US Airways dispatchers deny shaving fuel supplies

US Airways workers who calculate fuel loads deny a claim that pilots are pressured to carry less fuel as a cost-saving measure.

The president of the dispatchers' labor group said Thursday that the charge by pilots is "nothing more than hot air."

The dispute pits the 5,200-member pilots union against the company and a group of 174 dispatchers, and it threatens to raise questions about safety at US Airways.

On Wednesday, the US Airline Pilots Association said the union and eight pilots filed complaints with the Federal Aviation Administration charging that US Airways was pressuring pilots to use less fuel than they feel is safe. With less fuel aboard, the planes would be lighter and get better mileage, saving the company money.

The pilots' union also took at a full-page advertisement in USA Today to make their case.

That angered Don Wright, president of the Transport Workers Union Local 545, which represents dispatchers who plan every flight including calculating the fuel needs.

"I feel like they've taken a shot at us because the company isn't responsible for putting the fuel on the plane; we are," Wright said. "There has been absolutely zero pressure placed on us by the company to reduce the fuel loads."

Jet fuel is at record prices, causing airlines to ground gas-guzzling planes, cut back on flights and install mileage-stretching winglets on their planes.

FAA regulations require planes to carry enough fuel to reach their destination and an alternate airport, plus an additional 45 minutes' supply. A spokesman for Tempe, Ariz.-based US Airways Group Inc. said the company requires pilots to carry a 60- to 90-minute extra fuel supply and that it called in the eight pilots for training because they routinely carried more.

US Airways pilot James Ray, a spokesman for his union, said the treatment of the eight amounted to intimidation.

Wright said his dispatchers, who are certified by the FAA, plan 4,000 to 5,000 flights per year and consider weather, air traffic delays and other factors in calculating how much fuel to load.

"It's not a safety issue, it's a comfort issue," he said.

Comment (0)
Recommended (0)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

Be the first one to comment on this article.

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 687539, ~/articles/articlehandler.aspx, 8/30/2008 6:39:45 AM,

Sign up for FREE Motley Fool site access!

Already registered? Login Here

It’s FREE! Enter your email address, and we’ll rush you to the article you're looking for right now.

Privacy / Legal Information

We will use your email address only to keep you informed about updates to our web site and about other products and services that we think might interest you. The Motley Fool respects your privacy. Please read our Privacy Statement

.

Related Tickers

US Airways Group, Inc.

LCC Up! $8.49 +0.33 (+4.04%) 4:00 PM
CAPS Rating:
299 Outperforms
353 Underperforms
Rate This Stock

Major Indices

S&P 5001,282.83 -1.37%
DJIA11,543.55 -1.47%
RSL 2K739.50 -1.11%
NASD2,367.52 -1.83%
Updated: 5:10:01 PM
Sponsored by:

The Motley Poll

Where will the U.S. dollar go from here?

Sponsored by: