If you could wave a magic wand and bestow just one characteristic on all of your investments, what would it be? (Besides the ability to print money, that is.)
I began thinking about this after reading Tom Gardner's "A 25-Bagger in Five Years," in which he identified three things that give a company the chance to achieve outsized gains over the years -- like 25-baggers that turn $5,000 into $125,000. Of the three he mentions, one characteristic is most important to me: a high level of insider ownership.
Why it matters
But this makes sense, right? Think about any of your major personal investments:
- You are a stockholder, with a good deal of your wealth riding on this company's performance.
- Founders and managers with high levels of ownership also have their wealth riding on the company's performance.
- They are doing everything they can to increase the long-term value of their stock -- of your stock.
Having a wonderful time ...
With their reputations, their livelihoods, and their careers on the line, you can be fairly sure these managers and board members are motivated to do what's best for the company. It's like having someone on the inside, working for you. Every day. A great example is Amazon.com (Nasdaq: AMZN) CEO Jeff Bezos, who owns over 22% of the $24 billion e-tailer!
What is the opposite of that? Businesses where management has very little tied up in company stock. Where actions may be motivated by things that actually harm the stock's performance, like office politics, power plays, or working more with an eye on the clock (is it 5:00 yet?) than on improving the business model. Or, even worse, management that rewards itself with high salaries and bonuses that have nothing to do with outstanding performance.
Now, most of your larger holdings will have a low percentage of insider ownership. For example, Citigroup (NYSE: C) is only 0.4% owned by insiders. JPMorgan Chase (NYSE: JPM) sports just 0.5% insider ownership. The sheer size of those companies makes it awfully tough for anyone to own a significant share of the entire business -- though perhaps a different culture would have evolved in some of the large financial firms if management had held a greater stake in the future.
But smaller companies are a much different story. In small-cap land, CEOs and managers with high levels of ownership are much more likely to rise above the mediocrity and work toward the common goal of great stock performance.
For instance
I ran a screen for some companies with high insider ownership, but went a bit beyond that. The following businesses also have positive sales and earnings growth, high margins, and high returns on equity (ROE) -- a potentially winning combination. I also included some larger companies that nonetheless have high levels of insider ownership.
|
Company
|
Insider
Ownership
|
Net
Margin*
|
ROE*
|
|
TeleCommunication Systems (Nasdaq: TSYS)
|
19%
|
23%
|
67%
|
|
Star Bulk Carriers (Nasdaq: SBLK)
|
20%
|
56%
|
29%
|
|
Pre-Paid Legal Services (NYSE: PPD)
|
9%
|
13%
|
219%
|
|
AgFeed Industries (Nasdaq: FEED)
|
42%
|
12%
|
23%
|
*Trailing 12 months. Data provided by Capital IQ, a division of Standard & Poor's.
And beyond
Insider ownership, particularly in smaller companies, is one positive indicator in the quest for tomorrow's multibaggers. There are many more, of course, but insider ownership is one of the core variables we screen for in Motley Fool Hidden Gems.
We invite you to take a free trial and look through all of our active recommendations, as well as the top five small-cap stocks for new money now. There's no obligation to subscribe.
Already subscribe to Hidden Gems? Log in here.
This article was originally published on Feb. 21, 2006. It has been updated.
Rex Moore
thinks Jack Bauer would make quick work of Chuck Norris. He (Rex, not Jack) doesn't own shares of any of the companies mentioned. Amazon is a Motley Fool Stock Advisor pick. The Fool is investors helping investors.
Terms & Conditions
RSS Headlines
Fool UK