Logo of jester cap with thought bubble.

Image source: The Motley Fool.

Hess Corp  (HES 0.40%)
Q3 2018 Earnings Conference Call
Oct. 31, 2018, 10:00 a.m. ET

Contents:

  • Prepared Remarks
  • Questions and Answers
  • Call Participants

Prepared Remarks:

Operator

Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Third Quarter 2018 Hess Corporation Conference Call. My name is Jeje and I'll be your operator for today. At this time all participants are in listen-only mode. Later we will conduct a question and answer session. (Operator Instructions). As a reminder, this conference is being recorded for replay purposes.

I would now like to turn the conference over to Jay Wilson, Vice President of Investor Relations. Please proceed.

Jay Wilson -- Vice President of Investor Relations

Thank you. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for participating in our third quarter earnings conference call. Our earnings release was issued this morning and appears on our website at www.hess.com.

Today's conference call contains projections and other forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. These statements are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ from those expressed or implied in such statements. These risks include those set forth in the Risk Factors section of Hess' annual and quarterly reports filed with the SEC. Also, on today's conference call, we may discuss certain non-GAAP financial measures. A reconciliation of the differences between these non-GAAP financial measures and the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures can be found in the supplemental information provided on our website.

Now as usual, with me today are John Hess, Chief Executive Officer; Greg Hill, Chief Operating Officer; and John Rielly, Chief Financial Officer.

I'll now turn the call over to John Hess.

John B. Hess -- Chief Executive Officer

Thank you, Jay. Welcome to our third quarter conference call. I will provide a strategy update, Greg Hill will then discuss our operating performance and John Rielly will review our financial results. We delivered another strong quarter of execution with higher production than guidance and lower unit costs than guidance, while keeping capital and exploratory expenditures flat with guidance for the year and generating a profit for the quarter. We continue to execute our strategy to deliver capital efficient, growth in our resources and production, investing in the highest-return projects to move down the cost curve and be profitable in a lower price environment with increasing cash generation and returns to shareholders.

Fundamental to this strategy is our focused high return portfolio with Guyana and the Bakken as our growth engines, where we plan to invest about 75% of our capital and exploratory expenditures over the next five years and Malaysia and the deepwater Gulf of Mexico as our cash engines. Pro forma for our asset sales, our high graded portfolio is on track to deliver capital efficient compound annual production growth of approximately 10% through 2023, while driving cash unit costs down approximately 30% to less than $10 per BOE over the same period.

The combination of growth and margin expansion is expected to drive compound annual cash flow growth of approximately 25% through 2023 at a $60 per barrel Brent oil price. An integral part of our strategy is maintaining a strong balance sheet and liquidity position to ensure we have the financial capacity to fund our world-class investment opportunity in Guyana and maintain our investment grade credit rating.

Our position in Guyana is truly world-class in every respect and transformational for our company. As of June, gross discovered recoverable resources for the Stabroek Block where Hess has a 30% interest and ExxonMobil is the operator, have grown and are estimated to be more than 4 billion barrels of oil equivalent with multibillion barrels of additional exploration potential. In late August, we announced a ninth oil discovery on the block, at the Hammerhead-1 well located approximately 13 miles southwest of the Liza-1 well, proving a new play concept for potential development.

This month, a second exploration vessel, the Noble Tom Madden arrived to accelerate exploration and appraisal activities on the block, starting with the Pluma prospect located 17 miles south of Turbot, where we expect to spud in early November. The Liza Phase 1 development, which was sanctioned in June of last year is well advanced with first production of gross 120,000 barrels of oil per day expected by early 2020. Phase 2 development with gross production of 220,000 barrels of oil per day is on track for start-up by mid-2022. A third phase of development at the Payara Field is expected to have a gross production capacity of approximately 180,000 barrels of oil per day with first production in 2023.

We now see the potential to produce on a gross basis more than 750,000 barrels of oil per day by 2025 with industry-leading returns and cost metrics. Also key to our strategy is the Bakken, where we have a premier acreage position and a robust inventory of high return drilling locations with a significant infrastructure advantage. During the quarter, we continued testing, limited entry plug and perf completions and the higher proppant loadings and initial results are encouraging. In September, we added a sixth rig and we expect to generate capital efficient production growth of 15% to 20% per year through 2021, along with a meaningful increase in free cash flow generation over this period.

Now turning to our financial results, in the third quarter, we had net income of $52 million or $0.14 per share compared to a net loss of $624 million or $2.02 per share in the year ago quarter. On an adjusted basis, net income was $123 million or $0.38 per common share, compared with an adjusted net loss of $324 million or a $1.07 per common share in the third quarter of 2017. Compared to 2017, our improved third quarter financial results primarily reflect higher realized crude oil selling prices combined with lower operating costs and DD&A expense.

We had a strong operating performance across our portfolio. Third quarter production was above the high end of our guidance range, averaging 279,000 net barrels of oil equivalent per day excluding Libya. Net production from Libya was 18,000 barrels of oil equivalent per day in the quarter. For full year 2018, we expect production to average approximately 255,000 net barrels of oil equivalent per day excluding Libya, at the top end of our previous guidance of 245,000 to 255,000 net barrels of oil equivalent per day.

In the fourth quarter, production is expected to average approximately 265,000 net barrels of oil equivalent per day excluding Libya. Third quarter net production in the Bakken averaged 118,000 barrels of oil equivalent per day compared to 103,000 barrels of oil equivalent per day in the year ago quarter.

For the full year 2018, we continue to forecast that Bakken net production will average between 115,000 and 120,000 barrels of oil equivalent per day. In summary, our reshape portfolio is positioned to deliver a decade plus of capital efficient production growth with increasing cash generation and returns to shareholders. We look forward to providing a further update at our upcoming Investor Day on Wednesday, December 12 in Houston.

I will now turn the call over to Greg for an operational update.

