Biden Willing to Scale Back Stimulus Relief for Well-Off Households
by Maurie Backman | Feb. 1, 2021
The Ascent is reader-supported: we may earn a commission from offers on this page. It’s how we make money. But our editorial integrity ensures our experts’ opinions aren’t influenced by compensation.
Image source: Getty Images
Though the president has his eyes on a big relief package, he is willing to compromise.
Americans continue to struggle financially in the wake of the coronavirus pandemic. Many households have, at this point, depleted their savings and are running on fumes (or, more accurately, debt).
President Joe Biden is eager to provide more relief, and he wants to do it quickly. To this end, he's proposed a $1.9 trillion aid package that includes boosted unemployment benefits and a round of $1,400 stimulus checks.
It's the latter feature that's already a sticking point among Republicans, who want to lower the price tag of the next relief bill. For weeks, opposition lawmakers have argued that a blanket round of $1,400 stimulus checks is a waste of resources. And the president is definitely willing to consider that argument for the sake of getting aid out to the public quickly.
Fighting for targeted aid
Republicans don't want to see a round of $1,400 stimulus payments go out to people who are faring well and don't need the cash. They argue additional money should be reserved for households who truly need it. Biden is, in turn, open to negotiating his $1.9 trillion bill -- specifically, scaling down those stimulus payments for families making more than $150,000.
If the same income phase-out system that applied for the last two stimulus rounds were to apply to this upcoming $1,400 round, it's feasible that some households earning $300,000 or more could receive at least a partial stimulus payment. And that's precisely what Republican lawmakers don't want to see.
In fact, some lawmakers argue that any additional stimulus cash should be reserved for the jobless only. That, however, doesn't quite solve the problem of not sending money to people who don't need it. It's conceivable that a given household could have one member collecting unemployment, but still earn a competitive wage all-in if the other partner is bringing home a $300,000 salary.
Altered eligibility may be the answer
Biden may not be willing to scale down his $1,400 stimulus checks to a smaller sum. But he may be willing to alter the way eligibility is determined so that money goes to the people who need it. The president is meeting with Republican lawmakers on Feb. 1 to discuss the matter further. Winning over Republicans could help Biden all but secure a lock on his relief package, which ultimately needs Senate support to pass into law.
The issue of boosted unemployment may also come up in that meeting. In the past, Republican lawmakers have expressed concerns over increasing benefits too generously. Biden is calling for a $400 weekly increase in unemployment benefits through September. Right now, benefits are boosted by $300 a week through mid-March, but it's likely that the jobless rate will remain elevated beyond that point. Seeing as how the U.S. economy is still in dire shape, those benefits, combined with a round of $1,400 payments, could help a lot of households stay afloat or start to dig out of their current holes.
Top credit card wipes out interest until 2022
If you have credit card debt, transferring it to this top balance transfer card can allow you to pay 0% interest for a whopping 18 months! That’s one reason our experts rate this card as a top pick to help get control of your debt. It’ll allow you to pay 0% interest on both balance transfers and new purchases until 2022, and you’ll pay no annual fee. Read our full review for free and apply in just 2 minutes.
About the Author
Maurie Backman is a personal finance writer who covers everything from savings to retirement to healthcare. Her articles have appeared broadly on major outlets such as CNBC, MSN, and Yahoo.
We’re firm believers in the Golden Rule, which is why editorial opinions are ours alone and have not been previously reviewed, approved, or endorsed by included advertisers. The Ascent does not cover all offers on the market. Editorial content from The Ascent is separate from The Motley Fool editorial content and is created by a different analyst team.
