed for decades are those who consistently buy into situations where the range of outcomes is confined to "Heads, I win; tails, I don't lose too much."

The Foolish final word
No investor should be averse to making money. But we should all be averse to losing it. That's why, at our Motley Fool Hidden Gems small-cap investment service, we apply bottom-up, fundamental evaluation techniques to small companies that have been overlooked by the rest of the market.

When we find a solid business that is well-managed, underpriced, and consistently able to generate cash and deploy it efficiently, we recommend that our subscribers buy shares and hold for a minimum of three to five years. We believe this strategy will help investors achieve superior returns without excessive downside risk. And our returns to date reflect our strategy -- we're beating the market by nearly 30 percentage points, on average.

If you'd like to read all of our research, and see our favorite small caps for new money now, click here to join Hidden Gems free for 30 days. There is no obligation to subscribe.

This article was first published on April 24, 2007. It has been updated.

Tim Hanson does not own shares of any company mentioned. Bed Bath & Beyond and Intel are Motley Fool Inside Value recommendations. Bed Bath & Beyond is also a Stock Advisor pick. The Fool's disclosure policy bottles the mind.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

Be the first one to comment on this article.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 549339, ~/articles/articlehandler.aspx, 1/9/2009 6:33:31 AM

Sign up for FREE Motley Fool site access!

Already registered? Login Here

It’s FREE! Enter your email address, and we’ll rush you to the article you're looking for right now.

Privacy / Legal Information

We will use your email address only to keep you informed about updates to our web site and about other products and services that we think might interest you. The Motley Fool respects your privacy. Please read our Privacy Statement

.

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

What Fools Are Saying

Most Recommended

Jan 8 at 4:06 PM

Market Summary

DJIA 8,742.46 -27.24 -0.31%
S&P 500 909.73 +3.08 +0.34%
NASD 1,617.01 +17.95 +1.12%
Sponsored by:

Related Tickers

Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc.

CAPS Rating 2/5 Stars

$26.72

+1.17 (+4.58%)

Outperform1037

Underperform203

Rate This Stock