By
Let's first look at some of the non-analytical reasons for investing in multiple screens:
Let's look at the numbers and how developing a portfolio of screens affects them. For this example, I picked the following four screens:
I picked these because they would give an investor a nice diversity of both holding periods and stock types. The numbers below are annual returns for each strategy for the period 1986-1998. The Blend assumes an equal weighting of 25% in each strategy. (Note: 1999 numbers aren't included because 1999 fiscal year has just ended [i.e., June 2000] and those numbers are not yet available):
Year Key Spark PEG RS Blend
1986 25 26 47 28 32
1987 -15 -13 -23 -33 -21
1988 42 51 117 69 70
1989 23 18 23 39 26
1990 11 8 19 61 23
1991 24 41 12 26 26
1992 5 19 51 66 37
1993 13 13 14 -14 7
1994 24 21 47 52 36
1995 30 32 134 78 69
1996 40 39 44 31 39
1997 47 80 -4 36 40
1998 110 3 75 152 85
CAGR 26% 24% 37% 39% 33%
From this chart, one can draw a number of interesting conclusions.
I know what you are thinking: This is nice, but times have never been so volatile as the last 12 months. How would such a blend work for that period? I will answer that question next week when I report on a real money portfolio that was started 18 months ago and whose trades and results have been followed on the Foolish Workshop and the Mechanical Investing discussion boards since inception.
Until next time, Fool On!
RSS Headlines
Fool UK