Gregory P. Hill -- President and Chief Operating Officer

Thanks, John. I'd like to provide an update of our operational performance for the quarter as we continue to execute our strategy. In the third quarter, companywide production averaged 279,000 net barrels of oil equivalent per day, excluding Libya. This was nearly 10% above the midpoint of our guidance range of 250,000 to 260,000 net barrels of oil equivalent per day for the quarter and reflects strong performance across our portfolio. In the Bakken, production averaged 118,000 net barrels of oil equivalent per day, in line with our guidance for the quarter and we drilled 34 wells and brought 29 new wells online. Consistent with previous guidance, we added a sixth Bakken rig and a third frac spread in the third quarter.

For the fourth quarter, we forecast Bakken net production will increase to approximately 125,000 net barrels of oil equivalent per day and we expect to drill approximately 35 wells and bring 31 wells online, bringing the total for full year 2018 to 120 wells drilled and 100 new wells brought online. Average IP 180 for the year, which will be dominated by our 60 stage sliding sleeve completion design, is expected to exceed 125,000 barrels of oil, an increase of approximately 15% from full year 2017.

We are also seeing encouraging results from our transition to limited entry plug and perf completions. Of the 100 gross operated wells we now expect to bring online this year, approximately 30 are planned to be plug and perf. We will provide further details regarding these new high intensity completions, at our Investor Day in December. On August 31, we closed on the sale of our JV interest in the Utica shale play to Ascent Resources for approximately $400 million. As a result of the sale, fourth quarter net production will be reduced by approximately 10,000 net barrels of oil equivalent per day relative to the third quarter.

Turning to the Gulf of Mexico, net production came in well above guidance at 71,000 net barrels of oil equivalent per day, reflecting the return of production from the Conger Field in July, minimal weather-related downtime and strong operating performance across all assets. As a result, we are raising our full-year guidance to approximately 55,000 net barrels of oil equivalent per day. For the fourth quarter, we forecast Gulf of Mexico production to average approximately 65,000 net barrels of oil equivalent per day, which includes 6,000 net barrels of oil equivalent per day of planned downtime, primarily associated with an inspection of one of the risers of the Conger Field.

Now moving to the Gulf of Thailand, production from our Asian assets averaged 68,000 net barrels of oil equivalent per day during the third quarter. At the joint development area in which Hess has a 50% interest, production averaged 37,000 net barrels of oil equivalent per day in the third quarter. Production is forecast to average approximately 36,000 net barrels of oil equivalent per day over the full year 2018.

At the North Malay Basin, where Hess holds a 50% interest and is operator, production averaged 31,000 net barrels of oil equivalent per day in the third quarter, which came in higher than expected due to a one-time rebalancing of entitlement volumes. Production is forecast to average approximately 26,000 net barrels of oil equivalent per day in 2018.

Companywide, we forecast, fourth quarter production to be approximately 265,000 net barrels of oil equivalent per day, excluding Libya. Strong year-to-date performance across our portfolio enables us to raise our full-year guidance to approximately 255,000 net barrels of oil equivalent per day, which is at the upper end of our previous guidance range of 245,000 to 255,000 net barrels of oil equivalent per day, despite the loss of volumes associated with the sale of our Utica assets.

Now turning the exploration, in August, we announced our ninth discovery Hammerhead on the Stabroek Block, offshore Guyana in which Hess holds a 30% interest and ExxonMobil is the operator. The well, which is located about 13 miles southwest of the Liza-1 discovery well, encountered a 197 feet of high quality oil bearing Miocene-aged sandstone reservoir opening up a new play type. We recently completed a successful flow test and further appraisal activities are planned. The Stena Carron rig will now go to Las Palmas in the Canary Islands in Spain for recertification and is expected to return to the block in late December, when we plan to spud a well on the Upper Cretaceous Amara prospect located 24 miles southeast of the Turbot discovery.

A second exploration vessel, the Noble Tom Madden drillship has arrived in theater and is scheduled to spud a well on the Pluma prospect in early November. The well location is approximately 16 miles south of Turbot and will also target Upper Cretaceous Reservoirs on trend with the Turbot and Longtail discoveries. In Suriname, Kosmos announced earlier this month, that the Pontoenoe well on Block 42, in which Hess has a 1/3 interest failed to encounter commercial hydrocarbons and the well was expensed in the third quarter.

The partners are studying the results of the well and we'll reprocess seismic to improve our understanding of the subsurface and regional geology. We continue -- continue to see multiple additional large prospects on the block, which are independent from Pontoenoe and will be tested in 2020. In Canada, offshore Nova Scotia, BP continues drilling the Aspy play test well, targeting a large subsalt structure, analogous to those found in the Gulf of Mexico.

Moving to Guyana developments, Liza Phase 1 sanctioned in June 2017 remains on track, for first oil by 2020 with a nameplate capacity of 120,000 barrels of oil per day. Liza Phase 2 is also on track for first oil by mid-2022 with a nameplate capacity of 220,000 barrels of oil per day, and finally, Phase 3 is currently in feed with first oil expected in 2023. The operator is focused on maximizing value through rapid phase developments and accelerated exploration plans.

In closing, we have once again demonstrated strong execution in delivery and we're well positioned to deliver significant value to our shareholders. I will now turn the call over to John Rielly.

John P. Rielly -- Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Thanks, Greg. In my remarks today, I will compare results from the third quarter of 2018 to the second quarter of 2018. For the third quarter of 2018, we had net income of $52 million compared with a net loss of $130 million in the second quarter of 2018. On an adjusted basis, which excludes items affecting comparability of earnings between periods, we had net income of $123 million in the third quarter of 2018, compared with a net loss of $56 million in the previous quarter.

Turning to E&P, on an adjusted basis, E&P net income was $203 million in the third quarter of 2018, compared to $21 million in the second quarter of 2018. The changes in the after-tax components of adjusted E&P earnings between the third quarter and second quarter of 2018 were as follows.

Higher sales volumes increased earnings by $146 million, higher realized selling prices increased earnings by $65 million, lower cash costs increased earnings by $12 million, higher DD&A expense reduced earnings by $39 million, higher exploration expense reduced earnings by $13 million, all other items increased earnings by $11 million, for an overall increase in third-quarter earnings of $182 million.

Turning to Midstream, the Midstream segment had net income of $30 million in both the third and second quarter of 2018. Midstream EBITDA before the non-controlling interest amounted to $130 million in the third quarter compared to $126 million in the previous quarter. For corporate -- after tax corporate and interest expenses were $122 million in the third quarter of 2018, compared to $191 million in the second quarter of 2018. After tax adjusted corporate and interest expenses were $110 million in the third quarter of 2018, compared to $107 million in the previous quarter.

Turning to our financial position, excluding Midstream, cash and cash equivalents were $2.6 billion. Total liquidity was $7 billion, including available committed credit facilities and debt was $5.7 billion at September 30, 2018. Cash flow from operations before working capital changes and items affecting comparability was $738 million in the third quarter, while cash expenditures for capital and investments were $566 million in the quarter. Changes in working capital reduced cash flows from operating activities by $258 million in the third quarter, reflecting premiums paid of $105 million on WTI crude oil hedging contracts for calendar 2019 and a payment of $84 million related to previously accrued legal claims associated with our former downstream interests.

For calendar 2019, we have purchased WTI put options with a notional amount of 95,000 barrels of oil per day that have a monthly floor price of $60 per barrel. In the third quarter, we completed the sale of our joint venture interest in the Utica shale play for a net cash consideration of approximately $400 million. We also entered into a sale and leaseback agreement for a floating, storage and offloading vessel to handle produce condensate at our North Malay Basin project and receive net proceeds of approximately $130 million. The gross lease obligation is reported as debt on our balance sheet and we will recover our partner's share through future joint interest billings over the lease term. In the third quarter, we purchased $250 million of common stock, bringing total share repurchases under our previously announced $1.5 billion stock repurchase program to $1.25 billion. We plan to purchase the remaining $250 million in the fourth quarter.

Now turning to guidance. For E&P, in the third quarter, our E&P cash costs were $11.41 per barrel of oil equivalent, including Libya and $11.87 per barrel of oil equivalent, excluding Libya, which beat guidance on strong production and lower costs. On a pro forma basis, excluding Libya and Utica, which was sold in August, cash costs in the third quarter were $12.20 per barrel of oil equivalent. We project cash cost for E&P operations, excluding Libya in the fourth quarter to be in the range of $12.50 to $13.50 per barrel of oil equivalent, which includes planned maintenance costs at the Conger Field in the Gulf of Mexico.

Full year 2018 cash costs are expected to be $12.50 to $13.50 per barrel of oil equivalent, which is down from previous guidance of $13 to $14 per barrel of oil equivalent. DD&A expense in the third quarter was $16.14 per barrel of oil equivalent including Libya and $17.03 per barrel of oil equivalent, excluding Libya, which was below guidance. On a pro forma basis, excluding Libya and Utica, unit DD&A rates in the third quarter were $17.68 per barrel of oil equivalent.

DD&A expense excluding Libya is forecast to be in the range of $18 to $19 per barrel of oil equivalent in the fourth quarter of 2018 and full year DD&A expense is projected to be $17 to $18 per barrel of oil equivalent, which is down from previous guidance of $18 to $19 per barrel of oil equivalent. This results in projected total E&P unit operating costs, excluding Libya of $30.50 to $32.50 per barrel of oil equivalent for the fourth quarter and $29.50 to $31.50 per barrel of oil equivalent for the full year of 2018.

Exploration expenses excluding dry hole costs are expected to be in the range of $55 million to $65 million in the fourth quarter with full-year guidance expected to be in the range of $190 million to $200 million, which is in the lower end of our previous guidance. The Midstream tariff is projected to be approximately $170 million for the fourth quarter and approximately $655 million for the full year of 2018, which is up from previous guidance of approximately $635 million to $650 million. The E&P effective tax rate, excluding Libya, is expected to be a benefit in the range of 0% to 4% for the fourth quarter, the full-year effective tax rate is expected to be a benefit in the range of 7% to 11% which is updated from the previous guidance of a benefit in the range of 16% to 20%. For full year 2018, our E&P capital and exploratory expenditures guidance remains unchanged at $2.1 billion. Our 2018 crude oil hedge positions remain unchanged. We have $50 WTI put option contracts on a notional 115,000 barrels per day for the remainder of the year. We expect amortization of the premiums on these hedged contracts will reduce our financial results by approximately $50 million in the fourth quarter.

For calendar 2019, we have purchased $60 WTI put option contracts with a notional amount of 95,000 barrels of oil per day for $116 million. We expect amortization of the calendar 2019 option premiums will reduce our financial results by approximately $29 million per quarter in 2019. For Midstream, we anticipate net income attributable to Hess from the midstream segment to be approximately $30 million in the fourth quarter with the full-year guidance of approximately $115 million remaining unchanged. For corporate, for the fourth quarter of 2018, corporate expenses are estimated to be in the range of $25 million to $30 million and for the full-year guidance to be in the range of $100 million to $105 million, which is in the lower end of our previous guidance. Interest expenses are estimated to be approximately $85 million in the fourth quarter and approximately $340 million for the full year of 2018, which is also at the low end of our previous guidance.

This concludes my remarks, we will be happy to answer any questions. I will now turn the call over to the operator.

Questions and Answers:

Operator

(Operator Instructions). Your first question comes from the line of Bob Morris from Citigroup. Your line is now open.

Bob Morris -- CitiGroup -- Analyst

Thank you, nice quarter, John.

John B. Hess -- Chief Executive Officer

Thank you.

