5-Star Stocks Poised to Pop: Genesee & Wyoming

Recs

4

Based on the aggregated intelligence of 125,000-plus investors participating in Motley Fool CAPS, the Fool's free investing community, freight railroad operator Genesee & Wyoming (NYSE: GWR) has earned a coveted five-star ranking.

With that in mind, let's take a closer look at Genesee & Wyoming's business, and see what CAPS investors are saying about the stock right now.

Genesee & Wyoming facts

Headquarters (founded)

Greenwich, Conn. (1899)

Market Cap

$1.04 billion

Industry

Railroads

TTM Revenue

$587.37 million

Management

CEO John Hellmann (since 2007)

CFO Timothy Gallagher (since 2005)

Return on Equity (average, last three years)

22.3%

Competitors

Union Pacific (NYSE: UNP),

RailAmerica

CAPS members bullish on GWR also bullish on:

Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL),

Johnson & Johnson (NYSE: JNJ)

CAPS members bearish on GWR also bearish on:

Canadian National Railway (NYSE: CNI),

Burlington Northern (NYSE: BNI) ,

Fomento Economico Mexicano (NYSE: FMX)

Sources: Capital IQ (a division of Standard & Poor's), and Motley Fool CAPS. TTM = trailing 12 months.

Over on CAPS, 912 of the 934 members who have rated Genesee & Wyoming -- or 98% -- believe the stock will outperform the S&P 500 going forward. These bulls include Fuskie and KittyLitterClump.

Last month, Fuskie wrote that Genesee & Wyoming "is on the right track these days, providing short haul alternatives to fuel-expensive trucking options."

In a pitch from three weeks ago, KittyLitterClump hopped on board that same train of thought:

This is a nice sleeper railroad stock. It owns most of its own tracks and has good positions in the U.S., Canada, Australia and even a small play in Bolivia. The company doesn't hesitate to eliminate non-performing positions (recently vacated Mexico). The price is right and when fuel prices begin to go back up the use of rail will follow suit as it's a cheaper choice of shipping compared to air.

What do you think about Genesee & Wyoming, or any other stock for that matter? Make your voice heard on Motley Fool CAPS today. More than 125,000 investors are waiting to hear what you have to say. CAPS is 100% free, so simply click here to get started.

Closed for 15 months – opening 10 days only! Get notified ahead of time as our expert portfolio manager invests $1 MILLION in the best opportunities from across The Motley Fool’s premium investment services. This is the first open since August 2008, by invitation only. Enter email below.

Fool contributor Brian Pacampara owns no position in any of the companies mentioned. Genesee & Wyoming is a Motley Fool Hidden Gems pick. Apple and Canadian National are selections of Stock Advisor. Johnson & Johnson is an Income Investor choice. The Fool's disclosure policy always gets a perfect score.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On January 29, 2009, at 11:30 AM, pondee619 wrote:

    Brian:

    I went to the CAPS page, on January 28, 2009, and did an advanced search. I first check all five star stocks. There are 1080 of them. There are 1080 stocks in each category. I then did a search in each star category for those stocks that did better than -36% over the past year. I believe that over the past year the S&P was -36 or -37%. Here is what I found.

    Out of 1080 stocks in each category:

    445 five star stocks beat the market:

    466 four star stocks beat the market:

    503 three star stocks beat the market:

    476 two star stocks beat the market: and

    522 one star stocks beat the market, as measured by the S&P over the past year.

    What do these results tell us about that "coveted five star ranking"? (it came in last)

    Beating the market is nice, but Making money with positive returns is even better. The advanced search allow you to find stocks with a return of 3% or better over the past year. Over the past year, as of January 28, 2009:

    155 ONE star stocks had a return of 3% or better

    121 TWO star stocks had a return of 3% or better;

    96 THREE star stocks had a return of 3% or better;

    77 FOUR star stocks had a return of 3% or better; and (GET THIS)

    46 FIVE star stocks had a return of 3% or better.

    Beating the market or just getting a positive return in this dreadful year five star stocks came in last.

    Over the past year, according to CAPS advanced screener, on Jan 28, 2009;

    837 ONE star stocks had a negative return for the past year;

    905 TWO star stocks had a negative return for the past year;

    944 THREE star stocks had a negative return for the past year:

    968 FOUR star stocks had a negative return for the past year: AND

    992 FIVE STAR STOCKS HAD A NEGATIVE RETURN FOR THE PAST YEAR.

    This is astounding. Five star stocks had the fewest winners and the most losers.

    For 1/29/09 the break down of stocks flat to positive for the past full year is:

    Five star 93

    Four star 105

    Three star 134

    Two star 173 and

    ONE star 222

    Can we please stop giving CAPS any weight in picking our holdings? I believe that the Fool is doing its readers a dis-service by touting this game as a useful tool in stock picking.

    I look forward to any constructive debate showing that my findings may be in error

    You are going to have to show something other than a CAPS ranking to state that a stock is "poised" to do anything

  • Report this Comment On January 29, 2009, at 12:14 PM, nietschele wrote:

    I agree with Pondee 619: a lot of what CAPS says is hit or miss.

    One example is RIMM -- this company has never rated higher than a 3 star, yet it consistently performs well and rewards holders who follow it closely.

    Also someone please explain to me why the Fool has never suggested that its members protect large profit gains -- at least a portion -- BEFORE the market tanked, given than we were in uncertain times even last year.

    Nietschele

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 820095, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/9/2009 7:42:48 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
Which Companies Can Buy It Like Buffett?

Related Tickers

11/6/2009 4:00 PM
JNJ $60.30 Up +0.32 +0.53%
Johnson & Johnson CAPS Rating: *****
UNP $62.36 Up +1.71 +2.82%
Union Pacific Corp CAPS Rating: ****
GWR $31.63 Up +0.18 +0.57%
Genesee & Wyoming,… CAPS Rating: *****
AAPL $194.34 Up +0.31 +0.16%
Apple, Inc. CAPS Rating: ***
BNI $97.23 Up +0.25 +0.26%
Burlington Norther… CAPS Rating: *****
FMX $42.65 Down -0.70 -1.61%
Formento Economico… CAPS Rating: ****
CNI $51.61 Up +0.07 +0.14%
Canadian National… CAPS Rating: *****

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Efficient market hypothesis: The efficient market hypothesis or efficient market theory states that stock prices perfectly reflect all market information that is known by all investors.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!