by Maurie Backman | Published on July 25, 2021
Many or all of the products here are from our partners. We may earn a commission from offers on this page. It’s how we make money. But our editorial integrity ensures our experts’ opinions aren’t influenced by compensation. Terms may apply to offers listed on this page.
States that pulled boosted unemployment early were convinced it would solve their labor shortages. That apparently didn't happen.
Getting a job was a tricky thing to do back in March, when the $1.9 American Rescue Plan -- the relief bill that put $1,400 stimulus checks into millions of bank accounts -- was signed into law. Not only were jobs hard to come by at that point, but coronavirus vaccines were also in very short supply. For this reason, lawmakers decided to boost unemployment benefits by $300 a week and keep that increase in place through the beginning of September.
But things have changed a lot since then. For the past few months, there have been more available jobs and a vast supply of vaccines for those who want them and are eligible to receive them. As such, many states made the decision to put an end to boosted unemployment benefits before their early September expiration date.
A big reason so many states went this route is that they found themselves grappling with labor shortage issues. And, those states were convinced that ending boosted unemployment would inspire more jobless people to go out and seek work. After all, for a lot of people in that situation, losing out on $300 a week could spell the difference between covering bills and falling behind. But while states may have thought that ending boosted unemployment would solve their labor shortage problems, a new report reveals that that didn't happen.
Tips and tricks from the experts delivered straight to your inbox that could help you save thousands of dollars. Sign up now for free access to our Personal Finance Boot Camp.
By submitting your email address, you consent to us sending you money tips along with products and services that we think might interest you. You can unsubscribe at any time. Please read our Privacy Statement and Terms & Conditions.
According to the University of Massachusetts Amherst, Census Bureau data indicates that those who lost their $300 weekly unemployment boost didn't run out to get jobs once that money was taken away. The share of U.S. adults receiving unemployment benefits fell by 2.2% in the 12 states that cut off boosted benefits on June 12 or 19. But there wasn't a corresponding increase in employment among that group.
These findings align with a recent analysis by job site Indeed. It found that job search activity didn't pick up in states that cut off boosted unemployment ahead of schedule.
It's true that some people on unemployment today may be collecting more money in their boosted benefits (which are still in effect in roughly half of states) than they would at a full-time job. This especially holds true for minimum-wage earners.
But higher unemployment checks aren't the only thing keeping people out of the labor force. The spread of the highly contagious Delta variant combined with an absence of mask mandates may have some jobless people too nervous to go back to work -- perhaps because they either can't get vaccinated yet themselves, or because they share a household with children who are too young to be vaccinated.
And speaking of children, some workers may be waiting for the start of the upcoming school year to get back to a job, since school can serve as childcare during the day. Childcare costs can be a significant burden, particularly for low-wage workers, so it makes sense that some people may be waiting until they're able to get free daytime coverage in the form of in-person school.
Meanwhile, in some states, jobless workers are suing to have their boosted unemployment benefits reinstated. In Indiana and Maryland, they've been successful. As more data emerges that points to boosted unemployment not being a factor in job search activity, it'll be interesting to see if people in more states band together and fight to get their enhanced benefits reinstated as well.
If you have credit card debt, transferring it to this top balance transfer card secures you a 0% intro APR into 2023! Plus, you’ll pay no annual fee. Those are just a few reasons why our experts rate this card as a top pick to help get control of your debt. Read The Ascent's full review for free and apply in just 2 minutes.
We’re firm believers in the Golden Rule, which is why editorial opinions are ours alone and have not been previously reviewed, approved, or endorsed by included advertisers. The Ascent does not cover all offers on the market. Editorial content from The Ascent is separate from The Motley Fool editorial content and is created by a different analyst team.
The Ascent is a Motley Fool service that rates and reviews essential products for your everyday money matters.
Copyright © 2018 - 2021 The Ascent. All rights reserved.