A few weeks ago, someone pulled out a gun and shot four people in a Detroit tax preparer's office over a late income tax refund. Though such outrageous reactions are rare, thankfully, there is a surprisingly emotional division among people on the issue of whether it is best to aim (no pun intended) for a tax refund or not:
- The "Yes" camp believe it is best to shoot for a refund
- The "No" camp don't even think about it
Which camp do you think is bigger? The answer might surprise you. In 2011 (the latest available — I know, the IRS isn't too fast when it comes to updating their stats), a full 78 percent of all individual tax returns received a refund. Clearly the "yes camp" is the greater. The average refund? $2,872.
The "no camp" seems to make up for their lack of number with venom. There's no shortage of self-proclaimed experts who wag their self-righteous fingers at the nearly 80 percent of individual taxpayers who got refunds. When you comb the Internet for opinions, there are far more "No camp" posts and articles, many of which are surprisingly venomous and insulting. The word stupid (and worse) appears more often than you would expect in an otherwise rational kind of debate.
Okay, so to which camp do you belong — the one with numbers or the one with self-righteous venom? More importantly, why? Let's take a look at the arguments for both camps:
The naysayers proclaim refunds a bad idea because:
- You forego precious interest on your money by forking it over before it's necessary.
- In addition, inflation kills you — you give Uncle Sam precious money, but it's worth much less when you get the refund.
- You never know when an emergency will strike. When it does, you can't get that overpayment back from Uncle Sam. It's much better to have the money sitting in an emergency fund which you can replenish before April 15.
- It shows you're too lazy or incompetent to do proper tax planning (no warm-and-fuzzy crowd, this).
They add more reasons, which amount to simply rehashing the list. Funny, but true. This post lists Reason #4 and Reason #5 as the same thing, only with different (shrill) verbiage to justify it.
They jump for joy at their annual refund bonanza because:
- The amount of interest you can earn in a savings account is trivial. Assuming the average refund of $2,872 is earned evenly throughout the year, how much would that cost you in terms of lost interest? We reviewed online banks a while ago and found Ally Bank to have the highest online (i.e., national) interest rates on savings accounts, which at the time of writing was 0.87 percent per year. If that rate remained the same throughout the year, the total loss of interest would be ... $12.49! The guilt-ladling experts proclaim that a folly so great you'll never recover.
- The IRS will slap you with penalties way, way higher than $12.49 if you sail too close to the wind and end up needing to pay in more than 10 percent of your tax liability. Again, going to the averages, the average tax bill for 2011 was $9,377. If, trying to save $12 in interest, you underestimate your tax by even a dollar, the IRS will slap you with a $938 fine. A dollar a month is cheap insurance against a nasty surprise.
- The tax code is complicated, and only gets more complicated each year. For example, next year you need to add extensive paperwork simply to avoid the new health care fine/tax. That's just the latest in a long string of added burdens put on ordinary taxpayers. Therefore, it has become next to impossible for an ordinary person to estimate their tax liability accurately a year in advance. If you want to do the kind of tax planning those experts insist you should, you are going to have to hire an expert. Can you do that for less than $12.49?
- What inflation? In the '70s, this was a valid argument, but inflation running of less than 1.5 percent per year now has pretty much wiped out the strength of this argument. In fact, the reverse may be true: By waiting to buy that HD TV with my refund, I actually saved a couple hundred dollars one year. (Inflation doesn't apply to everything evenly.)
- Human nature: Getting a $1,000 refund beats having to pay $1,000 after Christmas shopping season any day. Why be a sourpuss for a buck a month?
- More human nature: We tend to prefer lump sums to regular payments. (More than 90 percent of lottery winners pick the lump sum.) Getting a single refund check for $2,400 just feels better on many levels than $200 per month. And, given the small cost of a buck a month, why not?
- Everyone loves a mystery. The tax code has become so complicated, and our lives unpredictable enough, that planning your taxes accurately has become next to impossible. So, you suspect you're getting a refund, but you don't know how big. Now you have the anticipation of waiting to see how big. For the same $12, you have another cheap thrill.
- If you know you have a refund coming but you don't know how big, you have a terrific incentive to file early and beat the rush. Admit it: It feels really good when you get something done ahead of time. So now you have a triple shot of joy: you're done early, you know you're getting money (even if it's your own) AND you've got the cheap thrill of guessing how much. All for just a buck a month.
Can you tell? I'm firmly in the "yes" camp. Those who know me know it's not often I side with the majority — there are too many times people simply follow the loudest voice out there, right or not. In this case, though, the logic is so overwhelmingly in favor of shooting for a refund, it's easy to see why most people do it.
Are you still in the same camp?
Which do you think is better: receiving a $2,000 refund or having to pay Uncle Sam $2,000 right after the holiday shopping season? Especially if the price tag for that simple joy is a buck a month, while the penalty for guessing wrong can approach a thousand dollars ... on top of what you have to pay in taxes alone?
Let the hysterical guilt-mongers shrill all they want. Shooting for a refund is a no-brainer in my book. Ordinary people are sometimes smarter than their critics. This would be one of those times.
Come on, what else can you do for $12 that adds that many smiles to your life? What do you do? What do you think you should do? (Not always the same thing, is it?)
The original article: Tax refunds: Why following the crowd makes sense appeared on FiveCentNickel.com
Additional personal finance articles can be found on FiveCentNickel.com.
Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.