Williams Companies Inc (WMB) Q4 2020 Earnings Call Transcript

Image source: The Motley Fool.

Williams Companies Inc (WMB -2.17%)
Q4 2020 Earnings Call
Feb 23, 2021, 9:30 a.m. ET

Contents:

• Prepared Remarks
• Questions and Answers
• Call Participants

Prepared Remarks:

Operator

Good day everyone and welcome to The Williams fourth quarter and full year 2020 earnings conference call. [Operator Instructions]. At this time for opening remarks and introductions, I would like to turn the call over to Mr. Danilo Juvane Vice President of Investor Relations, please go ahead.

Danilo Juvane -- Vice President of Investor Relations

Thanks Lindy, and good morning everyone. Thank you for joining us and for your interest in The Williams Companies. Yesterday afternoon we released our earnings press release and the presentation that, our President and CEO, Alan Armstrong and our Chief Financial Officer, John Chandler will speak to this morning. Also joining us on the call today are Michael Dunn, our Chief Operating Officer, Lane Wilson, our General Counsel. And Chad Zamarin, our Senior Vice President of Corporate Strategic Development. In our presentation materials you'll find a disclaimer related to forward-looking statements. This disclaimer is important and integral to our remarks and you should review it. Also included in the presentation materials are non-GAAP measures that we reconcile to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. These reconciliation schedules appear at the back of the day's presentation materials. So with that, I'll turn it over to Alan Armstrong.

Alan S. Armstrong -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Great, and thanks Danilo and thank you all for joining us today. We are pleased to share the result of a very strong fourth quarter rounding out a year of record business performance for Williams that yet again illustrates the stability and predictability of our business. So, starting here with slide one, first of all, I'm thrilled to announce that our EBITDA once again exceeded the midpoint of our original guidance range for the fourth consecutive year and resulted in a 4% CAGAR for the same four-year period and that also during the same period we dramatically improved our credit metrics through our asset sale program. So, really a nice steady period here of very predictable growth and balance sheet improvement. This unmatched predictability is important to our value proposition and is further reinforced by this being the 20th consecutive quarter of meeting or exceeding Street expectations. We also met or exceeded all of our other key financial metrics allowing us to once again produced positive free cash flow even after buying the outstanding interest Caiman II that controls Blue Racer Midstream in the fourth quarter. Our focus on continuously improving our project execution, our operating margin ratio, reliability metrics and safety performance delivered strong financial performance again in 2020 and allowed us to yet again achieved record gas gathering volumes in contracted gas transmission capacity. In all of these steady improvements and accomplishments build off of the clear foundation strategy that allows us to stay focused and aligned across the organization.

We demonstrated incredible business resiliency in a year of unprecedented chain challenges for our industry and our country. Our strong results in 2020 show just how durable this business can be against several headwinds, such as the COVID-19 pandemic and the associated oil price collapse, major customer bankruptcies and an active hurricane season in the Gulf of Mexico that exceeded anything from an outage standpoint that we had on record. The tumultuous 2020 market environment allowed us to truly distinguish ourselves. In fact, we were one of the few midstream companies to maintain and in fact deliver on our pre-guidance ranges that we provided to you in 2019, and I'm excited to see what this organization can produce without the large number of headwinds that we navigated through this past year and 2021.

Moving on here in addition to executing on our business in 2020 we accelerated our ESG performance. Last summer Williams became the first US midstream company to announce a climate commitment, setting an emissions reduction goal for 2030 that is based on real achievable target and that imposes accountability on the management team in setting these goals. We believe that focusing on the right here and right-now opportunity sets us on a positive trajectory to achieving net zero target by 2050. In addition, we call that an industry effort to standardize ESG metrics with the energy Infrastructure Council and in January we hosted the industry's first ever ESG Event, specifically devoted into sharing the company's direction, goals, aspirations and tangible accomplishments related to ESG performance.

In summary in 2020, we once again demonstrated the stability and predictability of our business, and importantly, we've also shown the ability to focus and execute our plan without being distracted by the challenging macro backdrop. And with that, I'll turn it over to John to go through the details.

John D. Chandler -- Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

Thanks, Alan. As a very high-level summary for the quarter, our cost reduction efforts, new Transco projects brought into service, incredibly strong results out of our Northeast G&P segment, and a catch up a minimum volume commitments EBITDA from a favorable Wamsutter/South bankruptcy settlement helped to offset a decline in profits from deferred revenue step-downs at our Gulfstar Deepwater Platform along with shut-ins from hurricane activities early during the fourth quarter of 2020. As you can see the strong performance in our statistics on this page, in fact we saw improvement in all of our key financial metrics, both for the fourth quarter and for the full year.

First, our adjusted EBITDA for the quarter was up $52 million or 4% for all of the reasons I just mentioned. The same played out in our year-to-date results, adjusted EBITDA year-to-date was up $90 million or 2%. However, I think it's interesting to point out that if you adjust for non-cash deferred revenue step-downs at our Gulfstar Platform and at our Barnett Gathering System, both of which were known and expected as well as a few other smaller noncash items, our year-to-date adjusted EBITDA without these noncash comparability items is actually up 4%, again, much like it was during the fourth quarter. We'll discuss EBITDA variances in more depth in a moment.

Adjusted EPS for the quarter increased 29% largely due to increased EBITDA and reduced income taxes during with the fourth 4th quarter of 2019 there was a larger than normal state tax adjustment, and also to certain extent lesser interest expense this year. Our year-to-date EPS is also up 11%, again due to increased EBITDA, lower allocations of income to non-controlling interest owners, and again to a lesser extent due to lower interest expense. This quarter we're presenting a new cash flow metric and we'll continue to present this going forward. The measure is available funds from operations, this measure will replace distributable cash flow and a similar to DCF except it's derived from cash from operations and is before all capital spending including before maintenance capital. Or said differently, AFFO was simply cash from operations adjusting out working capital fluctuations and also adjusting for cash flows from or to our non-controlling interest owners that shows up in the financing section of our cash flow statement. A reconciliation of this measure to cash from operations can be found in the appendix of this presentation, and also in our analyst package.

You can see the AFFO grew for both the fourth quarter and year-to-date similar to the growth in adjusted EBITDA except some of the EBITDA growth is from our consolidated JVs and so some of that growth does belongs and does flow to our JV owners. Distributable cash flow increased for the quarter due to higher EBITDA and also due to $42 million alternative minimum tax refund we received during the quarter that was not present in the 2019 period. DCF for the year is also up again due to higher EBITDA and lower maintenance capital, offset somewhat by increased EBITDA paid to our non-controlling interest owners and due to lower alternative minimum tax cash refund that we received for overall in 2020 versus 2019.

