Beware of Cash-Rich Companies

Recs

3

Disney Buys Marvel!

David Gardner called it. He’s up 1,334%! See what David’s recommending that you buy NEXT.

You're not going to like what I have to say today.

Over the years, you've been taught that companies stockpiling cash are winners. The fatter the legal tender pinata, the better, you've been schooled. "Cash is king" is a popular mantra around Fooldom, referring to both healthy balance sheets and companies that can generate gobs of cash flow.

As reasonable investors, we're trained to spot companies that have top-heavy income statements. However, before we get any deeper into earnings season, I have to warn you that cash-rich companies may break your heart.

The heavy burden of sandbags
As the interest rates that companies are collecting on their idle greenery continue to shrivel, the hurdle to top last year's performances are getting that much harder.

Let's start with Google (Nasdaq: GOOG).

 

Q4 2007

Q4 2008

Change

Cash & Marketable Securities

$14.2 billion

$15.8 billion

11%

Net Interest Income & Other

$167.3 million

$69.9 million

(58%)

Source: Google.

See that? Even though Google closed out 2008 with $1.6 billion more greenbacks, its interest income took a dive. Instead of earning a yield of roughly 1.2% of its greenery balance in interest as it did during the final quarter of 2007 (or an annualized clip of nearly 5%), Google's idle balances netted a yield of roughly 0.4%.

Did Google grow its bottom line? Absolutely. It even trounced Wall Street expectations. However, it was the result of Google itself having to work even harder to grow its operating income to overcome the shortfall in generating interest income.

The same thing happened to Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL). It was another blowout quarter for the company, but it took a sharp hit in interest income during the period. The company may have closed out the period with a whopping $25.6 billion in cash, equivalents, and marketable securities, but the weighted-average interest rate on those funds clocked in at an annualized clip of 2.37%. A year ago, Apple was averaging 4.94% on its idle funds.

Nowhere to hide
Some companies are great at managing their greenbacks. Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT) only took a small hit in dividend and interest income during last week's otherwise lackluster report. In pursuit of chunkier yields, roughly a third of its nearly $21 billion in balance sheet green is invested in foreign government bonds and mortgage-backed securities. What will happen as more of its investments mature and Microsoft has to settle for lower yields or take bigger risks?

Intel (Nasdaq: INTC) saw its "net interest and other income" line item take a 91% hit. Sure, the "other" stipulation means that there are several other factors weighing in on that line beside the shriveling up of interest income, but anyone who doesn't see that cash-rich companies are going to be hard-pressed to inflate profits by leaning on their cash balances needs to start checking in on the pittance that money market funds are paying these days.

The upside to these blue chips is that even with billions -- and tens of billions -- in their coffers, interest income will only move the earnings per share needle by a few token pennies. The more pronounced impact will come on smaller companies that have yet to report.

Chinese travel portal eLong (Nasdaq: LONG), real estate broker ZipRealty (Nasdaq: ZIPR), and residential realty lead generator Market Leader (Nasdaq: LEDR) are trading within spitting distance of the value of their cash, equivalents, and marketable securities.

That is typically a dinner bell to deep value investors, save for the unfortunate point that all three companies are expected to post losses for their most recent quarters. Interest income has usually been there to soften the blow, but how will they fare now that the mattress has been deflated?

Cash is still king, but the moat is thinning
Don't get me wrong. It's a blessing to be armed with an arsenal of cash. It is the cash-rich companies that will make the most of this situation by gobbling up the competition, given the one-two punch of tightening credit markets and the unattractiveness of equity as a transactional currency.

However, slumping interest rates do tend to close the gap between the cash and the cash-nots. Leveraged companies that are able to lasso financing may do so at attractive rates, at a time when the cash-blessed companies struggle to squeeze more yield out of their idle funds.

This is not a call to dump your cash-rich companies. I may be dumb, but I'm not stupid. However, investors will need to factor in the impact that piddly yield will have on income statements over the next few quarters. In a market where missing or beating Wall Street expectations by pocket change can move stocks, year-over-year comps are going to be challenging for the rich stocks you love.

