Image source: The Motley Fool.
Fortress Transportation and Infrastructure Investors LLCÂ (FTAI)
Q2Â 2020 Earnings Call
Jul 31, 2020, 8:00 a.m. ET
Contents:
- Prepared Remarks
- Questions and Answers
- Call Participants
Prepared Remarks:
Operator
Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by. It is now my pleasure to introduce your, Mr. Alan Andreini. Your line is open.
Alan Andreini -- Investor Relations
Thank you, Sidney. I would like to welcome you to the Fortress Transportation and Infrastructure Second Quarter 2020 Earnings Call. Joining me here today are Joe Adams, our Chief Executive Officer; and Scott Christopher, our Chief Financial Officer.
We have posted an investor presentation and our press release on our website, which we encourage you to download if you have not already done so. Also, please note that this call is open to the public in listen-only mode and is being webcast. In addition, we will be discussing some non-GAAP financial measures during the call today, including FAD. The reconciliation of those measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures can be found in the earnings supplement.
Before I turn the call over to Joe, I would like to point out that certain statements made today will be forward-looking statements, including regarding future earnings. These statements, by their nature are uncertain and may differ materially from actual results. We encourage you to review the disclaimers in our press release and investor presentation regarding non-GAAP financial measures and forward-looking statements and to review the risk factors contained in our quarterly reports filed with the SEC.
Now, I would like to turn the call over to Joe.
Joseph P. Adams Jr. -- Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Thank you, Alan. And welcome everybody to today's call for the second quarter 2020 results. To start, I'm pleased to announce our 21st dividend as a public company and our 36th consecutive dividend since inception. The dividend of $0.33 per share will be paid on August 31, based on shareholder record date of August 17.
Now, let's start with the numbers. The key metrics for us are adjusted EBITDA and FAD or funds available for distribution. Adjusted EBITDA for Q2 2020 was $66.5 million compared to Q1 2020 of $72 million and Q2 of 2019 of $92.7 million. On a normalized basis, excluding the gains or losses from the sales, Q2 2020 adjusted EBITDA was $65.7 million compared to $73.8 million in Q1 2020 and $70.1 million in Q2 of 2019. FAD was $47.3 million in Q2 2020 versus $96 million in Q1 of 2020 and $86.9 million in Q2 2019. On a normalized basis, excluding sale proceeds and non-recurring items, Q2 2020 FAD was $38.2 million compared to 50.1 million in Q1 of 2020 and $42.7 million in Q2 of 2019. During the second quarter, the $47.3 million FAD number was comprised of $82.1 million from our aviation leasing portfolio, negative $6.7m from our infrastructure businesses, and negative $28.1 million from corporate and other.
Now let's turn to aviation. Aviation had a pretty decent quarter given the circumstances. $77.5 million in Q2 EBITDA, after an estimated $20 million negative impact in Q2 from COVID-19 and further, more than half of the impact resulted from fewer hours and cycles flown, which means the hours in cycles are still available and have significant value. Somewhat offsetting the negative, we recognized $8 million and income from early lease terminations were we proactively took back seven aircraft and separated the engines as we believe engine demand is and will return faster than airframe demand. During Q2, we negotiated rent deferrals on approximately 20% of the portfolio, averaging three months of deferral in return for three months of lease term extension. Overall, we collected approximately $75 million in cash from customers, which is approximately 85% of a more normalized run rate, without the effect of a pandemic.
Turning now to the outlook for Q3 and the remainder of 2020. The environment is improving a lot and we believe the worst impact of COVID-19 is behind us. Whereas last quarter we estimated a range of $50 million to $100 million of one-time negative impact from COVID-19 in 2020, we now expect to be closer to $50 million total, if not potentially less with over half of that behind us in the first half of this year.
Looking at our aviation portfolio. We feel very good about what we currently own and what we expect to add this year. As of June 30, our fleet was comprised of 65%, 737NG and A320 CO narrow-body aircraft and engines, 20% cargo aircraft and engines, and 15% 757 and 767 aircraft and engines. As expected the 737 and A320 market has been the first to recover. The grounded fleet is down to approximately 30% from a high of 65% in April. In some markets such as China and Vietnam are less than 10% below the 2019 levels. And we expect to see continuing improvements the balance of 2020 as Europe is now almost fully reopened. We also expect the cargo market to remain strong for the balance of 2020 and 2021 as long haul international passenger flights will remain suppressed while industrial activity and trade rebound. Finally, for us the 757, 767 markets are recovering, but will take longer. Demand for cargo conversions are supporting residual values, but freighter conversions take time and the international leisure markets are still largely closed, but expected to begin reopening soon.
And with overall 90% of our fleet value being engine value, we think that is the best place to be invested in aviation today. Overall engine utilization in Q2 was low at 40% for two main reasons. One, we proactively added engines to inventory, as a result of taking engines off aircraft and selling airframes and two, with many airlines totally shutdown, new engine leases and even moving engines around the world was extremely limited. But that has changed now. While we had 20 engine lease extensions in Q2, we now have over 40 new engine leases that will start in July and August of this year. We anticipate Q3 engine utilization to return to a more normal level of 65% to 70%. Looking ahead, in terms of cash crisis and surplus equipment, airlines dramatically cut back engine aftermarket maintenance. With the quickest recovery in 737 and A320 flying, we are looking to add more CFM56 and V2500 engines today. We concluded a 16 aircraft sale leaseback with Air France in May and are actively negotiating to more similar deals totaling over 30 aircraft or 60 engines, all of which are CFM56 engines. We believe these are some of the best investments we've ever made.
With regard to our exclusive joint venture covering CFM products. The first product is in final form. All requisite testing has been successfully completed and we are awaiting approval to begin commercial production. The second product is moving along and is still targeting a potential year-end 2020 launch. Also importantly with the dramatic change in our favor of the aftermarket MRO business, we expect to finalize a partnership with a major aviation MRO shop to accommodate our requirements for CFM56 overhauls and maintenance shop visits. With airlines everywhere looking to outsource more capital intensive functions, our exclusive proprietary suite of cost saving products positions us perfectly to capture an expanding share of a growing market.