On the capital spending front, our intentional capital discipline drove capital spending down this year and free cash flow up, and nd to that point our co-capital spending for the year was 40% less than last year. And, that our spending this year included the acquisition of most of the remaining interest in the Caiman II at Blue Racer ownership for about $160 million in mid-November. As a result of that acquisition, we are now at 50% owner of Blue Racer with First Reserve owning the other 50% interest and we're excited to see what synergies we can bring to that business, now that we have a larger stake and we are the operator. Included in this capital spending number is also maintenance capital, which for the year was $393 million, about $107 million less than it was in 2019. Finally, if you put our AFFO in 2020 of $3.6 billion up against our total capital spending, including maintenance of $1.5 billion and our dividend of $1.9 billion, you can see that we were free cash flow positive in 2020. This strong cash generation and capital discipline has helped move us toward our goal to improve our leverage metrics for the year and this year our debt to EBITDA metrics ended at 4.35 down from 4.39 times at the end of 2019.

So now let's go to the next slide and dig in a little deeper into our EBITDA results for the quarter. Again Williams performed very well this quarter as you'll hear throughout each segment, cost control has been a big benefit this year. Before we dive in each segment, we believe it's important to isolate a few unusual items to make the numbers more comparable and reflective of the ongoing performance of the business. We've identified those unusual items, which are shown on this chart as noncash comparability items. Interestingly for the quarter they net only $2 million, and they consist primarily of two things, the first is a $24 million reduction in noncash deferred revenue step-downs in our transmission in Gulf of Mexico segment on our Deepwater Gulfstar Platform. As a reminder on deferred revenue, we received significant upfront cash payments several years ago from the Deepwater producer, but did not recognize revenue at that time. We have been amortizing the payments we previously received in the income over the last several years, and that amortization has been shrinking. The second unusual item is a $20 million minimum volume commitment true-up entry that we made in the fourth quarter of 2020 related to our settlement with South who agreed to pay us the MVCs they owed us for the year. This adjustment is for the first through the third quarter that we recorded in the fourth quarter. We had stopped recording those MVCs at the beginning of 2020 when Southland recently filed for bankruptcy. So with or without those noncash items, our EBITDA was up over 4%. Our transmission in Gulf of Mexico segment produced results that were $25 million better than the same period last year. New transmission pipeline projects added $17 million in revenues for the quarter including the gateway project that came in whereas in the fourth quarter of 2019 the Hillabee Phase 2 project that came to service in the second quarter of 2020 and the staffing of Northeastern trails project that went into service during the fourth quarter of 2020. We also did have a little over $20 million in lower cost during the fourth quarter of 2020 due to lower maintenance and lower labor expenses. Offsetting these positives was $10 million in lower Gulf of Mexico profits due to shut-ins resulting from hurricane activity occurring in October. Which is unusual for hurricane activity this late in the year. The impact of the shut-ins can be further seen in reduced deepwater gathering volumes, which were down about 13% quarter-over-quarter.

The Northeast G&P segment continues to come on very strong producing record results and contributing $29 million of additional EBITDA this quarter. Collectively, total Northeast gathering volumes grew 7% in the quarter and processing volumes were up 9%. The volume growth was predominantly at our joint ventures in the Bradford Supply Hub where we benefited from a gathering system expansion on that system in late 2019 and at our Marcellus gas supply basin where we benefited from more productive wells at larger pads. As a result, our EBITDA from equity method investments improved by a little over $20 million in the Northeast, which also includes the additional profits from Blue Racer again due to our increased ownership, which again was acquired in mid-November. The Northeast also benefited from cost reduction efforts of about $9 million, much of which came from reduced labor costs.

And then finally on the West, our West segment was down about $8 million compared to 2019, but within that revenues overall improved a little less than $10 million in the West with increases coming from higher rates and net MVCs and the Eagle Ford supply basin due to the contract re negotiations that we completed With Chesapeake in late 2019, and due to special payments received from our partner on OPPL for allowing them to pull volumes up of the system. These revenue increases were offset somewhat by lower deferred revenues in the Barnett Shale, lower Haynesville revenues due to lower volumes and rate in slightly lower volumes in the Mid-Continent and Rocky's. Despite revenues being up in total, gathered volumes for the West were down 8%. Interestingly though, roughly 90% of that volume decline occurred in the Haynesville, Eagle Ford and Wamsutter, and of note, each of these basins were impacted by customer bankruptcy with the South reemergence filing a couple of weeks ago, all those bankruptcy should be resolved soon. Also of note, in two of those three basins, where we saw a majority of our volume decline, specifically in the Wamsutter in Eagle Ford, our revenues are protected by NBC. So overall, the reduced volumes only had a small impact on revenues. And just as with our other segments, the West experienced lower cost of about $3 million as we keep a relentless focus on efficiencies and cost controls. Now, offsetting the higher revenues and lower cost in the last or commodity margins, which declined about $8 million due in part to lower volumes and due to a contract commitment there, we also had the absence of a favorable property tax reimbursement that we received in the fourth quarter of 2019, that was $6 million of something that we received from a third party compression provider, and we also had lower JV EBITDA in the fourth quarter of 2020 of about $4 million, but most of that coming from lower OPPL profits, and again though our partner going OPPL whole as I mentioned a minute ago reflected in our revenues.

Now moving to year-to-date results, our year-to-date results show growth of 1.8% in adjusted EBITDA driven by many of the same factors affecting our fourth quarter growth. The Barnett and Gulfstar noncash deferred revenue step-downs totaled about $109 million in 2020 versus 2019, while the net impact of commodity price fluctuations on our inventory linefill position created an $8 million non-cash reduction in EBITDA. So, without those noncash comparability, items full-year adjusted EBITDA results were actually up more like 4%, much like our 4th quarter results. And then looking at that by segments, the Transmission & Gulf of Mexico assets delivered $41 million of growth with an uplift coming from expansion projects and expense reductions being offset somewhat by lower Gulf of Mexico volumes and the impact that has had on commodity margins in the area. In the Gulf of Mexico the total impact of shut-ins from COVID, hurricanes and the price collapse earlier in 2020 had about a negative $49 million impact to our EBITDA. The Northeast is obviously a huge part of our growth this year adding $194 million in EBITDA in 2020 versus the prior year with the overall gathering volumes up 7% and incremental revenues being realized from processing, transportation and fractionation of gas and NGLs, while at the same time we have been reducing costs. And finally in the West, it's off by $33 million largely because of the Barnett MVC payments that ended in June of 2019 and lower Haynesville profits due to lower realized rate that being offset somewhat by reduced operating expenses in the West. Otherwise in the West, our gathered volumes were down about 4%, but they were largely offset by higher rate in the NBCs in the Eagle Ford due to the renegotiated contract with Chesapeake in December of 2019.

So again, all in all despite a tough market and a tough hurricane season, we've had a really good year on the back of cost reductions, Northeast performance and new pipeline projects coming into service on Transco.

I'll now turn the call back over to Alan to discuss our 2021 guidance. Alan?

Alan S. Armstrong -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Well, thanks, John, and now we're going to turn through our 2021 EBITDA guidance metrics. So, I want to emphasize that we continue to expect the same level of support fundamentals underpinning our base business for 2021. However, we do have more upside potential than we had in 2020 in this plan, due in part to upstream transactions that have the potential to drive incremental cash flows across our midstream assets in 2021 and beyond plus and emerging gas storage imbalanced caused by the recent higher demand that will likely put a call on gas-directed drilling here in 2021 as well. So, we're providing our initial EBITDA guidance range of $5.05 billion to $5.35 billion with the midpoint up 2% over last year, and we'll get to EBITDA drivers here in the second on what those specifics are but let's go through the rest of the guidance here.

Our available funds from operations or AFFO, as John described, which will now replace DCF are expected to be within a range of $3.55 billion to $3.85 billion, which translates to a per share range of $2.92 up to $3.16 per share. And importantly, even with the 2.5% increase in the dividend announced earlier in the year, we are still maintaining similar coverage on our dividend, whether looking at DCF metric or AFFO metric, and this continues to really underscore the continued safety of our dividend. Our gross CapEx of $1.0 billion to $1.2 billion is expected to remain in line with 2020 and this includes known opportunistic upstream acquisitions in the Wamsutter Basin that will be immediately accretive to both credit metrics and earnings. And notably, we still expect to generate free cash flow after CapEx and dividends, which provide us financial flexibility. In speaking of financial flexibility, we estimate, ending the year with a leverage ratio of 4.25, but with the line of sight that we have currently to a targeted 4.2 objective as we have consistently over achieved on this metric, and I know a lot of y'll follow that very closely, we continue to perform very well on that and we think we've got a lot of things that could help drive us toward getting to that 4.2 here in 2021.

So, looking at the drivers of our 2021 EBITDA guidance, we expect continued Northeast G&P growth from the base business and to a lesser extent the bolt-on Blue Racer acquisition. In our Transmission & Gulf of Mexico business, we see Transco growth continuing to add stable EBITDA via the Southeastern Trails Project that was just placed in service ahead of schedule at the end of the year, and we expect late year contributions to come from our Leidy South expansion, which is now under construction. And additionally, we expect a nice recovery in our Gulf of Mexico earnings this year due to less production outages from hurricane and the COVID-19 pandemic impacts. Offsets to our EBITDA growth are driven primarily from lower NGL throughput on the jointly owned Overland Pass Pipeline, lower earnings on our jointly own Rocky Mountain Midstream business in the DJ Basin and lower gathering rates from our global resolution in the Haynesville with Chesapeake Energy. So, these are partial offsets that we do already have built into our guidance and of course on that last note, a lot of potential upside, two is coming in the Haynesville, both from much healthier Chesapeake well positioned to develop the Haynesville, which is very well positioned in this gas market as well as our ability to drive volumes on the upstream properties that we now control.

Our takeaway here is that our EBITDA is primarily driven by growth in the base business with upstream EBITDA accounting for less than 1% of this forecast, we purposely did not include a full year of the upstream EBITDA from these existing producing reserves because we fully intend to transact during the year in a way that allows us to enjoy midstream cash flow growth in 2022 and beyond as we find the right partner to fully exploit the growth available in these high-value properties that we were able to pick up this past year. So, we are in a very strong position now to ensure that this acreage is developed quickly and gets turned into fee-based growth on our existing midstream capacity. So, we really are excited about the upside potential that we've positioned ourselves for around that business.

So, in closing I'll reiterate that intense focus on our natural gas based strategy has built a business that is steady and predictable with continued moderate growth, improving returns and free cash flows. Our best-in-class long haul pipes are in the right place and our formidable gathering assets are in low-cost basis that will be called on to meet gas demands that continue to grow. We remain bullish on natural gas because we recognize the critical role it plays and will continue to play in both our country and the world's pursuit of a clean energy future. Natural gas is an important component of today's fuel mix and should be prioritized as one of the most important tools to aggressively displace more carbon intensive fuels around the world. Williams is focused on sustainable operations including ready now solutions to address, climate change and by setting the near-term goal for 2030, we will leverage our natural gas focused strategy and today's technologies to focus on immediate opportunities to reduce emissions in and around our business. We also are looking forward to and anticipating future innovations and technologies that we can use on our key energy networks to deliver on this next phase of energy transition.

I also think it is important in light of last week severe cold weather event to talk about the resiliency and reliability of our natural gas infrastructure. Despite historic cold that on below much of the country we did not have to curtail any services to our gas transmission customers, and in fact operate above design capacity on our Northwest Pipeline System for a period and delivered flawlessly on a new record three-day peak on the Northwest Pipeline System. Our customers expect this from us based on our long history of performance and we are certainly glad that they do. However, last week's weather demonstrated the importance of a comprehensive energy strategy of the need for a comprehensive energy strategy for the US, one that it doesn't demonize one energy source over the other, but that includes a mix of energy that does not drive toward singular dependency because of labels imposed by the environmental opposition, and there are important and complex decisions that need to be balanced to address the things that we all want from our energy sources, reliability, affordability and and balancing the issues of carbon intensity. And, when we think about carbon intensity, we really have to consider that from the global perspective, and we believe that when all of these factors are accurately weighed and balanced, natural gas will be a very critical part of the energy mix for many more decades to come.

So finally, I want to recognize the tremendous efforts of our entire workforce in ensuring the safe and reliable delivery of natural gas to America's cities and communities, not only this last week in the base of severe weather challenges, but amid ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Many of those who benefit from our services may never realize the work needed to ensure the continued access to safe and reliable energy. Our employees are critical infrastructure workers on the frontlines of keeping our country's natural gas system operating and flowing, doing so while also in enduring power outages and lack of water at their own homes. I'm extremely proud of our employees for their efforts to keep our operations running smoothly during these extreme circumstances while also going to extra mile to keep themselves and their co-workers safe and Healthy.

And with that, I'll open it up for your questions.

Questions and Answers:

Operator

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Jeremy Tonet with JP Morgan Securities. Your line is now open.

Jeremy Tonet -- JP Morgan -- Analyst

Hi, good morning.

Alan S. Armstrong -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Good Morning, Jeremy.

Jeremy Tonet -- JP Morgan -- Analyst

Just want to touch based on the CapEx outlook, as you talked about it there, the $1 billion to $1.2 billion, and just wanted to see what's, the drivers behind that? Could there potentially be CapEx creep or do you see this as kind of a steady level? And then, just-if you could expand a bit more on the opportunistic upstream acquisitions in the Wamsutter, what that is exactly, that would be very helpful? Thanks.

Alan S. Armstrong -- President and Chief Executive Officer

You bet, Jeremy thank you. Well first of all, I would say we-in our base business, we have about $900 million of capital in what would be our normal base business. It is a little bit lower than what we've had historically. And that is about-half of that is in TGOM. So, that includes [Indecipherable], it includes building out Leidy South, kind of the final dollars on Southeastern Trail's and clean-up and so forth on Southeastern Trail's and some money on the front-end of the REA project.

So, that's kind of the primary drivers there in TGOM that's about half of that $900 million. And then, on the balance of that, about two-thirds of that is in the Northeast both finishing up projects, as well as getting some new project started that are driving higher margins for us in the new Northeast and some of that growth. A lot of that investment actually will drive growth in 2022, there in the Northeast as well.

And then, finally the balance of that is in the West. Some of that is in the Permian, pretty good expansion going on in the Permian as well as in the Haynesville area. As we're really going to be having to work hard to keep out front of a lot of drilling activity that's emerging there in the Haynesville. So, that pretty well rounds that up.

The second part of your question around the opportunistic upstream involves us taking advantage of the strong position we had with our midstream assets out there, particularly around the Southland bankruptcy. And we will be in the position of acquiring both the BP acreage out there that's adjacent and intermingled with that as well as the Southland acreage. And we're able-given our position in the bankruptcy there.

We were able to pick that up for some very attractive pricing. And as a result now, we're going to be working to gain the right person, the right party to rapidly develop those reserves and take advantage of the late and midstream capacity that we have out there. So, we are really excited about that both in the Wamsutter, because there's a tremendous amount of value to be driven across our midstream assets.

By using the PDP cash flows to drive that as well as in the Haynesville where we're already seeing Chesapeake get very focused on developing the remaining-the northern part of the Haynesville that they hang on to. And as well as some very attractive interest coming from parties that we're in the process to find the right party to develop the Haynesville acreage. So, I want to make it clear we have no intention of hanging on to that.

We're not going to become an E&P business. There is no ifs, ands or buts on that front. But this does allow us to put the right parties in place and assure ourselves that we have the right parties in place to take the cash flows off of these assets and put it back into the drill bit to drive midstream cash flows. So, really has turned into something actually a lot more positive than we were expecting.

And we really feel like there's a lot of upside from this both in 2021 and as well though into 2022 and beyond as we attracted the capital to develop those reserves. So really what is normally an area that might have been a problem for us with all these bankruptcies. We really were able to find a way to really turn some lemons into lemonade there. And we're really excited about the kind of value that's going to be driven out there over the next several years.

John D. Chandler -- Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

And Jeremy just to be clear there and I think it was, but just to reiterate. In our midpoint guidance for growth capital of $1.1 billion that included those acquisitions of that upstream acreage in the Wamsutter. And so Alan mentioned-a run rate for everything other than that of $900 million maybe a little bit more than $900 million. So, we paid less than $200 million for those assets actually significantly less than $200 million, not more than $150 million to $160 million for that acreage. Then we have very little EBITDA on our guidance for that, because we're not sure exactly what kind of partnership structure we'll have if somebody else just buy a part of that acreage where we partner and we'll see EBITDA uplift. So, there's a lot of big upside I think that we can see out of that.

Chad J. Zamarin -- Senior Vice President, Corporate Strategic Development

Yes, and one thing, and this is Chad to note, one of the reasons why I think we were uniquely positioned to step-in this transitional role in Wamsutter and BP asset, the Southend asset are checkerboard of acreage in Wamsutter. And so, we were uniquely positioned to acquire those properties put them together as one continuous package and then move that, that asset to producer that can now develop it to its full potential.

It was really locked in a situation where we couldn't have a producer get the full potential out of that acreage because of the checkerboard nature of Wamsutter. So, we're able to clean that up and now we're going to focus on moving that, that now contiguous position to a producer that can fully develop it-really reach its full potential.

Jeremy Tonet -- JP Morgan -- Analyst

Got it. That's very helpful color. Thanks. And just to recap on the CapEx side, it sounds like it's a very disciplined approach there, not really expecting any kind of creep over the course of the year from what you guys can see. Is that fair take away there?

Alan S. Armstrong -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yes I think, just as we've demonstrated, in the last several years we continue to impose a lot of capital discipline around our decisions. Even last year, lowering as you recall the only thing we did move in our guidance last year was lowering our CapEx during the year. And then we wound up even including the Blue Racer acquisition coming in under that so, yes. And I'll tell you our project execution teams have really been knocking it out of the park in terms of managing cost very tightly even in a difficult environment like COVID continue to deliver our projects under budget. So, we feel very good about the capital budget range that we have.

John D. Chandler -- Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

And two key points there, A, we are free cash flow positive in 2021 that we will generate more than enough cash to cover our dividends and capital and it allows us to deleverage a little bit. That's the first important point. The second thing I'd say we did give you maintenance capital guidance of, I think at the midpoint $450 million. Obviously we spent under $400 million this year in 2019-2020. It was just artificially low just due to COVID and some issues getting step down in the field. So, I wouldn't call that creep, it is going back up from $400 million about $450 million, but that's kind of what we believe kind of run rate to be on maintenance capital.

Jeremy Tonet -- JP Morgan -- Analyst

That's very helpful. And just one more if I could, post-election here. It seems like there is new energy policy come out of DC and could impact federal lands production. Just wondering any thoughts you could share with us on higher level thoughts on energy policy come out of DC and specifically federal lands, how you think about that? Thanks.

Alan S. Armstrong -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yes, I would just say-I'm going to-yes Mike will give you some detail here on the Deepwater Gulf of Mexico, because obviously, that's the area that would most impact us of all of our areas; otherwise, we're not too terribly impacted by it. But we've seen, maybe, a different story than has been-that you're hearing in media in terms of the actual actions going on out there. And most of the acreage is ready to develop. But Michael, if you would kind of share some of the detail that we're seeing there on the Deepwater.

Micheal G. Dunn -- Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer

Good morning, Jeremy. We are seeing continued permitting activity coming from the current administration. Since the executive order came out, we've seen four applications for permits to drill. Already 60 of those have been issued in the Gulf of Mexico, 13 of those being on properties that are delivering to us. And then, when you talk about permits for modifications such as workovers, things of that nature on existing wells. 163 of those have been approved by the current administration and just under 30 of those are on our asset footprint. So, we're seeing a lot of activity for permit approvals out there. And in fact, we received our gas pipeline permit after the executive order for the Whale project. And they're continuing to process permits. And we had our Whale permit as we rolling for pipeline already last year. And so, we're continuing to work with our producer customers out there. And as you probably know, there is a lot of leases that they've locked up and a lot of permits that they already had in hand. And so, there's a long runway of activity that will continue to occur in the Gulf of Mexico, we believe.

Jeremy Tonet -- JP Morgan -- Analyst

Got it. That's very helpful. Thank you.

Operator

Our next question comes from Praneeth Satish with Wells Fargo. Your line is now open.

Praneeth Satish -- Wells Fargo -- Analyst

Thanks, good morning. So now that you are the operator of Blue Racer, can you just elaborate on any of the steps you could take there to increase utilization on the system or capture any of the low hanging cost synergies?

Alan S. Armstrong -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yes, sure. Mike, you want to take that?

Micheal G. Dunn -- Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer

Good morning. Yeah, there's definitely an opportunity to capture some synergies there just like we did with the UEO interim acquisition that we became the operator on that asset. We rolled that into our Northeast JV. And we are having those conversations very similar with Blue Racer where we can consolidate some of the operations up there, utilize latent capacity in either one of our systems to the benefit of the other. There's a lot of activity currently on our northeast JV systems up there where our processing is full today and our fractionation facilities are full as well.

And so, we would be looking to possibly use some of the Blue Racer capacity should it become available to move some of those volumes over to them and vice versa ultimately. So, we think there's a lot of definite commercial synergy to there ultimately and certainly some operational synergies with the teams that are there.

