Image source: The Motley Fool.
Silgan Holdings Inc (SLGN 0.19%)
Q1Â 2019 Earnings Call
April 24, 2019, 11:00 a.m. ET
Contents:
- Prepared Remarks
- Questions and Answers
- Call Participants
Prepared Remarks:
Operator
Please stand by. Thank you for joining the Silgan Holdings First Quarter 2019 Earnings Results Conference Call. Today's call is being recorded.
At this time, I'd like to turn the call over to Kim Ulmer, Vice President, Finance and Treasurer. Please go ahead.
Kim Ulmer -- Vice President, Finance and Treasurer
Thank you, joining me from the Company today, Anthony Allott, Chairman and CEO; Adam Greenlee, President and COO and Bob Lewis, EVP and CFO. Before we begin the call today, we would like to make it clear that certain statements made today on this conference call may be forward-looking statements. These forward looking statements are made based upon management's expectations and beliefs concerning future events impacting the Company and therefore, involve a number of uncertainties and risks, including but not limited to those described in the company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2018 and other filings with the SEC. Therefore, the actual results of operations or financial condition of the Company could differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements.
With that, I'll turn it over to Tony.
Anthony J. Allott -- Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Thanks, Kim. Welcome everyone to Silgan's first quarter 2019 earnings conference call. I'll start by making a few comments about the highlights of the first quarter and provide a brief update regarding our outlook for the remainder of the year. Bob will then review the financial performance for the first quarter and provide further details around our 2019 outlook. Afterwards Bob, Adam and I'll be pleased to answer any questions.
As you saw in the press release, our first quarter results exceeded our earnings estimates, as we delivered adjusted earnings per share of $0.46, as compared with $0.42 in the prior year. Since there are several unique items impacting the year-on-year comparisons, let me just summarize that we're pleased with the initial performance of each of our businesses. The buy forward in Q4 of 2018 ahead of nearly 20% inflation in North American steel market did as expected negatively impact volumes in the metal food cans. But we were pleased with the resilience in the general market demand patterns in the first quarter, as well as the good operating cost performance. Our closure business also experienced some impact in the metal closure volumes in the quarter due to significant steel inflation. More significantly, results in our closure business were negatively impacted by onetime restructuring charges of $5.7 million, as we proactively reduced our European cost footprint and by negative impact from foreign exchange. Our cost control is excellent and we continue to expect full-year volume growth.
Our Plastic Containers business continues to gain traction with another quarter of volume growth and improved operational performance. Despite exceeding our first quarter earnings estimate and delivering solid performance thus far, we're maintaining our full-year guidance at this early stage of the year. Therefore, our estimate for the full-year adjusted earnings per diluted share remains at $2.20 as compared to $2.08 in 2018 which did benefit by $0.13 per share of higher pension income. We also anticipate improved results from operations in the second quarter and provide an estimated range of $0.51 to $0.56, as compared to $0.52 in the second quarter of 2018.
With that, I'll turn over to Bob.
Robert B. Lewis -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Thank you, Tony. Good morning, everyone. Overall results for the first quarter 2019 compared favorably to prior year and our estimate. We delivered adjusted earnings per diluted share of $0.46, an increase of nearly 10% versus the prior year period and modestly better than our estimate of $0.40 to $0.45, largely due to better than expected food can performance.
On a consolidated basis, net sales for the first quarter 2019 increased 1.5% versus the prior year totaling $1.30 billion, as the metal container and plastic businesses delivered top line improvement, while closures declined slightly. Net sales benefited from the pass through of higher raw material cost across the businesses, better volumes in the plastic business and favorable mix in the closures business. These increases were partially offset by unfavorable FX translation of approximately $20 million, primarily related to declines in the Euro and lower unit volumes in the metal container and closures business, largely a result of customer pre-buy activity around significant metal inflation.
We converted these sales in income before interest and taxes for the quarter of $86.7 million, versus $92.2 million in the prior year quarter, primarily as a result of higher rationalization charges related to the announced shutdown of our metal closures facility in Spain, lower unit volumes in the metal container and closures businesses, largely a result of customer pre-buy activity, lower non-cash pension income of $5.1 million spread across all businesses and unfavorable foreign currency translation of approximately $2 million. These negative drivers were partially offset by improved manufacturing efficiencies across each business, a larger seasonal inventory building containers as compared to the first quarter of 2018 in which we reduced our seasonal build, a favorable impact from the lagged pass through of lower raw material costs, higher volumes in plastics and a favorable mix of products sold in closures.
Interest and other debt expense declined $3.4 million versus the prior year quarter. The decrease was primarily due to lower average outstanding borrowings, as we used free cash flow to repay outstanding debt at the end of 2018. Our first quarter 2019 effective tax rate was 21.6% as compared to the '18 rate of 25.9%. The first quarter 2019 rate benefited from the timing of certain tax deductions recognized in the quarter, primarily as a result of divesting of RSU based compensation and changes in certain state tax rate, while the 2018 rate was unfavorably impacted by higher income and less favorable tax jurisdictions.
Capital expenditures for the first quarter 2019 totaled $61.7 million, as compared to $49.2 million in the prior year. On a full-year basis, we expect capital expenditures to be approximately $200 million in this year, as compared to $191 million in the prior year. Additionally, we paid a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share in March, with a total cash cost of $14.2 million.
Details for each of our business franchises are as follows. The metal container business recorded net sales of $507 million, up $21 million versus the prior year. This increase was primarily due to the pass through of higher raw material and other manufacturing costs, partially offset by lower unit volumes and the impact of unfavorable foreign currency translation of approximately $5 million.
Unit volumes were down approximately 4% as a result of customer pre-buy activity in the fourth quarter of 2018 in advance of significant 2019 steel inflation and the prior year competitive loss of a customer. These declines were partially offset by continued growth in pet food. Segment income in the metal container business was $38.9 million, an increase of $1.8 million versus the prior year. This increase was primarily attributable to a larger seasonal inventory build in the first quarter of 2019, versus the prior year and improved manufacturing efficiencies, partially offset by a decline in unit volumes and lower pension income.
Net sales in the closures business were $356.2 million, a decrease of $14.1 million, primarily due to the impact from unfavorable foreign currency translation of approximately $13 million and 2% lower unit volumes as a result of US and European customer pre buy activity for metal closures around significant steel inflation. These reductions were principally offset by the pass through of higher raw material costs and a favorable mix of products sold.
