BB&T Will Boost Buybacks, Not Dividendshttp://www.fool.com/investing/general/2013/09/19/bbt-will-boost-buybacks-not-dividends.aspx John Maxfield
September 19, 2013
The chief executive officer of BB&T (NYSE: BBT) recently announced that the bank is much more likely to boost buybacks next year as opposed to its quarterly dividend payout. "[Y]ou might think about us looking more positively toward buybacks as we head into 2014 relative to, say, the last two or three years," CEO Kelly King noted.
The issue of dividends versus buybacks is a hotly contested one. Company executives pitch it as a way to "return capital to shareholders." I, and others, have a different view -- and particularly when it comes to banks buying back their own stock.
A colossal waste of capital
In the five years between (and including) 2003 and 2007, Bank of America (NYSE: BAC) spent $40 billion to repurchase 768 million shares of its common stock. One year later, its capital base was so depleted it needed $45 billion from the federal government just to survive.
And Citigroup (NYSE: C) put itself in a nearly identical situation. In the decade before the crisis, it bought back $41 billion of its own stock. By 2009, it too required a $45 billion taxpayer-funded bailout to stay afloat.
How can a similar fate be avoided?
The answer, it turns out, is straightforward. As I discussed here, in order for a buyback to be accretive to book value on an ongoing basis, a bank should generally avoid repurchasing stock when it's priced at a multiple to book value that exceeds its return on equity.
U.S. Bancorp (NYSE: USB) serves as a perfect example. The Minnesota-based lender is one of the best in the country and accordingly trades for a dear 1.96 times book value. Thus, in order for a buyback program to be accretive to its book value