Bob Morris -- CitiGroup -- Analyst

Greg, on the Bakken, you've got 35 wells still to drill here in the fourth quarter. Looks like you've added five plug-and-perf wells to the slate. Where are those wells spread out between the four different areas in Q4 and where are you primarily drilling the plug-and-perf wells between Keene, Stony Creek, East Nesson, and Capa?

Gregory P. Hill -- President and Chief Operating Officer

Well they're actually spread out in a number of areas across the field. I don't have the actual well numbers in front of me, but it's really spread out over our whole position.

Bob Morris -- CitiGroup -- Analyst

Okay. I didn't know if there was one area that sort of was left for the year-end, so in the fixed rig this you just added, where -- where was that put, what area?

Gregory P. Hill -- President and Chief Operating Officer

That was put in the core.

Bob Morris -- CitiGroup -- Analyst

In Keene or Stony Creek?

Gregory P. Hill -- President and Chief Operating Officer

No, it was put in the East Nesson.

Bob Morris -- CitiGroup -- Analyst

East Nesson, okay. And then I was going to ask about the continued outperformance at Stony Creek and Keene, but I guess you'll give us an update on all that here in December?

Gregory P. Hill -- President and Chief Operating Officer

I will, absolutely on Investor Day.

Bob Morris -- CitiGroup -- Analyst

Okay, great. That's all I have for now. Thanks.

Operator

Thank you. Your next question is from Doug Leggate from Bank of America. Your line is now open.

Doug Leggate -- Bank of America -- Analyst

Thanks. Good morning.

Gregory P. Hill -- President and Chief Operating Officer

Good morning.

Doug Leggate -- Bank of America -- Analyst

I wonder if I could hit a couple of questions on exploration in Guyana to start off. Greg, I realize that Guyana is probably going to be a focus on December 12, but, I just wonder if you could touch on the visibility you have today? I want to reflect on comments you made back in August about potentially fast-tracking Hammerheads, that's not in the 750 or the more than 750 as I understand it and similarly the latest thoughts on the scale of Payara/Liza-3 and I've got a follow-up please?

Gregory P. Hill -- President and Chief Operating Officer

Okay, Doug. Well, -- first of all, Hammerhead -- we just completed it -- DSP, couple of comments on Hammerhead to start. This is a massive accumulation. A very thick sand package. In fact, it's the thickest single sand packages that we drilled on the block. It's a very large structure, so it's going to require some additional appraisal. What we can say is that the results of the DSP were good, meaning that the reservoir quality is excellent and the reservoir seems to be well connected. You're right to say that that will be Hammerheads accretive to the 4 billion barrels and it could -- it could jump the queue in some of the other, in terms of being ahead of some of the other phases that were on the Turbot cluster, but it's too early to say that because we need some additional appraisal before we make that final decision. But again, it is accretive to the 4 billion barrels. On the Payara cluster, as you mentioned were in feed. Right now, the vessel is sized at 180,000 barrels a day, but that's still under discussion and will be part of the final project sanction towards the end of 2019.

Doug Leggate -- Bank of America -- Analyst

Great. Thank you for that, Greg. And my follow-up on Guyana if I may, is the exploration program, you mentioned the amount of prospects. I just want to be clear, is that -- did that have another name, was that Escolar (ph) or is that something different? And if you could just give us an idea of where Ranger now fits in the queue, because my understanding was, Stana (ph) was going to go back to arrange our appraisal at some point?

Gregory P. Hill -- President and Chief Operating Officer

Yeah, Doug. You have a great memory, Amara is actually Escolar (ph), it used to be called Escolar. Regarding the sequence of exploration and appraisal next year that's still under discussion with the operator, we will let you know once we get our budget finalized in 2019 that ranger will be one of the things in the queue in 2019, obviously, but we've got some Hammerhead appraisal, we want to do. There's some more work that we want to do in the Turbot area. So all that sequence is still being worked out.

Doug Leggate -- Bank of America -- Analyst

A last -- last one from me if I may guys, this is for the two John's. John Hess, I realized you've made your thoughts on share buyback is quite clear, but I guess I'm looking at the strength of the cash flow this quarter -- the underlying cash flow, the demonstrable part of the portfolio, obviously in this environment is pretty punchy. What's the right level of cash to carry on the balance sheet and what is at the back of my mind really is, you've got your preference issue maturing next year, I'm just wondering if there is a potential offsetting buyback that could revert -- dilute that or offset that dilution, we're going to see next year, and I'll leave it there? Thanks.

John B. Hess -- Chief Executive Officer

Yeah, Doug, as you know, we are currently purchasing our stock under our current program. We constantly assess our allocation of capital, and as you know, we have been a leader among our peers and return of capital. So we will continue to balance investing in our highest-return projects and returning capital to shareholders, that's -- that's our investment proposition and that's the path we've been following and we will continue to follow.

Doug Leggate -- Bank of America -- Analyst

Great stuff. Appreciate the answers, guys. Thank you.

Operator

Thank you. Your next question comes from the line of Bob Brackett from Bernstein Research. Your line is now open.

Bob Brackett -- Bernstein Research -- Analyst

Good morning. I understand, you're probably not willing to talk too much about the 2019 program, but can you talk about the planning process and how you balance oil price uncertainty against the capital program and against building free cash flow?

John P. Rielly -- Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Sure, Bob. So the first thing, as you heard, that we were looking at. We've always looked at '19 again is with our bridge to Guyana coming in 2020 and we know we're investing in Phase 1 and now you know we are going to be also investing in Phase 2 and others that the first thing we did, we put the 95,000 barrels a day of WTI put options in place, so watching oil volatility, we made sure we put a floor on that price for us for a good part of our production to ensure that we have that base cash flow.