Segment income in the closures business decreased $8 million to $40.2 million in the first quarter of 2019, primarily due to higher rationalization costs of $5.7 million, principally associated with the announced shutdown of the metal closures facility in Spain, lower unit volumes, unfavorable foreign currency translation of approximately $2 million and lower pension income. These costs were partially offset by favorable impact of the lagged pass through of lower raw material costs and a favorable mix of products sold.
Net sales in the Plastic Containers business increased $7.9 million to $163.9 million in 2019, principally due to the pass through of higher raw material costs and approximately 2% improvement in volumes. Partially offset by the impact of unfavorable foreign currency translation of approximately $1 million. Segment income increased $1 million to $12.1 million for the quarter, largely attributable to higher volumes and lower manufacturing costs, partially offset by lower pension income.
Turning now to our outlook for 2019, we're off to a strong start and are reconfirming our estimate of adjusted earnings per diluted share for 2019 in the range of $2.10 to $2.20, which includes an unfavorable non-cash pension impact of $0.13 per diluted share, as a result of significant market value declines in the fourth quarter of 2018, that negatively impact the assets held in the Company's pension plan. This compares to adjusted net income per diluted share in 2018 of $2.08.
We're also providing a second quarter 2019 estimate of adjusted earnings in the range of $0.51 to $0.56 per diluted share, as compared to adjusted net income per diluted share of $0.52 in the second quarter of 2018. We anticipate improvements in each of our businesses despite the negative non-cash pension impact of $0.03 per diluted share. The quarter and full-year estimates of adjusted net income per diluted share exclude rationalization charges and loss on early extinguishment of debt.
Based on our current outlook for 2019, we're also maintaining our free cash flow guidance of approximately $275 million, as compared to $311 million in 2018, which benefited from the significant inventory reduction program in metal containers. That concludes our prepared comments and I'll ask that everyone limit their time to one question and one follow-up.
With that, I'll turn it over to Jessica to provide directions for the Q&A session.
Questions and Answers:
Operator
Thank you. (Operator Instructions) We'll go now to Scott Gaffner with Barclays.
Scott Gaffner -- Barclays -- Analyst
Thanks, good morning, guys.
Robert B. Lewis -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Hey, Scott.
Anthony J. Allott -- Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Good morning, Scott.
Scott Gaffner -- Barclays -- Analyst
Hey, Bob. Hey, Tony, just quickly on metal containers, I mean the -- it sounds like the impact of the pre-buy wasn't as negative as you expected. Is there something else going on there other than the pet food picking up that you discussed? And how should we think about, I think before you were talking about I recall correctly about 4% unit volume declines for the full-year with 1% from the base business and 3% from pre-buy, is that still a good number or how should we think about that?
Adam J. Greenlee -- President and Chief Operating Officer
Hey, Scott it's Adam.
Scott Gaffner -- Barclays -- Analyst
Hi, Adam.
Adam J. Greenlee -- President and Chief Operating Officer
Good questions. as far as the metal container business is concerned and what happened in the first quarter, you're right, we did anticipate full-year volumes down in the 4% range, you've got the numbers right, 3% of that 4% was due to the pre-buy. That would have really impacted Q1 and Q4 and the balance of the year would have been roughly comparable to prior year.
So the pre-buy given the nature of our metal food can business is pretty well defined, so there really was no change to the pre-buy. What had happened in Q1 for us was we did see again good volume and growth in our pet food market. We saw a little bit better volume in the soup market as well. And then the customer that we've been talking about that's been managing their inventory which was a big part of our projection for 2019 volume did a little bit better from a volume standpoint than we anticipated. And as we've been in regular dialogue with them, we've now come to understand that they're reassessing some of their strategy both from a driving inventory down perspective and also from an exiting certain aspects of their business perspective.
So at this point, we're very pleased with the volume that came through in the first quarter. Again we're still talking with that customer about the impact of inventory and management of Q2. But as we sit here in Q2, our expectation would be a little bit down versus prior year probably in that 1% range, with the possibility of getting back to flat. If that customer inventory management program look something like it did in Q1.
Scott Gaffner -- Barclays -- Analyst
Okay. And just as a follow-up to that, when we look at the weather in California and then in the Midwest maybe the Midwest is in -- wasn't close enough to you from where you're -- most of your customers are. But can you talk about what gives you confidence in the normalized harvest 2019 despite some negative weather impacts to start the year?
Adam J. Greenlee -- President and Chief Operating Officer
Sure. I think you've got it right as far as where our customers are located in those growing region. So, typically we're a little further north in the Midwest and where most of the flooding occurred. So as we look at the packs right now, our early packs are already in the ground. They look good. They're 100% contracted as far as the acreage or tonnage. And we feel good about the early packs. Those are things like sweet peas et cetera. Corn, green beans again are 100% contracted from a volume standpoint. And those are starting to go in the ground now. Again no real delays as far as we're concerned and where our product is grown. If we go to the West coast with fruit and tomatoes, really no change to our expectation. Tomato tonnage is up slightly versus 2018 in total. But as we've talked about before that really doesn't affect the canned volume portion of that. Can volumes protected if volumes are down for total tonnage and really it's pretty secure if volumes go up, it goes more to paste and other products.
Scott Gaffner -- Barclays -- Analyst
Perfect. I appreciate it. Thanks.
Operator
We'll now take a question from Anthony Pettinari with Citi.
Anthony Pettinari -- Citi Group -- Analyst
Good morning. I was wondering if you could -- why don't you if you could talk a little bit about what you're seeing in European metal containers. It seems like the industry has a extremely easy comp this year with the pack season, last year you're taking some footprint rationalization moves. And I think a competitor has talked about some competitive pressure in the industry. I was wondering if you could just kind of talk generally about what you're seeing in Europe.
Adam J. Greenlee -- President and Chief Operating Officer
Sure. As we look at Europe, I think we are expecting a more normal pack in Europe this year. We've had some challenges in the past. So I think you're right as far as the year-on-year volume of the pack, it should be a more normal pack versus a pack that was below expectation last year. As far as our footprint rationalization, we have taken cost out of our European footprint. We'll get the benefit of that this year from a year-to-year standpoint, but really we'll see a little bit of growth in our European Can business this year and generally in line with our expectations.
Anthony Pettinari -- Citi Group -- Analyst
Okay. And then maybe switching to closures, is it safe to say you still expect kind of full-year volume growth in closures. And in terms of the volume performance you saw in 1Q and maybe expect for the year, could you talk a little bit about metal hot-fill and then dispensing systems and then plastic, cold-fill and hot-fill?
Adam J. Greenlee -- President and Chief Operating Officer
Sure. So absolutely we are expecting growth in the closure segment for the year, so just for clarity. Really what happened in the first quarter that as you heard in the prepared remarks, as well as in the press release, this really was all around our metal closures which is an interesting concept, because it's not a segment of our business that we talk a lot about on this call. And the reason why is because it is so stable and it is so predictable. We have very few swings that would impact the business to the point where we talk about it on this kind of call. But as we've talked a lot about with our can business the 20% ish inflation that we saw in the US market did buy or did influence pre-buy activity in the US market. And then we've had significant inflation over the last couple of years in Europe as well. So the volume decline really was about our metal closures business. Our dispensing closures had another very good quarter. We're expecting the same 3% to 4% kind of growth that we had expected out of that business over time. We're expecting our hot-fill business to grow as well. So nothing has changed about the full-year expectation, this really was about a timing issue in the metal closures part of the business.
Anthony Pettinari -- Citi Group -- Analyst
Okay. That's very helpful. I'll turn it over.
Operator
We'll now take a question from Chip Dillon with Vertical Research.
Chip Dillon -- Vertical Research -- Analyst
Yes, good morning and good morning everyone. My first question has to do with the, just looking at the full-year and just to get a feel, certainly with respect to conservatism being so early in the year, but it looks like when we look at the first half, it looks a lot better than certainly we were looking for. And therefore the full -- the second half looks like maybe it's a little more cautious than we and others might be looking at. And I didn't know if there's anything in particular that you would point to for why you would maintain that conservatism other than just the fact it's early in the calendar.
Adam J. Greenlee -- President and Chief Operating Officer
Hey, Chip, it's Adam, it's a really good question and we spend a lot of time talking about it internally. It's -- you know as we look at the metal container business, which is a big driver here, we're very early days in the year. And again while we're in regular dialogue with our customer regarding their inventory management program, they're reassessing that as we speak and we just don't have a final outcome. So I think that would be an upside for the year if they would change that strategy and review the strategy that they took to exit some of their business as well. But as of now, we just don't have a final answer on that. And again we had a good start to the year with Q1, feel very good about Q2. And as we look at the balance of our businesses, we'll see good growth in closures and plastics for the year as expected.
Anthony J. Allott -- Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Yeah, Chip, the only thing I might add to that is that you know, obviously, there's a fair bit of assumptions because it is so early in the year, right? Adam just kind of walked through the weather conditions, but that too is subject to change as we all know. So I think we're doing the prudent thing here. I would say that we are very bullish on the year in terms of where we go from here. But there's a lot of risk that sits out there yet to be determined. So I think that's kind of where we're coming out with guidance thus far.
Chip Dillon -- Vertical Research -- Analyst
Okay, that's helpful. And then when you look at the non-operating pension change, it looks like it's around $0.12 this year, first of all we need to point out that not everyone like you all are -- some people are actually taking it out of adjusted earnings which obviously means the quality of your earnings is higher than that of Company's investing other areas. So I want to just note that, that's to be applauded, but as we think about the market hitting new highs today, if the stock market had ended last year about where it is now that is at a high, is it fair to say that $0.12 probably wouldn't have happened this year. And maybe said differently, if we are at this level roughly at the end of this year and I know there are other puts and takes with interest rates on the liability side, could we see that pension -- non-operating pension item swing back the other way?
Robert B. Lewis -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Yeah, you pretty much have it right. So, essentially all of that pension change, it is a non-cash item, because our pension plan even with the market decline is still in excess of 100% funded, as at year end I think it was about a 112% funded. So, our estimated rate of return is 8.5% last year. As we all know the market kind of fell apart in the fourth quarter. Our portfolio yield was in negative territory in the mid-single digit. You know obviously the market has recovered pretty significantly. Our portfolio is up some 10% on a year-to-date basis. So the accounting doesn't quite follow that impurity because it's all -- both of those end up getting amortized through the P&L, but yeah had we ended last year where we are now, the big portion of that $0.13 would not be in our P&L. But again you know it is a non-cash item, so it's not really that important from the cash generation of the business.
Chip Dillon -- Vertical Research -- Analyst
(multiple speakers) just turning it out.
Anthony J. Allott -- Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Sorry, you're also right and I thank you for pointing out that because we talk segment income, we do -- it doesn't show up in each of our segment results. And you are right that is not true for every company out there.
Chip Dillon -- Vertical Research -- Analyst
Yeah, that's right. And just quickly before we turn it over, you mentioned the Spain plant closure, I thought pretty much everything you had in food can was actually through Vogel & Noot and I thought that was more Central and Eastern Europe. So, can you let us know how you got that plant and could there be more, and is that part of -- was that part of that acquisition?
Adam J. Greenlee -- President and Chief Operating Officer
Sure. Chip, it's Adam. Actually, the Spanish plant that we closed was actually part of our closures business, not part of the can business that came through Vogel & Noot. So, it did come through an acquisition of the back then business, back in the call it the mid-2000s range and with a small plant for us and that volume will be absorbed into our other closure facilities across Europe.
Chip Dillon -- Vertical Research -- Analyst
Thanks for that clarification.
Operator
We'll now take a question from Mark Wilde with Bank of Montreal.
Mark Wilde -- Bank of Montreal -- Analyst
Good morning.
Anthony J. Allott -- Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Hey, Mark.
Mark Wilde -- Bank of Montreal -- Analyst
I wondered if we could switch over to the plastics business and maybe add a more Bob. You just give me a sense of whether you think that 15% EBIT -- EBITDA margin target that you had by I think the end of '19, whether you think that's still a good target?
Adam J. Greenlee -- President and Chief Operating Officer
Hey, Mark, it's Adam. We do think it's a good target. If you look at our projections now, I think if you would -- the 15% never really considered the pension income, the detriment that we're experiencing this year. So our projections would put us probably right above 15% for the year if we did not have that one time effect of the lower pension income. So, we think it's a good target. What I'd say is that there's been a lot of work in the business that's gotten us to this point and a lot of that has been driving cost out of the system. And really now as we transition to the next phase of where we're going with plastics, growth is going to be driven by revenue and by new volume coming in. So, as we've said all along, that will be a little bit lumpy this quarter, it is a little bit lumpy as we look at the 2%, but our growth projections for the year continue to be pretty good for this business.
Mark Wilde -- Bank of Montreal -- Analyst
Okay, that's helpful.
Robert B. Lewis -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Yes, Mark...
Mark Wilde -- Bank of Montreal -- Analyst
Go ahead.
Robert B. Lewis -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Sorry, I was going to say, just to put that in perspective, that that pension impact for that business is something pretty close to a 4 percentage point on the margin.
