Recs

9

Abbott Labs Might Be Cheaper Than You Think

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

Here's why Abbott Labs (NYSE: ABT  ) may be cheaper than you think.

In the daily noise machine of CNBC, analyst estimates, and quarterly announcements, investors are inundated with talking heads obsessing over earnings-per-share figures.

This is the primary metric we use to mark corporate progress. Earnings, or net income, are also the basis for the price-to-earnings ratio, the most popular way of measuring how cheap or expensive a stock is.

Unfortunately, "earnings" figures don't always give you the full picture.

Let me explain
Reported earnings are an accounting construction that may or may not accurately reflect a company's true earnings power. Free cash flow -- the amount of cash a company earns on its operations minus what it spends on them -- is another, oftentimes more accurate metric that can help you identify cheap stocks.

Better still, it's one that other investors frequently overlook. That means investors like us who peek at free cash flow can gain a significant advantage in the market.

How Abbott stacks up
If Abbott tends to generate more free cash flow than net income, there's a good chance earnings-per-share figures understate its profitability and overstate its price tag. Conversely, if Abbott consistently generates less free cash flow than net income, it may be less profitable and more expensive than it appears.

This graph compares Abbott's historical net income to free cash flow. (I omitted various gains and charges such as tax deferrals, restructurings, and benefits related to stock options.)

anImage

Source: Capital IQ, a division of Standard & Poor's, and author's calculations.


Source: Capital IQ, a division of Standard & Poor's, and author's calculations.

As you can see, Abbott has a tendency to produce more free cash flow than net income.

This means that the standard price-to-earnings multiple investors use to judge companies may overstate its price tag.

Let's examine Abbott alongside some of its peers for additional context:

Company

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow Ratio

Abbott Labs

14.8

12.5

Bristol-Myers Squibb (NYSE: BMY  )

15.1

16.9

Merck (NYSE: MRK  )

9.1

27.4

Pfizer (NYSE: PFE  )

15.7

7.8

Median Pharma

16.2

14.6

Source: Capital IQ and author's calculations. Similar adjustments were made in calculating FCF.

Abbott's free cash flow multiple is considerably less expensive than its earnings multiple, and it's somewhat cheaper than most peers' free cash flow multiples. Abbott may be cheaper than many investors think.

Best Odds in the Universe!
If you're interested in a 98.79% chance at beating the market... and a 70.84% chance at DOUBLING the market's return – Motley Fool Supernova could be just what you're looking for. And get this: We arrived at these odds from 10,000 random back-tested portfolios composed of Motley Fool Co-founder David Gardner's personal stock picks.

It's why David recently handpicked a small team of world-class portfolio managers. You see, he thinks these odds can get even better! And he'd like to prove it to you...

Simply enter your email address. And the answer to the question everybody is asking will be delivered to your inbox!

Ilan Moscovitz doesn't own shares of any company mentioned. Pfizer is a Motley Fool Inside Value selection. Johnson & Johnson is an Income Investor recommendation. Motley Fool Options has recommended a diagonal call position on Johnson & Johnson. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. True to its name, The Motley Fool is made up of a motley assortment of writers and analysts, each with a unique perspective; sometimes we agree, sometimes we disagree, but we all believe in the power of learning from each other through our Foolish community. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On September 09, 2010, at 7:08 PM, tshk1221 wrote:

    P/E and P/FCF themselves can't tell us ABT is cheaper than we think. Other factors such as acquisition price efficiency, profitability and human factor (management capacity) should all be considered to determine if a company is overvalued or undervalued. Horizontal valuation such as P/E can't tell us anything. We have to rely on perpendicular valuation to see the real value of a company. A daunting task for all investors out there..

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1296090, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 2/11/2012 7:03:50 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 8 hours ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,801.23 -89.23 -0.69%
S&P 500 1,342.64 -9.31 -0.69%
NASD 2,903.88 -23.35 -0.80%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

2/10/2012 4:00 PM
MRK $37.91 Down -0.24 -0.63%
Merck & Co., Inc. CAPS Rating: ****
PFE $21.05 Down -0.09 -0.43%
Pfizer, Inc. CAPS Rating: ****
ABT $55.11 Down -0.15 -0.27%
Abbott Laboratorie… CAPS Rating: *****
BMY $31.90 Down -0.09 -0.28%
Bristol-Myers Squi… CAPS Rating: ****

Advertisement