Praneeth Satish -- Wells Fargo -- Analyst

And then, can you provide any more details on the producing assets that you received from Chesapeake in the Haynesville? Specifically, what is the production at right now on those assets? And any more clarity in terms of when you plan to monetize that?

Chad J. Zamarin -- Senior Vice President, Corporate Strategic Development

This is Chad. Relatively small amount of existing production around 30 million a day kind of pre last week's poll. It's recovering. That had dropped a bit but is recovering. So not a lot of existing production around 130 existing wells. But I will first say we were really encouraged to see Chesapeake emerging from bankruptcy as a really healthy customer. So, I'll touch on Southland in a second but just know that they're very active up in the Spring Ridge area where they remain the owner/operator with two rigs and we think likely go into three rigs. So, that was good to see. And in Southland field, we view that as an additional opportunity where we have 350 million to 550 million a day of capacity available from a midstream perspective for development in that area.

We closed on that transaction prior to 2021, and we've been out now talking to potential partners and we've seen incredibly plus interest in this asset. It is a contiguous locked-up position in some really top-tier both Haynesville and Mid-Bossier area and, again, has available midstream capacity. I would say that we're likely to finalize our partnership strategy over the next couple of months.

I expect that we will have a very strong well-capitalized partner that will operate that asset and will dedicate one to two rigs at any given time to really fill up and utilize that capacity. So, we've seen an incredible amount of interest and I think we're really confident that we're going to find a great partner there and unlock the potential of that asset.

Alan S. Armstrong -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yeah, and I would just add to that, we are well into that process in terms of finding the right partner on that we've been very encouraged by the strong level of interest from a number of parties. But we're not waiting around on that. We move very quickly, Chad and his team were very quickly to find the right partner.

Praneeth Satish -- Wells Fargo -- Analyst

Great, thank you.

Operator

Our next question comes from Christine Cho with Barclays. Your line is now open.

Christine Cho -- Barclays -- Analyst

Thank you. If I could maybe just talk about the high end of the EBITDA range that you gave for 2021, Alan, it sounds like you said it's mostly driven by your expectations for a call on gas especially with what went on last week. So, is this really driven by G&P volumes and is it mostly in the Northeast? I just wasn't sure if Haynesville and Wamsutter was included in that or if that was more of a post 2021 impact. And have the producers behind the system in the Northeast started to talk to you about these plants, if that is the case?

Alan S. Armstrong -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yes. Thank you. Well, Christine, you're targeting right on the correct issue there. We really developed that plan before we've seen this recent call. And I think this week, we're going to see a huge pull on natural gas from storage this week and likely take us down below the five-year average. And meanwhile, production, we really haven't seen the activity in production to stabilize that decline in storage and the places that are going to be able to respond to that quickly are going to be Haynesville and the Marcellus and Utica. And so we didn't have any of that in our plans when we laid this plan out so certainly that is upside to this. In fact, most of the growth in the Northeast was really just margin expansion. It wasn't really a lot of volume, expected volume growth.

The growth that we've had there is really just been margin expansion. So that is certainly an attractive upside for us there. It is not based on the upstream at all. In fact, we basically assumed-we'd just got the PDP's flowing in here for Haynesville and Wamsutter assuming a July kind of finality to finding the right owner, so we only have cash flows in here on the Wamsutter area through about July.And in the Haynesville, we do have the PDPs in there, but we also have development capital that likely would be coming out of there if that gets done. So, I wouldn't be the first to admit that we've been very conservative on the upstream side of this because we really wanted to leave ourselves full flexibility, and we didn't to be able to either fully dispose of the asset if the right price was there, but at the end of the day we just wanted to have full flexibility, so we were very conservative in how we included the value of those upstream positions.

And you're right. I think, the upsides are probably mostly related to volumes in the Northeast, but I would also say we remain pretty conservative in the forecast that we have for the Deepwater and any other area frankly that can contribute from the gas side. So, and then I would say the other area that we've included-we've assumed rising cost versus 2020. We did a great job in 2020 on cost. And our 2021 does assume that we've got some comeback on cost that frankly the team has been doing a terrific job of managing. And so with that, that's another area of opportunity for us as well.

John D. Chandler -- Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

And just a couple of things maybe to play on that a little bit with Alan on Transco. We were successful in 2020 selling short-term firm both in Transco and Northwest pipe, and we don't have a repeat of that really in any meaningful way in 2021. That possibility still exists. We had all that hurricane activity in 2020, and our team reversed most of that in the forecast, but not all of that. We do expect that to be a little bit more active in 2021. And so, if that doesn't happen I think there is upside of just some additional EBITDA we just didn't put in that was left and is just conservative for hurricane activity. And then Alan pointed on the expenses. So, some of this is down.

Christine Cho -- Barclays -- Analyst

Okay. That's helpful. And then actually if we can move on to the weather impacts that we've seen in Texas and to a lesser extent in Macon. Is all of your natural gas storage in Texas contracted to third parties or do you have some for your own use? And how should we think last week's weather impacted you guys? It sounded like it was pretty neutral from a financial perspective in your prepared remarks, but any color there would be helpful?

Alan S. Armstrong -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yes. Thanks, Christine. First of all, we actually don't have any gas storage in Texas. So, the storage on Transco is at Washington which is kind of the middle part of the state by Opelousas and so, that's where the storage facilities are. So, there really wasn't a whole lot of impact there. And obviously, Transco is designed to flow from that area, designed to flow to the North and East, not back into Texas.In terms of the impact to us, I would say it was pretty small in terms of the impact to our gathering volumes just because we have such a dispersed business and the vast majority of our gathering is either Northeast or in the Rockies which were not directly impacted. But, I would just say as well, our team did a great job of doing things like selling fuel and shrink that we had bought at first of the month, turning down our processing recoveries and then selling that fuel and shrink back into the market. And so, I would tell you that I think net-net, it's going to be a little bit of a positive for us in terms of the way we manage things. But we certainly saw a lot of outage in the Oklahoma, Texas, and Louisiana area on our gathering system that's just a pretty small piece of our overall percentage of the business.

Christine Cho -- Barclays -- Analyst

Got it. Thank you.

Operator

Our next question comes from Gabriel Moreen with Mizuho. Your line is open.

Gabriel Moreen -- Analyst

I just had one in terms of bases in Appalachia and just how you're thinking about that within your forecast and kind of the cadence of the Northeast. Is there anything in your forecast for producers toggling gas on and off particularly during the shoulder seasons?

Alan S. Armstrong -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Gabe, no. I would just say we pretty well just stick with the producers' forecast that they've given us, and obviously they take that into consideration. And if the prices come up, they'll turn some volumes on, but a lot of the producers have their own takeaway capacity and certainly that amount that they're selling into that spot basis is pretty small, but it does impact their ability to sell incremental volumes if they have that. But, we're not-that isn't driven a lot into our calculation. We basically just take what the producers are saying they're going to do. And to the degree that we have a line of sight for how that's going to happen and that's how we included. And so far, they've been pretty accurate, consistently pretty accurate in the way that they've been forecasting that. They know their reserves and they know the market. I will say that obviously we're excited about Leidy South coming on and opening up additional capacity. That's about $580 million a day of additional takeaway capacity out of the Northeast. And our team has got a really good head start on Leidy South on the projects there. And so, again, great execution going on by that team. And then ultimately, REA will be additional takeaway out of that area as well. So, we're really-those projects are very important from a synergy standpoint because, not only do we get nice returns on the transmission, we get together and volume uplift-upstream of that as well.

