Amgen Threatens to Sue Roche on Mircera

Recs

0

Shortly after U.S. district Judge William Young said the court will appoint third-party experts to evaluate the dosing and pricing of Roche's Mircera, a potential competitor with Amgen Inc.'s anemia drugs Epogen and Aranesp, Amgen said it may sue Roche for damages in a jury trial if it goes ahead with the product launch.

A jury last fall found that Mircera infringed three Amgen anemia drug patents, but Judge Young has so far declined to issue a permanent injunction against Roche's product, saying he might consider allowing Mircera on the market in order to foster price competition.

Citi Investment Research analyst Yaron Werber said he believes Amgen's threat is aimed at preventing Roche from launching Mircera even if Young lifts the temporary injunction against Mircera, as they could be liable for substantial damages if they lose in a trial.

"While it is not clear if Roche will take this threat seriously and not launch the drug even if Young rules in their favor, it adds another layer of complexity to the trial," Werber wrote in a note to clients.

Rodman & Renshaw analyst Michael G. King, Jr. said he views the court's delay as a short-term victory for Amgen, but thinks the judge's move seems to indicate that the court is becoming increasingly interested in finding an economically fair solution for both parties rather than granting Amgen the typical permanent injunction.

In a note backing a "Market Perform" rating, King said the delay should help relieve some share pressure on Amgen. But, he warned that Judge Young's decision could have far-reaching effects in the drug sector if he rules in favor of Roche.

"We believe such a precedent would fundamentally alter the intellectual property landscape and jeopardize the exclusivity of all unexpired drug patents," he wrote.

However, Lazard Capital Markets analyst Joel Sendek doesn't think Roche will ultimately win a launch.

"In our view, the permanent injunction is still the most likely outcome given the potentially dangerous precedent a compulsory license would set," he wrote in a note to investors Thursday.

Shares of Thousand Oaks, Calif.-based Amgen slipped 33 cents to $41.67 in afternoon trading.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

Be the first one to comment on this article.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 608238, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/10/2009 1:28:12 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
Warren Buffett's Cold Shoulder

By The Motley Fool

Warren Buffett's Cold Shoulder

Related Tickers

11/10/2009 1:00 PM
AMGN $54.18 Down -0.73 -1.33%
Amgen, Inc. CAPS Rating: ****

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Gross margin: Gross Margin or gross profit margin is gross profit divided by revenue (or sales), expressed as a percentage.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!