Why Mark Cuban Thinks Crypto Needs More Regulations
Cuban's personal financial losses influenced his opinion.
In June, Mark Cuban told Bloomberg that he believes certain cryptocoins need more regulation.
Cuban is heavily invested in Bitcoin and Ethereum, but he dabbles in other coins as well. And a bad experience with one of them left him in favor of stricter rules for a specific kind of cryptocurrency investment known as stablecoins.
Cuban urged additional regulatory action after he lost a percentage of his cryptocurrency portfolio. This occurred when a token called IRON Titanium (TITAN) lost close to 100% of its value in a short period of time.
Here's what happened and why the billionaire investor and Dallas Mavericks owner believes action is needed.
Cuban believes more consumer protections should be put in place for these cryptocurrency investments
Stablecoins are a subgroup of cryptocurrency investments. They are meant to be more stable than many other cryptocurrencies because they are pegged to widely used fiat currency, such as the U.S. dollar, or because they are pegged to commodities such as gold.
They're also a critical component of the decentralized finance (DeFi) space, which is meant to serve as a foundation for an open financial system that gives the power to people rather than central banks or large financial institutions.
Our top crypto play isn't a token - Here’s why
We’ve found one company that’s positioned itself perfectly as a long-term picks-and-shovels solution for the broader crypto market — Bitcoin, Dogecoin, and all the others. In fact, you've probably used this company's technology in the past few days, even if you've never had an account or even heard of the company before. That's how prevalent it's become.
Sign up today for Stock Advisor and get access to our exclusive report where you can get the full scoop on this company and its upside as a long-term investment. Learn more and get started today with a special new member discount.
Cuban has praised DeFi, and he invested in a specific stablecoin called TITAN, which was part of the Iron Finance Investment project. Iron Finance describes itself as a "multi-chain partial-collateralized DeFi and algorithmic stablecoin ecosystem"
Unfortunately, TITAN collapsed and quickly lost nearly all of its value. Initially, the collapse appeared to be the result of an exit scam called a "rug pull," that occurs when DeFi developers steal user funds. However, Iron Finance later explained that a "bank run" on its protocol caused the collapse.
Whatever the reason, Cuban lost most of the money he had invested in TITAN when the price of the stablecoin fell from $65 to $0.00000003. Although he didn't disclose the exact amount, he indicated in a statement to Bloomberg that it was enough that he "wasn't happy about it."
While the billionaire investor indicated that there are "risks I take on with the goal of not just trying to make money but also to learn," he still believes that the takeaway lesson from the experience was that more crypto regulation is needed when it comes to stablecoins.
"There should be regulation to define what a stablecoin is and what collateralization is acceptable," Cuban said. Cuban believes this is essential because lots of new players will aim to establish stablecoins over time. To protect investors, he believes the "math of the risks" should be "clearly defined for all users and approved before release."
Unfortunately, lawmakers are still struggling to determine what types of regulations to impose within the broader cryptocurrency industry, and the technology is developing so rapidly it's difficult for politicians without a deep understanding of the space to keep up.
This general lack of consumer protection laws and regulatory oversight is a key reason why investors who are putting their money into any cryptocurrency -- whether it's stablecoins or other investments -- need to make sure they're aware of the added risk that comes with volatile, untested, and largely unregulated investment products.
Our Research Expert
We're firm believers in the Golden Rule, which is why editorial opinions are ours alone and have not been previously reviewed, approved, or endorsed by included advertisers. The Ascent does not cover all offers on the market. Editorial content from The Ascent is separate from The Motley Fool editorial content and is created by a different analyst team.