John D. Chandler -- Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

And now to the question on shut-ins in response to price where we certainly could still see producers respond to market dynamics. But I do think 2021 is going to look different than 2020. We're coming into out of the winter at a much different storage inventory level. We're seeing natural gas prices stronger than they were a year ago. We do think that there will be A-John acreage that will continue to represent the value of our existing infrastructure. We're going to see more LNG demand come online this year, and we're going to continue to see the need for growth and supply out of the northeast. So, I'm not sure we'll see bases that will drive shut-in activity, but I think it will continue to reinforce the value of having infrastructure to move from Appalachia to growing markets. But we'll certainly keep an eye on it.

Gabriel Moreen -- Analyst

Thank you. And then maybe if I can just ask just kind of interesting a lot more time has been spent on the upstream assets sales and midstream asset sales, but maybe if I can ask kind of where the latest thinking is on additional midstream asset sales and whether I guess some of the impairments on assets like Rocky Mountain Midstream kind of change your thinking and evaluation about how those assets might fit with the portfolio longer term?

John D. Chandler -- Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

Yes. I don't really think so, Gabe. I think we were as to the RMM impairment that we took that's an equity level investment. So, obviously, it's very different than along the way you value a consolidated asset where you take the total cash flows on the asset over time. But in those, you actually have to market to market effectively.

And we've given some of the sales that we've seen in the space. We've seen some lower markings on the value of assets. And that's what drives those kind of considerations. And in fact, as a result of that, it would probably drive us in the other direction because it's basically saying there's a weak market right now for GDP assets. And if that's true then this probably wouldn't be the right time to be liquidating assets.So not to say we don't constantly have our eyes open to structure and things that can add value from that but I think, you know, we're in a position of getting to our leverage metrics in a pretty straightforward manner and particularly these upstream assets which could be a really nice tool for that as well. And so right now, I would tell you I'm not sure it's the very best time to be trying to liquidate those assets.

Alan S. Armstrong -- President and Chief Executive Officer

So, Gabe, one thing I think that is interesting, you know, when we were thinking about this early 2020, it was actually in January of 2020, I think we were heavy in the middle of thinking about trying to market some of our assets in the West. And there were a lot of question marks at the time around and around Chesapeake, what was going to happen at Chesapeake, what was going to happen in the West in general. And I think now a lot of those questions are cleared up and you can see through our performance I think we demonstrated the resiliency through diversification not that we didn't have issues in certain basins but we had good performance in other basins and it kind of washes itself out. And so, what I would say is while the market's probably a little bit weaker, I think our demonstrated performance on the business is a little bit stronger, a little bit clearer now a year later. So, I'm not sure what all that means but I think there's still opportunity still out there. And I think we've demonstrated strong performance which should help any if we ever wanted to pursue that.

Gabriel Moreen -- Analyst

Thanks Alan. Thanks John.

Operator

Our next question comes from Spiro Dounis with Credit Suisse. Your line is now open.

Spiro Dounis -- Credit Suisse -- Analyst

First question is just on how you're thinking about sustainable EBITDA growth in the current environment. You guys once again highlighted about in the current environment. You guys once again he has once again highlighted about a $12 billion backlog on transmission projects. And so, simplistically the way I thought about it was kind of reflects about 10 years of growth and current CapEx level which I guess was enough to grow EBITDA about 2% this year in 2021. So just curious if based on that backlog of projects in front of you, you think sustaining 2% annual growth for next decade or so is maybe a floor or something you deem sort of easily achievable?

Alan S. Armstrong -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yes. I'm going to have Michael speak to that backlog on projects, but I think you have to be careful about drawing that kind of conclusion. Most of the projects that we've been doing have been 6%. We still were rolling off a lot of deferred revenue this last year and a little bit into 2021. So I think you have to be careful about making those kind of broad assumptions. So, for instance, when the Deepwater business comes on, that's going to be a very high growth rate on a fairly low amount of capital. And in the northeast sometimes we get nice surges of margin based on very high incremental return opportunities as they come to us. And on the other hand we have a decline bill that's just part of the gathering business if there's an area that's not growing. There's a decline that's working against it all the time. But I would tell you that it's more complex than taking $1 billion and saying that produces two%. On the other hand, I would say I think we feel very comfortable with the 2% growth rate if we are investing $1 billion we feel very comfortable with achieving a 2% growth rate. But given some of the upsides that we've got in some of these areas I think that probably would be kind of considered a floor from my perspective on that. So, Mike, we might talk about the Transco project?

Micheal G. Dunn -- Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer

Yeah. Yeah. We look at that backlog and it's really dynamic because we have a lot of projects that come into that backlog and then, we execute on a lot of those projects. And South eastern Trail is one that came out of the backlog, Leidy South came out with that backlog and it became an execution project, and Regional Energy Access will be the same once we get that filing under way and get our permitting under way. And so, you'll continue to see projects come out of our backlog and move into the execution phase over the next several years. There is a plethora of opportunities along the Transco corridor to take advantage of coal-fired generation that's going to come offline and ultimately be converted to gas and to renewables. And I think from the activities we've seen in Texas and Oklahoma over the last week, there definitely needs to be a mixture of energy generation resources in the mix in order to diversify across fuel sources. And so, I'm a true believer in that our company is definitely a natural gas-focused company now adding in some renewable mix into the play there to take advantage of some opportunities we have. But ultimately, on the Transco system, we're going to be able to drive a lot of new capital investment there on the backs of coal-fired generation going away. And then lastly, our emissions reduction program projects. We have upwards of $1.6 billion to $1.7 billion of investment opportunity there on Transco system and likely replacing a large component of our reciprocating compression to new modern either electric drives or gas turbines to reduce our emissions footprint there along the Transco corridor. So, there is definitely a lot of investment opportunity that we envision coming in the future for Transco's asset footprint.

Spiro Dounis -- Credit Suisse -- Analyst

Got it. Appreciate the color on that. Second one just briefly going back to Blue Racer. Can you just talk about some of the circumstances that led up to you increasing your interest there and how you're thinking about the remaining stake you still don't own?

Micheal G. Dunn -- Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer

Yeah. So, just to remind people the ownership there, Blue Racer is a Caiman II by the way is no longer an entity, it will not be Blue Racer.

Alan S. Armstrong -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Midstream Holdings.

