Symantec Locking Up Profits (and Customers)

Recs

4

Disney Buys Marvel!

David Gardner called it. He’s up 1,334%! See what David’s recommending that you buy NEXT.

Stock Advisor

Computer security expert Symantec (Nasdaq: SYMC) is facing more rivals than ever before. Those competitors are also bigger, stronger, and seemingly more determined than ever to cut larger slices of the security market. You don't see Symantec cowering in a fetal position, though.

Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT) is perhaps the biggest threat thanks to the free Security Essentials suite and the security measures built into the just-launched Windows 7 platform. It's hard to compete with free, and it's hard to overcome the default solution that ships with a new system (just ask Netscape or Firefox!). Microsoft is firing sharps on both fronts.

On the other side, Cisco Systems (Nasdaq: CSCO) is busy gobbling up security providers like IronPort and ScanSafe. Cisco is not a big name in security -- yet. But this acquisitive strategy is putting together a strong security stable that may soon rival the offerings from incumbents like Symantec and McAfee (NYSE: MFE).

But these threats are not hurting Symantec today. In the second quarter, Symantec saw sales fall a mere 3% from 2008 levels to $1.47 billion, while the backlog of deferred contract revenue grew 7% to $2.91 billion. This adds up to a strong base of recurring revenue that more than makes up for a drop in short-term spending and one-off license deals. And 51% of the sales happened abroad. If this business model is starting to sound familiar, you're probably thinking about IBM (NYSE: IBM) or Hewlett-Packard (NYSE: HPQ) of recent vintage.

The strong sales trickled down the income statement to product earnings of $0.18 per share, 20% higher than last year's $0.15 per share. For the next quarter, management sees even more contract revenue building up while top-line sales stay at about $1.5 billion. It's a beautiful model, and the fact that Symantec's customers are so eager to sign long-term licenses and support contracts tells me that they won't jump to the new competition any time soon.

Do you use Symantec's Norton security products, or do you just go with whatever Microsoft hands down from On High? If you're one of those Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL) mavericks, did you even know that there's a Norton suite for Macs? Consumer sales are big for Symantec today -- the segment accounted for more than 30% of company revenue -- so please help me understand how real people think about these things and leave a comment below.

“The Next Great Investment”… That’s how a top global investor describes India’s potential. On Nov. 28, The Motley Fool’s Tim Hanson returns to India to prove it. Follow along in real time and get his TOP pick first (Hanson returned from China in July with a stock that’s up 169%!). Enter email below.

Fool contributor Anders Bylund holds no position in any of the companies discussed here. He is way too big a nerd to share John Q. Everyman's view of computer security. Apple is a Motley Fool Stock Advisor recommendation. Microsoft and Symantec are Motley Fool Inside Value picks. Microsoft is a Motley Fool Options selection. Try any of our Foolish newsletters today, free for 30 days. You can check out Anders' holdings and a concise bio if you like, and The Motley Fool is investors writing for investors.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On October 30, 2009, at 3:56 PM, mrkruser wrote:

    I've had several Apple Macs online and powered 24/7 since 1995, and have never installed or used security software... there's just no need. However, I do see why it's a product/service that isn't going anywhere anytime soon, because businesses and schools still use Windows-based systems, or just don't "trust" the Mac platform yet. My daughter was required to install Mac security software on her MacBook, before her college would allow her to use the campus-wide Wi-Fi. Symantic and others continue to use FUD in their marketing to win over the Mac base. But with the Windows-base, it is justified fear that keeps 'em buying their software and services.

  • Report this Comment On October 30, 2009, at 4:00 PM, oswegodan wrote:

    Symantec shrunk overall revenue and shrunk security revenue 1% YoY and this is called a good thing? McAfee grew 18% in security YoY and there was a sell off. I dont get it...

  • Report this Comment On October 30, 2009, at 7:12 PM, chasman143 wrote:

    Where in the future do you see the coming of 'cloud computing'? As this idea gains potential and momentum, I know it will be heavily lobbied against. If 'cloud computing' gains any traction, will the need for ancillary software wane? What new stocks in this arena are poised to grow?

  • Report this Comment On October 31, 2009, at 9:58 AM, wickedpokah wrote:

    That was my question to oswegodan. Seems strange that this article implies SYMC success in security when in fact that part of their business has been shrinking for some time. If it wasn't for their Enterprise storage business and the strength of their consumer Norton brand this company would be an utter failure.

    Regardless of market reaction, MFE is the better company and long term play. SYMC beat lower expectations after missing in prior quarters - big deal. MFE was mostly inline with lofty analyst expectations and even beat by .$02 on non-gaap basis. You saw a lot of strength in MFE at the end of the day yesterday as the big boys bought back in at attractive prices while the little guys panicked and ran. I expect a strong Q4 from MFE. If the market ever recovers we'd see $50 pretty quickly.

  • Report this Comment On November 04, 2009, at 10:09 AM, Fool wrote:

    Is Anders Bylund a schill for Symatec? It is a company that is underperforming in many ways. Just read industry analyst reports. Crazy

  • Report this Comment On November 14, 2009, at 12:59 AM, appalachian8 wrote:

    The threat to SYMC by Microsoft's offering of its new security software at no charge is being underestimated. This alone will cause severe losses to both SYMC and MFE. .

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1027002, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/24/2009 2:52:39 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
Why Investors Should Be Excited for a Bank Breakup

Related Tickers

11/23/2009 4:00 PM
MSFT $29.94 Up +0.32 +1.08%
Microsoft Corp CAPS Rating: ***
MFE $41.31 Up +0.69 +1.70%
McAfee, Inc. CAPS Rating: **
HPQ $51.02 Up +0.98 +1.96%
Hewlett-Packard Co… CAPS Rating: ***
IBM $128.20 Up +1.24 +0.98%
International Busi… CAPS Rating: ***
AAPL $205.88 Up +5.96 +2.98%
Apple, Inc. CAPS Rating: ***
CSCO $23.90 Up +0.44 +1.88%
Cisco Systems, Inc… CAPS Rating: ****
SYMC $18.01 Up +0.29 +1.64%
Symantec Corp CAPS Rating: **

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Discussion boards: Discussion boards are a platform for hosting online interactions between people who wish to discuss the aspects of particular topics of mutual interest.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!