Workshop Portfolio

<FOOLISH WORKSHOP>

Keystone, the Big Stock Growth Screen      

By Moe Chernick (moebruin@excite.com)

El Segundo, CA (June 10, 1999) -- The Keystone is a mechanical stock strategy that, over the last 12 years, has doubled the Standard & Poor's 500 Index's average annual return without undue risk.

The screen has produced an average return of 31% per year from 1987-1998. In contrast, the S&P 500 averaged just under 18% over that time period. If you had invested $10,000.00 in Keystone at the beginning in 1987, you would have had $255,000 by the end of 1998, more than double what the Foolish Four would have returned to you over the same period and more than three times the cumulative return of an index fund. In those 12 years you would have suffered through only two losing years, 1990 and 1992, with a maximum loss of less than 3%. So today let's look at what Keystone is and how it works.

The Keystone was developed by Robert Sheard as a large-cap growth screen to complement the Foolish Four, which is a large-cap value screen. The screen selects high quality, large U.S. companies that have experienced strong price appreciation over the last six months. Let's look a little more closely at the screening process.

Since Robert Sheard intended to develop a screen of growth stocks similar to the Dow, the first hurdle is that a company must be based in the U.S. This also prevents some of the erratic returns that are common in some foreign markets.

The screen includes only stocks that are growing actively. This is the opposite of the Foolish Four, which looks for stocks that are out of favor. In order to find good growth stocks, the Value Line Investment Survey Timeliness rating is used. Rather than limit the screen to the most timely stocks, the screen searches through those ranked 1 or 2 to ensure that enough larger stocks are included in the pool from which stocks are selected.

Next we look at market capitalization to take advantage of the power and relative stability of the super caps. Large companies generally have a longer history and a proven record of returns and therefore tend to be more stable than smaller companies. This, of course, is true only relative to small growth stocks. It doesn't imply that the individual large cap stocks are more stable.

The final factor in Keystone is relative strength. It has been demonstrated that stocks that have gone up recently tend to outperform the market in the future. One good source for information about relative strength is What Works on Wall Street by James O'Shaughnessy.

Let's now put the four characteristics together to make the Keystone. First we filter out all non-U.S. stocks from the Value Line database. The screen next filters for stocks that have Timeliness ratings of 1 or 2. This gives you a list of less than 400 U.S. stocks that Value Line believes are the best buys now. The stocks remaining are sorted by market capitalization, largest companies first. The Dow has 30 stocks on it and therefore the top 30 stocks left on our list become our Keystone version of the Dow 30. This gives us a nice selection of large-capitalization stocks to choose from.

The 30 stocks remaining are then sorted by Value Line's 26-week Total Return -- obviously, the higher the recent total return, the better. The 26-week return is the relative strength portion of the screen. Why wasn't the IBD RS rating used? Only because of the difficulty of backtesting.

That's all there is to it. Take the top 5 stocks, and you have the Keystone 5. Hold those stocks for a year and repeat the process one year later. If you want to trade off returns for a bit more stability, you can take the top 10 from this list. The returns for the top 10 are only slightly less than those of the top 5, and the volatility is lower.

If you don't have Value Line, no problem. That's why the Workshop is here. Just click the link to Current Rankings below, look up Keystone ,and you'll get the complete list of 30 Keystone stocks in their proper order. The list is updated every Friday.

In my next article, we will look deeper into the theory and into the numbers to see why we believe that this screen will continue to work in the future.

Until next time, Fool on!

New Rankings | Workshop Returns


Workshop Portfolio


9/28/01 as of ~5:30:00 PM EDT

Ticker Company Price
Change
Daily Price
% Change
Price
AETAETNA INC NEW0.943.36%28.94
BABOEING CO(1.04)(3.02%)33.36
CATCATERPILLAR INC1.112.53%44.91
COGCABOT OIL & GAS 'A'0.693.59%19.90
DDDU PONT (EI) DE NEMOURS0.992.74%37.14
DGXQUEST DIAGNOSTICS(0.45)(0.73%)61.42
EKEASTMAN KODAK0.421.31%32.49
GMGENERAL MOTORS1.393.38%42.55
LHLABORATORY CORP AMER HLDG(NEW)1.141.42%81.21
MOPHILIP MORRIS COS(0.76)(1.55%)48.24
NEWPNEWPORT CORP0.261.90%13.97
NVRNVR INC(0.54)(0.38%)140.41
PKXPOHANG IRON & STEEL ADS1.097.51%15.61
PVNPROVIDIAN FINANCIAL1.075.64%20.04
QCOMQUALCOMM INC(0.40)(0.84%)47.16
RJRRJ REYNOLDS TOBACCO HLDGS(0.69)(1.19%)57.31
SLESARA LEE CORPUnchg.Unchg.21.09
UNFIUNITED NATURAL FOODS0.563.18%18.15
WMIWASTE MANAGEMENT(0.01)(0.04%)26.74