So we will, as you said, we'll be talking a lot more about this later on in our Investor Day, but while our budgeting process is under way. We are, really excited about our capital and exploratory expenditure program through 2025. We think it's distinctive kind of, as John Hess talked about earlier that will deliver capital efficient production growth to generate significant free cash flow over the period. So just to be high level, talking about the activity levels that Greg was discussing. Our 2019 budget will be closer to $3 billion, but it's important to note that all that incremental spend between '18 and '19 will be targeted in our view to two of the highest return investments in the E&P business and that's our Bakken and Guyana assets.

And then just going longer term and again we'll give more detail on this, but maintaining our disciplined capital allocation, we currently expect capital and exploratory expenditures to average approximately $3 billion per year through 2025 and the portfolio to be cash generative post 2020.

And I would tell you for now, what we are looking at from a planning assumption case is using a $60 WTI and a $65 Brent. But again, we'll provide more information later on in our Investor Day in December. But again really excited about that. Just specifically, because Greg had mentioned it, what's going on in the Bakken, it's basically the incremental spend is almost half and half between the Bakken and Guyana. So in Bakken, we're going to be operating six rigs, that's 30% higher rig count than 2018. And right now probably approximately 50% more wells online in '19 and '18. So the vast majority also of those wells in 2019 are expected to be the higher intensity plug and perf completions, which currently carry an incremental cost of about 1.5 million per well versus our previous sliding sleeve design. But these wells are expected to deliver increases in both IP rates and more significantly in NPV.

So it will result in our Bakken production exceeding our previous guidance of 175,000 barrels per day by 2021. Then in Guyana, we had the peak spend on Phase 1 in 2019 from our previous sanction release in 2019, it was about an $80 million increase in 2019 for Phase 1 and now you're going to see the commencement of spending for Phase 2 and remember a Phase 1, the initial year was $110 million. So Phase 2 is obviously, bigger than Phase 1, so you're going to see little more spending for that. As well now feed cost for FPSOs 3 and 4 most likely, and we are bringing the additional drillship in, the Noble Tom Madden for next year.

So that's kind of just high-level. We'll go into more detail on it, but again from our overall program, we are going to be generating significant free cash flow over the period because of these investments in Bakken and Guyana.

Bob Brackett -- Bernstein Research -- Analyst

Great, I appreciate the color. Quick follow-up, adding that second exploration rig to Guyana, can you talk about how many wells you can get down in 2019 and how you would split those across exploration of brand new concepts, exploration across the proven concepts and then kind of appraisals/development?

John P. Rielly -- Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Well Bob, obviously it depends on what we find as we continue to explore the block. Again that whole sequence hasn't been lined out yet with the operator, but we know that we want to do some more appraisal in Hammerhead, so there will be some more there. We know we've got some more exploration/appraisal around Turbot. We know that we've got appraisal at Ranger. We know that we're going to drill this Amara well, which could lead to more appraisal. And in addition to that, we have 20 additional prospects and leads that we'd like to drill on the block. So it's going to be a mix of exploration and appraisal and it really depends upon what we find as to how much appraisal we need. So we'll give you more color, when we do our budget in for 2019.

Bob Brackett -- Bernstein Research -- Analyst

Thank you.

Operator

Thank you. Your next question comes from the line of Brian Singer from Goldman Sachs. Your line is now open.

Brian Singer -- Goldman Sachs -- Analyst

Thank you. Good morning.

John P. Rielly -- Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Good morning.

Brian Singer -- Goldman Sachs -- Analyst

As we try to figure the cash flow piece of the equation for next year and we look specifically at the Gulf of Mexico where there is a -- nice step-up in production and it seems like maybe, you're free and clear of some of the issues over the last year and a half, is 70,000 barrels a day -- a BOE a day the new normal, when there is no downtime and how do you think about a more sustainable run rate of production and then the CapEx required to keep it there?

John P. Rielly -- Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

So what we've always said that in the Gulf of Mexico is that kind of 65,000 barrels a day is the level of production that we can maintain here for several years because of the tie-back opportunities that we have. So in 2019, we do have two rigs contracted, right. So we'll be completing the drilling and stampede with those two rigs. And then we talked about between sign of kind of like a $100 million and $150 million that we spend every year just to do some tie-back opportunities and hold that Gulf of Mexico production right around 65,000 barrels per day.

Brian Singer -- Goldman Sachs -- Analyst

Got it. Thank you. And then shifting to the Bakken -- and I guess, obviously we'll get more detail shortly here in December. But to follow up on the point you just made on the closer to 3 billion in '19 CapEx overall, can you talk more on the Bakken, specifically in terms of rig adds and then also expectations for well productivity/intensity and then also takeaway?

Gregory P. Hill -- President and Chief Operating Officer

Okay. Let me take the first two and then John can talk about the takeaway. Certainly our plan for next year is to hold six rigs flat. So we added that sixth rig in the third quarter and our plan is just to hold the rig count at six. As I mentioned, we're transitioning to plug and perf completion. So that'll be a 10 million pound per well proppant loading. That was confirmed as the optimum in the Bakken study. Just a few words about the Bakken study. Remember that was an independent third party look that examined over 10,000 wells, both ours and our competitors and the study confirmed a couple of things. First of all, it confirmed that our use of sliding sleeves and tight spacing during the downturn, maximized the SUNPV, which has always been our objective. And then secondly that the transition to plug and perf in 2018 as a result of improving technology and lower costs in that space is the right strategy to deliver more value going forward.

As John mentioned -- John Rielly mentioned previously, the cost of those wells currently right now is running about $7.5 million per well. So about a million a half above the sliding sleeve completion. However, just as we did with sliding sleeves, we begin to apply lean manufacturing to that process and we're reasonably confident that we can bring those well costs down over time as we apply lean manufacturing. But we will transition to that design over the remainder of 2018 and into 2019 on plug and perf. And again, we'll give more color on that in our Investor Day in December.