Mark Wilde -- Bank of Montreal -- Analyst
Okay. All right. And just kind of staying on plastics, I wondered if you could give us some sense of whether any of this plastics backlash that we're seeing in the market, whether that has any effect on that business? And also whether this is still a business that you would think about making acquisitions in?
Adam J. Greenlee -- President and Chief Operating Officer
Sure. As far as single use plastic, that really is not part of what we do, a lot of our products go into multi use, whether it'd be personal care or home care products in our plastics business. So, we don't think we're in a segment that is a target area focus on single use product. We have portions of our business that do in the food side of our business with pet food that are -- are essentially single use products, but it's a package that our customers are committed to and feel good about from a sustainability standpoint. So we do think it's an issue, but I think for the most part our business is outside of the single use criteria.
Mark Wilde -- Bank of Montreal -- Analyst
Okay. Any then just growth in that business, Adam?
Adam J. Greenlee -- President and Chief Operating Officer
Growth in the plastics' business?
Mark Wilde -- Bank of Montreal -- Analyst
Yes.
Adam J. Greenlee -- President and Chief Operating Officer
I think what we had said is, you know, something in the 3% to 4% kind of growth over time. And again it will be lumpy as we win new business and continue to manage the portfolio that we currently have in the plastics business.
Operator
We'll now take a question from Debbie Jones with Deutsche Bank.
Debbie Jones -- Deutsche Bank -- Analyst
Hi, good morning. I wanted to first ask about as you have like a number of Board changes and I think Adam now you're becoming President, I want to just see if there's anything you could comment on that, any changes in roles or responsibility?
Anthony J. Allott -- Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Sure. Well, first of all, yeah, you're right, we have made a couple of changes. I would say that they are sort of the combination of a very long and gradual process. Greg Horrigan who used to like to say, that succession should be a little like taking your fingers slowly out of water and I think that's what we've been trying to do. So I would not say there is radical changes that come from that. I think you know Adam is taking on as you can on hear on the call even more of the responsibility of all the businesses although we've had that for a period of time. So no radical changes, we work together, the three of us as a team for some lengthy period of time. I think I speak for all three of us that we enjoy that, we challenge each other on a regular basis and I think that's part of the uniqueness of Silgan, that's constant Socratic method every idea gets torn at pretty hard and so we hope to continue that.
So I wouldn't expect any major changes on it, I think we all feel very privileged to be following in the footsteps of our founders and the roles we're taking on. And we take that pretty seriously and we'll continue to do so.
Debbie Jones -- Deutsche Bank -- Analyst
Okay. Thanks for that. I wanted to go back to just European food, I know it's a smaller business for you and you mentioned too that things seem OK for you there. But there have been some reports of just pricing pressure and from what I've heard maybe some more than normal volume shifts. And I'm just wondering if you're seeing any of that if it's impacting the regions where you compete?
Anthony J. Allott -- Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
I wouldn't say that there's anything new in that. You may recall that Europe unlike our North American market which is tend to be a long-term contract, and sort of Europe is more of annual contract. So there's always a bit of friction that goes on each year. And so I would say that's kind of more the norm, it may be a little market specific where you're referring to. Again remember we point pretty far East. And so, again, so I want to be clear, I'm not saying there's not competitive action all the time, but I wouldn't say there's anything particularly new about that. We feel really good about kind of the value proposition we bring to our customers and we think we'll do well over time.
Debbie Jones -- Deutsche Bank -- Analyst
Great, thanks. I'll turn it over.
Operator
We'll now hand the call over to Ghansham Panjabi for a question with Baird.
Ghansham Panjabi -- Robert W. Baird -- Analyst
Yes. Hi everyone. Good morning.
Anthony J. Allott -- Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Hey, Ghansham.
Ghansham Panjabi -- Robert W. Baird -- Analyst
I guess going back to the upside in volumes for the first quarter relative to your initial (ph) view, I mean kind of thinking back to last year, a lot of your customers also had to deal with higher freight costs and logistics costs et cetera. Are you seeing them manage production differently that may also be impacting your order patterns or is that not the case?
Anthony J. Allott -- Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
No, I don't think so in the can business, Ghansham. I mean the demand patterns for that business are pretty well established over the course of the year, that's why as we talked about in our last call, we were so confident that we understood and could kind of capture what the pre-buy activity was at the end of the year. I think the biggest single item here is we're talking about steel inflation in the US market of something close to 20%. So outside of that activity, yes, there are other inflationary items, but the demand pattern really doesn't change over the course of the year versus our expectation.
Ghansham Panjabi -- Robert W. Baird -- Analyst
Okay. And then just going to the closures business and the plant closure in Spain, what is that intended to signal to us in terms of just the overall growth rate from metal closures in Europe? Has that shifted dramatically over the years? Is it losing share to plastics? Is it pretty stable or is it just more optimization relative to your aggregate footprint? Thanks so much.
Adam J. Greenlee -- President and Chief Operating Officer
I think it's the last item, it really is about optimizing our footprint. I mean that that business in Europe from a volume standpoint on the metal closure side has been very stable. I think Europe is at the forefront of single use plastic. So it's an interesting time to be in an alternative package. And it really is about our relentless focus on just driving cost out of the system and lowering the overall cost footprint for the business.
Ghansham Panjabi -- Robert W. Baird -- Analyst
Okay. Thank you.
Operator
We'll now take a question from George Staphos with Bank of America Merrill Lynch.
George Staphos -- Bank of America Merrill Lynch -- Analyst
Hi, everyone. Good morning. Thanks for the details and congratulations on the year, the start to the year and the change in responsibility everybody. First question and apologies a little bit in advance in terms of them being more nitty gritty in nature. But when you look back at the first quarter in metal containers was the variance versus your expectations mostly driven by the inventory build on your part and in turn the lower unit costs that you would have gotten from that? Or was it more driven by the fact that volume was to the end market, a little bit better than expected and if you could parse those that would be helpful.
Anthony J. Allott -- Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
So, George if I understand your question, I would say the variation to our expectation was mostly driven by slightly better volume and good operating performance. There was really no variance to speak of to our expectation around the inventory, that was just a year-on-year comparative point.
George Staphos -- Bank of America Merrill Lynch -- Analyst
Okay, that's fair. Thanks for that, Tony. And then the other question I had kind of a two parter, when we look at closures and you said the volume was down in the quarter I think 2% and that was impacted by pre-buying ahead of the steel price hike. When I look back at the fourth quarter last year closure overall, I think it was up 1%, it didn't look like there was a large pre-buy. Can you remind us within that number what metal might have done in advance of the steel closure? And then more broadly what effect are you seeing from direct to consumer in terms of your customers plan for the food can and the other products that you produce? Are you seeing more interest in the food can and some of your dispensing systems less how would you say that's shaking up? So thank you very much for that.
Anthony J. Allott -- Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Thanks, George. I think the, so to be clear, you're right that we did not call out in the fourth quarter that our closures had a pre-buy and that's what Adam was talking about that we can see that so visibly in our can business. But our closure business just is more fluid than that. So, it's -- we intuitively we knew there was something there, but we didn't feel like we had the concrete enough data to call it on that. If you look at volumes in the quarter, they had a lot more to do with the kind of the beverage side of the hot-fill market what was going on that side. So in retrospect looking back there, you could see some increase on it. The second thing and the reason our language is a little different about the closures, there is sort of two things on, the US, there's this spike in steel this year in the US and there was a fourth quarter buy-for.
There's a second impact happening in the volumes of metal comparatively this year and that's because Europe had a sizable steel increase last year. And Europe just gets a little complex, but Europe pushes it's price increase through during the first quarter. So we actually in 2018 first quarter, we had the benefit of some pre-buying ahead of that increase in Europe. So you got -- you have the compound of both of them hitting this quarter on. But to be a clear, there is a whole different thing this quarter is about metal closures. And everything else is exactly were expected and it is consistent.
Robert B. Lewis -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
As far as our customers inquiring and activity around maybe transitioning to metal can, look we're always in regular dialogue with our customers. It is something that's on the table, we haven't seen any those at this point. There is a lot of talk about opportunities, but nothing concrete as we sit here.
George Staphos -- Bank of America Merrill Lynch -- Analyst
Okay. Thank you. I'll turn it over.
Anthony J. Allott -- Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Thanks.
Operator
Our next question will come from Adam Josephson with KeyBanc.
Adam Josephson -- KeyBanc Capital Markets -- Analyst
Thanks. Good morning everyone. Adam, just on the closures volume expectation, I know you're expecting growth this year, I think last year legacy volumes were down too, I think the previous year they were down three, correct me if I'm wrong there, given that and given the first quarter decline, why do you expect growth this year and then longer-term, what do you think is the right number for your legacy closures volume?
Adam J. Greenlee -- President and Chief Operating Officer
Sure. I think you're roughly, directly correct on the two prior years as far as the flat cap hot-fill closure business for us. As we said here today again, it's really about the timing of the first quarter that Tony just walked through, the balance of the business. We do have annual and in many cases long-term contracts that provide the volume outlook for us. So we sit here today with a good order book for us, that does provide growth for the full-year, certainly it provides growth in the second quarter as well on kind of our historic business and closure. So we do feel good about that. I think if you go back over time, there were some significant items like weather that drove our hot-fill business, it drove it up in 2016 and then we had a poor weather year that drove volumes down in 2017.
So as we sit here now at the beginning of the pre-sale season and I would say we've got very good confidence based upon the assignments from our customers of filling locations and the contractual commitments that we have, that we will see good growth. And it's a growing market for us still.
Adam Josephson -- KeyBanc Capital Markets -- Analyst
Okay. Thanks for that, Adam. And just on sustainability, just as a company that's in both plastics and metal cans and given that we hear from some other metal can manufacturers that cans are taking share from plastics in certain markets or going to do so at some point, how do you view the issue?
Anthony J. Allott -- Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
I think Adam sort of hit it before, I think you can't help, but believe that it is a bit of a tailwind to the can business, I mean, it's -- and you can even look at those you know again generally the market was pretty solid this first quarter across all categories. So, is there a little bit of that in it maybe, I mean it's hard for us to quantify and say, but it just -- it felt a little bit better, but it's only one quarter and who know.
I think the food can is much more complex in terms of changing. I think the beverage industry has a very different argument, those customers use both packages all the time. And so you could see a quicker change. Food can, probably we've always told you guys about food can is, don't worry about us falling off a cliff on volume, because the system is so deep in terms of what goes into a food can, the same is true on the other side, right? It's not easy to shift stop into food cans in a big manner.
So what's great for us generally slows that process down. So I think you'll still find us feeling that yes for sure customers, consumers are more focused on this issue than in the past. Definitely plastics has some improvement to do in terms of recyclability and its story line. And all that gives us a little bit of help, but I just think food can, it will be less than you're probably likely to see in the beverage can.
Adam Josephson -- KeyBanc Capital Markets -- Analyst
Thank, Tony.
Anthony J. Allott -- Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Yeah.
Operator
We'll now take a question from Gabe Hajde with Wells Fargo Securities.
Gabe Hajde -- Wells Fargo Securities -- Analyst
Good morning gentlemen, congratulations to all. If you could maybe Bob quantify the raw material benefit that you did realize in plastics? And if there was anything in closures and/or anything expected in the second quarter?
Adam J. Greenlee -- President and Chief Operating Officer
Sure, Gabe, it's Adam. As we look at raw materials and resin in the first quarter, there was a small benefit in the closures business of a couple million dollars. And then in our plastics business there was really no impact in the quarter. So interestingly as we go forward and look at Q2 in our projection, CVI just published this morning and those projections have changed now which is why we always are pretty consistent in our forward look. So we take the current quarter and we essentially hold that flat for the balance of the year. So there typically is some upside or some risk to our forecast based upon movement in resin. As we sit here now, I would say there's not much impact in our forecast, a little bit of headwind in Q2. I'd also say that that's probably now changed based upon the publication this morning, but we'll see how the markets play throughout the quarter.
Gabe Hajde -- Wells Fargo Securities -- Analyst
Okay. And then back to the Spain closure, I recognize it's small in the grand theme of Silgan as a whole, but can you give us a sense for what the benefit could be on an annual basis from the closure and/or presuming you're transitioning some of the business to other facilities. And was that contemplated sort of when you gave full-year guidance earlier in the year?
Anthony J. Allott -- Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Yeah. So in terms of the overall cost, I think we called it out that there's roughly $5.7 million of restructuring charges, a little more than half of that is non-cash. So basically the way we look at these types of projects is on a on a cash-on-cash return basis, kind of right in that mid-teen kind of return hurdle, so that you can safely apply that that metric to this one as well as you look forward.
So you know it really as Adam said before, it really came down to an opportunity to take cost out and do it in a manner where we did not have to disrupt customers where we can continue to supply which is in large part the way we supply the broader European market in the closure side of the business from a select few facilities as well. So that is really the underlying premise there.
Gabe Hajde -- Wells Fargo Securities -- Analyst
Okay. And it was contemplated when you gave the full-year outlook before?