Now on to Jefferson and Infrastructure. Starting with Jefferson. Jefferson had another positive EBITDA quarter at plus $3 million despite demand destruction issues related to COVID-19 and the oil price decline, which effectively shut down the Canadian crude by rail market. Conditions continue to improve today and we are projecting another positive EBITDA quarter in Q3. There were several important developments in Q2, which are setting us up for a good second half of 2020. We executed a jet fuel storage deal with Exxon to lease the newly converted ethanol tanks. Motiva, Saudi Aramco's name in the US took over a tank, which Jefferson had used last year for crude marketing. And finally, we have a new customer in the terminal, who took over several tanks from an existing customer for a longer term and at a higher rate. Altogether our storage revenue went from $4.4 million to $6.1 million for 40% increase in the quarter. We also reduce costs to address the current COVID-19 operating environment, while continuing to operate safely. Headcount reductions will show up in the Q3 numbers, due to savings in Q2 being largely offset by severance packages, which were paid in Q2.
Of major importance for Jefferson is the progress we made in Q2 with our three pipeline projects. We executed an inbound pipeline connection in marketing agreement with the pay line pipeline to give us connectivity to Cushing, Oklahoma. We also progressed construction with our Southern Star project, which is our pipeline, outbound pipeline to Motiva, which we expect to be operational by the end of November of this year. And at that time, our three-year storage contract with Motiva becomes a five -year contract.
Finally, our six cross channel pipelines to Exxon are scheduled to be completed in November of this year as well and are actively under construction. When these three pipeline projects are completed, we expect to see a dramatic uptick in throughput volumes. Once those pipelines are completed, we will be in a position to offer our customers maximum optionality and flexibility, and the ability to bring in crude or refined products by truck, rail, ship or pipeline. And at various times any one or two of these means of transportation will be the most favorable to the refiners and producers. We will soon have the ability to offer all modes and in the terminal business customers look for, and we'll pay for maximum flexibility and optionality.
Now turning to Repauno. As a result of some equipment delivery delays related to COVID-19, construction of Phase 1 of NGL train to ship loading operation is now expected to be completed at the end of Q3. Also, our 186,000 barrel cavern has been successfully pressure tested confirming our ability to use that cavern to store propane in addition to butane. This is important to us because the size of the propane market is much bigger than the butane market. We are currently in negotiations with both producers and offtakers for propane deliveries early in 2021. The negotiations are going well and we expect to have firm commitments either late in Q3 or in Q4 of this year and we expect to begin shipping our first cargoes of propane late in Q1 or early Q2 of 2021.
As to Phase 2 of the Repauno development, the permits for dock 2, which is designed for two VLGCs are now in hand. As to other opportunities at Repauno, we are in advanced discussions with a wind farm developer and the state of New Jersey concerning the development of Repauno as a wind farm hub for steel component manufacturing and distribution. And finally road construction of the bypass road into Repauno has started and is expected to be completed in Q2 2021. Bottom line is that COVID-19 has caused some construction delays at Repauno, but as to the commercial discussions, we are seeing parties reengaging and those discussions are going well.
Turning to Long Ridge. Q2 was another good quarter for our frac sand business as we continue to take market share. For the first half of 2020, we transloaded nearly 0.5 million tons of frac sand, which is approximately 25% ahead of budget. Long Ridge volume has remained robust in the face of declining drilling activity in the basin, which is a result of our strategic location in the core of the Marcellus and Utica Shale and our high-speed transloading operation, which combined to make us the low cost operator in the basin. In addition, in the second quarter, Long Ridge signed a two-year contract with a large commodities company to transload and store road salt. The power plant construction continues to be on time and on budget. And we expect to be operational earlier than November of 2021, which is the date that is guaranteed by our construction firm.
Furthermore, we continue to see a high level of interest from data centers and other power intensive industries looking to site new facilities at Long Ridge. This is in part because we have been developing two carbon-neutral electricity options for power users. One deploying CO2 emissions capture and two, using hydrogen as an alternative fuel to generate power, both of which are of particular interest to hyperscale datacenter customers. The largest of these developments would utilize 52% to 100% of Long Ridge's power plant capacity at premium prices. If 50% of the plant capacity is taken by one of these data center customers, the EBITDA generated by the plant would go from $120 million to approximately $140 million to $145 million. And the contracted committed term would increase from 8.5 years to approximately 12 years. And the higher EBITDA and longer committed term should give our 50% interest and materially higher value.
In conclusion, as we look back on Q2, we like many companies are happy it is over. While putting enormous stress on our company, our customers and our employees, being able to successfully navigate these challenges has made us more confident than ever in our employees and our business model. In Aviation, it's clear that our decision five years ago to focus primarily on narrow-body aircraft was the right decision. Narrow bodies are the backbone of the world aviation fleet and there are the most liquid in most resilient, especially during times of crisis. Also, we have always pushed hard for security deposits and maintenance reserves in our lease terms. On occasion that position has cost us deals, but at times like this, those structures are proving to be robust and dramatically better than other alternatives.
From a revenue receive standpoint, our performance in Q2 is thus far leading the industry for those public aviation lessors who have reported. This is in no small part a result of the two items I just mentioned. The credit mix of portfolio combined with the equipment mix and deal structure makes our portfolio a model for the industry. And as I said before, I would not trade our portfolio for any other portfolio in the industry.
Finally on aviation, let me return to the advanced repair joint venture, which we formed 3.5 years ago. That initiative, as we feel days away from becoming reality. If it happens as we believe it will, we will have the most differentiated and exciting offering in the aviation leasing and maintenance markets. 3.5 years of planning and hard work is about to bear fruit with the potential for extraordinary results.
In real estate, the phrase, location, location, location is well known, but it also applies to the terminal business. When we started putting our infrastructure portfolio together years ago, we I consider that location. And in addition, we look for excellent connectivity to rail, water pipeline and roads. And it's hard to find all of those attributes in one location, which makes the selection process more difficult, but patience and hard work are about to bear fruit in that area as well. Our goal from the investment side in Infrastructure has always been to build at 3 times to 4 times EBITDA to have those businesses trade at 10 times to 12 times EBITDA. And to sell, if we choose at 15 times to 20 times EBITDA.