The world according to Microsoft:

“Make Big Money With Options” Motley Fool CFO Ollen Douglass recently made over $100,000 buying options on 7 well known stocks. Now we’re committed to turning his small fortune into a massive one! And we want you to join us! Enter your email address to hear more:

Microsoft and Intel are Motley Fool Inside Value recommendations. Google is a Motley Fool Rule Breakers selection. Apple is a Motley Fool Stock Advisor pick. The Fool owns shares and covered calls of Intel. Try any of our Foolish newsletters today, free for 30 days.

Longtime Fool contributor Rick Munarriz realizes that cash is king, but sometimes it's the queen that rules the kingdom. He does not own shares in any of the stocks in this story. He is also part of the Rule Breakers newsletter research team, seeking out tomorrow's ultimate growth stocks a day early. The Fool has a disclosure policy.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On January 26, 2009, at 1:15 PM, Bronscap wrote:

    Lol, what is the purpose of this article? It's obvious that a company that has a lot of cash doing nothing will perform worse than a company that's levered 10 times and has success at investing these levered funds. The problem with the levered company is that it could bankrupt easily if it had a big loss for whatever reason, the cash rich one won't.

  • Report this Comment On January 26, 2009, at 1:20 PM, e16189781 wrote:

    With these low equity prices, any reduction in the return on cash increases the chances that management will use the cash for a stock buyback.

    Also, the companies with levered balance sheets won't be here in a year. Exxon and Apple will still be here, not matter what the economy does, because it would be so hard to bankrupt them.

  • Report this Comment On January 26, 2009, at 1:31 PM, Bronscap wrote:

    Exactly, so I don't understand this article. What's the purpose of it? So interest rates went down...

  • Report this Comment On January 26, 2009, at 1:58 PM, Breakout55 wrote:

    Personally, I thought it was enlightening. He did go 'overboard' but that was just to get interest/attention imo

    The entire article's point is summed up in the last paragraph:

    "However, investors will need to factor in the impact that piddly yield will have on income statements over the next few quarters."

  • Report this Comment On January 26, 2009, at 2:20 PM, sa44ron wrote:

    Negative sensationalism at its best. You are if fact drawing attention to cash-rich companies. They made the right call to hold cash over the last twelve months. Now if they don't put this cash to use over the next twenty four months, there would be cause for concern. Besides the value of holding cash is not for the return. It is for the opportunity to use it when something comes along. And it is their call.

    How about you? Were you sitting on any cash at the beginning of September? What is your usual asset allocation to cash? Most funds hold minimal cash levels, only enough to manage withdrawals. And leave the cash allocation up to the investor.

    Disclosure: Commoditiy related stocks 100% long.

  • Report this Comment On January 26, 2009, at 2:22 PM, SiliconBeach wrote:

    The point of the article is valid. But also, looking out a bit longer, I believe that the massive printing of money going on will cause inflation, and then that cash will produce even more of a return.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 816857, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 12/2/2009 1:43:26 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
Is Everybody Losing It in Finance's Nervous Breakdown?

Related Tickers

12/1/2009 4:00 PM
INTC $19.66 Up +0.46 +2.40%
Intel Corp CAPS Rating: ****
MSFT $30.01 Up +0.60 +2.04%
Microsoft Corp CAPS Rating: ***
AAPL $196.97 Down -2.94 -1.47%
Apple, Inc. CAPS Rating: ***
GOOG $589.87 Up +6.87 +1.18%
Google, Inc. CAPS Rating: ***
LONG $12.11 Up +0.31 +2.63%
eLong, Inc. (ADR) CAPS Rating: **
ZIPR $4.03 Up +0.02 +0.37%
ZIPREALTY, INC. CAPS Rating: **

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Contrarian: A contrarian investor makes investing decisions that are often opposite conventional wisdom or the actions of the crowd.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!