Anthony J. Allott -- Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
No, this would probably be incremental, but again you're going to have a lengthy conversion here that and the clock sitting up against it. So not much real impact for the year.
Gabe Hajde -- Wells Fargo Securities -- Analyst
Thank you.
Operator
Our next question will come from Dan Rizzo with Jefferies.
Daniel Rizzo -- Jefferies -- Analyst
Hi. You guys mentioned the plant in Spain, the optimization there, I was just wondering if there is other opportunities for optimization throughout Europe the different segments?
Adam J. Greenlee -- President and Chief Operating Officer
Sure, Dan, it's Adam. As we talked about earlier, I mean, it's something that we are constantly evaluating. And again we've got a relentless focus to just drive cost right out of our system. So as we look across the segments obviously, we'll continue to think about closures and opportunities there. Plastics, we had a pretty extensive footprint rationalization program that we've been through, we're coming out of that. And I think you're seeing the benefit of that now.
On the metal can side, we announced the closure of a couple facilities in Europe last year. And then in the US market we had even alluded to on the last call that we are evaluating. And you know a lot of that's going to depend upon whether or not the volume levels that we were projecting for the year are a new normal or if it's a one time kind of impact on volume. So we're still evaluating that in deep discussions with our customers gaining a better understanding of those volume projections as well.
Daniel Rizzo -- Jefferies -- Analyst
Okay, thanks. And then you talked a great length about the issues with the customer while making decisions on inventories. I was just wondering if they've given you a time-frame when this issue will be resolved when we'll have a plan in place, is it something that's going to kind of linger over the next for mostly year or is it something that's going to be -- they're going to have a decision relatively quickly?
Adam J. Greenlee -- President and Chief Operating Officer
Well, I think we're going to know quite a bit here in the next couple of months is my guess, If you think about the business that they're in, it is more of a seasonal pack business. So there are a couple of things that play, one they're going to have to put inventory in place and two they're going to have to sell that through to the market. So I think those decisions will be upon us and pretty short order, we just don't have full clarity at this point, but we're in constant dialogue on the subject as we speak.
Daniel Rizzo -- Jefferies -- Analyst
All right. Thank you very much.
Operator
We'll now take a question from Arun Viswanathan with RBC Capital Markets.
Arun Viswanathan -- RBC Capital Markets -- Analyst
All right. Thanks, good morning guys. Just wanted to ask I guess around the volumes in metal container in Q1, that 4% I guess down, was that kind of in line with your expectations or was it slightly better? And then secondarily, as you go through the year, are there any notable kind of impacts from customers changing kind of business or do you see any of that could impact your view as it has in the last couple of years. Thanks.
Adam J. Greenlee -- President and Chief Operating Officer
Sure. As we look at Q1, again our expectation was a decline of about 6% in volume in Q1, so coming in at a 4% decline actually was better than what we originally anticipated which I think you know Bob and Tony had talked about in prepared remarks. So, volume was good for us in the first quarter versus our expectation. And then really the single -- there are two big notable items probably for the year. It's the customer and the inventory management program that we've been talking about. And then secondly, one of the benefits we saw in the first quarter versus our expectation with a little bit stronger soup volume.
So we've had a lot of discussion on these calls in the past year or so about the soup market and what our customers were doing in the soup market. We feel good that we think there's a renewed focus on kind of the core products that we supply to the soup market. So Q1 for us was kind of the tail end of the soup season. So I wouldn't necessarily think that would affect Q2 or Q3, but as we move later in the year, soup will be something that we'll be talking about and considering from a volume standpoint.
Robert B. Lewis -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Arun, one other thing that I'll add to that and we did talk about it in our -- in our full year guidance, but I think it's for purposes of clarity, it's probably good to get it on the table. And that is that Q4 last year benefited from a buy ahead. So as you think about comparatively this Q4 versus last year, there's going to be a pretty meaningfully -- meaningful decline in volumes as a consequence to that. And that's nothing more than the buy ahead issue that we benefited from at the tail end of '18.
Arun Viswanathan -- RBC Capital Markets -- Analyst
Okay. Understood. Thanks for that. So I guess similarly just looking at actually first off on the soup issue, would you say that that conversions to plastic are moderating at all. And again just wanted to touch on the sustainability issue, I mean on the one hand you have difficult weight to value issues in cans, but obviously it seems like the recycling in some other aspects could be positive. So maybe if you could just reiterate your views on sustainability and again the recent potential strength in soup is that -- it could be related to kind of a plateauing of those conversions. Thanks.
Anthony J. Allott -- Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Yeah, I don't think what you're saying in soup which was pretty modest and I think Adam was just trying to say there were some -- you saw a little bit of progress there. And again it's hard for us to know what that means on the year yet. Soup is a broad topic again. We talk about it a lot, it's -- I think what gives us some hope is that our customers are talking more about the importance of, it is a core product and needing to invest and solve some challenges there. So I think that we feel better about, but I don't know that we can sit here today and say we see actual growth from that yet, but maybe.
As to alternate packages, plastic which of course we supply a large part of the Plastic Containers for the soup market as well has never been a really meaningful part of that market. So it's not really a -- this is not so much a story about conversion to other packages, as it is a story about soup consumption and importance of soup in the meal category. I think the one other package that has gained some and certainly (inaudible) this is true when there are some products would be more in a box form. And I think that is an interesting area where the environmental question may come into play, because that is you know it's not a simple environmental story, a recycling story as can is. Cans infinitely recyclable, it uses recycled content. So it's about as good as you can get, that recycling story particularly in the US is much more complex around boxes. So maybe there'd be some benefit there despite my previous comment, but it's -- even that is I can't tell you there's clear data of a shift in either direction on that.
Arun Viswanathan -- RBC Capital Markets -- Analyst
And then on a similar topic to some Plastic Containers, what's your thoughts on any impact there, I know you noted that your participation in single use is lower, but just what's your thoughts on going forward if there could be any impact on that business from sustainability. Thanks.
Adam J. Greenlee -- President and Chief Operating Officer
Arun, we don't think there's going to be much of an impact at this point, as we look out at the landscape of our Plastic Containers business, just for the comments made earlier, just regarding multi-use versus single use plastic. There is a spot in the market for multi-use products that plastic is a very, very good package and material for those applications.
Arun Viswanathan -- RBC Capital Markets -- Analyst
Okay, thanks.
Operator
We'll now take a question from Tyler Langton with JPMorgan.
Tyler Langton -- JPMorgan -- Analyst
Good morning, thank you. Just on capital allocation, I guess could you talk about as you're sort of you are nearing your debt targets, could you talk about I guess a preference for acquisitions versus buybacks, and then just with acquisitions sort of what you're seeing in the market in terms of number of targets out there and multiples?