Micheal G. Dunn -- Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer

Midstream Holdings. Thank you. And so, now, that is owned effectively 50% by Williams and 50% percent by First Reserve, the parties that got out were primarily driven a consortium by Encap Flatrock Midstream. And so, that group has been an investor in that for a long time along with some of the management from Cayman 2. And obviously, they had held on to that much longer than a typical private equity shop likes to. And we've worked with them to liquidate them at the appropriate time. We think we bought it right at the right time and particularly given the large amount of synergies that we have available to extract from that business. And so, we're excited about the transaction. I can tell you we were super patient. We've been wanting to gain control of that asset and exploit the synergies between both our UEOM system and our Ohio Valley River. We've been wanting to take advantage of those. And it's been hard to not, but we've been patient. And I think our patience paid off and we're able to pick that up at a very attractive value. So that's kind of how I would offer that. But I think at the end of the day, it was a private equity held investment that was needing to get out the last investment they had and one of the funds they were wanting to get that look today.

Alan S. Armstrong -- President and Chief Executive Officer

And it was a pretty complicated structure. So not only do we get it, we got some really good value but we cleaned up. We were the majority owner who came in which was half of the owner in Blue Racer. And there were two different boards that managed the joint venture and there was a lot of governance complexity. And so, we really cleaned up that asset governance. And when you think about the two large joint ventures in that part of the system now you have our OBM system which is 65% Williams, 35% CPPIB and you have Blue Racer which is now 50% Williams, and 50% First Reserve. It's a much cleaner landscape for us to try to work on just creating value and optimizing value.

Spiro Dounis -- Credit Suisse -- Analyst

Got it. Thanks for the color guys.

Operator

Our next question comes from Tristan Richardson at Truist Securities. Your line is now open.

Tristan Richardson -- Truist Securities -- Analyst

Hey, good morning guys. I appreciate all the comments on the Gulf of Mexico and around the outsized impact in 2020. I think you noted in the slide $49 million of downtime impact, the question is just on 2021. What a normalized season looks like or sort of just a regular strong season that maybe what you have baked in or generally your assumptions for 2021?

Alan S. Armstrong -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Mike, you want to take that?

Micheal G. Dunn -- Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer

Yes. What's normally our team does put some hurricane impacts in there and it's usually between $5 million and $10 million of EBITDA impact based on what a non-hurricane year would look like. So, it's not a huge reduction that we would typically see there on a normal year that we built into our forecast.

John D. Chandler -- Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

And I think I alluded to a minute ago I think when Christine was asking questions, we-of that $49 million negative impact we had in 2020 versus 2019. We've got all but about $10 million of that reversing itself in 2021. So if we still held $10 million of even maybe a little bit more than normal outsized negatives into 2021 as well because the $49 million in comparative to 2019.

Micheal G. Dunn -- Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer

That's right. Yes.

Tristan Richardson -- Truist Securities -- Analyst

That's helpful. Appreciate it, John. And then just thinking about where your commodity exposure lies in the G&P businesses, could you maybe just give us a quick high level of maybe where the most POP lies versus people where we should think about those exposures regionally just at a high level?

John D. Chandler -- Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

Yes. We have very little to start off with it compared to the way the business used to be structured we just had very little and it's getting harder and harder to see frankly. But the areas that we do have the most exposure are primarily keep all agreements in our Opal area and we do have some exposure in the Gulf Coast as well. So you'll see that listed as Southwest Wyoming when I'd say Opal, I think our EBITDA breakout, I mean it shows you to the Southwest Wyoming.So that's the majority of that exposure. And again, though, we do have some margin in places like our discovery asset in the Deepwater Gulf of Mexico. But I think the total and plan on gross margin basis were down to well under 2% now so it's a really, really small amount.

Alan S. Armstrong -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yes. And one of the benefits of Wamsutter, we have a small amount in Wamsutter, but we'll actually modernize those contracts to be fee-based as part of our cleanup of the Wamsutter basins. So, we'll further reduce a little bit our existing POL and keep-whole contract.

Micheal G. Dunn -- Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer

I might just add so we don't skip over one thing. We do have in areas like in the Barnett, where our gathering contracts are exposed, they have a floor, but then they are exposed to gas prices above that similarly in Laurel Mountain Midstream. We have kind of those contracts basically are base level, but they may have exposure to gas price above that. So we do have some contracts that have direct gas price exposure and then the Barnett and Laurel Mountain are the two areas that we still have those.

Tristan Richardson -- Truist Securities -- Analyst

Thank you guys very much.

Operator

Our next question comes from Derek Walker with Bank of America. Your line is now open.

Derek Walker -- Bank of America -- Analyst

I know we're over the hour here, so just two quick ones for me. Alan I think in your former remarks you talked about line of sight on the leverage side with potential to have that $1.2 billion target achieved in 2021. Can you just talk about some of the drivers that could get you to that? I know that your guidance is 4.25, but how are thinking about some of the drivers that could get you to that 4.2 in 2021?

Alan S. Armstrong -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yes. Well, I would say there is really two areas there. One is, obviously, the obvious and when I talked with Christine earlier about some of the upsides drivers for 2021 and our EBITDA, obviously, that's the simple way for us and probably, I would say that most profitable. But as well, I think capital reductions that would come to us associated with the transactions on the upstream as well where we would lay off some of that capital responsibility to third-party. So, those are the two kind of easy ways to get there, I would say. And obviously, the EBITDA upside is one that probably has a clearest line of sight to.

Derek Walker -- Bank of America -- Analyst

Got it, and then maybe just a quick one? Just on the-are you seeing much-I know there's lot of commentary around kind of the upstream side of things. But are you seeing much difference in the behavior ex-kind of bankruptcies from public E&Ps versus private E&Ps and what areas are you seeing some of those big differences, if any?

Alan S. Armstrong -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yes, I've noticed that a lot of analysts are starting to pick up on that. And clearly, the public markets are just-have been sour about spending on anything. And I think the private markets have been seeing the opportunity and taking advantage of that pullback. We certainly are seeing that Haynesville is the poster child for that for sure where there's so much private capital that's going to work there. And it's an attractive place because you don't have a lot of the basis risk that you have to manage in the long haul capacity risk that you have to manage coming out of the Marcellus. So, it's an easy place to go in, in a fairly de-risk manner. And that's what's attracting-as Chad mentioned, that's also what's attracting a lot of capital to our opportunity there in the Haynesville. So, that's definitely-the money that can come in and get out pretty quickly by turning a bit. And turning it into cash up against the current-forward strip which is what a lot of the private parties are doing is what we're seeing. So it's a fairly de-risk model and they're just looking around the various basins for opportunities to do that. But clearly in our line of sight, Haynesville is the area that's getting the most attention in that regard.

Derek Walker -- Bank of America -- Analyst

Appreciate it. Thanks very much.

Operator

Our next question will be from Colton Bean with Tudor Pickering & Holt. Your line is now open.

Colton Bean -- Tudor Pickering Holt & Co -- Analyst

So, just wanted to follow-up on some of the comments there around volumes. It sounded like for G&P, the guidance assumes something close to maintenance in the Northeast. Is that a fair characterization? And then just any high level comments on what you're looking for in the West would be appreciated?

Alan S. Armstrong -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Mike, we'll take that?

