Is a Sagging Fannie Attractive?

Even with the recent upticks, shares of the ailing mortgage giants Fannie Mae (NYSE: FNM  ) and Freddie Mac (NYSE: FRE  ) are both down over 80% from their 52-week highs.

Fannie and Freddie are government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) that play a central role in buying loans from lenders and providing liquidity for the mortgage industry. The GSEs can also be credited with bringing a significant amount of standardization to the mortgage origination process, which facilitates even more liquidity and enables an active securitization market.

How big is big?
How wide have Fannie and Freddie been spread? According to the OFHEO 2008 Annual Report to Congress, the two companies combined have over $1.5 trillion of mortgage assets on their books. There is another $3.5 trillion of mortgage-backed securities that the two have sold, with varying guarantees for payment. Any time a discussion of a business (or industry, for that matter) rounds to the trillions, you can be sure they carry a lot of heft, in every sense of the word.

Look at the list of the top 10 mortgage lenders from Q1, according to National Mortgage News. All of these companies are major customers of the GSEs and would be significantly and immediately affected if the GSEs are forced to trim their appetites or become more selective on what they buy:

Company

Q1 2008 Originations

Countrywide*

$73.0 billion

Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC  )

$66.0 billion

JPMorgan Chase (NYSE: JPM  )

$54.3 billion

Citimortgage

$40.9 billion

Bank of America* (NYSE: BAC  )

$38.4 billion

ResCap (GMAC)

$20.9 billion

Wachovia (NYSE: WB  )

$19.6 billion

Washington Mutual (NYSE: WM  )

$19.2 billion

Suntrust

$12.0 billion

PHH Mortgage

$10.0 billion

*Bank of America has purchased Countrywide.

It is hard to overestimate the importance these two organizations play in our economy. Throw in the once implied but now explicit backing of the federal government, and it is not surprising that some will look at the twosome's flabby condition and think that with a little more discipline, greater patience, and a few butt crunches, these two could regain their youthful form.

Too big to fail?
As a potential investor, why worry about the risk now? The government has made it clear that the GSEs are too big to fail. On one level, I totally agree. After spending ten years working for large mortgage companies, it is easy for me to appreciate how integrated and central the GSEs are to the industry. But while the role of the GSEs will survive, there's no guarantee that their common stockholders will fare as well. There is a huge difference between propping up a company and propping up a company's stock. Just ask the shareholders of Bear Stearns or Kmart or countless other companies that were rescued by white knights, to the detriment of common stockholders.

The Fed's GSE bailout plan is not about protecting investors. It is about protecting taxpayers, stabilizing financial markets, and preserving liquidity. More pointedly, the Fed's plan includes a provision allowing the government to invest in the GSEs. While the specifics of that potential investment are not detailed, you can bet your bottom dollar that the investment, if it happens, will be dilutive at best and will put more downward pressure on their stock prices.

Investing versus gambling
Speaking of betting, buying stock in Fannie or Freddie today is more akin to spinning the roulette wheel than investing. For those who want to "invest," read Fannie's latest annual report, and keep in mind that the business environment has deteriorated since then:

  • Read the part where it says Countrywide was its largest customer.
  • Scan through the risk factors and see if you get the feeling that many of the risks don't seem so far-fetched and hypothetical.
  • Form an opinion on the politics of GSEs and decide whether the current situation makes it more or less likely that they will be nationalized.
  • Oh, and please help me quantify the risks imbedded in guaranteeing trillions of dollars of off-balance sheet mortgage-backed securities.

To be clear, taking a chance on a miracle lift for the sagging Fannie is fine, but please do not bet the house.

For related Foolishness:

Fool CFO Ollen Douglass doesn't cook the books and does not have a financial position in any of the stocks mentioned in this article. The Fool has a disclosure policy. JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America are Motley Fool Income Investor recommendations. Try any of our Foolish newsletters today, free for 30 days..


Read/Post Comments (2) | Recommend This Article (11)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On July 17, 2008, at 3:20 PM, pondee619 wrote:

    "Is a Sagging Fannie Attractive?"

    Do you refer to the British, American or financial definition/reference ot the term "fannie"?

  • Report this Comment On July 18, 2008, at 11:36 AM, robertf36009 wrote:

    I thought so and added FNM on the rebound at $10. I had intended to pick it up at$8 but got distracted and didn't pull the trigger. I expect it to out perform and turn a tidy profit long term. Of course I thought that I could profit from the BAC purchase of country wide as well and am only now getting back into the green on that fiasco. I do think that the larger financial s will weather the storm long term so I have recently gone overweight on C, BAC, PFG, MET and now FNM. Prior to the recent melt down the only ones I owned were PFG and MET.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 687077, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 10/22/2014 3:10:09 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement