Recs

3

Retirement Just Got Harder: The FHA Sets New Limits on Reverse Mortgages

Don't let it get away!

Keep track of the stocks that matter to you.

Help yourself with the Fool's FREE and easy new watchlist service today.

Bad news for seniors: Reverse mortgages just got significantly less attractive. Starting Sept. 30, new regulations will make it more difficult and more expensive to take advantage of the government's reverse-mortgage program.

What is a reverse mortgage?
The concept is fairly self-explanatory. With a mortgage, you make monthly payments to a lender. By contrast, with a reverse mortgage, you receive payments from a lender. The loan doesn't have to be repaid until you die, sell the house, or establish another primary residence.

Reverse mortgages are available to people 62 or older. The money can be used as supplemental retirement income, to pay for medical bills, for home improvements, or even to pay off your current mortgage. You are essentially converting part of your home equity into cash. As with any loan, you will pay interest on the amount borrowed.

New limitations
After two years with rates at historic lows, the Federal Housing Administration is attempting to mitigate insurance losses by imposing new restrictions on federally insured reverse mortgages. Here are the changes taking effect this fall:

  • First-year limit. A homeowner may now withdraw only up to 60% of the eligible sum during the first year. If, for example, a person can receive a reverse mortgage of $300,000, only $180,000 can be withdrawn in year one.
  • Smaller loans. Before the new rules, borrowers could take out as much as 61.9% of their home's value -- the limit depended on your age, your home value, and the prevailing interest rate. That same evaluation applies, but on average, borrowers will be able to take out about 15% less than they used to.
  • Fee changes. Previously, the upfront fee to take out a standard reverse mortgage was 2% of the property's value. The upfront fee to take out a saver reverse mortgage -- which limits you to a smaller amount you can borrow against your equity -- was 0.01%. Now, the upfront fee will be 0.5% across the board. Folks who take out more than 60% of their home's value will pay a 2.5% insurance premium.
  • Financial assessment. Lenders will now be required to analyze their borrowers' ability to keep up with tax and insurance payments before issuing a reverse mortgage. Lenders will look at income sources and credit history to determine the borrower's creditworthiness. If a lender decides you may not be able to make your payments, you will be required to set aside money.

The changes are intended to make people more careful about how they fund their retirement. The FHA wants borrowers to take out only what they need and what they can afford. The program strives to be less a safety net for financial emergencies and more a longer-term financial-planning tool. Of course, these changes present additional challenges to the already expensive process of retirement.


Read/Post Comments (3) | Recommend This Article (3)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On September 29, 2013, at 10:42 AM, jfl27511 wrote:

    why didn't you mention that this ONLY applies to loans that are STARTED AFTER September 30, 2013?

  • Report this Comment On September 29, 2013, at 10:47 AM, Dadw5boys wrote:

    hmm if they have a loan on the home the FHA will pay off the existing loan and give them enough each month to keep insurance on the house and do repairs ?

    Those people had better have good money management skills. One problem is that old women live forever. That is a lot of money to be paying out for 20 to 30 years if they live into their 90's,

  • Report this Comment On September 29, 2013, at 12:06 PM, greyhound44 wrote:

    Never for me.

    I retired on 31 Aug 2003 at age 58 3/4.

    Paid off my last debt - a 15 year mortgage - 4 years early in 1991.

    Sold that Dallas, TX house after nearly 25 years in 2004.

    Bought my first house (for cash) here in July 2003. Sold that for a cute US$86K untaxed net capital gain 25 months later in Aug 2005.

    Only fools have loans.

    ret expat MD

Add your comment.

DocumentId: 2659817, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 7/22/2014 8:53:20 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated Moments ago Sponsored by:
DOW 17,113.54 61.81 0.36%
S&P 500 1,983.53 9.90 0.50%
NASD 4,456.02 31.31 0.71%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes


Advertisement