Robert B. Lewis -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Yeah, sure, Tyler. As you saw at the year end, we were -- we're kind of back in the range that we had kind of put out as the optimal range 2.5 times to 3.5 times, we were kind of sitting right at the high end of that, obviously with a free cash flow generation forecast that we've got will all else equal, that will take a roughly another half a turn off of that. So we'll be squarely in the midst of that guidance, I think what that means for us is that kind of same strategy that we've always had and that is look for opportunities through the M&A lens to grow the platform where we can. And in the absence for that, I would say all else equal kind of near-term debt reduction probably still sits there for a little bit to give us dry powder to continue to look for M&A targets.
And then on a longer-term basis as we continue to delever then return of capital to shareholders much like we've done in the past is squarely on the table as well.
So I think as we would sit here today, we are actively engaged in looking at things that would fit us from a strategic standpoint and making sure that they would have the right kind of return profile for us. Yes, there are a number of properties in the market, multiples are generally high, trading multiples for public comps are equally high. So I think, the trick is as we've always done to find the right kind of opportunity where we can buy the multiple down through synergies or have the right kind of cash profile whether it's from a growth standpoint or from a limited capital standpoint, that allows the return metric to work. So I think the important part is that we stay disciplined around the M&A side. We are optimistic about our opportunity to find something that would fit us and merge in pretty well with us. So, yeah, no real change in strategy, but with a balance sheet that's equipped to take advantage of opportunities.
Tyler Langton -- JPMorgan -- Analyst
Okay. Perfect. Thanks. And then I think in the past for metal containers, it was the last year in 2018 you had $18 million negative from the lower production, is that still sort of in terms of sort of getting that back this year, is that number still sort of in the range with some in Q1 that you would have gotten and then the rest sort of in Q4 at the end of year?
Robert B. Lewis -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Yeah, it's a little bit confusing based on what happened last year. So as you might recall, we actually reduced inventory in Q1 of last year. We built it back in Q2, so the front half was kind of neutral. And then ultimately what we did is we took all of that inventory reduction out in Q4. So you sort of have to keep that sequence in mind when you start thinking about your comps.
Tyler Langton -- JPMorgan -- Analyst
Got it.
Robert B. Lewis -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
But in total you're right, it's the $18 million.
Tyler Langton -- JPMorgan -- Analyst
Okay.
Operator
We'll take our next question from Brian Maguire with Goldman Sachs.
Brian Maguire -- Goldman Sachs -- Analyst
Hey, good morning guys. Most of my questions have already even been asked, but I just wanted to come back to the metal volumes again with 1Q coming in better than expected, but the full-year guidance sort of maintained, is it possible that some of that outperformance in 1Q was seasonal change or shift or some kind of a pull forward from future quarters? Obviously, nothing to do really with metal prices, but just customer order patterns moving a little bit sooner in the year and that's the reason for some of the conservativism or is it really just that you guys are just early in the year not wanting to make a call in the full-year at this point?
Adam J. Greenlee -- President and Chief Operating Officer
Yes, Brian, it's Adam. I think as we look at the volume in the first quarter, we didn't see a whole lot of timing variation versus our expectation. So I think it was just stronger volume in the quarter. And for the most part, it just it is to your point very early days in the year and there's a lot of ground that we have to file here for the remainder of the year and food cans to -- so to really feel good about where we're going for the whole year.
Brian Maguire -- Goldman Sachs -- Analyst
Yeah, OK. That makes sense. And then just one for Bob real quick, I guess in the press release you had mentioned about the free cash flow guidance, but I'm assuming that's unchanged. And then also if you could comment on expectations for the book tax rate for the year?
Robert B. Lewis -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Yeah, sure. So -- we did, I did comment on the script that we're holding free cash flow guidance consistent with the $275 million that is down a little bit versus prior year largely because the prior year benefited from the large inventory reduction. But obviously we feel like we're off to a good start to that end and feeling good in that range. So we did reiterate that.
On the tax side, really what you had in the quarter was some timing differences, so you get a tax benefit relative to the some of the stock based compensation invested in Q1. So that adjustment and some state tax change -- rate changes against a relatively small quarter, had a fairly wide impact on the rate, but spread over the full year it doesn't really have much of an impact against our rate guidance. So we're not really changing guidance from where we originally started on the tax rate for the year.
Brian Maguire -- Goldman Sachs -- Analyst
Okay. Thanks very much.
Operator
Our next question will come from Edlain Rodriguez with UBS.
Edlain Rodriguez -- UBS -- Analyst
Thank you. Good morning, guys. Quick one on containers, on metals containers, I mean, Tony in the past you've talked about walking away from certain businesses that weren't profitable, is that something that's still going on? Or has that come to a close?
Anthony J. Allott -- Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Well, I think what we've talked about is there have been from time-to-time competitive issues that have come up. And we've chosen not to chase business in this competitive issue. So I think that's a slight nuance of a difference. So it's not as if we have elements of our portfolio on the can side that we look at just to not do that, that's not really true. It's more -- if a competitive intrusion comes at you, how do you react to that. So no, there's nothing there we would want to walk away from -- we like the business we have and I think we take great care of our customers et cetera. And as we said as a leader industry, there is a degree to which you may do that and it may suit your footprint to do it. And then there's a point at which you will not do that and you will defend that business.
Edlain Rodriguez -- UBS -- Analyst
Okay. And one on closures and again apologies if you've already addressed that, like how confident are you that the volume decline we saw this quarter is just due to timing and will definitely come back to the end of the year.
Anthony J. Allott -- Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
We're highly confident that it was just timing in one portion of our closures business and feel very good about not only the entire segment, but the full year for the segment from a volume standpoint.
Edlain Rodriguez -- UBS -- Analyst
Okay. Thank you.
Operator
We'll now take your question from Adam Josephson with KeyBanc.
Adam Josephson -- KeyBanc Capital Markets -- Analyst
Thanks everyone for taking my follow-up. Just a similar question to what I asked on closures related to the food can business. So if you're down on volume 3% to 4% this year, I think there would be three straight years of anywhere from 2% to 4% volume declines. Thereafter do you think flat is a reasonable expectation or is it more reasonable to perhaps expect just a smaller rate of decline?