Micheal G. Dunn -- Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer

Yes, fairly gathering side. We are looking at most likely maintenance-type activities on the gathering side. But on the processing side-it's highly dependent on the producer and the basin in the Northeast just to be clear. There are some upsides and downsides. But on the processing side, we are seeing a large influx of volumes year-over-year that we will continue to enjoy nice margins there.Our processing at Oak Grove is at capacity and we're finishing up our DXB 3 there. It should be online next month. And our fractionation facility as I said earlier, are at capacity level as well. So we're seeing a lot of activity continuing in the West Virginia, Ohio Southwest [Indecipherable] area that will drive a lot of volumes to our processing facilities where we see the upside occurring to our 2020 performance in 2021.

Alan S. Armstrong -- President and Chief Executive Officer

One thing that you'll see in the Northeast is even though our volumes don't look like they're going up that much in the Northeast, Laurel Mountain Midstream, Chevron pullback, EQT is taken that production over. We have an NBC so it really doesn't have a meaningful revenue impact to us, but they-no that volume is declining there. And so, that's muting maybe a little bit of the volume growth you otherwise never seen in Northeast especially around Marcellus South..

Micheal G. Dunn -- Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer

And just to be clear there, it's a little bit confusing sometimes in the Southwest Marcellus in West Virginia area there because we gather some of that gas and then we spin it off to other third party processors because we've been full, and so once we have that capacity build we get that business back. And so that's not obvious sometimes that we don't process everything we gather and we don't gather everything to process. And, so those two numbers don't row hand in hand.

Alan S. Armstrong -- President and Chief Executive Officer

And the West where we're seeing the least activity in the Eagle Ford which has NBC protection so though you might see some additional volume decline and NBC protected in the Eagle Ford. And we should see activity though increasing in the Haynesville and those gas-directed-the majority of our West beyond Eagle Ford is gas-directed activity and-with a relatively robust gas price. And we should see good activity on the gas side of that.

Micheal G. Dunn -- Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer

And I'd say also as it relates to the West, in 2021 you're seeing the back end-not as much production activity in the Haynesville as we've seen now with Chesapeake back recapitalized and new producers in the South Mansfield that we're working with. And on the Wamsutter, the same is happening in the Wamsutter, BP wasn't really active nor with Southland obviously, because they're in bankruptcy. And so, we're not going to see that in 2021, but in 2022 I think you'll see those volumes start to turn back around.

Colton Bean -- Tudor Pickering Holt & Co -- Analyst

And appreciate that detail and just a final one from me. I think you all highlighted a couple of times how you will-be either near or at the long-term leverage target to exit this year. So as you look forward, can you just update us on where you stand on capital allocation whether that be further debt reduction looking at a buyback authorization or supplementing the existing backlog with some renewables investments, appreciate it?

Alan S. Armstrong -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yes, I would just say-that question obviously is something that we've been saying for quite some time-will be coming to us. And I think as we get to this end of this year obviously that will be. But make no mistake about it the first thing and we've been very clear on this is debt reduction-is the first place to go with that. Once we get beyond that, things like investing in our rate base on Transco, on things like the emission reduction projects will be put up against other alternatives for that capital reduction whether that's further debt reduction or share buyback. And those are the things that would be in competition for that further capital allocation as we get into that year. But it's an interesting dilemma, because not very many people. In fact, I don't know if I could describe to you, too many other pipelines that are in the position of being able to invest in the rate base. And for us the cost of capital it just hasn't met that return hurdle internally. So, in the past it really hadn't been thought of as an opportunity. But as we think about the emission reduction project, that's some very sizable capital investment opportunity that will make a decision on that versus other alternatives from a cost of capital standpoint. So, I think that's the best color I can give you on that at this point.

Colton Bean -- Tudor Pickering Holt & Co -- Analyst

Great, thank you.

Operator

Next question will come from Michael Lapides with Goldman Sachs. Your line is open.

Michael Lapides -- Goldman Sachs -- Analyst

Hey, guys. Thank you for taking my questions. One easy one which is OpEx and G&A in 2021 over 2020 up, down, flattish. Just trying to look for little direction. And then second, can you remind us what's the expected CapEx for Regional Energy Access and what are the key permitting milestones we need to look for?

Alan S. Armstrong -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yes, Mike, why don't you take both of those, if you don't mind?

Micheal G. Dunn -- Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer

Yes, on Regional Energy Access, we have publicly stated in our pre-filing it was $760 million a day project. I think by the time we filed here in a few weeks, we'll be at or above that level. And what we've said in the past is it's between $800 million and $1 billion of investment. And we're probably at the lower end of that right now based on we're filing activity looks.

Alan S. Armstrong -- President and Chief Executive Officer

So yeah, John is going to take the first part of your question.

John D. Chandler -- Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

Yes, on operating cost and I'll drag at these numbers here real quick. But if you look in our analyst package and if you look at the operating cost in each of our segments and you compare 2019 to 2020, you'll see a number of $223 million reduction in operating expense. But I want to be clear on that. 2019 had incremental expenses because we did a voluntary severance program and we're cutting costs. So, 2019 costs were elevated, 2020 costs were low because we changed the benefit's program around with the days off and anyway, resulted in $40 million benefit to 2020 expenses. I'm dragging through all that to say that $223 million reduction and expenses on a normalized adjusted EBITDA basis is only $100 million reduction, $103 million reduction in expenses between 2019 and 2020. And, that includes an $11 million increase in property-in operating taxes, add-on taxes. And so, we saved about $114 million between 2019 and 2020. We think about 70% of that will stick going into 2021, so 30% of that will revert. And so, we'll see cost go up by about $30 million just due to operating cost kind of-that's not retaining all that savings. And then operating taxes probably go up another $20 million to $25 million. So, you're looking at probably $50 million of total expense increases in 2021. So a great job, we're retaining 70% of our cost savings that we got in 2020.

Michael Lapides -- Goldman Sachs -- Analyst

Thank you. Super helpful. I'll follow up with your team offline, much appreciate it guys.

Alan S. Armstrong -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Okay, thank you.

Operator

I will now turn it over to Alan Armstrong for closing comments.

Alan S. Armstrong -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Great, well thank you all very much to is, today we're really are excited to continue to produce such predictable cash flows in the business, and we're really excited about some of the catalysts for growth that really will drive in beyond 2021 and as well gives us some upside here for 2021. So thank you for your interest and stay safe and healthy.

Operator

[Operator Closing Remarks]

Duration: 76 minutes

Call participants:

Danilo Juvane -- Vice President of Investor Relations

Alan S. Armstrong -- President and Chief Executive Officer

John D. Chandler -- Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

Chad J. Zamarin -- Senior Vice President, Corporate Strategic Development

Micheal G. Dunn -- Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer

Gabriel Moreen -- Analyst

Jeremy Tonet -- JP Morgan -- Analyst

Praneeth Satish -- Wells Fargo -- Analyst

Christine Cho -- Barclays -- Analyst

Spiro Dounis -- Credit Suisse -- Analyst

Tristan Richardson -- Truist Securities -- Analyst

Derek Walker -- Bank of America -- Analyst

Colton Bean -- Tudor Pickering Holt & Co -- Analyst

Michael Lapides -- Goldman Sachs -- Analyst

More WMB analysis

All earnings call transcripts