When SAIC Spins, No One Wins

Recs

9

Be A Motley Fool Millionaire!

David Gardner's top pick took an epic run of 1,334%! See what he’s recommending that you buy NEXT.

By now you've probably heard: SAIC (NYSE: SAI) reported fiscal Q3 2009 earnings Tuesday. As usual, the mainstream press dutifully regurgitated the news, with MarketWatch reciting how:

  • Revenues grew 11% to $2.63 billion.
  • While per-share profits rose 20% to $0.30 per share.

The Associated Press did SAIC one better, reciting not just the numbers, but characterizing them as an earnings beat, and then proceeding to parrot the party line: "Looking ahead, SAIC says it's on track to meet its long-term financial goals in fiscal 2009."

And then there's me. I call shenanigans.

The party line
According to CFO Mark Sopp: "We are on track to meet all of our key financial metrics for the year, including revenue, operating margin, earnings per share, and cash flows from operations." All of which sounds good, but for one small detail: It's bunk.

In our pre-earnings Foolish Forecast, we discussed the "key financial metrics" that SAIC was targeting this year. Specifically: "Management targets booking revenues between $9.7 billion and $10 billion this year on as much as 9% organic growth, and to earn an operating margin of 7.7% or 7.8% on its revenues."

Now, score one for SAIC, because sales rose 11%, and organic growth constituted 10 of these percentage points -- so, revenue did better than expected. Unfortunately, the point of this game isn't just to generate revenues -- it's to generate revenue profitably. Specifically, to earn 7.7% to 7.8% operating margins on revenues. Which poses three problems:

  • First, SAIC failed to earn these margins in the first half of FY 09.
  • Second, SAIC failed to make up the difference in Q3.
  • And third ... in fact, SAIC went the wrong way. Its margins got worse relative to last year.

Operating margin in the third quarter was 7.8%, whereas in Q3 of last year, SAIC had earned 8.0%. The company offered the following explanation for decline: “The year-over-year decline in operating margin was primarily attributable to fewer shipments of higher margin border and port security products, lower recovery of prior year indirect cost over-runs, and a higher percentage of revenues from lower margin materials and subcontractor revenues compared to the third quarter of fiscal year 2008.”

All of which may be true. But it doesn't change the fact that SAIC failed to deliver what it promised in October: improved margins. So far this year, SAIC's operating margin is running at 7.5%. Don't get me wrong -- that's better than Computer Sciences (NYSE: CSC) can manage, and on par with SRA International (NYSE: SRX). But it's far worse than firms like L-3 Communications (NYSE: LLL) and Lockheed Martin (NYSE: LMT) earn.

Most important to SAIC investors, though, margins haven't improved from the 7.5% operating margin that SAIC was earning by this time last year. Instead of getting better, they're stagnant. If SAIC is to generate its hoped-for 7.7% to 7.8% operating margin for the year, therefore, it must do literally all of the heavy lifting in this current fourth fiscal quarter -- because so far this year, it's dropped the ball every time it got the chance.

Foolish takeaway
Unless a miracle happens between now and the end of its fiscal fourth quarter next month, SAIC likely won't hit its margin goals, which could cause it to miss its earnings target as well.

Sure, in the grand scheme of things, how much does one quarter's performance matter? Like Warren Buffett, we all want to invest in companies for the long term, not obsess over the quarter-by-quarter earnings game.

However, in a defense sector that's been hit pretty hard across the board, SAIC is already trading at a premium to several of its rivals. Boeing (NYSE: BA), for example, sells for just 0.5 times its sales, despite earning an 8.2% operating margin thereon. Northrop Grumman (NYSE: NOC) gets an 8.3% margin, yet just a 0.4 times sales multiple.

Meanwhile, here SAIC sits, earning worse profit margins but commanding a sales multiple twice as high as Northrop. Now, if SAIC pulls a rabbit out of the hat and delivers on its promises this quarter -- fine and dandy. Maybe it deserves the premium. But if SAIC fails to deliver?

Then look out below.

You've read what Rich thinks. Now find out whether the analysts at Motley Fool Inside Value agree. Sign up for a free trial subscription to Inside Value now, and learn whether they see a fluffy white tail poking out from under SAIC's hat.

“The Next Great Investment”… That’s how a top global investor describes India’s potential. On Nov. 28, The Motley Fool’s Tim Hanson returns to India to prove it. Follow along in real time and get his TOP pick first (Hanson returned from China in July with a stock that’s up 169%!). Enter email below.

SAIC is a Motley Fool Inside Value pick. Fool contributor Rich Smith owns shares of Boeing. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On December 13, 2008, at 9:37 AM, wax wrote:

    Hi Rich;

    So let me see if I have this right. Someone that has no position in the stock doesn't like management. Okay, I'll accept that, I mean we all have our opinions.

    What made me laugh though was this part:

    "As usual, the mainstream press dutifully regurgitated the news..."

    I hate to break it to you, but The Motley Fool is a "mainstream" as they come.

    Wax

  • Report this Comment On December 15, 2008, at 12:14 PM, BFawlty wrote:

    Rich-

    It seems like the market is still trying to get its arms around what SAIC actually does. While it is a very big defense (and other federal sectors) contractor, it really isn't comparable to the Boeings, Northrop-Grummans or Lockheed Martins, as it doesn't manufacture a lot of things (certainly not ships or airplanes or tanks.) It specialty is more in the systems integration area, and for that it is known throughout the government. Comparisons to companies like CACI and SRA and CSC are much more apt than comparisons with the ones I mentioned above. They are very rarely "rivals" of SAIC. Instead, SAIC is included on many of their teams for its integration talents.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 794051, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/24/2009 4:17:03 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
Live Chat on India, China, and the Demise of the Dollar

Related Tickers

11/24/2009 3:52 PM
BA $51.89 Down -0.74 -1.41%
The Boeing Company CAPS Rating: ***
SAI $17.95 Down -0.09 -0.50%
SAIC, Inc. CAPS Rating: ****
CSC $55.08 Down -0.25 -0.45%
Computer Sciences… CAPS Rating: ***
SRX $18.13 Up +0.07 +0.39%
SRA International,… CAPS Rating: ***
NOC $55.95 Down -0.10 -0.18%
Northrop Grumman C… CAPS Rating: ***
LLL $78.83 Up +0.51 +0.65%
L-3 Communications… CAPS Rating: *****
LMT $77.51 Up +0.23 +0.30%
Lockheed Martin Co… CAPS Rating: ****

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Two and twenty: Two and twenty or 2 and 20 (or other such variants) refers to a common hedge fund compensation structure.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!