With respect to the Central Maine & Quebec Railroad and 50% interest in Long Ridge, we did exactly that and more. And with respect to Jefferson and Repauno, we now see the way clear to have the same results. As I mentioned at the beginning of this section. There are few things better to test the strength of the business model then extreme stress and we have that in space [Phonetic] this quarter and I'm pleased to report that we successfully got through Q2 and we see that success continuing and growing over the balance of Q3 and beyond.
In short, I have never been more excited about where FTAI is today nor have I ever been this confident in our prospects for the future. So with that, I'll turn the call back to Alan.
Alan Andreini -- Investor Relations
Thank you, Joe. Operator, you may now open the call to Q&A.
Questions and Answers:
Operator
Thank you. [Operator Instructions] And our first question comes from the line of Brandon Oglenski with Barclays. Your line is open.
Brandon R. Oglenski -- Barclays -- Analyst
Yeah. Hey, good morning, Joe and good morning to Alan, and thanks for taking my question. So you mentioned that during the quarter, you had 20% deferral rate on some of your leases, but it does sound like your prospects are much more I guess relatively bullish looking ahead, can you just remind us again the utilization estimates that you're running in 3Q and any deferral or default rates that you're expecting going forward?
Joseph P. Adams Jr. -- Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
As I mentioned on the engine side, we expect Q3 utilization to be about 65% to 70% which is sort of a -- we always have targeted 50% to 75%. So we think that will be strong and improving. And as I also mentioned earlier with the lack of airlines doing shop visits, we expect over the balance of the year that the engine market is going to get even stronger. And sometime next year, we even think there'll be a shortage. So outlook is very good there. On the -- on the airframe side, the utilization -- we actually, as I mentioned in the remarks we took back seven aircraft early and it was because we felt like either the credits where weak and they weren't going to survive or there was a lease term coming up shortly. And it was advantageous for us to get those assets back early. And we took those seven narrow-bodies and we've scraped the airframe and put the engines in the engine lease business. Because overall I think the supply of airframe is going to take longer to use up than the supply of engines. So we think being in the engine market will be better quicker to get those assets deployed than in the -- than in the competitive airframe market.
On the deferral side, we did say 20% of our portfolio we gave deferrals. Most of those deferrals or the biggest portion of those were in the 757 and 76 market. Because as I mentioned a lot of those operators are just not flying. So that's were probably the highest stress, but it's only about 15% of our portfolio and ultimately, we think the value of 75 and 76's will be fine because cargo is still very strong and most of those planes, the excess of those planes will end up being converted to cargo.
Brandon R. Oglenski -- Barclays -- Analyst
Okay. Really appreciate that response. And then you did highlight, I think at the end of your prepared remarks that you're getting close on these engine products. I think one products coming up soon, then one toward the end of the year. Can you just update us on the approval process? And then how does that fit into your commentary about potential -- I think you said the JV partner and MRO structure. Is that something just for your own fleet or is this something you want to sell externally to so?
Joseph P. Adams Jr. -- Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
So I'll start with that, on the MRO side it's mainly for our own fleet because we're going to have several products. We mentioned two that are in development and we'll have another three that we will have in 2022. We'll have about 80% of the [Indecipherable] portion of shop visit in this joint venture. And we'll will have a substantial approximately $2 million cost advantage and we wanted to have a shop that was really dedicated to us to manage our shop visits and make sure there's no interruption. And that we have a priority place in the queue. It's not an ownership position. So, it's simply a partnership, but with the dramatic change in the MRO business, we had been looking at this for over a year. Now then MRO shops are largely empty, we actually got a significantly better deal with a very large company and I think it will address all of our needs for our own fleet for the CFM engine over the next 10 years.
It will also allow us -- facilitate us managing the parts. One of the things that we will have an opportunity to do is, if we take our engines into shop, and we put in these new joint venture parts, we could sell some of the used serviceable material that comes out of that engine, the OEM parts, and that's something also that we want to be able to manage and control as that could be a significant source of income and profits for us going forward, given the volume of business that we see that being able to do.
The approval process is -- we have been working very collaboratively with the FAA and through this whole period. So there's been a lot of back and forth and a lot of sharing of information, a lot of adjusting as I said in terms of what was needed. So with the conclusion of this, the parts are actually made, they've have been reviewed, they're being produced, tests have been completed. So with the first part, as I mentioned, it's substantially complete, now it's just up for the final -- review of the final package, but all of what has been submitted has been seen before. So there's nothing new. So we're very hopeful and confident that will move smoothly as it has to date.
Brandon R. Oglenski -- Barclays -- Analyst
Okay, I appreciate that. Then last one, can you just talk about your current liquidity position and how that compares to I think the 30 aircraft, you mentioned in the pipeline that you're looking to acquire? And any commitments on the infrastructure side?
Joseph P. Adams Jr. -- Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Yes. So we just did a $400 million bond deal last week. So that pay down the revolver in full and we have $150 million-ish -- $170 million of cash. So the two deals that I mentioned 30 aircraft, roughly a few ballpark. The aircraft it's $8 million to $10 million per aircraft. We have plenty of liquidity to close on those deals.
With respect to infrastructure. I think the remaining commitment we have is to Repauno is about $10 million for finishing of the ship -- rail to ship loading system, so that'll happen in Q3. And Jefferson, the pipeline projects we're anticipating financing all of that in Q3 and Q4 with non-recourse debt financing at Jefferson as we did in the Q1 of this year in the tax-exempt market. So no significant leads at infrastructure.
Brandon R. Oglenski -- Barclays -- Analyst
Thank you.
Operator
Thank you. And our next question comes from Justin Long with Stephens. Your line is open.
Justin Long -- Stephens -- Analyst
Thanks and good morning. Maybe to follow-up on that, on that last question, Joe, could you just talk about how the recent bond deal was received? And going forward as you think about the different carriers, you could deploy capital, what's the update on where you would feel comfortable taking leverage going forward?
