Thanks to Stimulus Checks, More Households Can Cover Surprise Expenses
by Christy Bieber | Published on Sept. 7, 2021
Before the pandemic, 41% of households couldn't cover a $400 expense. Stimulus checks drove that number down.
Many Americans are unfortunately unprepared for financial emergencies and have been for a long time.
According to the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College (CRR), 41% of households indicated in 2019 that they didn't have enough savings to cover an unexpected $400 expense. This included 71% of households with income under $25,000. But, surprisingly, many wealthier families also struggled, with 14% of households earning $100,000 or over reporting they'd be unable to come up with the $400 if they needed to.
The coronavirus pandemic, however, actually reduced the number of people who felt they couldn't find $400 to spend in an emergency. The reason for that? Stimulus relief.
Specifically, coronavirus stimulus checks made a big difference in financial preparedness for millions of families. Expanded unemployment benefits also helped to improve the personal finances of some people.
Here's how stimulus checks helped people cover a $400 expense
Stimulus checks had a clear and direct impact on the amount of money people saved for emergencies.
The CRR indicated that in April of 2020, shortly after the first stimulus payments were provided under the CARES Act, just 33% of households where people had kept their jobs couldn't cover a $400 emergency. Remember, this is down from 41% of all households during the pre-pandemic times.
Now, people who had lost their jobs unsurprisingly fared worse. In April of 2020, 51% of households that experienced a pandemic-related job loss said they couldn't cover an unexpected emergency. This was higher than before COVID. The stimulus checks simply didn't do enough for this group at that point in time.
However, the extra $600 per week in unemployment that people received, combined with the economic impact payment, did ultimately help many of these households. And by July of 2020, even among families who had lost jobs, there was a reduction in the number of people who couldn't cope with surprise expenses. Just 36% of those who had experienced a job loss said they couldn't pay a $400 expense -- a decline from the 41% of all households who couldn't cope with these costs pre-pandemic.
Families who had kept their jobs also continued to improve their financial picture during the early months of the pandemic. By July of 2020, just 31% of households in this group said they were unprepared for a $400 surprise cost. That's down from the 41% of unprepared households before the pandemic. A lack of spending options during lockdowns, combined with the stimulus money, helps to explain why many families were able to develop more of a financial cushion.
The CRR also indicated that both the second and third stimulus payments helped more families to save, with three-quarters of all households either saving these checks or using them to repay debt. This was true regardless of whether people had lost jobs or not. And in total, 35% of households who hadn't lost jobs ended up with less debt in 2020 than the prior year, while 28% of households that lost jobs were also able to reduce their debt.
Ultimately, the long-term effects of the stimulus money remain to be seen. But so far, people have been able to pay down debt and pad their savings thanks to these payments. And hopefully that means they're on firmer footing that improves their financial situations in the years to come.
Alert: highest cash back card we've seen now has 0% intro APR until 2024
If you're using the wrong credit or debit card, it could be costing you serious money. Our expert loves this top pick, which features a 0% intro APR until 2024, an insane cash back rate of up to 5%, and all somehow for no annual fee.
In fact, this card is so good that our expert even uses it personally. Click here to read our full review for free and apply in just 2 minutes.
About the Author
We're firm believers in the Golden Rule, which is why editorial opinions are ours alone and have not been previously reviewed, approved, or endorsed by included advertisers. The Ascent does not cover all offers on the market. Editorial content from The Ascent is separate from The Motley Fool editorial content and is created by a different analyst team.