John P. Rielly -- Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Yeah. And Brian fair question in terms of takeaway. Our company does not have an issue in terms of takeaway capacity from the Bakken, because of the pre-investment we've done to have access to multiple export markets and that flexibility really positions us well to maximize the value of our sales netbacks. The recent widening in the Clearbrook differential began with October trading and is primarily the result of unusually high mid-continent refinery maintenance takeaway issue, where that maintenance shut in more than 1 million barrels per day of refinery capacity. We expect this refinery demand to return in December with differentials narrowing towards historical levels. And our strategy of having these multiple export markets to maximize the value of our sales netbacks recently in June when Clearbrook was a premium was about a $1 over WTI, were were actually maxing sales into the Clearbrook market. And in the current market, we are currently delivering about 70% of our crude to export markets, where we received Brent-based pricing, which is about $6 over WTI. And in terms of the future, we're well positioned now, but we will continue to look at potential pipeline expansions as they may occur and may add additional firm transportation in the future to further optimize our marketing efforts.

Brian Singer -- Goldman Sachs -- Analyst

Thank you very much.

Operator

Thank you. Your next question comes from the line of Michael Hall from Heikkinen Energy Advisors. Your line is now open.

Michael Hall -- Heikkinen Energy Advisors -- Analyst

Thanks, good morning. Just curious on the comment on the Williston and the new plug and perf focused program being able to deliver higher peak volumes relative to the prior 175 MBOE a day that you all had discussed. What -- any willingness to talk about what that new peak looks like and how long you can hold it and what sort of rig and annual completion cadence is required to do that?

John B. Hess -- Chief Executive Officer

No, we will talk about that at our Investor Day in December. But you're right, the peak is going to go up. Our current plan on the Bakken, which again we'll cover in the Investor Day, is to take it to that new peak level, drop the rigs to four and then hold it at that new peak level for a number of years. And yeah -- and that at that point the Bakken becomes a massive cash generator for the company. So cash flow will be significantly up in the Bakken. So as John Rielly mentioned, post 2020, you really have all of our assets generating free cash -- significant amounts of free cash flow. And then of course in 2022 when Phase 2 comes on, then Guyana becomes a major cash flow generating assets. So you'll have all four assets generating significant amounts of cash when Phase 2 comes on.

Michael Hall -- Heikkinen Energy Advisors -- Analyst

Okay, that's helpful. How about how long you can hold that peak, any commentary there at this point?

John P. Rielly -- Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

We'll again talk about that in December. But it will be multiple years.

Michael Hall -- Heikkinen Energy Advisors -- Analyst

Okay. And then I guess maybe just on Suriname, any additional color or commentary on what you guys have learned here postmortem on the initial test and sounds like additional activities are not planned until 2020, but any spending that we should expect in 2019 as it relates to that asset?

Gregory P. Hill -- President and Chief Operating Officer

No, I think, first of all, the Pontoenoe well encountered 63 meters of really high-quality reservoir. Unfortunately, it was wet, but now we're taking all that data from the well and we're going to recalibrate the seismic, rerun all the seismic, and that will help inform future exploration in Suriname. But despite the dry hole, we still believe the block has significant resource potential as there's multiple plate types on the block. So as you mentioned, current thinking is we won't get back to drilling until 2020 on the block and give us a good amount of time to reprocess things and understand what we saw.

Michael Hall -- Heikkinen Energy Advisors -- Analyst

Okay. Great. That's helpful, thanks.

Operator

Thank you. Your next question comes from the line of Arun Jayaram from JPMorgan. Your line is now open. Arun, your line is now open.

Arun Jayaram -- JPMorgan -- Analyst

John, appreciate your comments on the Bakken takeaway, where I think you are better positioned than your peers given your 50k BD or so on DAPL, et cetera, and I think you only sell about 20% in the local markets today. My question is, as we think about the incremental barrel that you produce in the Bakken -- in our model we have you going from the mid-70s in oil to the low 90s in oil. So for those incremental barrels, where would you be selling those, would they be on rail, et cetera? So just trying to understand what kind of diffs you could see on the incremental barrels that you're producing next year?

John B. Hess -- Chief Executive Officer

Yeah. Good question, Arun. Our plan would be to continue to access Brent-based pricing between pipeline deliveries to the Gulf Coast and also rail deliveries either to the Gulf Coast, East Coast or West Coast.

Arun Jayaram -- JPMorgan -- Analyst

Got it, got it. And that's based on real capacity that you have today or one -- (technical difficulty).

John B. Hess -- Chief Executive Officer

Yeah, we're positioned for this now. And we'll also look at, as I said, potential pipeline expansions and may add additional firm transportation on those to ensure that we continue to optimize our differentials by getting access to offshore Brent-based pricing.

Arun Jayaram -- JPMorgan -- Analyst

Okay. And I understand you guys are going to leave quite a bit for the Bakken for the December update, but the plan is -- as I understand is to do about 50% more POPs that are tied in line in the Bakken in 2019, is that correct, like 150 wells or so?

John P. Rielly -- Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Yes, yes. That's -- you can make that assumption there with the six rigs -- six rigs, right around 150, maybe a little bit more.

Arun Jayaram -- JPMorgan -- Analyst

Got it. My final question is, John, you mentioned that CapEx could approach $3 billion or so in 2019. Is that just an E&P level or does that include with the consolidation of the Midstream, the Midstream piece of that as well or if you could separate the two, that would be helpful?

John P. Rielly -- Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

That's -- that's the E&P portion and includes the spend for exploration as well. So just that E&P, yeah.

Arun Jayaram -- JPMorgan -- Analyst

Okay, thanks a lot.

Operator

Thank you. Your next question comes from the line of Paul Cheng from Barclays. Your line is now open.

Paul Cheng -- Barclays -- Analyst

Hey guys, good morning.

John B. Hess -- Chief Executive Officer

Good morning.

Paul Cheng -- Barclays -- Analyst

Two quick questions. John, on the well capacity, can you just tell us that, how much you plan to ship from Bakken in the fourth quarter and also that we heard from people saying that the well operator that they are unwilling to increase the volume unless you are willing there to sign multiple year contract, is that what you guys are seeing?

