A Paradox Reveals an Important Trend in U.S. Oil Productionhttp://www.fool.com/investing/general/2013/01/24/a-paradox-reveals-an-important-trend-in-us-oil-pro.aspx Arjun Sreekumar
January 24, 2013
The past year was an interesting one for the energy industry. Faced with incredibly low natural gas prices in the first half of the year, an increasing number of North American energy companies pulled rigs from natural gas, choosing to focus instead on crude oil.
While the oil-directed rig count ended the year higher than it did in the year-ago period, even rigs drilling for oil saw a steady decline each month starting in August of last year. Yet despite this decline, U.S. crude oil production ended the year on a high note and continues to rise. Let's take a closer look at this apparent paradox and the major trend in domestic energy production that it highlights.
An apparent paradox in the oil and gas production data
The data present an apparent paradox. Since August of last year, the oil-directed rig count has fallen every month, yet oil production is stronger than ever. According to the Energy Information Administration, domestic crude oil output increased by 39,000 barrels per day to 7.04 million last week, which represents the highest production level since 1993.
How can this be if the number of rigs has been in steady decline?
Explaining the paradox
Another major trend has been the drastic reduction in the amount of time it takes to drill a well. In fact, hundreds of energy companies have seen drastic reductions in drilling days thanks to incremental improvements in technology.
For instance, an improved control system for managed pressure drilling introduced by Weatherford International (NYSE: WFT) led to a sharp reduction in drilling days for Forest Oil, a Denver-based independent oil and gas company. During its initial application, Weatherford's technology, called the Microflux control system, allowed Forest Oil to cut the number of drilling days in the Haynesville Shale from 31 to 16.
A lot of these and other technological improvements have been introduced by oil-field services firms like Weatherford, which consistently pour tons of money into research and development. Schlumberger (NYSE: SLB), for instance, shelled out more than $1 billion for research and development in 2011.
Many other companies have also realized meaningful cost savings through employing longer laterals and optimizing the fracking process, which can include varying the number of "frac" stages, to maximize the total quantity of hydrocarbons recovered. The focus on maximizing output through efficiency is a relatively new development, driven by quickly rising marginal production costs.
How the efficiency trend took off
The FlexRig is a computerized drilling rig that permits the operator to move more quickly and efficiently between drilling locations. The innovative rig utilizes variable frequency drives and computerized drilling technology that can control major aspects of the drill bit, such as the amount of torque and drilling fluid pressure.
When designing the FlexRig, the company had one major goal in mind – to create a highly efficient and safe drilling rig. The value proposition eventually paid off, attracting the interest of dozens of energy companies.
Some of the earlier adopters of FlexRig were Williams Companies and Devon Energy (NYSE: DVN), both Oklahoma-based energy firms located within close geographical proximity of Helmerich & Payne's Tulsa headquarters.
Williams attested that FlexRigs save