4-Star Stocks Poised to Pop: Walter Industries

Recs

6

Based on the aggregated intelligence of 125,000-plus investors participating in Motley Fool CAPS, the Fool's free investing community, coal producer Walter Industries (NYSE: WLT) has earned a respected four-star ranking.

With that in mind, let's take a closer look at Walter Industries' business, and see what CAPS investors are saying about the stock right now.

Walter Industries facts 

Headquarters (founded)

Tampa, Fla. (1946)

Market Cap

$1.21 billion

Industry

Coal and Consumable Fuels

TTM Revenue

$1.37 billion

Management

Vice Chairman/CFO Victor Patrick

Return on Equity (average last three years)

29.7%

Dividend Yield

1.8%

Competitors

Peabody Energy (NYSE: BTU),

CONSOL Energy (NYSE: CNX),

Massey Energy (NYSE: MEE)

CAPS members bullish on WLT also bullish on:

Johnson & Johnson (NYSE: JNJ)

CAPS members bearish on WLT also bearish on:

Citigroup (NYSE: C),

Freddie Mac (NYSE: FRE)

Sources: Capital IQ, a division of Standard & Poor's, and Motley Fool CAPS. TTM = trailing 12 months.

Over on CAPS, 95% of the 1,395 members who have rated Walter Industries believe the stock will outperform the S&P 500 going forward. These bulls include CAPS All-Star daharkleroad, who is ranked in the top 10% of our community, and einsteinpfleet.

Last month, daharkleroad complimented Walter on its recent weight loss: "After shedding the home construction business, this company looks lean and mean. Coal may be a dirty word to some, but it is the cheapest energy source available. With new carbon fixing technologies coming on line demand will be greater then ever."

In a pitch from December, einsteinpfleet expands on that bullish line of thinking:

Walter announced it would separate it's housing business from it's coal business, which is much more interesting now than when it was announced. If Obama and China decide to implement infrastructure programs, Walter should be a beneficiary. No matter what the economic conditions, I do not see people turning off their lights, televisions, or computers which means that electricity consumption should remain constant. Again, this is a plus for coal. Obama may be looking for cleaner burning coal, but there is no substitute for several years to come.

What do you think about Walter Industries, or any other stock for that matter? Make your voice heard on Motley Fool CAPS today. More than 125,000 investors are waiting to hear what you have to say. CAPS is 100% free, so simply click here to get started.

Like this article? Get our best articles delivered direct to your inbox at no cost. Sign up for Foolwatch Weekly by entering your email below.

Fool contributor Brian Pacampara owns no position in any of the companies mentioned. Johnson & Johnson is a Motley Fool Income Investor pick. The Fool's disclosure policy always gets a perfect score.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On February 09, 2009, at 4:01 PM, pondee619 wrote:

    "Walter Industries, Inc., based in Tampa, Fla., is a leading producer and exporter of metallurgical coal for the global steel industry "

    How can you offer a pitch regarding Walter Industries without mentioning steel production?

  • Report this Comment On February 09, 2009, at 4:11 PM, oyldeels wrote:

    10-1 these guys are now short on their picks. Especially those that have trended up for last weeks "no reason rally." yes i've coined that term.

    i'd bet on the reversal for the energies right now

    too high too fast

  • Report this Comment On February 09, 2009, at 6:28 PM, jmc613 wrote:

    Of course, Walter's "weight loss" will make it a pure play metallurgical coal company, making it relevant to the planned infrastructure program as part of the steel production industry, as pondee619 points out. They do NOT mine "steam" coal for electricity production.

  • Report this Comment On February 10, 2009, at 8:35 PM, coalsifter wrote:

    Not one ounce of our coal is used for power generation.Furthermore,bad blood exists between Alabama Power Co.& JWR.because of past conflicts.It' doubtful APC will Buy our coal in the future.Production costs are so high it's boubtful a decent profit can be made by converting from high grade Metalurgial Coal to steam Coal.From an insider.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 827840, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/22/2009 3:59:00 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
An Open Letter to the Federal Reserve

Related Tickers

11/20/2009 4:00 PM
JNJ $62.31 Up +0.37 +0.60%
Johnson & Johnson CAPS Rating: *****
WLT $69.83 Up +0.18 +0.26%
Walter Industries,… CAPS Rating: ****
FRE $1.14 Down -0.02 -1.72%
Freddie Mac CAPS Rating: *
MEE $37.99 Down -0.04 -0.11%
Massey Energy Comp… CAPS Rating: ****
BTU $45.39 Down -0.57 -1.24%
Peabody Energy Cor… CAPS Rating: ****
C $4.20 Down -0.06 -1.41%
Citigroup, Inc. CAPS Rating: ***
CNX $46.00 Down -1.55 -3.26%
CONSOL Energy, Inc… CAPS Rating: ****

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Fed Model: The Fed Model (not endorsed by the Federal Reserve) hypothesizes that the market is in equilibrium when the earnings yield on the S&P 500 matches the yield on the 10 year Treasury note. Any dissonance in the relationship would show that equity valuations are out of whack.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!