Beware of These Strong Buys

Recs

20

It's an understatement to say that investors are excited by the opportunities in green tech.

John Doerr, one of the world's most successful venture capitalists, called cleantech the "biggest economic opportunity of this century." One of the best-performing stocks of 2007 was none other than First Solar (Nasdaq: FSLR), up an incredible 795%. And recent data from the Cleantech Group (reported by CNET News) showed that VC investment in green tech increased 44% in 2007 -- from $3.6 billion to nearly $5.2 billion.

Triple back-up-the-truck booyah, right?

Not so fast
A centerpiece of a recent Roth Capital investment conference in California was an "Investing in Green Tech" expert panel. Its goal was ostensibly to reveal how to make obscene profits by investing in green tech stocks.

But it did the exact opposite.

As the panel went on, it became clear that even these experts -- people who now devote their careers to advancing "green" technologies -- weren't quite sure what the perfect green tech policy, incentive, initiative, or technology looked like. But who could blame them?

Wrap your head around this ...
First, there's significant government involvement in the sector that distorts market forces. That should be an immediate red flag for prospective investors. Whenever the government is involved in something, there can be no certainty.

Second, green tech development cycles are becoming increasingly rapid. That means that what seems like a great idea today could be obsolete tomorrow. For an investor in an early-stage company, that means your product may never get to market -- so you're staring down a significant risk of total capital loss.

Finally, we still haven't decided what the goal of green tech is. Is it to increase efficiency and reduce demand? If that happens, energy prices will drop and consumption will just rise again. Is it to build cleaner generation and consumption technologies? Unfortunately, every alternative solution has a shortcoming. For wind, it's the fact that wind tends not to blow during hot days when demand is highest. Plus, windmills aren't always welcome additions to a community's skyline. And then there's the equipment bottleneck along the solar supply chain. There just doesn't seem to be enough silicon or tellurium to go around.

Buyer beware
Yet investors continue to throw money at the sector, and they remain optimistic about current investment opportunities. Just look at the analyst ratings for a few well-known green tech stocks:

Company

No. of Buy Recommendations

No. of Sell Recommendations

First Solar

27

2

Comverge (Nasdaq: COMV)

7

0

Fuel-Tech (Nasdaq: FTEK)

3

1

Fuel Cell (Nasdaq: FCEL)

7

0

Energy Conversion Devices (Nasdaq: ENER)

8

2

Evergreen Solar (Nasdaq: ESLR)

8

1

That overwhelmingly positive analyst sentiment could very well have you considering entering the sector. This comment from Lisa Bicker of CleanTech San Diego, however, should send you running: "The capital markets for these types of investments are very frothy right now ... yet there are few productive investments available."

A case study
For evidence of what happens when frothy markets meet a lack of productive investments, take a look at what's happened to ethanol stocks over the past two years. Once thought to be a product that could make the United States both greener and more energy-independent, recent research has revealed that ethanol production may actually offset or, even worse, outweigh the greenhouse gas reductions caused by ethanol use. What's more, the combination of rising corn prices and farmers growing more corn and less of everything else has led to higher food prices across the board.

Of course, demand for ethanol wasn't necessarily stoked by market forces. The government, politicians who coveted the Iowa primary, and several powerful interest groups were very much involved in making it a green-tech priority.

All of this combined to make ethanol stocks a very bad investment back when they were being touted in the spring of 2006. For example, on April 5, 2006, analyst Michael Brush wrote about a few "ethanol stocks to get revved up about." Here is the performance of those picks since his article was published:

Company

Return since 4/5/06

Green Plains Renewable Energy

(95%)

Pacific Ethanol

(98%)

Archer Daniels Midland

(26%)

MGP Ingredients

(96%)

Another high-profile ethanol play, VeraSun Energy, had its IPO in June later that year with shares trading at $25 per share. It now trades for $0.28.

I am not against saving the world
This is not to say that energy companies pursuing green solutions are bad companies, or that they're misguided. The world is clearly pursuing cleaner energy solutions, even as the demand for energy around the world rises. A company like Fuel-Tech, which can help power plants reduce their emissions, will clearly benefit.

Still, investors can turn even the best company into a bad buy by paying the wrong price. That's a real risk in the green tech sector, where outcomes are uncertain and valuations "frothy."

If you do it, do it right
Nonetheless, there's clearly a wide market opportunity for green tech companies in today's economy -- and a wide market opportunity is one of the core traits we look for in the small companies we recommend to investors in our Motley Fool Hidden Gems service. So while we're somewhat wary of the sector, we're also taking a long, hard look at it.

Governing that research are a few tips gleaned from those Roth Conference panelists:

  • Focus on green initiatives that offer immediate return on investment to customers. They're most likely to be widely adopted.
  • Peak demand for electricity remains an enormous challenge, which makes distributed generation, energy storage, and advanced metering technologies extremely interesting to the large utilities that will be making many of the spending choices going forward.
  • Hybrid vehicles. They have clear consumer appeal, and they're one of the few ways for individuals to participate tangibly in emissions reduction.
  • Don't overpay.

So while we're looking hard at green tech at Motley Fool Hidden Gems, and we have Fuel-Tech on our Watch List, we won't recommend any stock at the expense of a compelling valuation. When it comes to buying green tech stocks, you should do the same.

After all, that focus on valuation in the small-cap space has our picks more than 5 percentage points ahead of the market, on average. You can check out what we're recommending today and read all of our research and notes from the conferences we attend by joining Hidden Gems free for 30 days. There's no obligation to subscribe.

This article was first published on March 7, 2008. It has been updated.

Tim Hanson does not own shares of any company mentioned. And lest you think he hates the prospect of being a good steward of the environment, know that he skateboards to work (shout out to Sector Nine longboards), uses reusable bags at the grocery store, and pushes the limits of his wife's tolerance for cold (in winter) and heat (in summer) when it comes to managing the thermostat at home. The Fool's disclosure policy doesn't require that he tell you all of that, but you can read about what is required here.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On February 07, 2009, at 11:16 AM, Psani wrote:

    I think that the author is missing an important point about the development of the new energy sources such as the Windmill and Solar panel. These technologies do not polute the air when producing energy for our use. Considering how fast the mother earth is changing with the global warming as the main environmental issue for current human race, one would hope that we learn from the past mistakes and make effort to prevent future disasters. Wind and Sun power generation alternatives are excellent choices to save the mother Earth today!

  • Report this Comment On February 25, 2009, at 9:23 AM, Renergie wrote:

    Renergie to Test Hydrous E10, E20, E30 & E85 Ethanol Blends in Non-Flex-Fuel Vehicles and Flex-Fuel Vehicles in Louisiana

    The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has granted a testing exemption to Renergie, Inc. Under the test program, the first of its kind in the U.S., Renergie will use variable blending pumps, not splash blending, to precisely dispense hydrous ethanol blends of E10, E20, E30, and E85 to test vehicles for the purpose of testing for blend optimization with respect to fuel economy, engine emissions, and vehicle drivability. Sixty vehicles will be involved in the test program which will last for a period of 15 months.

    Hydrous Ethanol

    Preliminary tests conducted in Europe have proven that the use of hydrous ethanol, which eliminates the need for the hydrous-to-anhydrous dehydration processing step, results in an energy savings of between ten percent and forty-five percent during processing, a four percent product volume increase, higher mileage per gallon, a cleaner engine interior, and a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions.

    Variable Blending Pump

    In the U.S., the primary method for blending ethanol into gasoline is splash blending. The ethanol is “splashed” into the gasoline either in a tanker truck or sometimes into a storage tank of a retail station. Renergie believes the inaccuracy and manipulation of splash blending may be eliminated by precisely blending the ethanol and unleaded gasoline at the point of consumption, i.e., the point where the consumer puts E10, E20, E30 or E85 into his or her vehicle. A variable blending pump would ensure the consumer that E10 means the fuel entering the fuel tank of the consumer’s vehicle is 10 percent ethanol (rather than the current arbitrary range of 4 percent ethanol to at least 24% ethanol that the splash blending method provides) and 90% gasoline.

    Team Approach

    “On June 21, 2008, Governor Bobby Jindal signed into law the Advanced Biofuel Industry Development Initiative (“Act 382”), the most comprehensive and far-reaching state legislation in the nation enacted to develop a statewide advanced biofuel industry. Act 382 is based upon the “Field-to-Pump” strategy developed by Renergie. Louisiana is the first state to enact alternative transportation fuel legislation that includes a variable blending pump pilot program and a hydrous ethanol pilot program,” said Meaghan M. Donovan, founder of Renergie, Inc. “We are excited and proud that Renergie, the Louisiana Department of Agriculture & Forestry, the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality, and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency are acting as a unified team to develop a network of small advanced biofuel manufacturing facilities and the necessary fueling infrastructure throughout Louisiana. Representative Jonathan W. Perry (R - District 47), Senator Nick Gautreaux (D - District 26), and Dr. Mike Strain, Commissioner of the Louisiana Department of Agriculture and Forestry, should be praised for their leadership on this issue. Renergie’s decentralized network of small advanced biofuel manufacturing facilities reduces Renergie’s feedstock supply risk, maximizes rural economic development, maximizes job creation in the state and does not burden local water supplies. The legislature and governor of the great State of Louisiana have chosen to lead the nation in moving ethanol beyond being just a blending component in gasoline. By blending fuel-grade ethanol with gasoline, via blending pumps at its gas stations, Renergie will offer the consumer a fuel that is renewable, competitively-priced, cleaner, and more efficient than unleaded gasoline in the form E10, E20, E30 and E85.”

  • Report this Comment On April 13, 2009, at 12:54 AM, poracer wrote:

    I've followed Fuel Cell Tech since 2002-2003. It ha lowly built up a real business with real products and real customers and with a very large backlog of orders. Management is solid. They say they will be profitable with their latest cell.

    The products are pretty amazing. Making energy at waste water sites from methane and using. Powering large painting factories (auto painting) from teh fumes.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 826927, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/9/2009 11:01:47 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
Health-Care Reform: A Tale of Two Chambers

Related Tickers

11/9/2009 4:00 PM
ENER $10.93 Down -0.56 -4.87%
Energy Conversion… CAPS Rating: ****
ESLR $1.45 Up +0.03 +2.11%
Evergreen Solar, I… CAPS Rating: ***
FCEL $3.65 Up +0.18 +5.19%
FuelCell Energy, I… CAPS Rating: **
FSLR $119.50 Up +1.57 +1.33%
First Solar, Inc. CAPS Rating: **
FTEK $10.54 Down -0.28 -2.59%
Fuel Tech, Inc. CAPS Rating: ****
COMV $12.06 Down -0.39 -3.13%
Comverge, Inc. CAPS Rating: ***

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Variable cost: A variable cost is an expense that rises or falls in conjunction with a company's level of productivity.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!