Recs

8

Will the Baby Boom Spell Doom for Stocks?

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

For decades, the baby-boom generation has captured the attention of those looking for a demographic secret to successful investing. As the first of the boomers start to approach normal retirement age, the big question that many investors have is this: Are cash-seeking baby-boomers going to dump stocks, leading to the next downturn for the market?

Testing the theory
The idea behind the concern that many have over the boomer cohort's impending retirement is pretty simple. Boomers collectively have a lot of money, and in order to finance their living expenses in retirement, they'll need to cash in their investments. Because there are a lot of boomers and a relatively smaller group of young workers accumulating wealth and making new investments, the resulting imbalance in buying and selling will result in prices falling.

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) recently took a closer look at this theory to see if a major disruption to the financial markets was likely. It concluded that retiring baby boomers were unlikely to cause a big drop in prices of stocks and other financial assets for a variety of reasons, including the following:

  • Like most retirees, baby boomers will have an incentive to try to preserve their savings as long as possible, and so it's unlikely that they'll sell off their investments all at once. Markets should be able to absorb a more gradual pace of boomers' sales.
  • In particular, concerns about rising health-care costs, the desire to leave money to future generations, and the fact that many boomers have enough wealth to make massive liquidations unnecessary should combine to drive boomers to keep their investments rather than selling them.
  • Because the baby-boom generation is 18 years long, made up of people born from 1946 to 1964, boomers will obviously retire at different times in the future. It'll take decades for the full effects of retiring boomers to make itself known, and the extended duration of the transition should moderate its impact.
  • Regardless of demographic trends in the U.S., economic development throughout the world will increase demand among foreign buyers to buy U.S. financial assets, lifting prices.

Of these reasons, the last seems the most compelling. Already, foreign companies have expressed interest in making major investments in U.S. companies, such as CNOOC's (NYSE: CEO  ) unsuccessful bid for Unocal, which was later acquired by Chevron (NYSE: CVX  ) . In addition, foreign businesses have provided infusions of capital to several struggling companies in past years, including Citigroup (NYSE: C  ) and Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS  ) . More recently, the China Investment Corporation reportedly bought a stake in the electricity company AES (NYSE: AES  ) , and further acquisitions seem likely for the foreseeable future.

Looking at asset mixes
That's good news for the financial markets generally. But a variant of the primary theory sounds potentially more plausible. It goes like this: Even if retiring boomers keep their stocks, one might think that they'd move their money from risky, highly volatile stocks to more conservative investments. That could help investors in blue-chips like IBM (NYSE: IBM  ) and Procter & Gamble (NYSE: PG  ) but hurt those who gravitated toward small-caps and other higher-risk assets.

The CBO report, however, debunks that theory as well. Despite financial advice to the contrary, the CBO found that in reality, most aging retirees don't reduce their general allocations to stocks or to particular types of stocks.

What to do
Skeptical investors will note that being a government agency, the CBO has at least some political incentive to downplay any threat to the financial markets, especially given the events of the past year. Yet the CBO has often taken controversial positions contrary to other government agencies, on issues ranging from the budget deficit to health-care costs. Most experts trust its impartiality.

The CBO report suggests that whether you're a baby-boomer or someone on either side of that group, you should be able to keep following your own investing strategy without fear of a large demographic effect on stocks. Given all the other challenges that investors face right now, taking even a single item off your worry list is a nice thing to be able to do.

If you're looking for great investing ideas, listen to Todd Wenning. He'll tell you what the market's strongest buys are right now.

Best Odds in the Universe!
If you're interested in a 98.79% chance at beating the market... and a 70.84% chance at DOUBLING the market's return – Motley Fool Supernova could be just what you're looking for. And get this: We arrived at these odds from 10,000 random back-tested portfolios composed of Motley Fool Co-founder David Gardner's personal stock picks.

It's why David recently handpicked a small team of world-class portfolio managers. You see, he thinks these odds can get even better! And he'd like to prove it to you...

Simply enter your email address. And the answer to the question everybody is asking will be delivered to your inbox!

Fool contributor Dan Caplinger hopes to beat some of the boomers to retirement, although he's not holding his breath. He doesn't own shares of the companies mentioned in this article. The Fool owns shares of Procter & Gamble, which is a Motley Fool Income Investor pick. CNOOC is a Motley Fool Global Gains selection. Try any of our Foolish newsletters today, free for 30 days. Trust the Fool's disclosure policy keeps things bright and sunny.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On November 12, 2009, at 3:07 PM, ryanalexanderson wrote:

    Interesting article and conclusions.

    But I think many of us are far more worried about the baby boomers' reduction in buying stuff, and their increase in using Social Security and healthcare services, than liquidating their portfolios. No way to debunk that demographic trend, I fear.

  • Report this Comment On November 12, 2009, at 3:26 PM, plange01 wrote:

    the baby boom no .the 11 month old depression in the US yes!

  • Report this Comment On November 12, 2009, at 4:16 PM, stanton17 wrote:

    I've always read that the baby-boomers were terrible savers. And if I recollect properly, I think I've read a few of those articles here on TMF.

    Never mind... just thinking out loud.

  • Report this Comment On November 12, 2009, at 4:17 PM, stanton17 wrote:

    I've always read that the baby-boomers were terrible savers. And if I recollect properly, I think I've read a few of those articles here on TMF.

    Never mind... just thinking out loud.

  • Report this Comment On November 12, 2009, at 4:39 PM, TMFTypeoh wrote:

    Also note that IF assest prices fall, boomers will cut spending, and be less likely to sell their assets when they are low. In addition, if they took a big hit, they would be forced back into the work force.

    I also think that these boomers are work-a-holics, who need to keep providing their kids/grandkids with subsidies to help them maintain lifestyles that they cannot afford. Again, a major reason for them to continue to work, make money, and invest it in the market.

    However, this article does raise a good point in that investors would be wise to start to allocate more of their portfolios to foreign companies with much better growth prospects.

  • Report this Comment On November 12, 2009, at 6:41 PM, stockmenot wrote:

    I Am not very happy at the moment. I gave in to the subscription for 195.00 a year, with the promise of the name of the next big small cap.....and guess what? All I get is the 7 caps that have already been talked about. I do not like feeling tricked.

  • Report this Comment On November 13, 2009, at 11:00 AM, appealnow wrote:

    This article says nothing new. Wahrton Professor Jeremy Siegel wrote a book on it about 2 years ago.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1041199, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 2/10/2012 5:46:36 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 7 hours ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,890.46 6.51 0.05%
S&P 500 1,351.95 1.99 0.15%
NASD 2,927.23 11.37 0.39%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

2/9/2012 4:01 PM
IBM $193.13 Up +0.18 +0.09%
International Busi… CAPS Rating: ****
MS $20.34 Down -0.10 -0.49%
Morgan Stanley CAPS Rating: ***
PG $64.04 Up +0.40 +0.63%
The Procter & Gamb… CAPS Rating: *****
CVX $106.37 Down -0.39 -0.37%
Chevron Corp CAPS Rating: *****
AES $12.98 Up +0.04 +0.31%
The AES Corp CAPS Rating: ****
C $33.66 Down -0.57 -1.67%
Citigroup Inc CAPS Rating: ***
CEO $225.68 Up +3.66 +1.65%
CNOOC, Ltd. CAPS Rating: ****

Advertisement