The Best Way to Fund Your Retirement

Recs

25

My fellow Fools and I spend a lot of time talking (and writing) about the process of saving for retirement. It's a confusing, challenging endeavor for many -- if you're new to investing, or don't have a lot of exposure to the basic concepts, picking your way through a 401(k) plan's options or setting up an IRA can be daunting. For some, it's so daunting that they don't do it, or put it off indefinitely, and they let years slip by before they start saving.

But happily, plenty of people do get it. They've put in the time to learn how to invest well, and they've found ways to save more of what they earn. Combined with their discipline to contribute to their retirement plans and IRAs year after year, they end up with a nice nest egg as they approach retirement.

Great! Now what?

Shifting from saving to spending
Obviously, drawing down that nest egg requires a different mind-set than the one you had while you built it up. While you're building your nest egg, the ups and downs of volatile stocks like NVIDIA (Nasdaq: NVDA) or Advanced Micro Devices (NYSE: AMD) don't bother you too much. As long as the fundamentals remain strong, and the overall trend is going in the right direction, who cares if the stock -- or the market -- is in a funk?

But when you're planning on spending that money, suddenly that funk looks like a problem. Suddenly the ups and downs of your nest egg's overall value seem to mean the difference between a secure retirement and going broke early. The temptation is strong to shift the whole thing into a money market fund -- or just buy an annuity. Sure, a money market's yield is low, but at least your nest egg will still be there when you need it. And the fees on an annuity can be outrageous -- but at least you're guaranteed an income stream. Right?

You know what I'm going to say: There's a better way.

The better way
You may know that most experts recommend that you limit your withdrawals to about 4% of your retirement fund's total value every year. That's good advice. You may also know that some of us recommend that you keep a sizable portion of it invested in stocks -- all the money you won't need for at least five years should be in stocks, in part to help you keep up with inflation.

But managing that stock portfolio will require -- again -- a different mind-set than the one you had while you were building it in the first place. In this month's issue of the Fool's Rule Your Retirement newsletter, available online at 4 p.m. ET today, advisor Robert Brokamp examines this question in detail.

Sure, you'll still be invested in stocks, and some of the same thinking still applies. But there are some big differences.

If you were still working and saving back in the late 1990s, you could afford to take some big risks on companies like Amazon.com (Nasdaq: AMZN), Qualcomm (Nasdaq: QCOM), Pets.com, and Art Technology Group (Nasdaq: ARTG), hoping that one or two would work out well over the long haul. But as Robert's article notes, once you've saved all you can, managing your nest egg requires more of a conservative approach.

Does that mean you have to dump all your growth stocks and hunker down with traditional defensive plays like utilities? Not at all. Among other things, it means spending some time looking at blue chips like General Electric (NYSE: GE) and dividend-paying stars like United Parcel Service (NYSE: UPS) instead of throwing all your spare cash into the next great technology wonder stock. It means being sensible, rather than adventurous, as you'd expect -- but it doesn't mean foregoing risk entirely. And it means being "sensible" in some ways you probably haven't thought of.

If you'd like to read Robert's full article, help yourself to a complimentary one-month guest pass to Rule Your Retirement. The pass will give you full access to today's new issue, all back issues, our special members-only discussion board for your questions and ideas, and a unique set of planning tools to help you create your own plan for retirement. It's yours for 30 days, with absolutely no obligation to subscribe.

Fool contributor John Rosevear loves this retirement-planning stuff, which he admits probably makes him a little weird. He owns shares of Art Technology Group, but does not own any of the other stocks mentioned. Amazon and NVIDIA are Stock Advisor picks. UPS is an Income Investor recommendation. The Motley Fool's disclosure policy is a firm believer in balancing risk with reward.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

Be the first one to comment on this article.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 547803, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/8/2009 2:37:05 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
Which Companies Can Buy It Like Buffett?

Related Tickers

11/6/2009 4:00 PM
GE $15.33 Up +0.90 +6.24%
General Electric C… CAPS Rating: ****
QCOM $43.90 Up +0.05 +0.11%
Qualcomm, Inc. CAPS Rating: ****
NVDA $13.16 Up +0.89 +7.25%
NVIDIA Corp CAPS Rating: ****
AMZN $126.20 Up +5.59 +4.63%
Amazon.com, Inc. CAPS Rating: **
AMD $5.04 Up +0.21 +4.35%
Advanced Micro Dev… CAPS Rating: **
UPS $54.86 Up +0.40 +0.73%
United Parcel Serv… CAPS Rating: ***
ARTG $4.16 Up +0.01 +0.24%
Art Technology Gro… CAPS Rating: ***

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Listing requirements: Listing requirements are criteria a stock must meet in order to be traded on an exchange such as NYSE, Nasdaq, or AMEX. Each exchange sets its own requirements and failure to meet them can result in removal.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!