A Big Upgrade for Rodman & Renshaw

Recs

18

Disney Buys Marvel!

David Gardner called it. He’s up 1,334%! See what David’s recommending that you buy NEXT.

Every day, the sun rises on Wall Street, and a plethora of professional analysts wake to issue new opinions on stocks. Here at the Fool, we use our "This Just In" column to examine some of these picks-- and the track records of the firm behind them -- so individuals can make better investing decisions.

In addition to following professional banks, anyone can use Motley Fool CAPS to monitor the collective opinions of more than 140,000 members, many of whom demonstrate better investing insight than published analysts do.

A few CAPS bears had been keeping the stock of Rodman & Renshaw Capital Group (Nasdaq: RODM) at four-star rank, but all 41 members who are rating the investment bank are now unanimously on the bullish side, giving it a five-star rating. So why the recent optimism, even if it is only a handful of investors?

Mostly it’s a case of being at the right place at the right time. The company provides investment banking services focusing on biotech companies with a long list of clients, including Cell Therapeutics (Nasdaq: CTIC), Spectrum Pharmaceuticals (Nasdaq: SPPI), and CEL-SCI (AMEX: CVM). The sector has been hot lately, and some believe that the growing biotech field will continue to bring in business to Rodman & Renshaw. The company recently announced record revenue in the third quarter, helped by strong demand to raise money.

The broader markets also have seen a recent uptick in mergers and acquisitions activity, which benefits not only large banks like JPMorgan Chase (NYSE: JPM), Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS), and Barclays (NYSE: BCS), but also boutique firms like Lazard -- and potentially specialists like Rodman & Renshaw.

The stock has made massive gains in recent months, prompting some investors -- including a couple of company executives -- to sell off shares. But the management team still retains a sizable stake in the company. In addition to the biotech sector, Rodman & Renshaw aims to bring in more business from other sectors such as energy and clean technology. And amid an increasing number of stateside IPOs by Chinese companies, Rodman & Renshaw is also considering opening an office in China, to tap the market of Chinese companies looking to raise capital in the U.S.

Do you think Rodman & Renshaw deserves five-star status? Add your thoughts in the comments box below on this page, or head over to CAPS to rate the company.

Love this article? Get our best articles delivered direct to your inbox at no cost. Sign up for Foolwatch Weekly by entering your email below.

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor service looks for companies with strong management poised to beat the market over the long haul. To see all the stocks that have helped Tom and David Gardner beat the market by 50 points on average, take a free 30-day trial.

Fool contributor Dave Mock takes free upgrades whenever he can get them. He owns no shares of companies mentioned here. The Fool's disclosure policy gives partial credit, grades on a curve, and is easily wooed by chocolate.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On November 11, 2009, at 10:05 AM, jerseyperson wrote:

    The article mentioned that many Fools have better track records than published analysts. I think it is worth noting that this is in spite of the fact that the more recognized analysts regularly move the market with their advice, thereby making their advice a self-fulfilling prophecy to at least some extent. This is an advantage not available to Fools or other non-published individuals.

    In addition, there is the “duh” factor with published analysts. This I define as the calls they make that are so glaringly obvious as to be beyond question, and therefore having no real value since being obvious the information is not worth paying for and by the way requires no research or “analysis” on their part.

    Put these two factors together, and you really have to question what legitimate value published analysts have in the overall securities trading market.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1037615, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 2/10/2010 9:46:01 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
Is This Bull Over?

By The Motley Fool

Is This Bull Over?

Related Tickers

2/9/2010 4:00 PM
GS $152.49 Down +0.00 +0.00%
Goldman Sachs Grou… CAPS Rating: ***
CVM $0.65 Down -0.01 -1.52%
CEL-SCI Corp CAPS Rating: **
CTIC $0.77 Up +0.13 +20.86%
Cell Therapeutics,… CAPS Rating: ***
BCS $17.19 Down +0.00 +0.00%
Barclays PLC (ADR) CAPS Rating: ***
SPPI $4.36 Down +0.00 +0.00%
SPECTRUM PHARMACEU… CAPS Rating: *****
JPM $38.39 Down +0.00 +0.00%
JPMorgan Chase & C… CAPS Rating: ***
RODM $3.93 Down -0.41 -9.44%
Rodman & Renshaw C… CAPS Rating: ***

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Benchmark: A benchmark is a reference point against which other data are compared. For example, the S and P 500 index is a commonly used benchmark for the performance of many mutual funds that invest in common stocks.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!