Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

What Is the Die Size of Intel Corporation's Knights Landing Xeon Phi Processor?

By Ashraf Eassa – Jan 13, 2015 at 3:49PM

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More

A look at the potential die size and its cost structure implications of Intel's upcoming Xeon Phi processor.

In early 2013, SemiAccurate's Charlie Demerjian wrote an interesting piece titled "Why is Intel so secretive about [Xeon] Phi's die?" In the article, Demerjian said sources had told him that the die size of Intel's (INTC -1.11%) 22-nanometer Knights Corner Xeon Phi chip (a specialized co-processor for high-performance computing workloads) was "closer to 700mm^2 than 600."

(AMD -1.65%)

If Intel wants to improve margins on these chips -- particularly as their sales grow and become a more impactful part of the company's data center group revenue stream -- it will need to either improve the designs in order to fetch a premium or lower production costs.

While Intel's next-generation 14-nanometer Knights Landing part looks to offer compelling features and specifications, only time will tell if it will be competitive enough to allow the company to raise prices while growing sales volumes. With that in mind, I think it's worth looking at the potential cost structure of the upcoming Knights Landing chip.

Digging deeper into cost structure
Let's assume that, per SemiAccurate's comments, the die size of Knights Corner (the 22-nanometer part) sits at 675 square millimeters. This is a high-performance part built on Intel's high-performance 22-nanometer process, so I'm also going to make the reasonable assumption that the transistor density of the Knights Corner Xeon Phi is roughly equivalent to the reported density of the 662-square-millimeter Haswell-EP.

This would suggest Knights Corner features roughly 5.8 billion transistors. At Intel's November investor meeting, though, data center group chief Diane Bryant claimed the 14-nanometer Knights Corner Xeon Phi chip features 7.1 billion transistors.

If we assume moving to 14-nanometer roughly doubles transistor density, then Knights Landing's die size should stand at about 413 square millimeters. Now, according to Intel, the capital intensity per wafer in moving from 22-nanometer to 14-nanometer goes up by 30%. Notice, though, that the transistor count looks to be up by 22% based on these estimates.

So if it costs X for a wafer of Knights Corner chips, then it will cost 1.3X for a wafer of Knights Landing chips. Assuming similar yields per wafer, if Intel is getting Y good Knights Corner dies, then the smaller die of the Knights Landing chip will allow for approximately 1.76Y good die per wafer (note: for this calculation I employed Silicon Edge's dies per wafer estimator and used the square root of the estimated die sizes for the dimensions).

If the cost per die for a Knights Corner is X/Y and the cost per die of a Knights Landing is (1.3/1.76)(X/Y), then, if I've done my math right, the Knights Landing -- with a better architecture and packed with more transistors -- should actually be about 74% the cost to build as the Knights Corner. Again, this assumes similar yields.

What does this mean?
While the Knights Landing might be cheaper to build from a die perspective, the Knights Landing solutions will, according to AnandTech, be paired with specially designed on-package memory from Micron. This advanced memory might be more expensive than the GDDR5 found on today's Knights Corner boards.

In a nutshell, while I believe that -- if Intel gets 14-nanometer yields sorted out -- the Knights Landing die should be cheaper to build, Intel's gross margin structure on the parts will also be a function of the chip's sales price. This, in my view, will be a function of the performance and power competitiveness of the parts, something that won't be known until the products have launched (Intel claims first systems using Knights Landing in the second half of 2015) and have had some time in the marketplace. 

Ashraf Eassa owns shares of Intel. The Motley Fool recommends Apple, Intel, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool owns shares of Apple and Intel. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Invest Smarter with The Motley Fool

Join Over 1 Million Premium Members Receiving…

  • New Stock Picks Each Month
  • Detailed Analysis of Companies
  • Model Portfolios
  • Live Streaming During Market Hours
  • And Much More
Get Started Now

Stocks Mentioned

Intel Stock Quote
Intel
INTC
$29.34 (-1.11%) $0.33
Apple Stock Quote
Apple
AAPL
$148.11 (-1.96%) $-2.96
Nvidia Stock Quote
Nvidia
NVDA
$162.70 (-1.51%) $-2.49
Advanced Micro Devices Stock Quote
Advanced Micro Devices
AMD
$75.14 (-1.65%) $-1.26
Micron Technology Stock Quote
Micron Technology
MU
$58.41 (-0.88%) $0.52

*Average returns of all recommendations since inception. Cost basis and return based on previous market day close.

Related Articles

Motley Fool Returns

Motley Fool Stock Advisor

Market-beating stocks from our award-winning analyst team.

Stock Advisor Returns
356%
 
S&P 500 Returns
118%

Calculated by average return of all stock recommendations since inception of the Stock Advisor service in February of 2002. Returns as of 11/27/2022.

Discounted offers are only available to new members. Stock Advisor list price is $199 per year.

Premium Investing Services

Invest better with The Motley Fool. Get stock recommendations, portfolio guidance, and more from The Motley Fool's premium services.