Sponsored by
Associated Press
  •  

Analysts weigh in on new Estee Lauder COO

By Associated Press May 21, 2008 Comments (0)

0 Recommendations

Analysts say that while cosmetics maker Estee Lauder Inc.'s new chief operating officer could improve results eventually, that will take awhile to occur.

Estee Lauder hosted an analyst meet-and-greet on Tuesday with Fabrizio Freda, who took over as the company's president and chief operating officer in March.

Freda was previously president of global snacks at Cincinnati-based consumer products company Procter & Gamble Co. By hiring Freda, Chief Executive William Lauder, grandson of the company founder, has created a succession plan that sets the stage for Freda to become his successor within 24 months.

Citigroup analyst Wendy Nicholson wrote in a note late Tuesday that Freda offered some "suprisingly big new thoughts" about the New York company, which earlier this month reported third-quarter earnings fell 4 percent as strong international sales were offset by weak U.S. results.

"Freda suggested that he would be focused on making return on investment capital more of an important metric within Estee Lauder," Nicholson wrote.

She reiterated her "Buy" rating on the company.

Gary M. Giblen, a Goldsmith & Harris analyst, said he was surprised at the enthusiastic reception given to Freda, particularly since he has no experience in the beauty sector, and said a turnaround is not necessarily a given.

"The superficial reaction to anyone from a marquee company is it's great," he said in a telephone interview. "But it's important to look at specific experience and challenges," they've faced, Giblen said.

Amid a weakening U.S. economy and intensifying competition in the prestige beauty sector, a turnaround should not be treated like a sure thing, and wouldn't happen until 2010 or 2011 anyway, he said.

Goldman Sachs analyst Andrew Sawyer said the company's stock, which is up more than 8 percent since the beginning of the year, is "ahead of itself."

"Investors are clearly focused on the potential for a more productive business model," he wrote. "We do not anticipate much margin progress in fiscal 2009, which could disappoint some of the more optimistic investors."

He kept his "Neutral" rating on the stock.

"We would await a more opportunistic entry point or early signs of margin progress before putting fresh money to work," he wrote.

Estee Lauder shares fell 27 cents to $47 during afternoon trading.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

Be the first one to comment on this article.

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 649880, ~/articles/articlehandler.aspx, 7/9/2008 3:40:15 AM, No ticker

FREE 1-Step Fool.com Access!

Already registered? Login Here

Simply enter your email address below to get:

  • Instant access to this article and all in-depth Motley Fool news and analysis.
  • A FREE special report, "The Motley Fool's Top Two Picks," immediately sent to your inbox. Inside you'll read about the Fool's two best plays for new money in 2008 — this report is free for a limited time.

No, thanks

Related Tickers

The Estee Lauder Companies, Inc.

EL Up! $45.52 +0.03 (+0.07%) 4:05 PM
CAPS Rating:
78 Outperforms
24 Underperforms
Rate This Stock

Major Indices

S&P 5001,267.34+1.20%
DJIA11,384.21+1.36%
RSL 2K674.34+2.44%
NASD2,276.34+1.47%
Updated: 4:04:12 PM
Sponsored by:

The Motley Poll

Will the U.S. economy fall into recession?

Sponsored by: