POST OF THE DAY
Intel
Analysts v. the Companies

Format for Printing

Format for printing

Request Reprints

Reuse/Reprint

By throgsnk
August 8, 2001

Posts selected for this feature rarely stand alone. They are usually a part of an ongoing thread, and are out of context when presented here. The material should be read in that light. How are these posts selected? Click here to find out and nominate a post yourself!

Since the SEC precludes Companies from discussing their fortunes with analysts via whispers in smoke-filled rooms opting instead for full disclosure, it makes me wonder where these so-called, self-proclaimed "experts" get their information? The latest barrage designed to tank the semiconductor, equipment, and PC sector comes from CSFB with such phrases as: "Even when a bottom is established, growth from the bottom will be lackluster at best". Wait a second. Says who? Where are the sources of this information? Exactly which OEMs, Their customers, Purchasing Agents, Shoeshine Boy is disseminating this information? Why is it that these "unknown/unnamed sources" are so otherwise closed-mouth but "spill-their-guts" to CSFB at a time coincidentally that contradicts the first positive statements made by a technology company (INTC) in about a year?

The Pundits have unanimously held the position that the Market is a discounting mechanism that "foresees" 6-9 months into the future. However, according to CSFB in today's announcement: "In this climate, investors are wise to wait on the sidelines until there is evidence of an actual demand turn". Well, if we investors wait until "there is evidence of a demand turn", the only investors in the shares will be the ones that CFSB tells before it goes public with the information - assuming that CFSB knows what's it's talking about regarding demand (which, in my view, is a very large assumption indeed).

Another scintillating bit of nebulous advice from CSFB is: "the [typical] metrics used to measure the ebb and flow of the industry do not provide enough evidence to gauge when a rebound will occur or how deep and sustained it will be." What? Excuse me? The "typical" metrics? A deep rebound? I've never heard of a "deep rebound" -- is that anything like a "mountainous trench"?

Well, I'm a firm believer that CSFB's intention in disseminating the ton of rubble isn't to benefit investors -- rather it's just another attempt to drive the price of the shares in semis, equipment, and PC sector into the tank until, a few months hence, CSFB tells us that "the deep rebound" and the "mountainous trench" has run its course.