Anthony J. Allott -- Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
But there's a lot to that one. And so first of all I think what we've been talking about is that over time the growing elements of the our food can business are becoming a bigger part of what we are. And so I would say I think that is a logical answer as things like pet food become a larger percentage of our business and it's been a consistent growth over a long period of time. And products like fruit which have been a consistent decline over time are down to now 4% of our total business. So I think flat about right, I think I've got to be clear we are just not as manically focused as you all are on individual growth in our individual business, the model Silgan from the beginning of time has been is vast and get a franchise position and mature businesses, run those businesses for cash, take that cash and deploy that cash.
If you look over the last decade, our food can business you got to give me the exact numbers, but the global food, but don't forget it's probably down some, I usually say flat but it's not meant to be an exact answer. But over that time, Silgan has generated an increase in our EPS of 9.4%. So, you'll take my answer and understand, it just comes from when I read things that say will still in the lower growth company, so you should get a lower multiple. I keep look at saying, but that's not how our model works. We take care of these franchise businesses very carefully, we take the cash, we deploy that cash and the cash is half of the strategy of our engine. And I recognize it's hard to know how to model that, but over time I think it's demonstrated as being a very workable answer to that. So that part of way, we don't get quite as narrowly hung up on that growth question on the cans as your question make or imply.
Adam Josephson -- KeyBanc Capital Markets -- Analyst
Sure. Just two other questions, D&A versus CapEx, it's -- I think you're expecting them to be roughly equivalent this year. Did you expect that to remain the case? I guess because volume declining at least in food cans this year, but I guess thereafter your take in volume will be flattish to up depending on the segment, so you'd expect CapEx to be at least in line with D&A, is that a reasonable assumption?
Robert B. Lewis -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Yeah, the one thing that droves that off obviously is when you end up with a deal through M&A that could have some influence on your D&A as well. But all things equal I think you're in the right ballpark.
Adam Josephson -- KeyBanc Capital Markets -- Analyst
Thanks. I mean just one last one back to sustainability for a moment, obviously you invested a considerable amount of money in plastic packaging two years ago with the dispensing deal, just given all this talk about sustainability and media concerns about plastic et cetera, are you any more reluctant to deploy capital on plastic packaging than you were before this discussion about sustainability reached a fever pitch as it seemingly has now?
Anthony J. Allott -- Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Yeah, good, excellent question, I would say it really depends on the plastic package. So, if I look at the dispensing system of the business, we wouldn't change one bit on that. The uniqueness of what is delivered in their product and their dispensing systems, I don't see any viable change to that market and it goes to kind of what Adam is saying, those are very much multi-use, specialized products et cetera that to me I just can't for -- let me envision another package taking that market over. If you're asking me about water bottles, I think that's very different question for us. And so it does -- we are definitely paying attention to it and it does change your view of certain markets.
Adam Josephson -- KeyBanc Capital Markets -- Analyst
Thanks so much, Tony.
Anthony J. Allott -- Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Yeah.
Operator
We'll take a question from George Staphos with Bank of America Merrill Lynch.
George Staphos -- Bank of America Merrill Lynch -- Analyst
Hi, guys, thanks for taking the follow-on. First of all, when I look at cash flow, I noticed there was a fairly large drop in payables in the first quarter or use of cash I should say. And by the way congratulations on maintaining the balance sheet pretty tightly quarter-on-quarter this year. Is that just you might have bought some steel ahead last year ahead of pricing going up and now is when you're paying the vendors or is it related to any of the payments related to any of your traditional right sizing and restructuring, just curious what was -- curious what was in that number. And then if you could remind us recognizing it's not in your guidance, if the customer came back, the customers came back and ordered in more normal levels relative where they had been in '17 and prior. In terms of upside to gone would that be a few pennies, would that be dimes if you had any kind of view that you could share recognizing it's a bit of a sensitive topic would appreciate it. Thanks guys and good luck in the quarter.
Robert B. Lewis -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Sure. Yeah, George I'll take the cash flow one, you essentially have it right. So that was largely due to kind of timing with all the inflation and cost changes coming through around steel kind of as we managed our own purchases and that carried through year end given terms ultimately that flushes through in Q1. There's probably a little bit of deferred tax that's showing up on that line as well, but for the most part it is the (inaudible).
George Staphos -- Bank of America Merrill Lynch -- Analyst
Thank you.
Anthony J. Allott -- Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
And George on your second one, if I understand we're time of buy-forward and the impact of that, if I have that right and your question is...
George Staphos -- Bank of America Merrill Lynch -- Analyst
No, no, if the customer and question went back to their normal order patterns that you've been saying you're not sure yet whether they will or won't, what that might add to your earnings all else equal in a normal year? Thank you, Tony.
Anthony J. Allott -- Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Got it. Now I got it. I think that if they said, look let's forget about this inventory reduction this year, there are some probably 150 million to 200 million units that would come from that and I'll let you do the math that comes from there, but that's sort of what would come back.
George Staphos -- Bank of America Merrill Lynch -- Analyst
Okay. Thank you very much.
Operator
It appears there are no further questions at this time. I'd like to turn the conference back to Mr. Tony Allott for any additional or closing remarks.
Anthony J. Allott -- Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Great. Thank you, Jessica. Thank you very much for your time. And we look forward to talking to you about our second quarter in late July.
Operator
This concludes our teleconference. Thank you for your participation.
Duration: 63 minutes
Call participants:
Kim Ulmer -- Vice President, Finance and Treasurer
Anthony J. Allott -- Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Robert B. Lewis -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Scott Gaffner -- Barclays -- Analyst
Adam J. Greenlee -- President and Chief Operating Officer
Anthony Pettinari -- Citi Group -- Analyst
Chip Dillon -- Vertical Research -- Analyst
Mark Wilde -- Bank of Montreal -- Analyst
Debbie Jones -- Deutsche Bank -- Analyst
Ghansham Panjabi -- Robert W. Baird -- Analyst
George Staphos -- Bank of America Merrill Lynch -- Analyst
Adam Josephson -- KeyBanc Capital Markets -- Analyst
Gabe Hajde -- Wells Fargo Securities -- Analyst
Daniel Rizzo -- Jefferies -- Analyst
Arun Viswanathan -- RBC Capital Markets -- Analyst
Tyler Langton -- JPMorgan -- Analyst
Brian Maguire -- Goldman Sachs -- Analyst
Edlain Rodriguez -- UBS -- Analyst
Transcript powered by AlphaStreet
This article is a transcript of this conference call produced for The Motley Fool. While we strive for our Foolish Best, there may be errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in this transcript. As with all our articles, The Motley Fool does not assume any responsibility for your use of this content, and we strongly encourage you to do your own research, including listening to the call yourself and reading the company's SEC filings. Please see our Terms and Conditions for additional details, including our Obligatory Capitalized Disclaimers of Liability.