Joseph P. Adams Jr. -- Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Yes. So the bond deal we did was higher cost it was probably 300 basis points higher than what we've had typically traditionally done in the high yield market. As a result of being in the aviation business is not great on a fixed income side and then also with energy exposure. So, but having said that the reception was very, very strong. We had over $900 million of orders for the $400 million deal that we did. We launched 300 [Phonetic] and then increased it to 400 [Phonetic]. So very, very good reception bonds have traded up. So we're very pleased really to be able to access capital at this point, at that pricing. The way -- on the return side though, the returns have gone up more than 300 basis points. I would estimate, we're seeing higher returns on aviation in the order of a 1,000 basis point. So 10 percentage points higher than historically given that the industry is in tremendous distress, never been more distressed. And we're only doing deals right now on CFM engines with government owned airlines that have substantial backing. So it's hard to imagine a better set of circumstances for that given that we are not even factoring, when I talk about yield return, I'm not even factoring in the upside from having the joint venture parts that we will have next year -- starting next year or the end of this year. So it's a -- it's a dream in terms of being able to buy these assets at these prices from government-backed airlines. And I think the reason that it's happening is A, there is very little competition for us, nobody else is buying 17 year old, 18 year old airplanes, and b, the government's if you're an airline that is owned by government, you only have two choices, you can, you can go find people like us and that allows you to go back to the government and say I don't need this much money, I can take less and or conversely, if you don't do the deal you have to go ask the government for more money, which is not very popular. So that's why I think the deals in the market is so attractive.
In terms of leverage, we've always targeted 50%. We are on a non-recourse debt basis. We're about 50.6 I think or something. So we're right at the level we've targeted. Obviously, this environment is one where you'd want to have lower leverage, not higher leverage. So I think we'll look again to potentially issue preferred stock as we've done before to bring some of the leverage down and then just take advantage potentially of monetizing asset sales as we did with Long Ridge and CMQR last year. We could potentially sell minority stakes in some of the infra or do other things to raise capital, but not really looking to take leverage up much from here.
Justin Long -- Stephens -- Analyst
Okay. That's really helpful. And going back to what you said on the COVID headwind. I guess, now you're expecting it to be $50 million or less, as we think about these aviation deals that are in the pipeline, if you just get one of these two deals done, do you think that's enough to kind of fill the COVID hole this year?
Joseph P. Adams Jr. -- Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Yes. The first deal with Air France, it's approximately $20 million of additional EBITDA. And the second deal, we're working on right now is probably $40 million and the third deal about $25 million. So if you add all that up, you get well above $50 million.
Justin Long -- Stephens -- Analyst
Okay, that's great. I'll leave it at that. Thanks for the time.
Joseph P. Adams Jr. -- Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Yeah. Thank you.
Operator
Thank you. And our next question comes from Ariel Rosa with Bank of America. Your line is open.
Ariel Rosa -- Bank of America Merrill Lynch -- Analyst
Great, thank you and good morning, Joe and Alan. So Joe, I was hoping you could address the variability in demand patterns for aviation assets across regions? And just offer some thoughts on what you think the lingering effects of COVID could be in terms of the types of negotiations that you have an and not necessarily specific to FTAI, but also just kind of across the industry, how the experience of COVID kind of changes those negotiations and the overall market for aviation leasing?
Joseph P. Adams Jr. -- Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Yes. Sure, so several points there. I think regionally, I mean our view isn't dramatically different than anybody else's. And that is Asia recovered the fastest and you can see it in China, Vietnam, Korea, other markets in Asia have done pretty well considering on the domestic flights. So I mean long haul international is going to be challenged for many several years. And so I would not want to own a lot of 777 and A330s and we don't own any. So then, Europe is now sort of coming on where a lot of countries have gotten the virus largely under control and the flights are opening up and domestic flights, you know Air France, Alitalia, THY, Lufthansa, they're all starting to add in domestic market, which is what I -- we care about the most.
Long term what I mentioned is I wouldn't necessarily want to be facing a lot of new deliveries of aircraft in the next few years, because you can imagine that's not going to be very -- that's going to be hard given that there is going to be surplus equipment. So putting new asset on lease of almost any kind of is going to be difficult, but when I look at our -- where we are positioned is we are the engine people and what has happened previously in crisis and this is one, but it's much bigger is that airline stop putting engines through major overhauls and we've seen -- we've had that discussion, because every big airline they all confirm it, you see articles confirming the same thing, you see maintenance and repair shops are emptying out. So it's happening, but at the same time, people are flying those airplanes and they're using up the green time. So that for us means that sometime in early 2021, there is going to be increased demand for leased engines once people use up there green time in their existing fleet and there will probably be a shortage. So that's perfect timing to have our products that we're developing, which we expect to get approved this year, our maintenance joint venture, which we hope to announce this quarter and finalize very close and we're trying to add as many CFM engines at good prices as we can right now, that's what the Air France deal was in the other two deals we're looking at are all the same, CFM56 engines. So that's where we're focused and headed and I think it's a great, it's actually not that you want to benefit from this, but I think that being position there where you can see that's where the -- that's where the puck is going to be and that's where we're trying to skate to.
Ariel Rosa -- Bank of America Merrill Lynch -- Analyst
Got it. Understood. So sounds really exciting for FTAI and congratulations on navigating obviously a very difficult market. So turning to the FAD, it continues to be well in excess of the dividend or what maybe not well in excess, but comfortably in excess of the dividend in what's probably one of the most difficult quarters that anyone will face in the kind of businesses that you are in. Any thoughts on either increasing the dividend or thoughts around kind of uses of capital for that spread between where FAD is coming in and where the dividend, is at?
Joseph P. Adams Jr. -- Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Well, we have great Aviation investment opportunities. So with these returns that's where -- our priority would be to invest in CFM engines, just like we're doing so. So I see those airlines are not going to get out of distress quickly, it's going to go on. So I think there is going to be more deals. So we have good uses. In terms of the dividend, I mean it's been always been an important part of our shareholder investment thesis and maintaining that in this quarter was important for us and we've done that. And so I think that feels like a great place to be to have gone through what is arguably one of the worst environments ever for both aviation and energy and not reduce the dividend. And also have great investment opportunity. So I feel like we're going to good spot.
Ariel Rosa -- Bank of America Merrill Lynch -- Analyst
Got it. That makes lot of sense. Thanks for the time.
Operator
Thank you. And our next question comes from Josh Sullivan with the Benchmark Company. Your line is open.
Josh Sullivan -- Benchmark -- Analyst
Hey, good morning. Congrats on the quarter. Just a question on the PMA part opportunity and commercial production. Can you give us a flavor of how deep in discussions you are with airlines customers at this point? Do you have any LOIs or orders from airlines or other customers? And then, how do you see the go-to-market strategy unfolding with the joint venture?
Joseph P. Adams Jr. -- Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Yes, there are several orders that were both orders or two orders that are sizable were and before COVID hit. So yes, there are customers, and there are people who have put in pre-production orders, which is a good sign. Once COVID hit, obviously, it was very hard to get airlines to focus on this. And so, it's kind of, I would say, went into a marketing low pre-approval, but every airline we talked to is interested in two things. One is reducing costs, and this is a way to do that. And secondly, reducing any capital investment. And so, the opportunity for us is to offer a total solution to an airline and say, we will manage the shop visit for you. We will put in our proprietary products and -- into the engine and lease them to you on a power, almost like a PBH, power-by-the-hour business. So that I think will get a very, very good reception once we're through a little bit more of this and people are sort of back to a more normal environment, which I think will be the end of this year -- by the end of Q4.
Josh Sullivan -- Benchmark -- Analyst
Got it. Thank you. And then, just turning over to the cargo market, what's the timing calculus between returning passenger belly capacity, freighter conversions, we have seen some cargo rates come back to Earth. But if I add and others are looking at, say, kind of a 2023 return of global passenger traffic, how should we think about the tightness in the cargo market between now and then?
Joseph P. Adams Jr. -- Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
I think it's going to be tight. I mean, it's just hard to add a lot of supply of cargo airplanes. So to the extent you've got this excess demand and which is coming really from -- the two things that are happening is, one is the passenger planes are not flying as much on those international routes, which is a lot of the capacity, but also e-commerce is growing very rapidly. So we see demand in particular number of 737-800 aircraft that we were looking at where people are looking at converting them and putting them into China, in the domestic market in China, which has barely scratched the surface. So I think the outlook for cargo is pretty good for the next two to three years. I think anybody that forecasts longer than that in aviation is sort of getting themselves, but it does feel like there is two -- those two fundamentals are pretty strong, and it's hard to create a lot of cargo aircraft capacity that quickly.
Josh Sullivan -- Benchmark -- Analyst
Thank you.
Operator
Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Giuliano Bologna with BTIG. Your line is open.
Giuliano Bologna -- BTIG -- Analyst
Good morning, and congrats on successfully navigating a pretty tough environment here. I guess, jumping in on the aviation side, obviously, as you build out the portfolio, CFM56 has become increasingly relevant player in that market. I would be curious where you are in terms of the number of CFM56 engines that you have in the portfolio with Air France and then, where you could go with the other transactions?
Joseph P. Adams Jr. -- Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Do you have that number, Scott?
Scott Christopher -- Chief Financial Officer
I can -- I just don't have it right off the top my head here. I can get in the second part.
Giuliano Bologna -- BTIG -- Analyst
In the interim, I'll jump in on the -- kind of switching over to the engine repair JV topic. I'd be curious, yes, since you have some orders I believe on for some of the parts, how fast could you ramp up and ship some of those products and start recognizing your 25% share of the economics on those?
Joseph P. Adams Jr. -- Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
So our partner has been preparing for production all along and is in very good shape to produce products quite quickly. And there is not a significant bottleneck in the production. The only thing, when you do start up production, what typically happens is your yield starts out a little bit low and that increases as you make more in the parts. So in the beginning, there'll be more scrapping and then, the production will ramp up very quickly. So the facilities, the capability, the castings, the machining and the coatings are all readied and available for a very quick ramp-up.
Giuliano Bologna -- BTIG -- Analyst
That makes sense. And kind of switching gears a little bit, I realize that asset values on the infrastructure side are probably not back yet and probably take some time to recover. But if you're able to get some deals done with Long Ridge and potentially start scaling Jefferson, would you consider selling the remaining 50% stake in Long Ridge or selling a partial stake in Jefferson in the near term, call it, a year or two years and redeploy some of that capital either into aviation assets or related investments like MRO type of platform that would help scale the leasing business?
Joseph P. Adams Jr. -- Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Yes, I think we're going to have a great MRO deal without having to buy an MRO, which is what I -- that would be my preference, but yes, we would be open to that. And I do think that probably the time to sell Long Ridge is when it's operating, and it should be where they are targeting -- [Indecipherable] is now saying potentially September, it was originally promised for November of 2021, and they're saying September now and maybe August. So we should be -- we could be operating in a little over a year, which would be great. And that's what I think -- that's where we have the longest contract coverage and you take away the issue that some buyers have. They just don't buy things that are not operating. So you get access to potentially the lowest cost of capital in the infrastructure world, which is fully contracted and operating. And so, I think that would be -- that's something that we would definitely think about.
Jefferson as well, it's -- these pipeline projects are huge step-change for the capabilities of the terminal and what it does, it allows us to compete in much bigger projects. So it's not just crude by rail or refined products to Mexico. It's serving refineries and exporting refined products for the two largest refineries in North America. So that's what this will allow us to do, and I wouldn't want to sell without getting the benefit of all the work that we've done to get it to this point. So -- but that's definitely something that we would consider as well as we did last year and the markets are coming back. I think there were a number of sale processes, which were -- as people were thinking of launching in April and May and they stopped. Obviously, it's not a great M&A market, but we see them restarting now. So people are confident that values are back. And so, I think that the M&A market will start to pick up. And in particular, there is tremendous amount of infrastructure capital that's still being raised. There's a lot of it now being raised in Europe. European companies are looking to invest in North America. So I think the infrastructure did from an M&A standpoint will be strong.
Giuliano Bologna -- BTIG -- Analyst
Great. And then, just...
Joseph P. Adams Jr. -- Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Particularly, zero interest rates for the next, who knows how long.
Giuliano Bologna -- BTIG -- Analyst
Fast answer. And then, just pivoting over to dividend kind of the payout, I realize that there are a lot of opportunities. On the investment side, they're extremely attractive. So there is probably that went into the balance and then, at least in the near term in terms of talking about moving the distribution, and also getting the recovery, as you invest more into other aviation asset to get more accretion and also get the -- as the impact of deferrals roll off, you should see a significant boost in kind of both EBITDA and FAD probably into the end of the year and into ' 21. I'd be curious what kind of leverage are you looking at in terms of essentially driving an increase in the distribution?
Joseph P. Adams Jr. -- Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Well, we've always said we wanted two-to-one coverage. So once we exceed that, that's when we would look at raising the dividend. And you're right, there is potential that it could ramp meaningfully late this year or early next year.
Giuliano Bologna -- BTIG -- Analyst
That makes a lot of sense. I really appreciate the time and I will jump back in the queue. Thank you.
Joseph P. Adams Jr. -- Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Thank you.
Scott Christopher -- Chief Financial Officer
Yeah. Again, just for the follow-up with respect to the CFM engines, currently, we have 145 CFM engines and then, pro forma for the two new deals, we have over 200 plus.
Operator
Thank you.
Joseph P. Adams Jr. -- Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
So 200 and I would say that there are 22,000 CFM56 engines out in the world. So just to give you, a sense of the total market is enormous and we are still -- we are one of the bigger players, but we're not by any means close to being considered that big and a market mover yet.
Operator
Thank you. And our next question comes from Frank Galanti with Stifel. Your line is open.
Frank Galanti -- Stifel, Nicolaus & Company -- Analyst
Yeah. Hi, Joe. Congrats on the strong quarter. I wanted to follow up on the engine business. It's actually pretty surprised that you guys expect to get back to utilization above 65% in 3Q. And so to that end, good job on that. But those 40 new leases that you signed in the quarter, can you give us a sense for who those leases were, kind of, geographically end market and then, what those rates were comparable to a year ago or I guess the end of last year?
Joseph P. Adams Jr. -- Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
The biggest uptake is Europe, and the rates are comparable. I mean, there is no -- there's not a lot of rate pressure on engine leasing right now. And I don't foresee it happening. I see it going the other way potentially.
Frank Galanti -- Stifel, Nicolaus & Company -- Analyst
Okay. And so, I guess to follow up on the aviation market, the leasing market, obviously, the largest toggle for anybody's investment case in FTAI and aviation asset specifically is based on expectations around effectively aircraft utilization and the implications that will have for the burn rate on green time that currently exists. To that end, would you be able to add any color on how much green time exists for the engines that you guys focus on?
Joseph P. Adams Jr. -- Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Yes, we actually -- we did our own analysis and then, we hired an independent appraiser to do an independent analysis. And we looked at both the CFM56-5B, which is on the A320 and the 7B, which is on the 737 NG. And both our numbers and the experts numbers came out saying that sometime around the end of Q1, the available supply of engines will be less than the available -- than the demand for those engines, so the Q1 of 2021. So by the end of this year, people expect probably 75%, 80% of the A320 and 737 aircraft to be flying globally. And then, assuming that happens, then you basically -- with the limited number of shop visits, you basically are out of engines by the end of Q1.
Frank Galanti -- Stifel, Nicolaus & Company -- Analyst
Okay. Great. Yeah, that's super helpful. Thanks very much. Congrats again on a good quarter.
Joseph P. Adams Jr. -- Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
We can share that information with you. We have that available. I think it's in the slide deck or one of our decks.
Frank Galanti -- Stifel, Nicolaus & Company -- Analyst
That would be great. I'll follow up offline. Thanks so much.
Joseph P. Adams Jr. -- Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Yeah.
Operator
Thank you. And our next question comes from Devin Ryan with JMP Securities. Your line is open.
Devin Ryan -- JMP Securities -- Analyst
Great. Good morning. Most questions have been asked here, but I want to just come back to the sale leaseback transactions and the opportunity. So, Joe, you walk through what's driving them right now, which makes sense. There is not a lot of competition, which is a pretty good position to be in. Do you see the window of opportunities like these closing, just as economies reopened and flying increases, or is this kind of a several year opportunity? And I'm assuming that you guys are probably getting a fair amount of attention in the market for these deals, especially if these other couple come together. So I suspect that could actually drive more to you to the extent there is going to be more activity like this in the market.
Joseph P. Adams Jr. -- Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Yes. I think there'll be more, because as I mentioned, airlines are not going to be unstressed [Phonetic] for quite a while. So their mode is going to be looking at anything they can do to generate cash and selling, and selling and leasing back some of their older equipment, which they plan to phase out is obviously attractive because several people are doing it and I think more will do it. So I don't see it ending right away, but you can never be sure markets -- when markets get distressed, capital flows in and you don't want to wait around and assume that's going to be the case. So I think that these deals are here and now and that's why we're acting. But I do think that it's not going to be the end of it. And the beauty about our strategy is that we have two ways to monetize those assets. You can actually keep them as an airplane and lease them to somebody else.
And by the way, whenever an airline tells you, they're going to phase out an airplane, they almost never get the timing right. They are almost always keep those assets longer than they think, I would say, 90% of the time. So that's an opportunity for extensions, but not that you count on that, but it usually happens, but we can -- we have the opportunity to keep it as an airplane or scrap the airframe, which is our base case and just leasing engines. And I see a number of airlines on the horizon, where we could develop leasing programs for the CFM56 engine for their entire needs, so they don't have to do any shop visits, they don't have to do any acquiring of engines, they can rely solely on us, and we have a cost advantage in the shop visit. We can manage that shop visit for $3 million versus $6 million average industry costs, so that delta is something that we're going to obviously point out and make sure that we can grow that business by taking advantage of that and still generate amazing returns.
Devin Ryan -- JMP Securities -- Analyst
Okay. Thanks, Joe. And then just a follow-up here, I know this is our job as analyst here, but at $15, it doesn't feel like at least to us the valuation is getting a lot of credit for the forward opportunity, which I'm assuming you agree with, but appreciate there is a lot of moving parts to the story right now. So it can sometimes be complex from the outside to look at. As you evolve the firm to more of a vertically integrated aviation company, which it feels like is where we're headed here given the opportunity set need to deploy capital. As you potentially exit some of the infrastructure assets, how are you thinking about what that does for, call it, a firmwide valuation? What -- I am assuming there has to be some calculus around as you have to think about allocating capital to the different opportunities.
Joseph P. Adams Jr. -- Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Yes, it's a good question. We've acknowledged that and sometimes, our story is too complicated. We would benefit by simplifying it and simplifying it as we grow the joint venture in the engine business, that could be a separate business and a separate company, which might be better as a stand-alone asset. So that's a goal. Obviously, we didn't expect this kind of disruption that hit us. We had the best quarter ever Q1. And then starting in April, the world shutdown. So I think everything is. On that side, it's a goal. It's something we'd like to move toward. Obviously, the stock is better now than it was in May. But it is still not reflective of what we think it will be, but I'm not complaining. I'm just saying, we're going to work hard to get it there.
Devin Ryan -- JMP Securities -- Analyst
Okay. Thanks, Joe. Appreciate it.
Operator
Thank you. And our next question comes from Chris Wetherbee with Citi. Your line is open.
James Monigan -- Citigroup -- Analyst
Hey, guys. James Monigan again on for Chris. Just wanted to follow up on that last question about the -- with respect to the transactions, you're starting the sale leasebacks. I just wanted to understand you're still handling the maintenance on those engines and those assets. Are these more sort of financially opportunistic transaction? Just wanted to understand how these might be -- these transactions coming up might be different than what you typically do and -- or if that's even the case and sort of how that might fit into your long-term strategy? Just kind of wanted to get your view or thoughts there.
Joseph P. Adams Jr. -- Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
The transactions are very similar to what we have been doing. It's just, I'd say, two differences. One is they're bigger. We're acquiring more assets at one time. So you do a 15-aircraft deal instead of one or two airplanes and so, larger transaction. They also involve government-owned airlines, which is something previously a lot of government-owned airlines would never have considered doing these transactions, but the financial reality of today has changed enough that they are looking at everything.
So that market opportunity is new to us, but the fundamental deal is the same and that we're going to own an airplane at the end of the lease. When it comes back to us, we will have an airplane with engines on it. And what we've typically done is that gives us a choice, if we're going to release it, we could -- if there is people who want to release the whole airplane with the engines, we could do that. But alternatively, we've been able and very successful in selling off the airframes and then just leasing the engines. And in large part, we get almost the same cash flow from the two engines as you get from a whole airplane and you end up putting money in your pocket by selling the airframe. So there's been great-- financially and from a flexibility point of view, it's our core strength.
James Monigan -- Citigroup -- Analyst
Got it. And then also turning to infrastructure, I just wanted to get your updated take on crude by rail and sort of interest you're kind of seeing there, if any? And maybe so to get your view on if there will be and when there would be a rebound?
Joseph P. Adams Jr. -- Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Yes. So I think ignoring the shutdown of the DAPL, which we don't know if that'll happen. But if it did happen, there'd be a lot of crude by rail, all of a sudden, moving. That's out of the Bakken, but that's in the courts. And so we don't know the answer to that.
The other market opportunity is Canada, and that is coming back. And we see the spreads widening now back out to normal or showing in the forward market looking normal in Q4 of this year. And in talking with some of the producers and refiners, people are anticipating that crude by rail will still be in the mix. And people are making commitments and looking at investments. And one in particular people are working on still is we talked about the last time or two quarters ago was a diluent recovery unit, a DRU. And that's where you build a processing plant in Canada, which strips out the diluent, so that what you're shipping is really undiluted bitumen, and that has to move in rail. So it's -- so if that happens, then we're looking at people making 10-year commitments to crude by rail, which we still believe that will happen. So we're still working on that. But it's obviously, with the spreads down where they are now, there's not a lot of -- not great optimism, but it's definitely coming back.
James Monigan -- Citigroup -- Analyst
Okay. That makes sense. Thank you for the time.
Joseph P. Adams Jr. -- Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Yes.
Operator
Thank you. And our next question comes from Rob Salmon with Wolfe Research. Your line is open.
Rob Salmon -- Wolfe Research -- Analyst
Hey, good morning, guys. And thanks for squeezing me in. A quick kind of -- perhaps, I missed it in the prepared remarks. The asset impairment charge that you guys took in the second quarter, was that related to the seven aircraft that you proactively returned, or was this related to something else?
Joseph P. Adams Jr. -- Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Scott, do you want to answer that?
Scott Christopher -- Chief Financial Officer
Yeah. Yeah, that related to the early return of some aircraft that we took. We took back six aircraft as part of early release -- return of a lease. And then, there was one engine included in that overall impairment.
Rob Salmon -- Wolfe Research -- Analyst
Yeah. That's helpful. And another clarification question and then, a longer-term one. The clarification question is, when you guys were talking about the percentage of your book that's off lease. I want to say you had mentioned it was 20%. Was that 20% of the 15% that is kind of exposed to the 757, 767 market, or was that -- 20% is off-lease, and all of that market, basically, is kind of off-lease currently?
Joseph P. Adams Jr. -- Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Well, the 20%, I think you're referring to was the amount of rent deferral we gave to lessees in the quarter. And that was what was in the prepared remarks, if that's what you're referring to. And that's for the entire portfolio.
Rob Salmon -- Wolfe Research -- Analyst
Yes, that was, Joe. Yeah. And then, I think you'd mentioned that the majority of that was in 757, 767s.
Joseph P. Adams Jr. -- Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
The most of this -- yes. Yeah, I think two-thirds of that was in the 75 and 767 markets, which is 15% of our portfolio. But the biggest chunk of that deferral was for those aircraft, because those are the aircraft that are the hardest to fly and lease right now. So the narrow-body fleet is actually performing very well. The engines are doing well. Cargo is doing well. It's -- the 75 and 76 is the most challenged. But it will come back with the freighter market being strong and the leisure markets reopening, it's just slower to develop, but that's where the deferral -- most of the deferrals were there.
Rob Salmon -- Wolfe Research -- Analyst
Got it. Helpful. And then Joe, bigger picture. Just in light of COVID, could you kind of provide us an updated -- your updated thoughts with regard to the engine repair market opportunity for FTAI? Like how should we be thinking about kind of your ultimate share opportunity, potentially things getting pushed out, but maybe you've got a bigger end market now. Just how should we think about those puts-and-takes?
Joseph P. Adams Jr. -- Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Yeah. So I actually think it is a bigger market because, for instance, Air France doing a deal with us and then talking about engine leasing opportunities with us, Delta telling us they would entertain engine leasing. These are carriers that typically wouldn't have thought about, they would would've done everything in-house. But with the financial crisis and the cash crisis, they're much more open to outsourcing functions that consume capital, and engine shop visits consume a lot of capital.
So with our products that we have coming, on the joint venture side, we can overhaul a CFM56 engine for under $3 million versus an industry cost average of $6 million. And so, where I would love to see us get to is being able to go to a larger airline. Obviously, we're going to do our own fleet the way we're doing it. But you could go to a larger airline and you could say, we'll do all of your CFM56 engines for you, and here's your hourly rate. And you're done, you're out of it, and you don't have to invest capital. You don't have to manage that and you get a rate that saves you money and doesn't require you to invest capital in shop visits. So that opportunity, I think, is coming much, much faster than it would have otherwise because of the crisis.
And as I mentioned, the CFM engine is 22,000 engines in the world. It's not going away for the next 15 and maybe 30 years. They're still making the aircraft and there -- a lot of the 737-800s are going to be converted into cargo airplanes to replace the 757. So that -- that's going to have demand for many, many years. So I think the opportunity is fantastic for us. And one of the things I mentioned also is we do want to have a maintenance MRO partner, and we're very close to finalizing that deal. So I think we'll have all the pieces in place to actually do this.
Rob Salmon -- Wolfe Research -- Analyst
Appreciate the perspective.
Joseph P. Adams Jr. -- Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Thanks.
Operator
Thank you. And our next question comes from Robert Dodd with Raymond James. Your line is open.
Robert Dodd -- Raymond James -- Analyst
Hi, guys. And congrats on the quarter. One more about aviation. And you mentioned, Joe, in the prepared remarks that the deal with the MRO could give you a -- part of it would be to get a preferential place in the queue, the shop. And you've talked before about how those can take a while if capacity isn't there. And if we end up with a squeeze on availability for shop visits when green time runs out sometime next year, how much do you think that preferential -- if the deal gets done, that preferential price in the queue could add to kind of value or another way, if we put that plus your cost advantage on a shop visit, plus potentially a preferential place in the queue, what could that do to kind of the yield on engine assets, either ROE, EBITDA yield, whichever way you want to look at it, say, a year from now?
Joseph P. Adams Jr. -- Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Well, that's -- I mean, terrific question. There's a couple of elements. One is that the preferential treatment, and we're also working on price -- advantageous pricing under the deal and on a fixed basis, so a no surprise basis. And also, one of the things we're focused on working together, and one of the reasons we want to do this as a partnership is we want to shorten the time an engine is in the shop. Because often, an engine will go in, and everything is done in sequence, and you might be waiting months for a single section of the engine before the whole engine can come out. And so, part of our design is to create module inventory. And as I've mentioned before, the CFM56 engine has four modules. And so, to the extent the work is needed primarily on one module, you could swap one module out of an engine and be out of the shop in 15 days instead of six months. So there's tremendous benefits. The other benefit, as I alluded to, was being able to monetize parts.
And to the extent, we have our own MRO shop partner, we'll be better -- we'll be able to better manage the parts that come out of that engine and be more effective at that. So when you put all that together, if you think about today, you can earn 25% or 30% unlevered on an engine. And if the average shop cost is $6 million, and our cost drops to $3 million, then we should earn 50% unlevered. And actually, those are not -- sounds high, but maybe somewhere between 25% and 50%, but not -- it's definitely going to be going up, particularly if it's a tight market, and we can turn the inventory faster.
Robert Dodd -- Raymond James -- Analyst
I appreciate that. Thanks a lot. And then, one more kind of structurally. Obviously, the aviation business, you've mentioned might make sense as a stand-alone entity. It probably would make more sense as a stand-alone C-corp entity rather than an LLC. And if you were to sell off stakes or spin the other parts, that could make sense. So is that -- obviously, we've talked about a C-corp conversion before, is that still on the table? Any idea about the time frame for that? Would it make sense to do it while the infrastructure assets are still owned, or can you give us any thoughts there?
Joseph P. Adams Jr. -- Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Yes. The goal would be to get rid of K-1s because we know that's not helpful. So yes, to convert to C-corp is definitely on the table. And it's something -- I don't have a specific time line on it, but it's rising up in terms of the priority level. So, we're working on it. But -- and we do think it has value on multiple fronts, but I don't have a specific timeline.
Robert Dodd -- Raymond James -- Analyst
Got it. I appreciate it. Thanks a lot.
Joseph P. Adams Jr. -- Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Yes.
Operator
[Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from Scott Buck with B. Riley. Your line is open.
Scott Buck -- B.Riley FBR -- Analyst
Yeah. Good morning, guys. Assuming you're able to close in the two aviation asset transactions, does that change the way you think about additional asset acquisitions for 2021, or do you continue to be fairly active in the market next year?
Joseph P. Adams Jr. -- Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
I think we continue to be active, because as I mentioned, the CFM56 market is enormous. And our advantage is huge. And so, I think we would continue to capitalize on that to the extent, it advances the business, and you can generate those types of returns.
Scott Buck -- B.Riley FBR -- Analyst
Great. And have you seen any material change in the asset pricing in -- here in July versus the Air France deal back in April and May?
Joseph P. Adams Jr. -- Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
No.
Scott Buck -- B.Riley FBR -- Analyst
Perfect. Thank you, guys.
Operator
Thank you. And I'm not showing any further questions at this time. I'd now like to turn the conference back to your speaker, Alan Andreini for any further remarks.
Alan Andreini -- Investor Relations
Thank you, Sidney. And thank you all for participating in today's conference call. We look forward to updating you after Q3.
Joseph P. Adams Jr. -- Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Thanks, everyone.
Operator
[Operator Closing Remarks]
Duration: 71 minutes
Call participants:
Alan Andreini -- Investor Relations
Joseph P. Adams Jr. -- Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Scott Christopher -- Chief Financial Officer
Brandon R. Oglenski -- Barclays -- Analyst
Justin Long -- Stephens -- Analyst
Ariel Rosa -- Bank of America Merrill Lynch -- Analyst
Josh Sullivan -- Benchmark -- Analyst
Giuliano Bologna -- BTIG -- Analyst
Frank Galanti -- Stifel, Nicolaus & Company -- Analyst
Devin Ryan -- JMP Securities -- Analyst
James Monigan -- Citigroup -- Analyst
Rob Salmon -- Wolfe Research -- Analyst
Robert Dodd -- Raymond James -- Analyst
Scott Buck -- B.Riley FBR -- Analyst