John P. Rielly -- Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

In terms of takeaway capacity right now, I mentioned it before, is about 70% of our crude is going to export markets where we can receive Brent-based pricing most of it on DAPL to out to Nederland and then some to both the East Coast and West Coasts via train. And in terms of going forward, there are multiple pipeline expansion opportunities, we're looking at them, and the terms and conditions of those vary.

Paul Cheng -- Barclays -- Analyst

Can you share with us that how much is the cost for you to move from Bakken to the East Coast, if you're going to value it?

John B. Hess -- Chief Executive Officer

Well, I'll tell you, what I would say is going down south to Nederland is about $7 and train is a little bit higher than that, West Coast being closer to that number, East Coast being a little higher.

Paul Cheng -- Barclays -- Analyst

Okay, thank you.

Operator

Thank you. Your next question comes from the line of Roger Read from Wells Fargo. Your line is now open.

Roger Read -- Wells Fargo -- Analyst

Read, whatever it needs to be today, I guess. Good morning guys.

John B. Hess -- Chief Executive Officer

How are you doing?

Roger Read -- Wells Fargo -- Analyst

Doing alright, thanks. Just one thing I'd like to follow up on the CapEx side, the move from kind of $2.1 billion, $2.2 billion this year to $3 billion overall, you mentioned kind of half between the Bakken and half between Guyana, what's -- since we had obviously a little spending on Utica and maybe some other places, this year, kind of what's the right increment is that to think about it as $900 million and $450 million, $450 million or it's a larger number, as you -- the starting point is slightly different? And then maybe the other way to think about it is, does the exploration spending go up from here relative to what we've seen, which I would think has to happen given a second rig in Guyana and then potential in 2020 to restart in Suriname. So maybe just a little clarity on that if you could?

John P. Rielly -- Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Sure. So first, outside, like you said Utica or assets like that, we were not spending much capital in 2018 on that. So the base that you should start with is the $2.1 billion because our capital guidance remains unchanged, and so they're moving up, I'd say, going to that -- closer to $3 billion. There is a little bit more going to Bakken than Guyana. And if you can just -- I'll do some simple math for you, Bakken guidance was approximately $900 million for this year. We're about at four and three quarter rigs and we're going to six rigs for the full year. On average we are four and three quarter rigs. Just do the math on that, you'll get about 240 million just with everything being exactly the same. Then as Greg and I had mentioned, the current plug and perf wells are approximately 1.5 million higher, we're going to be drilling a lot more of them next year than we did this year. So just simply, if you took that 150 times, 1.5, put our working interest around 80% or so in it, you can kind of see how you're getting to the numbers there in the Bakken. So it's simply like that. And then Guyana, it's exactly what I talked about before. It's just the additional drill ship, that factors in for exploration. So when I was talking about Guyana that included this additional exploration spend of that additional drill ship.

John B. Hess -- Chief Executive Officer

Yeah, and Roger, just again to -- I'd say reemphasize the point that John made earlier, the increment in CapEx is going to very high-return projects. The increment being probably in the range of 30% to 50% IRRs, very quick paybacks. While next year we'll ramp up in CapEx, we should start becoming cash flow positive in a $60 WTI, $65 Brent world.

In 2020, covering the CapEx and dividend, we should become cash flow generative there. And then the outlook going past that, we'll go over this in Investor Day is that CapEx going forward probably is going to be in the range of $3 billion, holding flat out to 2025. So our portfolio becomes very cash generative, putting us in a great position to balance investing in the business in the high returns going forward and also returning capital to our shareholders.

Roger Read -- Wells Fargo -- Analyst

That's great clarity. Thank you.

Operator

Thank you. Our next question is from Jeffrey Campbell from Tuohy Brothers, your line is now open.

Jeffrey Campbell -- Tuohy Brothers -- Analyst

Good morning.

John B. Hess -- Chief Executive Officer

Good morning.

Jeffrey Campbell -- Tuohy Brothers -- Analyst

I wanted to just ask a quick question regarding the expectations for the Pluma exploration well that you mentioned in the press release. And I'm really asking this because I'm trying to get some sort of a feel for how the hubs are going to develop. If it was successful, would it more likely be a tie-in to Turbot or could it potentially support stand-alone production?

Gregory P. Hill -- President and Chief Operating Officer

No, I think it will be part of that, what we call the greater Turbot complex. We're really trying to define that to understand how many vessels it's going to take to evacuate that, right, that area. There is a lot of accumulations there that we want to get a drill bit in.

Jeffrey Campbell -- Tuohy Brothers -- Analyst

Okay, that's helpful. Thank you. And I just wanted -- a quick question, just a little color on the improved Bakken well performance that was mentioned in the press release. So I was just wondering, is there anything there going at the completion kit or was this just an example of exceeding prior expectations?

Gregory P. Hill -- President and Chief Operating Officer

No, I think it's just continuous improvement in completion practices. You know that number that I gave you is primarily dominated by sliding sleeve. So recall, this year, we increased the proppant loading in our 60 stage sliding sleeves to 140,000 pounds per stage. So that's about 8.4 million pounds on the sliding sleeve. So that, primarily that number I gave you reflects that increase in proppant in sliding sleeve.

In addition to that, we're also transitioning to plug and perf and based on the results of the Bakken study and some of the very preliminary results that we got from our early plug and perf trials that moved to 10 million pounds is going to be very value accretive. So, we'll give you some more color on that in December, but that will be to -- the first jump was sliding sleeve move, the next jump will be plug and perf and you'll get an increment on each of those.

Jeffrey Campbell -- Tuohy Brothers -- Analyst

Okay, great. That's very helpful. I look forward to the Analyst Day in December. Thank you

Operator

Thank you. Our next question is from Paul Sankey from Mizuho. Your line is now open.

