Rich or Not, You Should Do This

When you have a lot of money, you don't have to worry about spending a little extra to get what you want. But whether you've got a couple million in the bank or you're just getting started, paying up to use a full-service broker to make your investments just doesn't make sense.

The broker wars
Reuters reported yesterday that Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS  ) is stepping up efforts to lure 150 brokers away from its rivals, enticing them with cash bonuses and recruiting packages if they can pull client assets into the firm. The move comes in the wake of the company's losing thousands of brokers since Citigroup (NYSE: C  ) sold its Smith Barney brokerage division to Morgan Stanley.

The move is just the latest in a game of musical chairs on Wall Street targeting ultra-affluent clients. Citigroup has reportedly hired executives and private bankers from Bank of America's (NYSE: BAC  ) U.S. Trust, as well as the private wealth management divisions of Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS  ) and Barclays. In turn, Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC  ) has sought new recruits from outside Wall Street, and Bank of New York Mellon (NYSE: BK  ) is also hiring.

Essentially, what it comes down to is this: Wall Street brokers are job-hopping, and their biggest bargaining chip in wooing prospective employers is your money. Is that how you deserve to be treated?

Haves and have-nots
At least now, you have options. In the bad old days before Charles Schwab came around and started the discount-brokerage business, every broker was a full-service broker, with the price tag to go with it. Imagine paying several hundred dollars every time you wanted to buy or sell 100 shares of a blue-chip stock, and you'll understand why so many investors in your parents' or grandparents' generation were die-hard believers in buy-and-hold investing.

Discount brokers gave investors a choice. You could keep paying up and have full-time professional stockbrokers tell you how to invest, or you could do your own work and save a bundle in commissions. For small investors who never could have afforded those high commissions in the first place, the choice was a simple one. But full-service brokers focused on keeping their high-end clientele, who cared more about prestige and excellent customer-focused service than on paying $9.95 or less for a stock trade.

That worked fairly well until the financial crisis hit. Now, Wall Street is broken, and even the wealthy should protect themselves.

Stop paying to be a pawn
Admittedly, the experience you'll have with a discount broker is likely to be far different from what a full-service broker provides. If your primary purpose in having a broker was to have a person to go to lunch with or to be your fourth for Saturday's golf game, discount brokers aren't going to give you what you want.

But as far as your investments are concerned, many discount brokers have what it takes to compete with the big Wall Street players. And it's not just about low commissions on stocks. Depending on which broker you choose, you can get rock-bottom margin borrowing rates, comprehensive research tools, and access to just about every type of investment you can think of, both in the U.S. and around the world.

Now granted, discount brokers are just as happy about bringing in rich clients as Wall Street's finest are. What you may find, however, is that your money goes further with discount brokers than it does on Wall Street. To a broker with a client list filled with the Park Avenue elite, being a mere millionaire isn't going to get you noticed. To E*TRADE Financial (Nasdaq: ETFC  ) , which is struggling to make up for its missteps in the mortgage markets, landing a $1 million account is a much bigger deal -- and you should expect to be treated accordingly.

Make the smart move
Of course, if you're lucky and have a full-service broker who's actually delivered market-crushing returns over the past few years, then you can justifiably say your broker's worth the price you pay. But if Wall Street's broker-hopping is making you feel more like an account number than a valued customer, stop feeding the frenzy and take your money where you won't have to pay through the nose.

Need help picking the right discount broker? Check out our broker comparison tool.

Tune in every Monday and Wednesday for Dan's columns on retirement, investing, and personal finance.

True to its name, The Motley Fool is made up of a motley assortment of writers and analysts, each with a unique perspective; sometimes we agree, sometimes we disagree, but we all believe in the power of learning from each other through our Foolish community.

Fool contributor Dan Caplinger declared independence from full-service brokers 20 years ago and hasn't looked back. He doesn't own shares of the companies mentioned in this article. Charles Schwab is a Motley Fool Stock Advisor recommendation.Try any of our Foolish newsletters today, free for 30 days. The Fool's disclosure policy can't play golf to save its life, but it treats for lunch every once in a while.


Read/Post Comments (6) | Recommend This Article (25)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On September 27, 2010, at 12:39 PM, ChuckWoolery wrote:

    Lame article. For a website that encourages people to inform themselves, I would think that people who do research here are using discount brokers. If they didn't want to learn the lingo and how trading works, why would they visit this site?

  • Report this Comment On September 27, 2010, at 2:39 PM, goalie37 wrote:

    I had a very short lived experience on Wall Street and the main flaw in the system is obvious in your article as well. The brokerage firms are luring brokers with large client lists...not brokers who have a track record of making money for their clients. Wall Street has zero interest in making money for you, just for themselves.

  • Report this Comment On September 27, 2010, at 8:25 PM, HectorLemans wrote:

    You're right, ChuckWoolery - the Motley Fool should never mention the fundamental, obvious stuff because everyone who comes here is a seasoned investor.

    //rolls eyes

  • Report this Comment On September 28, 2010, at 1:28 PM, timeinthewind wrote:

    I've used E*Trade since the early days on Compuserv (before this whole internet thing) and continue to favor their low costs and solid tools. I have some money with a full service broker and my retirement plan from work is tied up with Fidelity (a mix of funds, many of which aren't Fidelity funds). I'm beating both by about 2:1 these days and paying lower costs when I do.

  • Report this Comment On September 29, 2010, at 2:36 AM, fishler1 wrote:

    just as i told E*trade is the best just be patience

    they going to pay 6b$ for become 24$ share so

    this is all about

  • Report this Comment On September 29, 2010, at 11:08 PM, Latinus wrote:

    I agree with the first three comments.

    I got nothing out of reading this article.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 1313136, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/25/2014 3:56:29 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement