Apple (AAPL -1.22%) might be the biggest, most popular company in the world. But investors don't give the iGiant anywhere near the same level of respect as its largest tech peers.
Apple is trading at an average 40% discount to Facebook (META -4.13%), Alphabet (GOOG -1.10%) (GOOGL -1.23%), and Microsoft (MSFT -1.27%)! And it's pretty much always been this way.
AAPL PE Ratio (TTM) data by YCharts
But why is this the case?
Some investors have resigned themselves to this reality. Others have very plausible excuses:
- Apple's simply too big for its own good.
- Apple isn't growing as fast as the other three.
But while these make sense on the surface level, I simply don't think they explain the heart of the matter. There's only one plausible explanation: Apple's moat is nowhere near as wide as those of the other three, and the market knows it.
It's not about size or growth rates
It's true, Apple is the largest, most valuable company the world has ever known. With a bump of just 10%, it would become the history's first trillion-dollar organization. But while the law of large numbers does make sense on paper, Apple's not so big compared to its peers that it should necessitate such a discount.
If you look at the top ten largest stocks listed on the New York Stock Exchange and Nasdaq, all three of these peers sit in the top six.
Data source: Finviz.com
It's also worth stating that just because a company is approaching a landmark like $1 trillion, it doesn't mean it can't stop growing from there. Indeed, because the stock market has always gone up over the long-run, all-time barriers are routinely broken. There's no reason Apple couldn't keep growing.
Others will argue that Apple is simply not growing as fast as its tech peers. While that's true with Facebook, it isn't with Microsoft or Alphabet.
| Metric | Apple | Alphabet | Microsoft | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-Year Revenue CAGR | 8% | 17% | 3% | 48% |
| 3-Year EPS CAGR | 13% | 9% | 11% | 53% |
Data source: E*Trade, SEC filings. CAGR = Compounded Annual Growth Rate. EPS figures calculated using non-GAAP figures when applicable.
While Facebook is growing demonstrably faster, Apple's earnings growth has outpaced Alphabet (surprise!), and it has Microsoft beat on both top and bottom lines.
And yet Apple still trades at a 40%+ discount.
What's a moat?
Before getting into the weeds, it's important we define our terms. A "moat" is another word for an enduring competitive advantage. In the simplest sense, a moat is what keeps customers (or users) coming back to a single company year after year, and holding the competition at bay for decades.
Image source: Getty Images
There are four key types of economic moats, and while each company has elements of multiple moats in its business model, a single moat dominates. For the purposes of this article, that's convenient.
- Network Effect: I consider this the strongest of all moats. With each additional user, the value of a network becomes greater, further incentivizing more users to join. This is Facebook's key moat. As each user joins the network, others are incentivized to join, creating a virtuous cycle.
- High Switching Costs: If a customer will need to pay dearly to switch away from a service -- in terms of direct costs, time, or headaches in general -- they are more likely to stick with the incumbent. This is Microsoft's key moat. Users the world over have been using the Office Suite -- Word, Excel, PowerPoint, etc.-- for over two decades. This reliable income helps fund other initiatives.
- Low-Cost Production: If a company can offer a product or service for markedly lower costs than the competition -- with the same or greater value -- it will be the provider of choice. This is Alphabet's key moat. Remember, Google makes most of its money on advertising. Because it has seven products with over one billion users each -- search, Maps, Gmail, YouTube, Chrome, Android, and Play Store -- it has tons of data that it gets just for maintaining these properties. Advertisers pay hand over fist for that data.
- Intangible Assets: This includes things like brand value, patents, and regulatory protection. This is Apple's key moat. Its brand is the most valuable in the world, and patents on in-house developed chips are a key differentiator.
No moat will ever mean that a business is safe forever. As Arjun Sethi -- co-founder and CEO of MessageMe -- recently wrote: "A moat simply buys a company time to figure out the next great business." [emphasis in original].
Alphabet, Microsoft, and Facebook have business models with uber-wide moats around them. It would take a herculean effort to create a social network with as much stickiness as Facebook, Instagram, or WhatsApp (and not get bought out by Facebook). Someone would need to wrest "Google it" from our lexicon to break the stranglehold that Alphabet has on our search data. And competitors have been trying for decades to create a better Excel spreadsheet.
Those advantages give the leaders of these businesses an enormous head-start on figuring out the Next Big Thing.
There's no questioning Apple's status in the industry. But it has to count on its users continually upgrading to the next iPhone to remain relevant. That's not exactly an enduring advantage when viewed against the protection that Alphabet, Facebook, and Microsoft enjoy.
Don't get me wrong -- I'm an Apple shareholder myself. The company has done a great job of introducing high switching-costs via the iCloud, and it benefits from the network effect of third-party app developers building on its iOS. Its efforts in providing services have also been hugely successful.
But for now, it is predominantly an iPhone maker. And it is priced accordingly. I think the price is fair -- which is why I'm holding my shares. But I have no illusions of it ever consistently trading above a P/E of 20. You shouldn't either.