Overall Return -- total % Gained (Lost)
  Day Week Month Year
To Date
Since
Inception
(12/24/1998)
Workshop1.30%7.32%(12.02%)(20.66%)(18.91%)
Comparable S&P 500n/an/an/an/a(19.07%)
S&P 500 (DA)1.95%7.48%(8.33%)(21.22%)(14.88%)
NASDAQ2.02%4.71%(17.46%)(39.68%)(31.41%)
DJIA (DA)1.68%7.07%(11.07%)(17.86%)(2.22%)

Internal Rate of Return -- Annualized Rate of % Gained (Lost)
  Since Inception (12/24/1998)
Workshop(17.62%)
vs. S&P 500(17.63%)

Trade Date # Shares Ticker Cost/Share Price Total % Ret
1/8/0126MO40.9448.2417.82%
1/8/0122RJR50.1057.3114.39%
1/8/0167UNFI16.4518.1510.34%
12/24/9824CAT43.0844.914.24%
1/8/018NVR136.63140.412.77%
1/8/0140WMI27.4426.74(2.54%)
1/8/0150SLE22.5421.09(6.42%)
1/8/0161PKX17.8315.61(12.46%)
1/8/0115DD48.8337.14(23.95%)
1/8/0129AET38.1728.94(24.19%)
1/8/0139COG28.7519.90(30.79%)
1/8/0114QCOM75.5447.16(37.57%)
1/8/018LH134.6981.21(39.70%)
12/27/9918GM73.2642.55(41.92%)
1/8/0118BA59.5333.36(43.96%)
1/8/019DGX114.4961.42(46.35%)
12/27/9920EK65.0932.49(50.08%)
1/8/0120PVN55.5020.04(63.89%)
1/8/0115NEWP74.9613.97(81.36%)

Trade Date # Shares Ticker Total Cost Current Value Total Gain
1/8/0126MO$1,064.50$1,254.24$189.74
1/8/0122RJR$1,102.25$1,260.82$158.57
1/8/0167UNFI$1,102.12$1,216.05$113.93
12/24/9824CAT$1,034.00$1,077.84$43.84
1/8/018NVR$1,093.00$1,123.28$30.28
1/8/0140WMI$1,097.50$1,069.60($27.90)
1/8/0150SLE$1,126.88$1,054.50($72.38)
1/8/0161PKX$1,087.75$952.21($135.54)
1/8/0115DD$732.50$557.10($175.40)
1/8/0129AET$1,107.00$839.26($267.74)
1/8/0139COG$1,121.37$776.10($345.28)
1/8/0114QCOM$1,057.62$660.24($397.39)
1/8/018LH$1,077.50$649.68($427.82)
1/8/0118BA$1,071.50$600.48($471.02)
1/8/019DGX$1,030.44$552.78($477.66)
12/27/9918GM$1,318.62$765.90($552.73)
12/27/9920EK$1,301.75$649.80($651.95)
1/8/0120PVN$1,110.00$400.80($709.20)
1/8/0115NEWP$1,124.37$209.55($914.83)
 
Cash: 
Total: 
$10.80
$15,681.03
 

Key
• S&P 500 (DA) = dividend adjusted. Dividends have been added to the total return of the index.
• DJIA (DA) = dividend adjusted. Dividends have been added to the total return of the DJIA.

Note
Note: The Workshop Portfolio was launched on December 24, 1998, with $4,000 which was invested in the Foolish Four strategy. Approximately $15,000 was added on January 8, 2001, to support five additional mechanical strategies. At that time approximately $1000 was transfered out of the Foolish Four strategy to bring the Foolish Four into balance with the other strategies. (That's why the Foolish Four's overall return is not consistent with stock values.) Such rebalancing will take place each year among the strategies so that each will start out with approximately the same value at the begining of the year. No more cash additions are planned. The first four tables above show the overall performance of the portfolio. Below that we also track the performance of each component strategy. All transactions are announced publicly before being made, and returns are compared daily to the S&P 500 and the Dow. (Dividends are included in the yearly, historic and annualized returns.) Stocks are chosen using strategies developed by the Workshop community.