Paul Sankey -- Mizuho Securities -- Analyst

Hi everyone.

John B. Hess -- Chief Executive Officer

Hi.

Paul Sankey -- Mizuho Securities -- Analyst

Actually John Hess just hit the nail on the head, I was going to ask about the run rate of CapEx given next year's number, but you clearly answered that one so thank you there. One, maybe I could ask on DD&A coming down. Could you give the outlook for that dynamic, what caused it to come in below expectations and what do you think the outlook is there? Thank you.

John B. Hess -- Chief Executive Officer

And Paul, before John Rielly answers it, I understand, congratulations are in order for your marriage. So I want to get that out first.

Paul Sankey -- Mizuho Securities -- Analyst

I appreciate that, John. Thank you very much indeed.

John P. Rielly -- Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Paul, the DD&A in the third quarter, really the better performance in guidance was due to the production. So, what we had was that higher production in the Gulf of Mexico with lower DD&A and so that's what's driving that third quarter DD&A rate down. And then on a go forward basis, as we project into the future kind of what John was talking about with always our capital being focused in those high return Bakken and Guyana assets, we continue to see over this period through 2025 that our DD&A rate will continue to come down and we'll give more information on that on the Investor Day.

Paul Sankey -- Mizuho Securities -- Analyst

Great. Thank you gentlemen.

Operator

Thank you. Your next question comes from the line of Pavel Molchanov from Raymond James. Your line is now open.

Pavel Molchanov -- Raymond James -- Analyst

Thanks for taking the question. It seems like every week now, there is a parent company that is taking back in, acquiring its MLP. In that context, I thought it would get your thoughts on how committed you are and Global Infrastructure Partners is to maintaining Hess Midstream as a stand-alone public entity?

John P. Rielly -- Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Yeah, so, I mean it hasn't been that long since we've done the IPO of the Midstream and the Midstream has been performing fantastically. And it's been a great partner for us in this build out of infrastructure. And as we're going to talk about, obviously moving to the plug and perf and our increase in production above the 175, having that Midstream partner GIP and Hess Midstream overall has -- will really help us in that. And as John had mentioned before in our takeaway capacity, is really just in general put us in a great place from a revenue standpoint and a cost standpoint. So where we are with that, I know what you've been talking about where we have been watching that happen in the market, but where it's early days, we've got plenty of growth left in that public Midstream vehicle that we have. We're happy with this performance and expect it to continue to perform well.

Pavel Molchanov -- Raymond James -- Analyst

And one question about Guyana that you may -- maybe hold off on this until the Analyst Day. But, you're very close to approving Phase 2, you're talking about five total. For a country as small as Guyana and that has never had an oil industry, are you facing any labor shortages or other kinds of bottlenecks, as you're creating essentially a brand new value chain where none has existed before?

Gregory P. Hill -- President and Chief Operating Officer

No. So far there is no issues with labor shortage. Remember this is an offshore development. So the majority of everything is floated in right and the work is all done offshore. And I think ExxonMobil as operator has done a great job in maximizing local content where possible.

Paul Sankey -- Mizuho Securities -- Analyst

All right. Appreciate it guys.

Operator

Thank you. Your next question comes from the line of Doug Leggate from Bank of America. Your line is now open.

Doug Leggate -- Bank of America -- Analyst

Hey guys, sorry for lining up again. I just wanted to clarify something on the capital program. So, John Rielly -- I know you don't want to give details on the Guyana fiscal contract, but exploration costs on the entire block as I understand it can be recovered from any revenue, is that still the case? In which case, once you've got first oil what can you say about the cost recovery on the exploration dollars?

John P. Rielly -- Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

The contract works as the whole block is the ring fence. So all costs can be recovered once production starts. So you are correct in what you said.

Doug Leggate -- -- Analyst

That applies to development dollars on subsequent phases as well?

John P. Rielly -- Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Yes, it does.

Doug Leggate -- -- Analyst

Great stuff. Thank you. And just one final quick one on the MLP, given that question, just got asked, is your plan still to monetize units from the MLP over time?

John B. Hess -- Chief Executive Officer

We are committed to the MLP and we don't have the need as Hess to monetize anything right now and neither does GIP because basically the drop-downs from Hess go into Midstream Partners. And we have a multi-year runway where we don't need to do any drop-downs into the MLP. So I just want to be clear. And I also want to be clear that Hess and GIP are committed to the MLP and continuing the growth trajectory and really maximizing value from our investment in the midstream business.

Doug Leggate -- Bank of America -- Analyst

Great. Thanks fellows.

Operator

Thank you very much. This concludes today's conference. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect. Have a great day.

Duration: 62 minutes

Call participants:

Jay Wilson -- Vice President of Investor Relations

John B. Hess -- Chief Executive Officer

Gregory P. Hill -- President and Chief Operating Officer

John P. Rielly -- Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Bob Morris -- CitiGroup -- Analyst

Doug Leggate -- Bank of America -- Analyst

Bob Brackett -- Bernstein Research -- Analyst

Brian Singer -- Goldman Sachs -- Analyst

Michael Hall -- Heikkinen Energy Advisors -- Analyst

Arun Jayaram -- JPMorgan -- Analyst

Paul Cheng -- Barclays -- Analyst

Roger Read -- Wells Fargo -- Analyst

Jeffrey Campbell -- Tuohy Brothers -- Analyst

Paul Sankey -- Mizuho Securities -- Analyst

Pavel Molchanov -- Raymond James -- Analyst

More HES analysis

Transcript powered by AlphaStreet

This article is a transcript of this conference call produced for The Motley Fool. While we strive for our Foolish Best, there may be errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in this transcript. As with all our articles, The Motley Fool does not assume any responsibility for your use of this content, and we strongly encourage you to do your own research, including listening to the call yourself and reading the company's SEC filings. Please see our Terms and Conditions for additional details, including our Obligatory Capitalized Disclaimers of Liability.